Journal of System Simulation ›› 2023, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2202-2211.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-FZ0786
• Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wen Rui1,2()
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
With the development of technology, through the complementary interaction among operations, operation effectiveness can non-linearly increase and realize fissional and exponential effect. In order to realize dynamic convergence, it is necessary to carry out the action, information and energy unified design. From the antagonism view, taking into account the factors such as the purpose of the operation, the strength of the operation, the conditions of the operation, and so on, the joint operation is divided into the preorder action/ state, the major operational action, the counter-action, the response action, and the branch action, which is synthesized to major operation, operating scenario and branch operation. In operation design, the "main line" of battlefield is formed by the major operational action of attack and defense, and the "part line" is formed by battle scene, and the "condition" is formed by branch actions from different professional fields. Through the structural understanding, all operations are labeled from design to operation.
Key words: operation action, conceptual model, structured, major operational action, operating scenario
CLC Number:
TP391.9
Wen Rui. A Structured Conceptual Model of Joint Operations From Design Perspective[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(10): 2202-2211.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.china-simulation.com/EN/10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-FZ0786
https://www.china-simulation.com/EN/Y2023/V35/I10/2202
Fig. 1
Operational action distinguishment from realistic and purposeful thinking
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of antagonism between enemy and self in war
Fig. 3
Decomposition and integration of “target task-major operational action sequence-target task”
Fig. 4
Specific relationship of major operational actions
Fig. 5
A model of contradictory movement between major operational action of ourselves and operation of enemy's countermeasure
Fig. 6
Differentiation between main confrontation vein and counteraction
Fig. 7
Step-by-step design schematic
Fig. 8
Design example of major operational action
Fig. 9
Composition of operating scenario
Fig. 10
Space-time of operating scenario determined by space-time of major operation
Fig. 11
Sequence of confrontational actions on timeline
Fig. 12
Different professional and domain branch operations are scattered in different operating scenario schematics