Modeling and Analysis of Metro Emergency Decision Based on Logical Game Probability Petri Net

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0355

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that logical Petri net can not describe dynamic game process well, logical game probabilistic Petri net is proposed. The four elements of the game are integrated into the logical Petri net, and the players of the game are defined as an attribute of Token, for which the strategy set and utility function are defined, and the information database is introduced. Probability change and vector are introduced to represent the transformation relationship of empirical probability in the process of game, and fuzzy theory is introduced on the basis of Bayes formula to solve the problem of information loss in the early stage of decision making, and decision change is introduced to help rational people make decisions. Logical game probability Petri net was used to model the subway emergency decision-making process, and the system reachable graph was constructed to analyze the problem. Tina simulation was used to verify the model properties, the feasibility of the proposed method was also verified.

Key words: logical game probability Petri net, metro emergency decision-making, fuzzy Bayes formula, reachable graph

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Zhe Yan, Wei Liu, Yuyue Du. Modeling and Analysis of Metro Emergency Decision Based on Logical Game Probability Petri Net[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(7): 1602-1618.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Decision group at the first stage judged that it was a level Ⅰ emergency

状态	数值
M₂	[0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₃	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, (1, Ⅰ), (1, Ⅰ), (1, Ⅰ), (1, Ⅰ), (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₄	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), (1, β₁₁, β₁₂, …, β₁_n ), (1, β₂₁, β₂₂, …, β₂_n ), (1, β₃₁, β₃₂, …, β₃_n ), (1, β₀₁, β₀₂, …, β₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₅	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, $U 11 Ⅰ$ ), (1, $U 12 Ⅰ$ ), (1, $U 13 Ⅰ$ ), (1, $U 10 Ⅰ$ ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₆	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₇	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]
M₈	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]
M₉	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]

Table 4

Table 5

Decision group at the first stage judged that it was a level Ⅱ emergency

状态	数值
M₁₀	[0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₁	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, (1, Ⅱ), (1, Ⅱ), (1, Ⅱ), (1, Ⅱ), (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₂	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), (1, β₁₁, β₁₂, …, β₁_n ), (1, β₂₁, β₂₂, …, β₂_n ), (1, β₃₁, β₃₂, …, β₃_n ), (1, β₀₁, β₀₂, …, β₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₃	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, $U 11 Ⅱ$ ), (1, $U 12 Ⅱ$ ), (1, $U 13 Ⅱ$ ), (1, $U 10 Ⅱ$ ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₄	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₅	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₆	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]
M₁₇	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]

Table 5

Table 6

Decision group at the first stage judged that it was a level Ⅲ emergency

状态	数值
M₁₈	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₁₉	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, (1, Ⅲ), (1, Ⅲ), (1, Ⅲ), (1, Ⅲ), (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₀	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), , (1, β₁₁, β₁₂, …, β₁_n ), (1, β₂₁, β₂₂, …, β₂_n ), (1, β₃₁, β₃₂, …, β₃_n ), (1, β₀₁, β₀₂, …, β₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₁	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, $U 11 Ⅲ$ ), (1, $U 12 Ⅲ$ ), (1, $U 13 Ⅲ$ ), (1, $U 10 Ⅲ$ ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₂	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₃	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₄	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]
M₂₅	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]

Table 6

Table 7

Decision group judged that it was a false alarm

状态	数值
M₂₆	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₇	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (1, 0), (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₈	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), , (1, β₁₁, β₁₂, …, β₁_n ), (1, β₂₁, β₂₂, …, β₂_n ), (1, β₃₁, β₃₂, …, β₃_n ), (1, β₀₁, β₀₂, …, β₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₂₉	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, $U 110$ ), (1, $U 120$ ), (1, $U 130$ ), (1, $U 100$ ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₃₀	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]
M₃₁	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]
M₃₂	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]
M₃₃	[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, (1, α₁₁, α₁₂, …, α₁_n ), (1, α₂₁, α₂₂, …, α₂_n ), (1, α₃₁, α₃₂, …, α₃_n ), (1, α₀₁, α₀₂, …, α₀_n ), 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 10

Table 11

References 23

1	田野, 刘宏, 张智峰, 等. 中国地下空间学术研究发展综述[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(6): 1596-1610.
	Tian Ye, Liu Hong, Zhang Zhifeng, et al. A Summary of the Development of Underground Space Academic Research in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020, 16(6): 1596-1610.
2	林晓飞, 喻箫, 侯正波, 等. 地铁应急疏散影响因素研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2020, 16(增1): 41-45.
	Lin Xiaofei, Yu Xiao, Hou Zhengbo, et al. Research on Influencing Factors of Emergency Evacuation in Subway[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2020, 16(S1): 41-45.
3	佚名. 郑州地铁5号线"7·20事件"中有14人不幸遇难[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(8): 164.
	Anon. 14 People Were Killed in the "July 20 Incident" of Zhengzhou Metro Line 5[J]. Urban Mass Transit, 2021, 24(8): 164.
4	Zhang Ming, Li Ping, Wang Fuzhang. The Emergency Decision Support Platform of Urban Rail Transit Based on Information Sharing and Digitalized Plan[C]//Tenth International Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals (ICCTP). Reston, VA, USA: ASCE, 2010: 287-294.
5	Kyriakidis M, Hirsch R, Majumdar A. Metro Railway Safety: An Analysis of Accident Precursors[J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(7): 1535-1548.
6	Wang Haiyong, Zhang Yanpeng, Gao Jieqiong, et al. Research on the Mobile Assistant Decision-making System Based on Service-oriented Architecture for Transport Accident Rescue[J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 10(4): 1687814018767256.
7	王付宇, 王骏. 基于精炼贝叶斯均衡的地铁站突发事件应急管理[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018(1): 18-21.
	Wang Fuyu, Wang Jun. Emergency Management of Subway Station Emergency Based on Refined Bias Equilibrium[J]. Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 2018(1): 18-21.
8	郑云水, 穆然, 林俊亭, 等. 铁路应急资源动态多阶段调度决策模型及算法研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(20): 213-219, 233.
	Zheng Yunshui, Mu Ran, Lin Junting, et al. Research of Dynamic Multi-stage Scheduling Decision Model and Algorithm for Railway Emergency Resources[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2015, 51(20): 213-219, 233.
9	洪玲, 高佳, 邱树涵, 等. 基于改进势能场模型的地铁车站应急疏散动态仿真[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(3): 398-406.
	Hong Ling, Gao Jia, Qiu Shuhan, et al. Dynamic Simulation on Emergency Evacuation in Metro Stations Based on Improved Potential Energy Field Model[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2020, 48(3): 398-406.
10	朱小马. 地铁车站突发性大客流应急疏散研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2017.
	Zhu Xiaoma. Study on Emergency Evacuation of Sudden Passenger Flow on Subway Station[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2017.
11	Li Shiqi, Uzam M, Yin Li, et al. Robust Diagnosability Analysis of Discrete Event Systems Using Labeled Petri Nets[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 163504-163515.
12	刘伟, 史晓浩, 孙红伟. 基于逻辑混合Petri网的混合系统建模与分析[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(4): 65-75.
	Liu Wei, Shi Xiaohao, Sun Hongwei. Modeling and Analysis of Hybrid Systems Based on Logic Hybrid Petri Nets[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2021, 40(4): 65-75.
13	He Zhou, Dong Yuying, Ren Gongchang, et al. Path Planning for Automated Guided Vehicle Systems With Time Constraints Using Timed Petri Nets[J]. Measurement and Control, 2020, 53(9/10): 2030-2040.
14	Zhao Jiantao, Chen Zengqiang, Liu Zhongxin. Modeling and Analysis of Colored Petri Net Based on the Semi-tensor Product of Matrices[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2018, 61(1): 010205.
15	陈金栋, 刘伟, 冯新, 等. 基于逻辑工作流网的有限无死锁组合[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(5): 89-97.
	Chen Jindong, Liu Wei, Feng Xin, et al. Finite Deadlock-free Combination Based on Logical Workflow Network[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2020, 39(5): 89-97.
16	张艺凡, 陈文瑛. 地铁运营突发事件应急响应模式的马尔科夫链分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(2): 165-170.
	Zhang Yifan, Chen Wenying. Markov Chain Analysis of Metro Network in Responding to Emergency[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(2): 165-170.
17	袁俊辉. 基于SCPN的地铁车站火灾应急处置流程建模研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017.
	Yuan Junhui. Research on Modeling of Subway Station Fire Emergency Response Process Based on SCPN[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017.
18	You Dan, Wang Shouguang, Zhou Mengchu, et al. Supervisory Control of Petri Nets in the Presence of Replacement Attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2022, 67(3): 1466-1473.
19	Feng Xin, Lin Mao, Liu Wei, et al. Modeling and Analysis for Uncertainty in Logistic Chains Based on Logical Time Petri Nets[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 61665-61671.
20	Mohammadian M, Aminifar F, Amjady N, et al. Data-driven Classifier for Extreme Outage Prediction Based on Bayes Decision Theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2021, 36(6): 4906-4914.
21	宋瑶. 基于动态博弈的智慧城市灾害应急决策研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2017.
	Song Yao. Research on the Emergency Decision-making of Disasters in Smart City Based on Dynamic Game Theory[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2017.
22	Zazo S, Valcarcel M S, Sánchez-Fernández Matilde, et al. Dynamic Potential Games With Constraints: Fundamentals and Applications in Communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2016, 64(14): 3806-3821.
23	王振, 杜玉越, 亓亮. 扩展颜色逻辑Petri网及其可达性分析[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 39(3): 84-98.
	Wang Zhen, Du Yuyue, Qi Liang. Extended Colored Logic Petri Net and Its Reachability Analysis[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science), 2020, 39(3): 84-98.

库所	库所含义
P₁	地铁突发事件
P₂	地铁应急决策组
P₃	地铁突发事件历史数据
P₄	决策组判断事故等级为Ⅰ级
P₅	决策组判断事故等级为Ⅱ级
P₆	决策组判断事故等级为Ⅲ级
P₇	决策组判断应急结束
P₈	计数库所
P₉	准备计算Ⅰ级概率
P₁₀	准备计算Ⅱ级概率
P₁₁	准备计算Ⅲ级概率
P₁₂	准备计算0级概率
P₁₃	事故等级Ⅰ的前验概率和条件概率
P₁₄	事故等级Ⅱ的前验概率和条件概率
P₁₅	事故等级Ⅲ的前验概率和条件概率
P₁₆	事故等级0的前验概率和条件概率
P₁₇	事故等级Ⅰ的后验概率
P₁₈	事故等级Ⅱ的后验概率
P₁₉	事故等级Ⅲ的后验概率
P₂₀	事故等级0的后验概率
P₂₁	选择应急方案1的效用
P₂₂	选择应急方案2的效用
P₂₃	选择应急方案3的效用
P₂₄	不选择应急方案的效用
P₂₅	选择应急方案1
P₂₆	选择应急方案2
P₂₇	选择应急方案3
P₂₈	不选择应急方案
P₂₉	实施所选应急方案

变迁	含义
t₁	警报
t₂	等级分类
t₃	传送专家组判断
t₄	计算在决策组判断为Ⅰ级事故时实际等级的后验概率
t₅	计算在决策组判断为Ⅱ级事故时实际等级的后验概率
t₆	计算在决策组判断为Ⅲ级事故时实际等级的后验概率
t₇	计算在决策组判断为Ⅲ级事故时实际等级的后验概率
t₈	计算在决策组判断为Ⅰ级事故时各应急方案的期望效用
t₉	计算在决策组判断为Ⅱ级事故时各应急方案的期望效用
t₁₀	计算在决策组判断为Ⅲ级事故时各应急方案的期望效用
t₁₁	计算在决策组判断为0级事故时各应急方案的期望效用
t₁₂	选择应急方案
t₁₃	实施应急方案
t₁₄	将实时信息汇总

条件概率	y₀	y₃	y₂	y₁
p(x₀\| y_k )	0.80	0.10	0.05	0.05
p(x₃\| y_k )	0.10	0.70	0.15	0.05
p(x₂\| y_k )	0.05	0.15	0.50	0.30
p(x₁\| y_k )	0.05	0.05	0.30	0.60

[1]	Dong Zhiming, Hu Zhongqi, Dai Haoran, Gao Jiancheng. An Automated Generation Method for Combat Simulation Scenarios Based on Large Language Models [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1129-1145.
[2]	Li Xiaonan, Chao Tao, Ma Ping, Yang Ming, Wang Yuxuan. Robust Identification of Black-box Nonlinear SSM Using Expectation-maximization [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1146-1158.
[3]	Liu Yingang, Ma Ming, Zhang Ronghua. Dynamic Task Planning for Wargaming Based on Large Language Models [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1187-1204.
[4]	Su Hongjia, Zhang Cheng, Liu Fei. SoS Effectiveness Evaluation Method Based on Fuzzy Functional Dependency Network Analysis [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1224-1238.
[5]	Mei Huawei, Yang Penghui, Yu Yang. Ultra-short-term Photovoltaic Power Prediction Based on Improved PatchTST Considering Data Drift [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1239-1254.
[6]	Li Quan, Su Peng, Wan Haiying, Zhang Chengxi, He Zhijian, Ni Yiyang, Zhao Zhonggai, Liu Fei. Modeling of Penicillin Fermentation Process Based on a Multi-stage LHS-EPRCC Method [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1255-1276.
[7]	Zhou Zicong, Zeng Junjie, Hu Yue, Zhu Zhengqiu, Yin Quanjun. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning Method for Wargame Simulation Based on Suboptimal Demonstration Guidance [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1277-1289.
[8]	Shi Min, Guo Shisheng, Wang Suqin, Li Zhaoxin, Zhu Dengming. Annotation-free 6-DoF Grasp Detection Method Integrating Physical and Geometric Priors [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1290-1302.
[9]	Jiang Yanji, Xiao Xingyi, Dong Hao, Yu Miao, Huang Jinshan, Liu Daqian, Fei Bowen. Detection Method for 3D Lanes Based on Graph Relationship Optimization Integrating Point and Lane Features [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1303-1319.
[10]	Zhang Xin, Zhang Ping, Zhang Chen, Liu Wei, Han Boyang. Research on Calculation Model of Excavation Resistance Under Heterogeneous Soil Conditions [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1320-1332.
[11]	Wang Wei, Liu Dong, Cui Xinhao, Li Bo, Xiao Yiyong, Ren Yi. Multi-level Digital Model of Dynamic Earned Value Management for Complex Engineering Projects and Its Applications [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1350-1364.
[12]	Peng Lijun, Su Tingqi, Liu Peijin, He Lin, Zhou Xiewu, Zhang Minxin. Detection Method for Laboratory PPE Compliance Wearing Based on Human Key Points [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1365-1382.
[13]	Teng Jing, Tong Wencong, Zhang Zhongjie, Yao Xing, Li Junxian. Automatic Speed Guidance Method and Simulation Evaluation for Trams at Intersections [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1426-1439.
[14]	Jiang Shengchao, Pei Yunqing, Zhai Hongying, Wu Guojian, Gao Fang. Power Flow Calculation Based on Block-encoded Adiabatic Quantum Newton-Raphson Method [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1453-1465.
[15]	Qin Lang, Xie Jiacheng, Qiao Xiaojun, Wang Xuewen, Xiao Zhijie. Robot Trajectory Planning and Adjustment Method for Abnormal Pose of Actuator [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(5): 1466-1483.