Simulation and Effectiveness Evaluation System for Joint Delivery Mission Planning of Airlift Fleets

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0829

Abstract

Abstract:

Airlift fleet plays an important role in modern war. Compared with other countries such as the USA and Russia, China's airlift fleet still has obvious shortcomings and deficiencies. To analysis and optimize the future fleet alternatives, a software tool is established with the modules of model construction and management, scenarios editing, mission planning, simulation deduction, effectiveness analysis. This tool mainly focuses on the interactive relationship between the transport aircraft and cargo, airport and so on, as well as the cooperative relationship of different types of aircraft, which can realize the functions of automatic generation of loading schemes, automatic planning of task processes, cooperative using of different types of aircraft, and dynamic scheduling of multi-task, and can provide the technical means for the development of our future airlift fleet.

Key words: airlift fleet, transport aircraft, mission planning, simulation deduction, effectiveness evaluation

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Guochen Wang. Simulation and Effectiveness Evaluation System for Joint Delivery Mission Planning of Airlift Fleets[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(11): 2497-2506.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 1

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Table 2

References 11

[1]	海军, 程龙. 对加快我军航空运输装备建设发展的若干思考[J]. 国防交通工程与技术, 2014(4): 4-6, 17.
	Hai Jun, Cheng Long. Thoughts on Accelerating the Development of Air Transport Equipment Construction[J]. Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence, 2014(4): 4-6, 17.
[2]	Liebeck R H. Design of the Blended Wing Body Subsonic Transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft (S0021-8669), 2004, 41(1): 10-25.
[3]	Hooker R J, Andrew Wick. Design of the Hybrid Wing Body for Fuel Efficient Air Mobility Operations[C]//52^nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting of AIAA SciTech. National Harbor, Maryland, USA: AIAA, 2014: 1285.
[4]	王景涛, 海军, 常刚. 新时代航空战略投送任务与能力需求[J]. 军事交通学院学报, 2018, 20(12): 6-10.
	Wang Jingtao, Haijun , Chang Gang. Mission and Capability Demand for Aviation Strategic Projection in New Era[J]. Journal of Military Transportation University, 2018, 20(12): 6-10.
[5]	郑江安. 军用运输机运输效能指标[J]. 航空科学技术, 2012(1): 26-29.
	Zheng Jiang’an. Indexes of Airlift Effectiveness for Military Aerotransport[J]. Aeronautial Science & Technology, 2012(1): 26-29.
[6]	杨希锐, 黄荣贵, 刘浩华. 运输装备保障效能评估模型研究[J]. 后勤工程学院学报, 2009, 25(4): 75-80.
	Yang Xirui, Huang Ronggui, Liu Haohua. Research on the Support Effectiveness Evaluation for Transportation Equipment[J]. Journal of Logistical Engineering University, 2009, 25(4): 75-80.
[7]	Mouton C A, Orletsky D T, Kennedy M, et al. Reducing Long-Term Costs While Preserving a Robust Strategic Airlift Fleet: Options for the Current Fleet and Next-Generation Aircraft[R]. USA: RAND Corporation Press, 2013.
[8]	Greer W L. An Application of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Major Defense Acquisition Program: The Decision by the U.S. Department of Defense to Retain the C-17 Transport Aircraft[R]. USA: International Development Association Document D-4218, 2010: 12.
[9]	赵志忠, 刘艳, 高正红. 军用运输机运力评估模型及影响因素研究[J]. 航空工程进展, 2010(1): 25-29.
	Zhao Zhizhong, Liu Yan, Gao Zhenghong. Research on Military Transport Aircraft Transport Capability Evaluating Models and Influecing Factors[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2010(1): 25-29.
[10]	邱枫, 杨臻, 韩晓明, 等. 运输机装载规划视景仿真技术的研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2017, 42(1): 117-120.
	Qiu Feng, Yang Zhen, Han Xiaoming, et al. Study in Transport Aircraft Cargo Loading Plans with Visual Simulation Technology[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2017, 42(1): 117-120.
[11]	刘宁君, 王立新, 潘文俊. 运输机群货物装载方案生成方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013(6): 751-755.
	Liu Ningjun, Wang Lixin, Pan Wenjun. Optimal Method of Transport Aircraft Fleet Cargo Loading[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013(6): 751-755.

分类	装备名称	分类	物资所在地
物资	医疗物资、食品、帐篷、衣物等	5个463 L货盘	郑州
		5个463 L货盘	成都
		5个463 L货盘	沈阳
		5个463 L货盘	广州
人员	地震专家、搜救人员、医疗队员	40人	郑州
		40人	成都
		40人	沈阳
		40人	广州

指标	方案1	方案2
总运输时长/h	24.74	26.94
运输总量/t	106.6	106.6
平均运量(t/架次)	26.65/53.3	26.65
飞行架次(架次)	6	4
飞机平均使用时长/h	24.03	26.03
平均飞行时长/h	16.81	19.02
运输能力(t·km·10⁶/d)	2.64	1.05