Research on Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Space-based Information Support Equipment System

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0683

Abstract

Abstract:

The operational effectiveness evaluation of space-based information support equipment systems has become a research hotspot in the military field. How to effectively deal with the nonlinear and confrontational problems of the operational effectiveness of the space-based information support equipment system has become a crucial issue in the development of the space-based information support equipment system. In this paper, a method for evaluating the operational effectiveness of the space-based information support equipment system based on the system dynamics (SD) model is presented. The SD flow rate basic tree entry modeling method is used to establish the basic tree entry model of seven subsystems and finally form the SD model for the evaluation of the space-based information support equipment system. The operational effectiveness of the space-based information support equipment system is defined. It is verified that the proposed method can effectively evaluate the operational effectiveness of the space-based information support equipment system and can play a supporting role in the scientific demonstration of equipment systems.

Key words: space-based information support equipment system, system dynamics(SD), operational effectiveness evaluation, non-linear, dynamic

CLC Number:

N945.13

Yu Xiaolan, Xiong Wei, Han Chi, Wu Zhenwei. Research on Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Space-based Information Support Equipment System[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(11): 2429-2444.

Figures/Tables 29

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Table 3

Fig. 14

Table 4

Load parameters of optical imaging satellite

编号	半视场角 $/ (°)$	最大侧摆 $/ (°)$
G₁	15	25
G₂	15	20
G₃	20	25
G₄	20	20
G₅	15	30

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Payload parameters of radar imaging satellite

编号	俯仰角范围 $/ (°)$	排除角范围 $/ (°)$
S₁	30~60	45，45
S₂	35~65	50，40
S₃	40~60	45，45
S₄	30~65	45，45

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Table 9

Table 10

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Table 11

References 17

1	李德仁, 沈欣. 我国天基信息实时智能服务系统发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2020, 22(2): 138-143.
	Li Deren, Shen Xin. Research on the Development Strategy of Real-time and Intelligent Space-based Information Service System in China[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2020, 22(2): 138-143.
2	梁家林, 熊伟. 基于作战环的武器装备体系能力评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1810-1819.
	Liang Jialin, Xiong Wei. Capabilities Assessment of the Weaponry System Based on Combat Ring[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1810-1819.
3	韩驰, 熊伟, 刘文文, 等. 基于结构方程模型的天基信息系统效能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(8): 1799-1810.
	Han Chi, Xiong Wei, Liu Wenwen, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Space-based Information Systems Based on SEM[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(8): 1799-1810.
4	胡笛, 李浩悦, 李健. 基于改进支持向量回归机的天基信息系统效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45(7): 78-82.
	Hu Di, Li Haoyue, Li Jian. Research on Effectiveness Evaluation of Space-based Information System Based on the Improved SVR[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2020, 45(7): 78-82.
5	韩驰, 熊伟. 基于改进灰狼算法优化SVR的航天侦察装备效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
	Han Chi, Xiong Wei. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Space Reconnaissance Equipment Based on SVR Optimized by Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
6	钟永光, 贾晓菁, 李旭, 等. 系统动力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
7	贾书伟, 严广乐. 基于SD-GM循环预测理论的机动车污染物收费政策效应分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(9): 2436-2450.
	Jia Shuwei, Yan Guangle. Effects of the Policy of Air Pollution Charging Fee Based on System Dynamics and Grey Model Approach[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(9): 2436-2450.
8	杨兵, 陈树江, 陈希. 基于系统动力学的网络空间联合应急处置指挥体系效能评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39(12): 118-122.
	Yang Bing, Chen Shujiang, Chen Xi. Effectiveness Evaluation of Command System of United Emergency Disposal in Cyberspace Based on System Dynamics[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39(12): 118-122.
9	孔红山, 张明清, 唐俊. 系统动力学C³I系统作战效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36(8): 60-63.
	Kong Hongshan, Zhang Mingqing, Tang Jun. Operational Effectiveness Assessment of C³I System Based on System Dynamics[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2011, 36(8): 60-63.
10	欧阳帅捷. 基于系统动力学的海上信息系统效能评估[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2018.
	Ouyang Shuaijie. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Maritime C⁴Isr System Based on System Dynamics[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2018.
11	翟豆豆. 基于系统动力学的装备体系建模与仿真[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2020.
	Zhai Doudou. Equipment System Modeling and Simulation Based on System Dynamics[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2020.
12	潘星, 左督军, 张跃东. 基于系统动力学的装备体系贡献率评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(1): 112-120.
	Pan Xing, Zuo Dujun, Zhang Yuedong. Contribution Rate Evaluation Method of Equipment System-of-systems Based on System Dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 112-120.
13	陈国卫, 周雨菁, 任蕾. 面向系统性能最大化的装备经费结构SD优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.
	Chen Guowei, Zhou Yujing, Ren Lei. SD Optimization of Equipment Cost Structure Facing System Performance Maximization[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 1022-1029.
14	Jia Niping, Yang Zhiwei, Yang Kewei. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of the Swarming UAVs Combat System Based on a System Dynamics Model[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 25209-25224.
15	韩驰, 熊伟. 航天侦察装备体系指标关联信息挖掘研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(10): 2372-2380.
	Han Chi, Xiong Wei. Research on Assocoation Information Mining of Space Reconnaissance Equipment System Index[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(10): 2372-2380.
16	贾仁安, 伍福明, 徐南孙. SD流率基本入树建模法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1998, 18(6): 18-23.
	Jia Renan, Wu Fuming, Xu Nansun. Modeling of RATE Variable Fundamental in Tree for System Dynamics[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 1998, 18(6): 18-23.
17	黄汉文. 移动目标打击链研究[J]. 航天电子对抗, 2015, 31(2): 27-30.
	Huang Hanwen. Study on Kill Chain of Moving Target[J]. Aerospace Electronic Warfare, 2015, 31(2): 27-30.

变量分类	含义	变量符号
状态变量	可见光成像侦察能力	L₁
	SAR成像侦察能力	L₂
	电子侦察能力	L₃
	通信保障能力	L₄
	导航定位能力	L₅
	火力打击能力	L₆
	蓝方舰队生存概率	L₇
速率变量	可见光成像侦察能力变化率	R₁
	SAR成像侦察能力变化率	R₂
	电子侦察能力变化率	R₃
	通信保障能力变化率	Q₁
	导航定位能力变化率	Q₂
	火力打击能力变化率	R₄
	蓝方舰队生存率变化率	Q₃
辅助变量	侦察监视效能	F₁
辅助变量	信息支援能力	F₂
常量	蓝方雷达干扰系数	C₁₆
	蓝方电子干扰系数	C₁₇
	蓝方导航干扰系数	C₁₈
	蓝方舰船速度系数	C₁₉
	攻击系数	C₂₀
	防御系数	C₂₁
	侦察初始参数	C₂₂
	打击系数	C₂₃
	平均重访时间1、2、3	C₁、C₄、C₇
	平均访问时间1、2、3	C₂、C₅、C₈
	重放次数1、2、3	C₃、C₆、C₉
	电磁环境干扰系数	C₁₀
	气象系数	C₁₁
	传输时延	C₁₂
	导航精度	C₁₃
	红方导弹部署位置	C₁₄

常量	参数设置(无量纲)
导弹部署位置	800
蓝方雷达干扰系数	10
蓝方舰船速度系数	0.4
蓝方电子干扰系数	1
蓝方导航干扰系数	5
攻击系数	0.01
防御系数	0.5
侦察初始参数	2
打击系数	4

编号	覆盖幅宽/km	位置误差/m
D₁	2 000	1
D₂	3 000	1.5
D₃	2 500	1
D₄	4 000	2

方案	光学成像	电子成像	雷达成像	导航卫星缺失
1	G₁G₂G₃	D₁D₂D₃	S₁S₂S₃	6
2	G₁G₂G₄	D₁D₂D₄	S₁S₂S₄	4
3	G₁G₂G₅	D₁D₃D₄	S₁S₃S₄	0
4	G₁G₂G₄	D₂D₃D₄	S₂S₃S₄
5	G₁G₂G₅	D₁D₂D₃D₄	S₁S₂S₃S₄
6	G₁G₄G₅
7	G₂G₂G₄
8	G₂G₂G₅
9	G₂G₄G₅
10	G₃G₄G₅
11	G₁G₂G₃G₄
12	G₁G₂G₃G₅
13	G₁G₂G₄G₅
14	G₁G₄G₄G₅
15	G₂G₄G₄G₅
16	G₁G₂G₄G₄G₅

指标	方案
指标	1	2	3	4	…	1 200
C₁	0.61	0.61	0.61	0.61	…	0.79
C₂	0.63	0.63	0.63	0.63	…	0.79
C₃	0.83	0.83	0.83	0.83	…	1
C₄	1.00	1.00	0.97	0.96	…	0.52
C₅	0.73	1.00	0.69	0.50	…	0.73
C₆	0.64	0.50	0.57	0.54	…	1.00
C₇	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	…	0.50
C₈	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	…	0.89
C₉	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	…	1.00
C₁₀	0.27	0.27	0.27	0.27	…	0.27
C₁₁	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	…	0.50