Research on Battle Damage Assessment Method of Aggregating Target in Theater-Level

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812011

Abstract

Abstract: The damage adjudication model in the theater-level combat simulation is the key to judge the target damage status and evaluate the attack process. The current research mainly focuses on the abstract modeling of single ground target, and the needs of the damage assessment of ground aggregation targets in large-scale joint operations cannot be met. The ground aggregation target is decomposed into different sub-targets through the structure tree, and the sub-target value is given to determine the main attacked target. Standard sub-targets are created based on the sub-target's shape and presence or absence of protection. The mapping relationship between the target physical damage and the degree of performance attenuation is determined, and the degree of attenuation is used to judge the damage effect. The validity of the damage assessment method is verified through a simple scenario.

Key words: theater-level combat simulation, aggregating target, structure tree, standard sub-targets, efficiency attenuation function, battle damage assessment

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Hou Qihao, Yao Yiping, Cao Xiang. Research on Battle Damage Assessment Method of Aggregating Target in Theater-Level[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(12): 4580-4586.

References

[1] 芦漪, 许梅生. 典型目标系统级毁伤评估[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2012, 33(3): 52-53.
Lu Yi, Xu Meisheng.Typical Target System Level Damage Assessment[J]. Journal of Sichuan Armed Forces, 2012, 33(3): 52-53.
[2] 张成, 石全, 赵湘. 美军目标毁伤效果评估发展状况探析[J]. 国防科技, 2011, 32(6): 63-68.
Zhang Cheng, Shi Quan, Zhao Xiang.An Analysis of US Military Battle Damage Assessment Development[J]. National Defense Technology, 2011, 32(6): 63-68.
[3] Hillestad, R J,L Moore. The Theater-Level Campaign Model[Z]. 1996: 75-76.
[4] Bennett, B W,C M Jones, A M Bullock et al. Davis. Main Theater Warfare Modeling In the RAND Strategy Assessment System (3. 0)[D]. 1988.
[5] Taylor J G, Yildirim U Z, Murphy W S.Hierarchy-of-models approach for aggregated-force attrition[C]// Simulation Conference, 2000. Proceedings. Winter. IEEE, 2000: 925-932.
[6] Washburn A.A review of the ASW model in ITEM[Z]. Calhoun, 2005.
[7] 陈东明, 朱志良, 常桂然, 等. 空对地攻击效能评估模型[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 26(10): 964-967.
Chen Dongming, Zhu Zhiliang, Chang Guiran, et al.Air-to-ground attack effectiveness evaluation model[J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2005, 26(10): 964-967.
[8] 韩志刚, 贺建良. 现代空对地攻击技术[J]. 电光与控制, 1999(4): 17-22.
Han Zhigang, He Jianliang.Modern Air-to-ground Attack Technology[J]. Electronics & Control, 1999(4): 17-22.
[9] 刘家军. 俄陆军火力毁伤理论体系[J]. 外国军事学术, 2004(4): 59-60.
Liu Jiajun.The Russian Army Fire Damage Theory System[J]. Foreign Military Academics, 2004(4): 59-60.
[10] 李望西, 黄长强, 吴文超, 等. 空地精确制导武器对地攻击目标毁伤评估[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(1): 211-218.
Li Wangxi, Huang Changqiang, Wu wenchao, et al. Battle damage assessment of air-to-ground precision guided weapon air-to-ground attack[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(1): 211-218.
[11] 李新其, 向爱红, 李红霞. 系统目标毁伤效果评估问题研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(1): 57-62.
Li Xinqi, Xiang Aihong, Li Hongxia.Calculation and Assessment on Damage Effect of System Target[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(1): 57-62.
[12] 凌云翔, 马满好, 袁卫卫, 等. 作战模型与模拟[M]. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2006: 10.
Ling Yunxiang, Ma Manhao, Yuan Weiwei, et al.Combat Model and Simulation[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2006: 10.
[13] Averill M Law, 肖田元, 范文慧. 仿真建模与分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社. 2012: 12.
Averill M. Law, Xiao Tianyuan, Fan Wenhui. Simulation Modeling and Analysis[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press. 2012: 12.
[14] 李琦, 姚新宇. 连续系统仿真[M]. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2014: 2.
Li Qi, Yao Xinyu.Continuous System Simulation[M]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2014: 2.
[15] 刘宝宏. 面向对象建模与仿真[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011: 3.
Liu Baohong.Object-Oriented Modeling and Simulation [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2011: 3.