Improved Social Force Model Based on Enhancing Psych behavioral Heterogeneity

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0965

Abstract

Abstract:

Simulating the evacuation behavior of people under anxiety is of great significance for solving the kinematic problems such as escape. At present, most at home and abroad studies consider the anxiety factors as the only medium of population evacuation without considering how external key factors affect anxiety factors in such emergency environments. The improved social force model is proposed, combined with Agent-based stampede risk assessment, the influence of key environmental variables on the anxiety factor is quantified. The psychological force parameters are introduced, and the impact of the anxiety factor on the actual evacuation process is applied to the model through the physical vector. The model carries out the selection of individual motor vectors by enhancing the heterogeneity of individual psychological behavior. Compared with the real evacuation scenario, the experiment results show that the improved social force model can better describe the individual evacuation behavior and are more realistic and convincing.

Key words: crowd stampede, systems engineering, social force model(SFM), psychodynamic, multi-agent

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Yandong Liu, Gaoxiang Huang, Wen Chen. Improved Social Force Model Based on Enhancing Psych behavioral Heterogeneity[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(5): 1120-1130.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References 24

1	Helbing Dirk, Farkas Illés, Vicsek Tamás. Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic[J]. Nature, 2000, 407(6803): 487-490.
2	Han Yanbin, Liu Hong, Moore P. Extended Route Choice Model Based on Available Evacuation Route Set and Its Application in Crowd Evacuation Simulation[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2017, 75: 1-16.
3	李锋, 刘晓强. 基于Agent和元胞的火灾逃生仿真模型应用研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(15): 4163-4167.
	Li Feng, Liu Xiaoqiang. Simulation of Escape from Fire Based on Agent and Cellular Automaton[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(15): 4163-4167.
4	Mitsopoulou M, Dourvas N I, Sirakoulis G C, et al. Spatial Games and Memory Effects on Crowd Evacuation Behavior with Cellular Automata[J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2019, 32: 87-98.
5	Alginahi Y M, Mudassar M, Kabir M N, et al. Analyzing the Crowd Evacuation Pattern of a Large Densely Populated Building[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2019, 44(4): 3289-3304.
6	李昌华, 杨晶, 李智杰. 一种应用于人群仿真的改进社会力模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(3): 521-528.
	Li Changhua, Yang Jing, Li Zhijie. An Improved Social Force Model for Crowd Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(3): 521-528.
7	Anton von Schantz, Ehtamo Harri. Minimizing the Evacuation Time of a Crowd from a Complex Building Using Rescue Guides[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2022, 594: 127011.
8	薛怡然, 吴锐, 刘家锋. 组合动作空间深度强化学习的人群疏散引导方法[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(8): 29-38.
	Xue Yiran, Wu Rui, Liu Jiafeng. Crowd Evacuation Guidance Based on Combined Action-space Deep Reinforcement Learning[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(8): 29-38.
9	Chen Jieyu, Shi Tianxing, Li Nan. Pedestrian Evacuation Simulation in Indoor Emergency Situations: Approaches, Models and Tools[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 142: 105378.
10	Chen Xu, Treiber M, Kanagaraj V, et al. Social Force Models for Pedestrian Traffic-state of the Art[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018, 38(5): 625-653.
11	邓宇菁, 冯页新, 胡列格. 社会力模型中行人的心理因素和随机行为对人群疏散过程的影响[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(11): 144-148.
	Deng Yujing, Feng Yexin, Hu Liege. The Impact of Psychology and Randomness on the Evacuation of Pedestrians: A Modification of Social Force Model[J]. Systems Engineering, 2014, 32(11): 144-148.
12	Richardson O, Jalba A, Muntean A. Effects of Environment Knowledge in Evacuation Scenarios Involving Fire and Smoke: A Multiscale Modelling and Simulation Approach[J]. Fire Technology, 2019, 55(2): 415-436.
13	Ding Ning, Zhang Hui, Chen Tao. Simulation-based Optimization of Emergency Evacuation Strategy in Ultra-high-rise Buildings[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017, 89(3): 1167-1184.
14	Chen Xiaowei, Wang Jian. Entropy-based Crowd Evacuation Modeling with Seeking Behavior of Social Groups[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 4653-4664.
15	曹宁博, 陈永恒, 曲昭伟, 等. 基于社会力模型的行人路径选择模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2018, 52(2): 352-357.
	Cao Ningbo, Chen Yongheng, Qu Zhaowei, et al. Pedestrian Route Choice Model Based on Social Force Model[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2018, 52(2): 352-357.
16	王艳. 地铁踩踏事故机制分析及应对措施探讨[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
	Wang Yan. Analysis and Discussion on the Subway Stampede Mechanism and Countermeasures[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.
17	田玉敏. 人群疏散心理及行为个体差异的探讨[J]. 人类工效学, 2010, 16(3): 53-55, 82.
	Tian Yumin. Exploration of Individual Differences in Crowd Evacuation Psychology and Behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2010, 16(3): 53-55, 82.
18	卓霖, 刘婷婷, 刘箴, 等. 疏散出口附近的人群踩踏仿真分析[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2022, 58(11): 234-241.
	Zhuo Lin, Liu Tingting, Liu Zhen, et al. Simulation Analysis of Crowd Stampeding Near Evacuation Exit[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2022, 58(11): 234-241.
19	Busogi M, Shin D, Ryu H, et al. Weighted Affordance-based Agent Modeling and Simulation in Emergency Evacuation[J]. Safety Science, 2017, 96: 209-227.
20	Cristiani E, Peri D. Handling Obstacles in Pedestrian Simulations: Models and Optimization[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2017, 45: 285-302.
21	Pereira L A, Burgarelli D, Duczmal L H, et al. Emergency Evacuation Models Based on Cellular Automata with Route Changes and Group Fields[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, 473: 97-110.
22	Liu Chi, Ye Rui, Lian Liping, et al. A Least-effort Principle Based Model for Heterogeneous Pedestrian Flow Considering Overtaking Behavior[J]. Physics Letters A, 2018, 382(20): 1324-1334.
23	赵来军, 王珂, 汪建. 城市应急避难场所规划建设理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
	Zhao Laijun, Wang Ke, Wang Jian. Theory and Methods of Urban Emergency Shelter Planning and Construction[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
24	彭锐, 刘皆谊. 日本避难场所规划及其启示[J]. 新建筑, 2009(2): 102-106.
	Peng Rui, Liu Jieyi. The Planning for Evacuation Area in Japan[J]. New Architecture, 2009(2): 102-106.

关键因素	信息熵值	信息效用值	权重
逃生通道宽度	0.973	0.027	0.403
预期悲观程度	0.994	0.006	0.086
空间内噪音程度	0.994	0.006	0.086
疏散人数	0.992	0.008	0.118
空间内能见度	0.985	0.015	0.231

[1]	Zhang Yue, Zhang Wenliang, Feng Qiang, Guo Xing, Ren Yi, Wang Zili. Combat-oriented Comprehensive Simulation and Verification Technology for Equipment System RMS [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(7): 1823-1835.
[2]	Gu Xueqiang, Luo Junren, Zhou Yanzhong, Zhang Wanpeng. Survey on Large Language Agent Technologies for Intelligent Game Theoretic Decision-making [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(5): 1142-1157.
[3]	Yao Changhua, Bi Shanning, Ma Rufei, Yu Xiaohan, Li Jiaqiang, Chen Jinli. Method for Dynamic Coalition Formation of Wargame Agent for Force Cooperation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(5): 1188-1196.
[4]	Xiong Jun, Zhang Wenbo, Xiong Zhi, Zhou Feng, Yang Bo. Survey of Cooperative Multi-Agent Path Finding [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(12): 3033-3049.
[5]	Huang Zhiqin, Lu Tianying, Chen Zheyi. Multi-UAV Deployment and Collaborative Offloading for Large-scale IoT Systems [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(1): 25-39.
[6]	Jiang Quan, Wei Jingxuan. Real-time Scheduling Method for Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(7): 1609-1620.
[7]	Yu Lei, Zhu Xichou, Liao Huaming, Guo Jiafeng, Cheng Xueqi. Interaction Between Virus Transmission Variation and Population Crossover Activity and Diffusion Model [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(7): 1713-1728.
[8]	Zhou Zhiyong, Mo Fei, Zhao Kai, Hao Yunbo, Qian Yufeng. Adaptive PID Control Algorithm Based on PPO [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(6): 1425-1432.
[9]	Yan Xingyu, Li Dayan, Wang Niya, Zhang Kaixiang, Mao Jianlin. Multi-agent Path Planning with Obstacle Penalty Factor [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(3): 673-685.
[10]	Xing Zhiwei, Yu Ruiwen, Li Biao, Chen Zhaoxin. Modeling for Decision Support of Flight Ground Support Process [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(11): 2552-2565.
[11]	Zhang Guohui, Gao Ang, Zhang Ya'nan. Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Homogeneous Cluster Equipment System Based on RLoMAG+EAS [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(1): 160-169.
[12]	Miaomiao Ma, Lipeng Dong, Xiangjie Liu. Energy Management Strategy of Multi-agent Microgrid Based on Q-learning Algorithm [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(7): 1487-1496.
[13]	Chengbing Li, Yunfei Li, Peng Wu. Dynamic Simulation of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Transport Network Vulnerability Based on Multi-agent [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(6): 1183-1190.
[14]	Guodong Yuan, Ming He, Ziyu Ma, Weishi Zhang, Xueda Liu, Wei Li. Multiagent Following Multileader Algorithm Based on K-means Clustering [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(3): 616-622.
[15]	Cheng Cheng, Chen Zhijie, Guo Ziming, Li Ni. Research and Development of Simulation Training Platform for Multi-agent Collaborative Decision-making [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(12): 2669-2679.