Journal of System Simulation ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2375-2386.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.24-0475
• Papers • Previous Articles
Zhao Zejing1, Shang Junliang1, Qin Yanpei2
Received:
2024-04-30
Revised:
2024-09-21
Online:
2025-09-18
Published:
2025-09-22
Contact:
Shang Junliang
CLC Number:
Zhao Zejing, Shang Junliang, Qin Yanpei. Kill Chain Efficiency Evaluation Model Based on Gray DEMATEL-ANP[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(9): 2375-2386.
Table 1
Indicators connotation index
编号 | 指标名称 | 内涵及衡量标准 |
---|---|---|
T11 | 侦察出动效率 | 侦察兵力在出动侦察任务时的效率,以侦察系统接收到侦察任务到出动侦察兵力的时间来衡量 |
T12 | 侦察速度 | 侦察兵力在执行侦察任务时的速度,以侦察单位从开始执行侦察任务到完成侦察任务的时间来衡量 |
T13 | 探测准确率 | 探测设备正确探测和识别目标的准确率,以探测设备正确识别的单位数与需要探测的单位数的比值来衡量 |
T14 | 探测距离 | 探测设备可以有效探测目标的最远距离 |
T21 | 定位准确率 | 定位系统准确定位目标位置的准确率,以定位系统准确定位的单位个数与需要定位的单位数的比值来衡量 |
T22 | 定位速度 | 定位系统准确定位目标位置的速度,以定位系统完成定位的时间来衡量 |
T23 | 定位距离 | 定位系统可以有效定位目标的最远距离 |
T24 | 追踪成功率 | 追踪系统对目标成功追踪的成功率,以成功追踪的目标数与需要追踪的目标总数的比值来衡量 |
T25 | 追踪稳定性 | 追踪系统对于目标在运动过程中稳定追踪能力,以追踪过程中目标丢失的时间与总追踪时间的比值来衡量 |
T31 | 通信保障覆盖率 | 通信系统能够提供可靠通信保障范围的比例,以实际实现可靠通信的区域的面积与需要实现可靠通信区域的面积的比值来衡量 |
T32 | 消息传输效率 | 通信系统中传输作战相关消息的效率,以消息传输的总数据量与传输所用总时间的比值来衡量 |
T33 | 情报处理效率 | 指挥中心情报从收集情报到处理完成的效率,以情报处理完成的时间来衡量 |
T34 | 目标分配能力 | 指挥中心给各单位分配的目标与其能力的匹配程度,以分配与单位能力匹配的目标数量与总分配数量的比值来衡量 |
T41 | 目标命中率 | 火力打击系统对目标进行命中的准确率,以己方弹药命中敌方目标的数量与发射的弹药总量的比值来衡量 |
T42 | 目标毁伤能力 | 火力打击系统对目标造成的破坏、损伤的能力,以对敌方造成的实际伤害量来衡量 |
T43 | 武器突防率 | 火力打击系统对敌方拦截或防御的突破能力,以己方突破地方防御的弹药数量与发射的弹药总量的比值来衡量 |
T44 | 打击精度 | 火力打击系统对目标命中位置的准确度,以圆概率误差(CEP)来衡量 |
T51 | 作战单位损失率 | 在完成任务过程中损失单位数量的比例,以战斗中损失的单位数与作战出动单位总数的比值来衡量 |
T52 | 弹药利用率 | 在完成任务中弹药的利用率,以对目标造成的实际伤害量与作战过程中使用的弹药量的比值来衡量 |
T53 | 资源消耗量 | 完成任务消耗的弹药、燃料等资源成本,以作战任务结束后消耗资源的价值来衡量 |
T54 | 时间消耗量 | 完成作战任务所花费的时间成本,以作战想定起止时间来衡量 |
T61 | 协同响应时间 | 各环节协同完成任务的响应时间,以侦察系统接收到任务到火力打击系统开始执行任务的时间来衡量 |
T62 | 任务协同性 | 各环节协同完成任务的能力,以完成的协同动作数量与总协同动作数量的比值来衡量 |
T63 | 资源调配效率 | 各环节之间资源分配的能力,以实际调配到位的资源量与计划调配的资源量的比值来衡量 |
T64 | 跨域作战协同能力 | 在不同作战域内协同作战行动的能力,以完成的跨域作战任务数量与总任务数量的比值来衡量 |
Table 6
Weights and ranking of each indicator
一级指标编号 | 权值 | 二级指标编号 | 局部 权值 | 总体 权值 | 排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.123 6 | T11 | 0.249 2 | 0.030 8 | 21 |
T12 | 0.246 8 | 0.030 5 | 22 | ||
T13 | 0.280 7 | 0.034 7 | 19 | ||
T14 | 0.223 3 | 0.027 6 | 24 | ||
T2 | 0.193 3 | T21 | 0.202 8 | 0.039 2 | 14 |
T22 | 0.200 2 | 0.038 7 | 16 | ||
T23 | 0.155 7 | 0.030 1 | 23 | ||
T24 | 0.220 4 | 0.042 6 | 11 | ||
T25 | 0.220 9 | 0.042 7 | 10 | ||
T3 | 0.164 4 | T31 | 0.200 1 | 0.032 9 | 20 |
T32 | 0.251 2 | 0.041 3 | 13 | ||
T33 | 0.274 9 | 0.045 2 | 7 | ||
T34 | 0.273 8 | 0.045 0 | 8 | ||
T4 | 0.187 0 | T41 | 0.261 5 | 0.048 9 | 4 |
T42 | 0.266 3 | 0.049 8 | 2 | ||
T43 | 0.208 6 | 0.039 0 | 15 | ||
T44 | 0.263 6 | 0.049 3 | 3 | ||
T5 | 0.184 2 | T51 | 0.278 0 | 0.051 2 | 1 |
T52 | 0.226 9 | 0.041 8 | 12 | ||
T53 | 0.259 5 | 0.047 8 | 5 | ||
T54 | 0.235 6 | 0.043 4 | 9 | ||
T6 | 0.147 5 | T61 | 0.185 7 | 0.027 4 | 25 |
T62 | 0.246 1 | 0.036 3 | 18 | ||
T63 | 0.246 8 | 0.036 4 | 17 | ||
T64 | 0.321 3 | 0.047 4 | 6 |
Table 7
Importance and correlation of each indicator
指标 | 影响度 | 被影响度 | 中心度 | 原因度 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T11 | 1.659 6 | 1.329 0 | 2.988 7 | 0.330 6 |
T12 | 1.500 4 | 1.309 2 | 2.809 6 | 0.191 1 |
T13 | 2.147 0 | 1.481 2 | 3.628 2 | 0.665 8 |
T14 | 1.760 9 | 1.172 4 | 2.933 4 | 0.588 5 |
T21 | 2.155 9 | 1.720 7 | 3.876 6 | 0.435 2 |
T22 | 1.791 1 | 1.694 8 | 3.485 9 | 0.096 2 |
T23 | 1.565 7 | 1.291 5 | 2.857 2 | 0.274 1 |
T24 | 1.913 8 | 1.876 9 | 3.790 8 | 0.036 9 |
T25 | 2.034 5 | 1.867 2 | 3.901 7 | 0.167 3 |
T31 | 2.693 1 | 1.414 8 | 4.107 9 | 1.278 3 |
T32 | 2.338 5 | 1.769 9 | 4.108 4 | 0.568 6 |
T33 | 2.413 2 | 1.927 9 | 4.341 1 | 0.485 3 |
T34 | 2.416 1 | 1.889 7 | 4.305 9 | 0.526 4 |
T41 | 1.383 7 | 2.069 5 | 3.453 2 | -0.685 8 |
T42 | 1.306 1 | 2.050 4 | 3.356 4 | -0.744 3 |
T43 | 1.219 0 | 1.628 8 | 2.847 8 | -0.409 8 |
T44 | 1.243 7 | 2.076 3 | 3.320 0 | -0.832 6 |
T51 | 0.913 4 | 2.159 9 | 3.073 4 | -1.246 5 |
T52 | 1.086 7 | 1.687 1 | 2.773 7 | -0.600 4 |
T53 | 0.987 8 | 2.976 5 | 2.964 2 | -0.988 7 |
T54 | 1.182 2 | 1.846 9 | 3.029 1 | -0.664 6 |
T61 | 1.455 3 | 1.191 6 | 2.646 8 | 0.263 7 |
T62 | 2.022 2 | 1.527 5 | 3.549 7 | 0.494 6 |
T63 | 1.770 6 | 1.484 2 | 3.254 7 | 0.286 4 |
T64 | 1.464 7 | 1.981 1 | 3.445 8 | -0.516 4 |
[1] | 陈登, 陈楚湘, 周春华. 基于OODA环的杀伤网节点重要性评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(2): 363-372. |
Chen Deng, Chen Chuxiang, Zhou Chunhua. Importance Evaluation of Kill Network Nodes Based on OODA Loop[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(2): 363-372. | |
[2] | 杨松, 王维平, 李小波, 等. 杀伤链概念发展及研究现状综述[C]//第三届体系工程学术会议论文集. 珠海: 国防科技大学, 2021: 62-67. |
Yang Song, Wang Weiping, Li Xiaobo, et al. Summary of the Concepts Development and Research Status of Kill Chain[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd Academic Conference on System Engineering. Zhuhai: National University of Defense Technology, 2021: 62-67. | |
[3] | 杨建, 董岩, 边月奎, 等. 联合作战背景下的体系效能评估方法[J]. 科技导报, 2022, 40(4): 106-117. |
Yang Jian, Dong Yan, Bian Yuekui, et al. Effectiveness Evaluation for System-of-systems: A Review of the State of the Art[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2022, 40(4): 106-117. | |
[4] | 张子伟, 郭齐胜, 董志明, 等. 体系作战效能评估与优化方法综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(2): 303-313. |
Zhang Ziwei, Guo Qisheng, Dong Zhiming, et al. Review of System of Systems Combat Effectiveness Evaluation and Optimization Methods[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(2): 303-313. | |
[5] | 张子伟, 李亮, 董志明, 等. 作战概念牵引的作战效能仿真评估指标构建方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(3): 603-613. |
Zhang Ziwei, Li Liang, Dong Zhiming, et al. Research on the Construction Method of Simulation Evaluation Index of Operation Effectiveness Operation Concept Traction[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(3): 603-613. | |
[6] | 王玉茜, 曹亚杰, 佘晓琼, 等. 美军杀伤网概念研究及对我防空作战装备体系的启示[J]. 现代防御技术, 2023, 51(6): 1-8. |
Wang Yuqian, Cao Yajie, She Xiaoqiong, et al. Research on U.S. Military's Kill Web Concept and Inspiration to Chinese Air Defense Combat Equipment System[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2023, 51(6): 1-8. | |
[7] | 李静, 王星宇, 张灏龙, 等. 基于网络分析法的装备作战能力优化评估方法研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术(中英文), 2023(1): 146-152. |
Li Jing, Wang Xingyu, Zhang Haolong, et al. Research on Optimization Evaluation Method of Equipment Combat Capability Based on Analytic Network Process[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2023(1): 146-152. | |
[8] | 韩明磊, 马晶, 周泽宇, 等. 基于Agent建模的海战场杀伤链评估系统研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2022, 39(3): 11-16, 406. |
Han Minglei, Ma Jing, Zhou Zeyu, et al. Research on Assessment System of Kill Chain in Naval Battlefield Based on Agent Modeling[J]. Computer Simulation, 2022, 39(3): 11-16, 406. | |
[9] | 杨欣河, 廖馨, 王鑫, 等. 面向杀伤链的装备体系成熟度评估问题研究[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2024, 39(1): 55-59. |
Yang Xinhe, Liao Xin, Wang Xin, et al. A Study on Readiness Assessment of Equipment System-of-systems for Kill Chain[J]. Military Operations Research and Assessments, 2024, 39(1): 55-59. | |
[10] | 黄炎焱, 王凯生, 史宇昂. 基于网络化指标的数据链作战保障能力评估模型研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(8): 2361-2369. |
Huang Yanyan, Wang Kaisheng, Shi Yuang. Research on an Evaluation Model for Data link Operational Support Capability Based on Networking Index[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2361-2369. | |
[11] | 王玉帅, 司光亚. 基于杀伤链和FDNA的能力依赖关系分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(4): 1076-1089. |
Wang Yushuai, Si Guangya. Capability Dependency Analysis Based on Kill Chain and FDNA[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(4): 1076-1089. | |
[12] | 杨建勋. 基于DEMATEL-AHP的绿色矿山综合评价模型[C]//第九届全国砂石骨料行业科技大会. 武汉: 中国砂石协会, 2022: 1-15. |
[13] | 杨作宾, 王远航. 基于DEMATEL-AHP的某系统作战效能评估指标权值问题研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2022, 42(11): 140-145. |
Yang Zuobin, Wang Yuanhang. Research on the Weight of Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Assessment Indicators About a Certain System Based on DEMATEL-AHP[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2022, 42(11): 140-145. | |
[14] | 张璐, 许开立, 葛及, 等. 基于DEMATEL-ANP-可拓云模型的铜冶炼企业安全生产风险评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2023, 30(1): 1-8. |
Zhang Lu, Xu Kaili, Ge Ji, et al. Safety Production Risk Assessment of Copper Smelting Enterprises Based on DEMATEL-ANP-extensible Cloud Model[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2023, 30(1): 1-8. | |
[15] | 王康宇, 李建宁, 陈扬杰, 等. 基于DEMATEL-ANP的回溯容错控制[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2024, 41(10): 1853-1862. |
Wang Kangyu, Li Jianning, Chen Yangjie, et al. DEMATEL-ANP Based Retrospective Fault-tolerant Control[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2024, 41(10): 1853-1862. | |
[16] | 唐政, 孙超, 刘宗伟, 等. 基于灰色层次分析法的水声对抗系统效能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(4): 432-436. |
Tang Zheng, Sun Chao, Liu Zongwei, et al. Research on Efficiency Evaluation for Underwater Acoustic Countermeasure System Based on Grey Hierarchy Analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(4): 432-436. | |
[17] | 韩月明, 刘铁林, 薛辉. 基于灰色理论的有人/无人机协同作战效能评估[J]. 军事运筹与评估, 2023, 38(1): 20-26. |
Han Yueming, Liu Tielin, Xue Hui. Effectiveness Evaluation of Manned/Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Cooperative Operation Based on Grey Theory[J]. Military Operations Research and Assessment, 2023, 38(1): 20-26. | |
[18] | 罗菁, 张逸楠. 基于改进Grey-AHP的察打一体无人机作战效能评估方法[J]. 空天防御, 2022, 5(2): 1-7. |
Luo Jing, Zhang Yinan. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Reconnaissance and Strike Integrated UAV Equipment Based on Improved Grey-AHP[J]. Air & Space Defense, 2022, 5(2): 1-7. | |
[19] | Li Yang, Zhao Guoyan, Wu Pan, et al. An Integrated Gray DEMATEL and ANP Method for Evaluating the Green Mining Performance of Underground Gold Mines[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(11): 6812. |
[20] | Zheng Qian. Method for a New Risk Assessment of Urban Inundation: G-DEMATEL-AHP[J]. MethodsX, 2023, 10: 101997. |
[21] | 刘竞妍, 张可, 王桂华. 综合评价中数据标准化方法比较研究[J]. 数字技术与应用, 2018, 36(6): 84-85. |
Liu Jingyan, Zhang Ke, Wang Guihua. Comparative Study on Data Standardization Methods in Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Digital Technology & Application, 2018, 36(6): 84-85. |
[1] | Dong Zhiming, Hu Zhongqi, Liu Zhaoyang, Zhou Heyang. A Review of Intelligent Generation of Combat Simulation Scenarios [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(7): 1665-1683. |
[2] | Wang Yushuai, Si Guangya. Capability Dependency Analysis Based on Kill Chain and FDNA [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(4): 1076-1089. |
[3] | Zhang Bin, Lei Yonglin, Li Qun, Gao Yuan, Chen Yong, Zhu Jiajun, Bao Chenlong. Reinforcement Learning Modeling of Missile Penetration Decision Based on Combat Simulation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(3): 763-774. |
[4] | Zhang Peng, Feng Ke, Gong Jiancheng, Yang Xiaoqiang, Shen Jinxing. Combat Effectiveness Evaluation of Air Defense Missile Weapon System Based on RBF Neural Network [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(2): 529-540. |
[5] | Liu Fei, Lai Peng, Lu Yingbo, Wang Min, Lu Zhifeng. Research on Hybrid Experimental Scheme Design for Combat Simulation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(3): 735-742. |
[6] | Chen Shikang, Wang Zhimin, Liang Biao, Gu Kunren, Song Keman, Gao Yuan. Modeling Method of Blue Army Warship Formation Air Defense Command and Control for System-of-systems Simulation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(10): 2246-2256. |
[7] | Ding Shi, Xuefeng Yan, Lina Gong, Jingxuan Zhang, Donghai Guan, Mingqiang Wei. Multi-agent Cooperative Combat Simulation in Naval Battlefield with Reinforcement Learning [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(4): 786-796. |
[8] | Baiyuan Ding, Fuling Mu, Yunpeng Li, Zhongkuan Chen, Chengyu Liu. Design of System Combat Simulation Platform for Complex Electromagnetic Environment [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(2): 330-338. |
[9] | Ying Xu, Shuai Zhang, Zhige Xie, Xinhai Xu, Manhui Sun, Ning Guo. A Simulation Method of Airborne Radar Real-time Detection Based on Three-dimensional Subdivision [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(2): 268-276. |
[10] | Wang Yukun, Wang Ze, Dong Liwei, Li Ni. Research on Multi-aircraft Air Combat Behavior Modeling Based on Hierarchical Intelligent Modeling Methods [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(10): 2249-2261. |
[11] | Zheng Yang, Zhimin Xiang, Shiwen Ma. A Method of Loose Coupling Entity Modeling Based on Variable Rules [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(7): 1506-1511. |
[12] | Zejian Ding, Songtao Sun, Zhiwen He, Fei Liu. Contribution Rate Calculation Method to System-of-Systems Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number ANP [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(11): 2386-2395. |
[13] | Xie Xu, Qiu Xiaogang, Duan Hong, Huang Kedi. Research on Combat Simulation Body of Knowledge [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(4): 773-780. |
[14] | Lei Yonglin, Zhu Zhi, Gan bin, Lei Sen, Chen Yong. Combat Effectiveness Simulation Evaluation Framework of Complex Weapon System [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(9): 1654-1663. |
[15] | Wu Wei. Research on Dynamic Editable Method for Combat Simulation Model Combination [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(5): 967-974. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||