Resilience Analysis and Evaluation of Combat System of Systems Architecture Based on Dynamic Super Network

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0237

Abstract

Abstract: The resilience of combat architecture is a kind of adaptability and recovery ability presented by the architecture when the combat system of systems (CSoS) faces destruction, attack and failure. It has become an important index to measure the capability of CSoS. The dynamic super network model is established by mapping the experimental data of CSoS resilience simulation. The resilience index of CSoS architecture is proposed and the resilience measure CSoSIR algorithm is designed. Based on the resilience analysis framework of competitive game, the CSoS architecture resilience is analyzed and evaluated.

Key words: System of Systems (SoS), combat system of systems (CSoS), resilience, CSoS architecture resilience, SoS capability evaluation

CLC Number:

N391.9

Rong Ming, Hu Xiaofeng, Yang Jingyu. Resilience Analysis and Evaluation of Combat System of Systems Architecture Based on Dynamic Super Network[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(6): 1055-1061.

References

[1] Burch R. Measures of Resilience for Space Systems[R]. Presentation to the National Defense Industrial Association Resilience Forum, 2013, As of September 23, 2015.
[2] Edlund Gregory. Space Systems Resiliency: Definition, Measurement,Application[R]. presentation to Air Force Space Command, 2013. As of September 23, 2015.
[3] Lockheed Martin.NDIA Forum on Space Resilience: Space Resiliency Study[R]. presentation, August 14, 2013.
[4] Bodeau D, Graubart R, LaPadula L, et al. Cyber Resiliency Metrics[R]. MITRE, April 2012.
[5] Hura M, Gary M L, George J N.Enhancing Space Resilience Through Non-Materiel Means: Appendix B-Missile Warning Mission Case Study[R]. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, 2016.
[6] Dreyer P, Krista S L, David M, et al.RAPAPORT (Resilience Assessment Process and Portfolio Option Reporting Tool): Background and Method[R]. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation, RR-1169-AF, 2016.
[7] Uday P, Marais K B.Resilience-based system importance measures for system-of-systems[J]. Procedia Computer Science (S1877-0509), 2014, 28: 257-264.
[8] 石建伟, 刘俊先, 姜志平, 等. 基于超网络的军事体系韧性评估[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2017, 3(3): 213-217.
Shi Jianwei, Liu Junxian, Jiang Zhiping, et al.Evaluating military system of systems resilience using super networks[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2017, 3(3): 213-217.
[9] 陈宽, 李元元, 罗云峰, 等. 基于功能依赖网络的体系韧性分析[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2016, 2(3): 256-260.
Chen Kuan, Li Yuanyuan, Luo Yunfeng, et al.Evaluating system of systems resilience nased on functional dependency network analysis[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2016, 2(3): 256-260.
[10] 潘星, 蒋卓, 杨艳京. 基于弹性的体系组件重要度及恢复策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(9): 1713-1720.
Pan Xing, Jiang Zhuo, Yang Yanjing.Resilience-based component importance and recovery strategy for system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronaut, 2017, 43(9): 1713-1720.
[11] 费爱国. 韧性指挥与控制系统设计相关问题探析[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2017, 8(2): 1-4.
Fei Aiguo.Analysis on related issues about resilient command and contro1 system design[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2017, 8(2): 1-4.
[12] 崔琼, 李建华. 网络化指挥信息系统弹性度量方法[J].军事运筹与系统工程, 2016, 12: 18-24.
Cui Qiong, Li Jianhua.Resilience measurement of network command and control system[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2016, 12: 18-24.
[13] 蓝羽石, 周光霞, 王珩, 等. 韧性指挥信息系统构建机理及实现研究[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2015, 1(3): 284-291.
Lan Yushi, Zhou Guangxia, Wang Heng, et al.Construction Mechanism and Implementation of Resilient Command Information Systems[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2015, 1(3): 284-291.
[14] 赵洪利, 杨海涛, 付芸. 网络化指控信息系统弹性分析方法研究[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2015, 1(1):14-18.
Zhao Hongli, Yang Haitao, Fu Yun.Analysis method of resilience in networked command and control information system[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2015, 1(1): 14-18.