Effectiveness Evaluation of Surface Ship Air Defense and Antimissile Combat in Complex Electromagnetic Environment

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0844

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to effectively evaluate the effectiveness of surface ship air defense and antimissile combat in complex electromagnetic environment, a surface ship air defense and antimissile combat effectiveness index system is established considering the influence of equipment, environment and human behavior, the evaluation process of surface ship air defense and antimissile combat effectiveness based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP) is proposed, and a hierarchical structure model of effectiveness evaluation is constructed including five levels of target layer, sub-efficiency layer, capability layer, constraint layer and plan layer. The application shows that the evaluation process and structure model can fully reflect the influence of various factors such as complex electromagnetic environment, effectively improve the rationality of the relative importance index of each factor of analytic hierarchy process, and ensure the confidence of effectiveness evaluation results.

Key words: surface ship, air defense and antimissile, combat plan, effectiveness evaluation, complex electromagnetic environment, analytic hierarchy process(AHP)

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Gaofeng Zhang, Liang Wu. Effectiveness Evaluation of Surface Ship Air Defense and Antimissile Combat in Complex Electromagnetic Environment[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(3): 640-650.

Figures/Tables 11

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Value rules of elements in comparative judgment matrix

元素	标度	取值规则
$b i j$	1	以上一层次某因素为准则，本层次因素 $i$ 与因素 $j$ 相比， $i$ 与 $j$ 同样重要
	3	以上一层次某因素为准则，本层次因素 $i$ 与因素 $j$ 相比， $i$ 比 $j$ 稍微重要
	5	以上一层次某因素为准则，本层次因素 $i$ 与因素 $j$ 相比， $i$ 比 $j$ 明显重要
	7	以上一层次某因素为准则，本层次因素 $i$ 与因素 $j$ 相比， $i$ 比 $j$ 强烈重要
	9	以上一层次某因素为准则，本层次因素 $i$ 与因素 $j$ 相比， $i$ 比 $j$ 极端重要
	2,4,6,8	2个相邻标度的中间值

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Calculation results of single criterion ranking

矩阵	特征向量 $W$	$λ m a x$	$C R$
$A_B$	$(0.222 ? 2,0.666 ? 7,0.111 ? 1) T$	3.000 0	0
$B 1_C$	$(0.089 ? 0,0.323 ? 4,0.587 ? 6) T$	3.009 2	0.007 9
$B 2_C$	$(0.161 ? 9,0.287 ? 9,0.490 ? 1,0.060 ? 1) T$	4.019 2	0.007 2
$B 3_C$	$(0.428 ? 6,0.428 ? 6,0.142 ? 9) T$	3.000 0	0
$C 1_D$	$(0.500 ? 0,0.500 ? 0) T$	2.000 0	0
$C 2_D$	$(0.750 ? 0,0.250 ? 0) T$	2.000 0	0
$C 3_D$	$(0.109 ? 5,0.309 ? 0,0.581 ? 6) T$	3.003 7	0.003 2
$?$	$?$	$?$	$?$
$C 10_D$	$(0.750 ? 0,0.250 ? 0) T$	2.000 0	0
$D 3_E$	$(0.295 ? 9,0.029 ? 3,0.295 ? 9,0.295 ? 9,0.083 ? 0) T$	5.040 0	0.008 9
$D 5_E$	$(0.153 ? 8,0.153 ? 8,0.076 ? 9,0.307 ? 7,0.307 ? 7) T$	5.000 0	0
$?$	$?$	$?$	$?$
$D 23_E$	$(0.292 ? 7,0.035 ? 4,0.292 ? 7,0.292 ? 7,0.086 ? 3) T$	5.083 1	0.018 5

Table 8

References 12

1	刘宗福. 基地化训练中水面舰艇防空作战能力评估方法[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2018, 38(6): 17-20, 85.
	Liu Zongfu. Evaluation Method of Air-Defense Capability of Surface Ship in Base-Training[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2018, 38(6): 17-20, 85.
2	吴溪, 王铁虎, 高振辉. 武器装备作战试验评估指标体系构建及优化方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2020, 45(3): 75-80, 85.
	Wu Xi, Wang Tiehu, Gao Zhenhui. Research on Establishment and Optimization Method of Evaluation Index System for Weapons Equipment Operational Test[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2020, 45(3): 75-80, 85.
3	孙旭涛, 曹泽宇, 孙向前. 基于内外场联合试验的作战试验构想[J]. 系统仿真技术, 2018, 14(3): 191-196.
	Sun Xutao, Cao Zeyu, Sun Xiangqian. Operational Test Conception Based on Infield and Outfield Joint Test[J]. System Simulation Technology, 2018, 14(3): 191-196.
4	秦绪凯. 新型舰艇作战系统复杂电磁试验环境构建技术[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2020, 42(7): 130-133.
	Qin Xukai. Constructing Technology of Complex Electromagnetic Environment for New Type Campaign System Test[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2020, 42(7): 130-133.
5	刘大成, 蚩建峰, 刘宗福. 复杂电磁环境下反辐射武器系统毁伤效能评估方法[J]. 系统仿真技术, 2020, 16(2): 103-106, 122.
	Liu Dacheng, Chi Jianfeng, Liu Zongfu. Damage Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Anti-Radiation Weapon System in Complex Electromagnetic Environment[J]. System Simulation Technology, 2020, 16(2): 103-106, 122.
6	宋敬华, 林清享, 李亮. 指控装备作战效能评估指标体系构建[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2020, 42(5): 47-50.
	Song Jinghua, Lin Qingxiang, Li Liang. Research on the Construction of Evaluation Index System of Combat Effectiveness of Command and Control Equipment[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2020, 42(5): 47-50.
7	刘翔宇, 赵洪利, 杨海涛. 作战方案评估方法综述[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2018, 39(8): 79-84.
	Liu Xiangyu, Zhao Hongli, Yang Haitao. Overview of Operational Plan Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2018, 39(8): 79-84.
8	郑锦, 王宇. 基于层次分析法的水面舰艇作战效能评估[J]. 自动化与仪表, 2017, 32(6): 23-27.
	Zheng Jin, Wang Yu. Combat Effectiveness Evaluate of Surface Ship Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Automation ＆ Instrumentation, 2017, 32(6): 23-27.
9	王雅君. C⁴ISR系统效能评估指标体系及计算模型[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2018, 41(3): 24-27, 35.
	Wang Yajun. Efficiency Evaluation Index System and Calculation Model of C⁴ISR System[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2018, 41(3): 24-27, 35.
10	陈璇. 武器装备作战效能评估和分析方法研究[D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2017.
	Chen Xuan. Research on Evaluation Analysis Method of Weapon Equipment Operational Effectiveness[D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2017.
11	杨娟, 朱延雷, 何榕. 面向装备体系作战效能评估的SEM建模与评估方法[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2016, 38(2): 33-36.
	Yang Juan, Zhu Yanlei, He Rong. SEM Model and Evaluation Method for Operational Effectiveness Assessment of Equipment System[J]. Command Control ＆ Simulation, 2016, 38(2): 33-36.
12	张玙彬, 董志明. 基于仿真即服务的作战试验仿真系统设计[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2020, 41(2): 72-74.
	Zhang Yubin, Dong Zhiming. Design of Operational Test Simulation System Based on SaaS[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2020, 41(2): 72-74.

作战环节	受影响装备	影响效果
侦察预警	电子侦察设备	信号密度和强度达到一定程度，会对接收机造成影响，轻者虚警率、漏警率提高，重者可能会造成侦察系统被阻塞，甚至失效
	对空搜索雷达	易受干扰，会影响舰载中远程搜索雷达对空中威胁目标的探测，使我防空预警系统无法达成早期预警
	通信设备	易受干扰，会对舰舰、舰机、舰岸通信质量造成影响，无法正常接收来自友邻方的信息支援，延误战机或影响抗击行动
指挥控制	指挥控制系统	不直接受影响，但传感器批号频繁变化、航迹质量下降会导致指控系统综合态势不稳定，影响指挥决策和目标指示下达
干扰拦截	硬武器	影响舰空导弹、舰炮发射时机，影响目标跟踪稳定性，降低打击效果
干扰拦截	软武器	影响有源、无源干扰的实施时机，影响干扰资源分配和干扰决策，降低干扰效果

阶数	RI	阶数	RI
3	0.58	7	1.36
4	0.89	8	1.41
5	1.12	9	1.46
6	1.26	10	1.49

方案序号	使用武器类型	考虑复杂电磁环境	软硬武器综合运用	应急处置预案
1	电子对抗舰空导弹	全面考虑	部分合理	完善
2	舰空导弹舰炮	未考虑	合理	完善
3	电子对抗舰炮	全面考虑	合理	不完善
4	电子对抗舰空导弹舰炮	全面考虑	部分合理	完善
5	电子对抗舰空导弹舰炮	部分考虑	合理	不完善

B1	C1	C2	C3	B2	C4	C5	C6	C7	B3	C8	C9	C10
C1	1	1/4	1/6	C4	1	1/2	1/3	3	C8	1	1	3
C2	4	1	1/2	C5	2	1	1/2	5	C9	1	1	3
C3	6	2	1	C6	3	2	1	7	C10	1/3	1/3	1
				C7	1/3	1/5	1/7	1

C1	D1	D2	C2	D3	D4	C3	D5	D6	D7	C4	D8	D9
D1	1	1	D3	1	3	D5	1	1/3	1/5	D8	1	5
D2	1	1	D4	1/3	1	D6	3	1	1/2	D9	1/5	1
						D7	5	2	1
C5	D10	D11	C6	D12	D13	D14	D15	C7	D16	D17
D10	1	3	D12	1	3	5	7	D16	1	1/2
D11	1/3	1	D13	1/3	1	2	3	D17	2	1
			D14	1/5	1/2	1	2
			D15	1/7	1/3	1/2	1
C8	D18	D19	C9	D20	D21	D22	C10	D23	D24
D18	1	3	D20	1	1/5	1/3	D23	1	3
D19	1/3	1	D21	5	1	2	D24	1/3	1
			D22	3	1/2	1