Requirements of Parallel Combat System Based on GQFD-Coupling Coordination Degree

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0724

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of future intelligent unmanned combat characteristics, the concept of parallel combat is proposed and the model of parallel combat system is built based on OODA ring theory. Meanwhile, this paper builds a demand analysis model based on GQFD-coupling coordination degree to solve the low reliability, lack of objectivity, and single description perspective of the traditional quality function deployment (QFD) method and coupling coordination degree analysis during demand analysis. Additionally, the importance ranking of ability requirements in the parallel combat system is obtained by the house of quality of ability requirement analysis in the combat system based on grey correlation analysis. The capability coupling coordination of the parallel combat system is analyzed. Finally, the study provides a more objective method for the requirement analysis of parallel combat systems and a theoretical basis for the construction of parallel combat systems.

Key words: parallel combat, parallel combat system, grey quality function deployment(GQFD), demand analysis, coupling coordination

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Dong Zhiming, Si Bingshan, Li Liang. Requirements of Parallel Combat System Based on GQFD-Coupling Coordination Degree[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(11): 2454-2463.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 7

References 26

1	王飞跃. 人工社会、计算实验、平等系统—关于复杂社会经济系统计算研究的讨论[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2004(4): 25-35.
	Wang Feiyue.Artificial Societies Computational Experiments and Parallel Systems A Discussion on Computational Theory of Comples Social-Economic Systems[J]. Complex systems and Computational, 2004(4): 25-35.
2	姜相争, 刘铁林, 崔帅博, 等. 基于GQFD的智能化装备保障能力需求分析[J]. 现代防御技术, 2022, 50(4): 38-44.
	Jiang Xiangzheng, Liu Tielin, Cui Shuaibo, et al. Requirement Analysis of Army Intelligent Equipment Support Capacity Based on GQFD[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2022, 50(4): 38-44.
3	李波, 陈海建, 禹琳琳. 基于灰色模型的战时物资需求的定量预测[J]. 物流技术, 2013, 32(10): 269-270.
	Li Bo, Chen Haijian, Yu Linlin. Quantitative Forecasting of Wartime Material Demand Based on Grey Model[J]. Logistics Technology, 2013, 32(10): 269-270.
4	黄颖, 段继琨. 基于QFD的电磁蓝军构设需求研究[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2021, 44(6): 34-37, 77.
	Huang Ying, Duan Jikun. Research into the Construction Requirements of Electromagnetic Blue Army Based on QFD[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2021, 44(6): 34-37, 77.
5	丛晓男. 耦合度模型的形式、性质及在地理学中的若干误用[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(4): 18-25.
	Cong Xiaonan. Expression and Mathematical Property of Coupling Model, and Its Misuse in Geographical Science[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(4): 18-25.
6	吴凡. 铁路货运周转量与GDP的耦合协调度分析[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2022, 43(13): 24-26.
7	王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
	Wang Cheng, Tang Ning. Spatio-temporal Characteristics and Evolution of Rural Production-living-ecological Space Function Coupling Coordination in Chongqing Municipality[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
8	张扬, 师海猛. 黄河流域城镇化高质量发展与生态环境耦合协调度评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2022, 38(10): 71-75.
9	刘翔宇, 姜海洋, 赵洪利, 等. 基于DODAF-OODA的天基信息支援作战视图研究[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2019, 40(2): 33-38.
	Liu Xiangyu, Jiang Haiyang, Zhao Hongli, et al. Research on OV of Air Precision Striking Operation with Space Information Support Based on DODAF-OODA[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2019, 40(2): 33-38.
10	周波, 戴幻尧, 乔会东, 等. 基于"OODA环"理论的认知电子战与赛博战探析[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2014, 9(6): 556-562.
	Zhou Bo, Dai Huanyao, Qiao Huidong, et al. Research on Recognition EW and Cyberspace Operation Based on "OODA Loop" Theory[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2014, 9(6): 556-562.
11	张明智, 马力. 体系对抗OODA循环鲁棒性建模及仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 1968-1975.
	Zhang Mingzhi, Ma Li. System-of-systems Combat OODA Loop Robustness Modeling and Experiment[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(9): 1968-1975.
12	王飞跃. 平行控制与数字孪生:经典控制理论的回顾与重铸[J]. 智能科学与技术学报, 2020, 2(3): 293-300.
	Wang Feiyue. Parallel Control and Digital Twins: Control Theory Revisited and Reshaped[J]. Chinese Journal of Intelligent Science and Technology, 2020, 2(3): 293-300.
13	周军华, 薛俊杰, 李鹤宇, 等. 关于武器系统数字孪生的若干思考[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(4): 539-552.
	Zhou Junhua, Xue Junjie, Li Heyu, et al. Thinking on Digital Twin for Weapon System[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(4): 539-552.
14	李欣, 刘秀, 万欣欣. 数字孪生应用及安全发展综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 385-392.
	Li Xin, Liu Xiu, Wan Xinxin. Overview of Digital Twins Application and Safe Development[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(3): 385-392.
15	张霖, 陆涵. 从建模仿真看数字孪生[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(5): 995-1007.
	Zhang Lin, Lu Han. Discussing Digital Twin from of Modeling and Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(5): 995-1007.
16	段伟. 平行仿真的内涵、发展与应用[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2019, 5(2): 82-86.
	Duan Wei. Parallel Simulation: Motivation, Concept and Application[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2019, 5(2): 82-86.
17	邱晓刚, 张鹏. 面向平行军事系统的领域仿真知识工程研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1665-1669, 1679.
	Qiu Xiaogang, Zhang Peng. Knowledge Engineering in Simulation of Parallel Military System[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(8): 1665-1669, 1679.
18	方凌智, 沈煌南. 技术和文明的变迁-元宇宙的概念研究[J]. 产业经济评论, 2022(1): 5-19.
	Fang Lingzhi, Shen Huangnan. Conceptualizing Metaverse: A Perspective From Technology and Civilization[J]. Review of Industrial Economics, 2022(1): 5-19.
19	李洪阳, 魏慕恒, 黄洁, 等. 信息物理系统技术综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(1): 37-50.
	Li Hongyang, Wei Muheng, Huang Jie, et al. Survey on Cyber-physical Systems[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(1): 37-50.
20	周玉芳, 余云智, 翟永翠. LVC仿真技术综述[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2010, 32(4): 1-7.
	Zhou Yufang, Yu Yunzhi, Zhai Yongcui. Review on LVC Simulation Technology[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2010, 32(4): 1-7.
21	张昱, 张明智, 胡晓峰. 面向LVC训练的多系统互联技术综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2013, 25(11): 2515-2521.
	Zhang Yu, Zhang Mingzhi, Hu Xiaofeng. On Multi-system Integration Technology Oriented to LVC Training[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2013, 25(11): 2515-2521.
22	高昂, 董志明, 郭齐胜, 等. 陆军分队LVC战术训练虚实实体配置研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 982-994.
	Gao Ang, Dong Zhiming, Guo Qisheng, et al. Study on Virtual and Real Entity Configuration of Army Units LVC Tactical Training[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(4): 982-994.
23	李亮, 郭齐胜, 李永, 等. 基于灰关联分析的质量功能配置方法研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2007, 13(12): 2469-2472, 2486.
	Li Liang, Guo Qisheng, Li Yong, et al. Qality Function Deployment Based on Grey Relational Analysis[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2007, 13(12): 2469-2472, 2486.
24	蒋晓原, 邓克波. 面向未来信息化作战的指挥信息系统需求[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2016, 7(4): 1-5.
	Jiang Xiaoyuan, Deng Kebo. Command Information System Requirements for Future Informatization Operation[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2016, 7(4): 1-5.
25	陈毅雨, 刘硕, 钟斌, 等. 基于GQFD的警用反恐无人机战技性能需求分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(9): 142-145, 150.
	Chen Yiyu, Liu Shuo, Zhong Bin, et al. Requirement Analysisof Police Anti-terrorism Unmanned Aerial Vehicle's Tactical Performance Based on GQFD[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2016, 41(9): 142-145, 150.
26	秦海峰, 侯兴明, 廖兴禾, 等. 基于GQFD航天装备维修保障能力需求分析[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2020, 41(7): 228-232.
	Qin Haifeng, Hou Xingming, Liao Xinghe, et al. Requirement Analysis of Space Equipment Maintenance Support Capacity Based on GQFD[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020, 41(7): 228-232.

作战阶段	需求	需求内容
观察O	X₁	侦查半径
	X₂	目标判别率
	X₃	预警时间
判断O	X₄	信息传输质量
判断O	X₅	信息处理时间
决策D	X₆	备选决策方案数量
决策D	X₇	决策方案生成时间
执行A	X₈	打击效果评估
执行A	X₉	打击效果

需求	需求内容
Y₁	异构数据处理能力
Y₂	态势实时共享能力
Y₃	多源态势感知能力
Y₄	平行映射能力
Y₅	精准定位、授时能力
Y₆	目标快速建模能力
Y₇	高速态势融合能力
Y₈	分布式解算能力
Y₉	多域平行交互能力
Y₁₀	超实时仿真能力
Y₁₁	平行态势可视化能力
Y₁₂	跨域指挥能力
Y₁₃	装备健康管理能力
Y₁₄	态势准确预测能力

专家	需求
专家	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	Y₁	Y₂	Y₃	Y₄	Y₅	Y₆	Y₇	Y₈	Y₉	Y₁₀	Y₁₁	Y₁₂	Y₁₃	Y₁₄
a	6	3	9	2	2	5	8	3	8	7	5	8	6	8	2	5	2	3	2	4	2	9	5
b	8	4	2	8	4	7	8	9	6	6	1	1	5	8	4	6	8	3	9	9	3	4	5
c	5	3	7	8	6	7	1	5	1	8	1	7	1	7	5	7	7	2	6	4	5	8	4
d	7	4	9	6	9	3	6	2	4	4	4	3	6	3	5	9	9	7	6	3	3	4	8
e	7	6	3	1	7	2	2	7	6	7	3	8	9	4	6	1	8	5	6	2	8	4	7
f	9	4	1	4	7	6	2	3	4	8	1	2	1	8	4	7	8	3	3	4	8	8	3
g	4	7	2	6	5	8	8	2	3	6	8	6	4	7	5	6	5	7	2	7	9	7	1
h	4	8	8	3	5	3	5	3	2	8	7	4	5	9	8	5	1	2	4	6	6	4	7
i	6	6	9	7	3	6	7	6	8	6	1	6	2	4	4	5	2	3	4	6	7	8	3
j	7	8	5	5	1	6	1	6	7	8	7	9	8	6	6	2	8	7	7	4	7	3	6
k	3	9	4	5	4	3	7	6	3	4	6	6	8	7	3	4	7	4	5	5	9	1	1
l	7	2	2	7	4	6	2	7	2	2	4	4	8	5	8	7	8	9	6	7	4	2	5

需求	绝对权值	排序	需求	绝对权值	排序
Y₁	25.156 70	12	Y₈	30.996 10	6
Y₂	27.933 95	10	Y₉	32.249 50	5
Y₃	34.198 85	2	Y₁₀	33.021 05	3
Y₄	26.640 45	11	Y₁₁	28.738 80	9
Y₅	29.934 80	8	Y₁₂	30.996 10	7
Y₆	33.014 25	4	Y₁₃	35.486 25	1
Y₇	23.428 45	14	Y₁₄	24.397 70	13

需求	耦合度 C	协调指数T	耦合协调度D	协调等级	耦合协调程度
Y₁	0.937	0.709	0.815	9	良好
Y₂	0.754	0.787	0.770	8	中级
Y₃	0.857	0.964	0.909	10	优质
Y₄	0.806	0.751	0.778	8	中级
Y₅	0.951	0.844	0.896	9	良好
Y₆	0.936	0.930	0.933	10	优质
Y₇	0.878	0.660	0.761	8	中级
Y₈	0.834	0.873	0.853	9	良好
Y₉	0.886	0.909	0.897	9	良好
Y₁₀	0.910	0.931	0.920	10	优质
Y₁₁	0.928	0.810	0.867	9	良好
Y₁₂	0.904	0.873	0.889	9	良好
Y₁₃	0.847	1.000	0.920	10	优质
Y₁₄	0.840	0.688	0.760	8	中级