Modeling and Analysing of Complex Combat Systems Based on Symbiosis Theory

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-0551

Abstract

Abstract:

As the combat systems develop towards clustering, coordination, unmanned, and intelligent direction, traditional combat system modeling methods are unable to reflect the complexity and intelligence of the combat systems. By drawing on symbiosis theory, this paper models and analyzes complex combat systems, and decomposes the complex combat system into various subsystems according to combat missions. The combat units, interaction modes, and combat environments in the subsystems are analyzed. The paper builds mathematical models to capture the collaborative interaction relationships between combat units, finally constructing a symbiotic model of complex combat systems. By the symbiosis principles and methods, quantitative analysis of collaborative effectiveness, stability, balance, and evolution direction of complex combat systems can be achieved. A modeling and analysis framework for complex combat systems based on the symbiosis theory is constructed, which provides a new theory and method for modeling and analysis of complex combat systems.

Key words: symbiosis theory, complex system, combat systems, coordination, modeling

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Tian Xiangrui, Yin Jie, Yao Rui, Wan Xiaodong. Modeling and Analysing of Complex Combat Systems Based on Symbiosis Theory[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(1): 203-219.

Figures/Tables 21

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 1

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 12

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig. 13

References 41

1	Li Jichao, Jiang Jiang, Yang Kewei, et al. Research on Functional Robustness of Heterogeneous Combat Networks[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13(2): 1487-1495.
2	Jia Niping, Yang Zhiwei, Yang Kewei. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of the Swarming UAVs Combat System Based on a System Dynamics Model[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 25209-25224.
3	Wang Tao, Zhou Xin, Wang Weiping, et al. An Optimal Approach for Combat System-of-systems Architecture Search Under Uncertainty[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 119140-119150.
4	李林林, 张承龙, 卓志敏. 智能无人作战系统发展及关键技术[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(3): 37-43.
	Li Linlin, Zhang Chenglong, Zhuo Zhimin. Development and Key Technology of Intelligent Unmanned Combat System[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2020, 48(3): 37-43.
5	徐爽. 面向多任务的作战体系结构智能构建技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2021.
	Xu Shuang. Research on Intelligent Construction Technology of Multi-mission Combat Architecture[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2021.
6	陈宣汝, 邢积超. 基于大数据背景探究战争系统的复杂性[J]. 信息系统工程, 2018, 31(11): 141-144.
7	卓硕. 基于Matlab和STK的无人机作战仿真研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2019.
	Zhuo Shuo. Research on UAV Combat Simulation Based on Matlab and STK[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2019.
8	闫杰, 符文星, 张凯, 等. 武器系统仿真技术发展综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(9): 1775-1789.
	Yan Jie, Fu Wenxing, Zhang Kai, et al. Review of the Weapon System Simulation Technology[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(9): 1775-1789.
9	谢冉. 复杂系统建模方法综述[J]. 现代防御技术, 2020, 48(3): 31-36, 68.
	Xie Ran. Survey of Complex System Modeling Methods[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2020, 48(3): 31-36, 68.
10	刘晓平, 唐益明, 郑利平. 复杂系统与复杂系统仿真研究综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(23): 6303-6315.
	Liu Xiaoping, Tang Yiming, Zheng Liping. Survey of Complex System and Complex System Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(23): 6303-6315.
11	吴成海. 基于复杂适应系统范式的战斗随机协同控制方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2018.
	Wu Chenghai. Research on Combat Stochastic Collaborative Control Based on CAS Paradigm[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2018.
12	向锦武, 董希旺, 丁文锐, 等. 复杂环境下无人集群系统自主协同关键技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 325-357.
	Xiang Jinwu, Dong Xiwang, Ding Wenrui, et al. Key Technologies for Autonomous Cooperation of Unmanned Swarm Systems in Complex Environments[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(10): 325-357.
13	Ye Fang, Chen Jie, Tian Yuan, et al. Cooperative Task Assignment of a Heterogeneous Multi-UAV System Using an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(4): 687.
14	钟常绿, 贾子英, 王印来. 基于复杂系统的作战体系对抗研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39(3): 112-115.
	Zhong Changlu, Jia Ziying, Wang Yinlai. Research on System-of-systems Combat of Operation System Based on Complex System[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39(3): 112-115.
15	刘德胜, 付东. 作战体系评估及评估方法研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2018, 32(3): 14-17.
16	刘德胜, 马宝林, 葛亚维. 作战体系建模方法与应用[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2020, 42(5): 1-6.
	Liu Desheng, Ma Baolin, Ge Yawei. Modeling Method and Application of Combat System of Systems[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2020, 42(5): 1-6.
17	Chen Zhiwei, Zhao Tingdi, Jiao Jian, et al. System of Systems Architecture Modeling and Mission Reliability Analysis Based on DoDAF and Petri Net[C]//2019 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1-6.
18	李志强, 李元龙, 殷来祥, 等. 智能无人蜂群作战系统适应性进化模型仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(4): 878-886.
	Li Zhiqiang, Li Yuanlong, Yin Laixiang, et al. Research on Unmanned Swarm Combat System Adaptive Evolution Model Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(4): 878-886.
19	Mo Lipo, Yuan Xiaolin, Yu Yongguang. Target-encirclement Control of Fractional-order Multi-agent Systems with a Leader[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 509: 479-491.
20	王三喜, 夏新民, 黄伟. 联合作战力量协同机理研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学, 2011, 8(1): 9-14.
	Wang Sanxi, Xia Xinmin, Huang Wei. Research on Mechanism of Multi-arms Power in Joint Operations[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2011, 8(1): 9-14.
21	衡祥安, 许建中, 冯进. 基于复杂系统理论的未来步兵作战概念研究[C]//第八届中国指挥控制大会论文集. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2020: 184-188.
22	杨未强, 刘书雷, 邓启文. 战争制胜机理的历史演变及启示[J]. 装备学院学报, 2016, 27(4): 9-13.
	Yang Weiqiang, Liu Shulei, Deng Qiwen. Historical Evolution of War Winning Mechanism and Its Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Equipment Academy, 2016, 27(4): 9-13.
23	郑少秋, 吴浩. 智能化作战及其智能指挥控制技术需求[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(2): 1-6, 13.
	Zheng Shaoqiu, Wu Hao. Intelligent Operations and Its Intelligent Command and Control Technology Requirements[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(2): 1-6, 13.
24	许瑞明, 黄谦. 群体智能无人机系统作战仿真需求分析关键问题[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2019, 41(6): 87-90.
	Xu Ruiming, Huang Qian. Key Issues of Combat Simulation Requirement Analysis of Swarm Intelligent UAV System[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2019, 41(6): 87-90.
25	Mills R, Watson R A. Symbiosis, Synergy and Modularity: Introducing the Reciprocal Synergy Symbiosis Algorithm[C]//Advances in Artificial Life. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 1192-1201.
26	孟方琳, 田增瑞, 常焙筌, 等. VC和PE产业链的共生模式及路径选择研究[J]. 复旦学报(自然科学版), 2018, 57(6): 675-685.
	Meng Fanglin, Tian Zengrui, Chang Beiquan, et al. Research on the Symbiotic Mode of VC and PE Industry Chain and the Path Selection[J]. Journal of Fudan University(Natural Science), 2018, 57(6): 675-685.
27	侯晓. 基于共生理论的会展综合体设计研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2019.
	Hou Xiao. Research on Convention and Exhibition Complex Design Based on Symbiosis Theory[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2019.
28	董彬. 基于共生理论的运输方式发展模式及机理研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
	Dong Bin. Study on Transportation Development Mode and Mechanism Based on the Symbiosis Theory[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2017.
29	周金其. 基于共生理论的高校独立学院演变研究-以浙江省为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2007.
30	常晓飞, 蒋邓怀, 姬晓闯, 等. 无人作战系统仿真发展综述[J]. 无人系统技术, 2021, 4(6): 28-36.
	Chang Xiaofei, Jiang Denghuai, Ji Xiaochuang, et al. Summary of Simulation Development of Unmanned Combat System[J]. Unmanned Systems Technology, 2021, 4(6): 28-36.
31	谢旭, 邱晓刚, 段红, 等. 作战仿真知识体系的初步探索[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 773-780.
	Xie Xu, Qiu Xiaogang, Duan Hong, et al. Research on Combat Simulation Body of Knowledge[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(4): 773-780.
32	胡剑文, 常青, 冯晓文, 等. 作战仿真实验理论、平台与应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2016.
33	王涵, 李浩, 范莉娟, 等. 作战仿真技术发展现状[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2023, 14(3): 87-92, 100.
	Wang Han, Li Hao, Fan Lijuan, et al. Development Status of Operation Simulation Technology[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2023, 14(3): 87-92, 100.
34	李灿, 侯兴明, 祁启明, 等. 基于数字孪生的无人机平行作战仿真[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48(8): 23-31.
	Li Can, Hou Xingming, Qi Qiming, et al. Parallel Battle Simulation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Based on Digital Twin[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2023, 48(8): 23-31.
35	罗浩, 张剑锋, 宁云晖, 等. 潜艇作战系统数字孪生体应用需求分析[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2021, 4(3): 233-237.
	Luo Hao, Zhang Jianfeng, Ning Yunhui, et al. Application Requirement Analysis on Digital Twin of Submarine Combat System[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2021, 4(3): 233-237.
36	邹立岩, 张明智, 柏俊汝, 等. 无人机集群作战建模与仿真研究综述[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2021(3): 98-108.
	Zou Liyan, Zhang Mingzhi, Bai Junru, et al. A Survey of Modeling and Simulation of UAS Swarm Operation[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2021(3): 98-108.
37	许瑞明. 无人机集群智能涌现与演化建模论述[J]. 兵工自动化, 2021, 40(3): 5-9, 35.
	Xu Ruiming. Discussion on Intelligent Emergence and Evolution Modeling of UAV Cluster[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2021, 40(3): 5-9, 35.
38	袁纯清. 共生理论-兼论小型经济[M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 1998.
39	郭一鸣, 陈春良, 曹艳华, 等. 基于排队论和兰彻斯特方程的战时维修保障装备数量确定[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2021, 46(11): 124-129.
	Guo Yiming, Chen Chunliang, Cao Yanhua, et al. Research on Quantity Determination of Wartime Maintenance Support Equipment Based on Queuing Theory and Lanchester Equation[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2021, 46(11): 124-129.
40	毕凯, 李大喜, 杨坤龙, 等. 基于多元兰彻斯特方程的电火一体作战模型[J]. 空军工程大学学报, 2022, 23(5): 96-100.
	Bi Kai, Li Daxi, Yang Kunlong, et al. Research on Electronic-Fire Attack Model Based on Multivariate Lanchester Equation[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University, 2022, 23(5): 96-100.
41	刘奇华. 基于Agent的预警机协同作战仿真技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
	Liu Qihua. Research on Agent-based Awacs Cooperative Combat Simulation Technology[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020.

行为模式	组织模式
行为模式	点共生	间歇共生	连续共生	一体化共生
寄生(P)	M_P1	M_P2	M_P3	M_P4
偏利共生(C)	M_C1	M_C2	M_C3	M_C4
非对称性互惠共生(a)	M_a1	M_a2	M_a3	M_a4
对称性互惠共生(s)	M_s1	M_s2	M_s3	M_s4

作战单元	象参量X	质参量Z
G550	{翼展=28.5 m；机身长=29.4 m；机身高度=7.9 m；机身质量=21 800 kg；构型=固定翼；驾驶舱仪表=数字仪表；座位数=5 }	{敏捷性=0.5；单元探测距离=350 n mile；探测角度=360°；燃油量=18 700 kg；爬升率=7 m/s；飞行速度=260 n mile/h}
F16I	{翼展=9.5 m；机身长=15 m；机身长=29.4 m；机身高度=4.8 m；机身质量=8 715 kg；构型=固定翼；驾驶舱仪表=数字仪表；座位数=2}	{敏捷性=4.9；探测距离=80 n mile；探测角度=120°；攻击速度=2 100 n mile/h；攻击距离=56.7 n mile；打击精度=0.95；燃油量=8 429 kg；载弹量=3；爬升率=159.5 m/s；飞行速度=350 n mile/h}
F15A1	{翼展=13.1 m；机身长=19.3 m；机身高度=4.65 m；机身质量=12 710 kg；构型=固定翼；驾驶舱仪表=机械仪表；座位数=1}	{敏捷性=4；探测距离=95 n mile；探测角度=30°；攻击速度=2 100 n mile/h；攻击距离=38 n mile；打击精度=0.7；燃油量=8 894 kg；载弹量=5；爬升率=122.4 m/s；飞行速度=350 n mile/h}
F15A2	{翼展=13.1 m；机身长=19.3 m；机身高度=4.65 m；机身质量=12 710 kg；构型=固定翼；驾驶舱仪表=机械仪表；座位数=1}	{敏捷性=4；探测距离=95 n mile；探测角度=30°；攻击速度=2 100 n mile/h；攻击距离=38 n mile；打击精度=0.7；燃油量=8 894 kg；载弹量=5；爬升率=122.4 m/s；飞行速度=350 n mile/h}
Boeing707	{翼展=44.4 m；机身长=44.6 m；机身高度=12.9 m；机身质量=66 406 kg；构型=固定翼；驾驶舱仪表=机械仪表；座位数=5 }	{敏捷性=0.5；燃油量=72 460 kg；载重量=12 454 kg；飞行速度=230 n mile/h；爬升率=6.4 m/s；飞行速度=230 n mile/h}

作战单元	作战单元
作战单元	F16I	F15A1	F15A2
F16I		0.58	0.58
F15A1	0.33		0.47
F15A2	0.33	0.47

作战单元	单要素共生度
F15A1	0.37
F15A2	0.37
F16I	0.20

作战单元	作战类型
作战单元	单独作战	协同作战
G550	0	0
F16I	0.06	0.20
F15A1	0.03	0.35
F15A2	0.03	0.35
Boeing707	0	0
作战系统	0.12	0.90