基于上下结合法的战场态势信息本体构建

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-0665

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

由于战场态势信息的来源复杂、数据结构和表达方式存在较大差异，建立统一的知识表达模型具有一定的挑战。本体作为语义化的概念模型，常被用于描述知识领域中的概念、关系和属性。提出了一种基于上下结合法的战场态势信息领域本体构建方法。采用自顶向下法构建上层本体，通过定义概念、关系和属性，设计上下位结构明确的概念层次结构模型，建立概念类之间的层级关系和语义关联。采用自底向上法构建底层本体，提出了一种基于双重聚合算法的本体抽取方法。TF-IDF获得实体的特征表示，利用K-means++初步抽象归纳出本体，利用凝聚式层次聚类算法进一步细分本体概念，定义本体之间的关系。使用描述语言OWL和编辑工具Protégé管理本体，最终构建了对战场态势信息进行一致性管理的知识本体模型BattleOnto，在指挥员做出决策时提供支持和帮助。

关键词: 战场态势, 本体, 聚类, 实体, OWL(web ontology language)

Abstract:

The construction of the unified expression model of battlefield situational information is challenging due to the complexity of data sources and the significant differences in data structures and expression methods. Ontologies, as semantic conceptual models, are often used to describe concepts, relationships, and attributes within knowledge domains. An ontology construction method for the battlefield situational information domain based on a top-down and bottom-top integration is proposed. The top-down method is used to construct the upper ontology, in which a conceptual hierarchy model with a clear top-down structure is designed to establish the hierarchical relationships and semantic associations. A bottom-up method is used to construct the lower ontology, and a novel double aggregation algorithm is proposed for its extraction. The feature representation of entities is obtained by using TF-IDF. The ontology is initially abstracted by using K-means++algorithm, and an agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm is applied to further refine the ontology concepts. Theontology model BattleOnto is constructed by using OWL and Protégé, which can support the decision making.

Key words: battlefield situation, ontology, clustering, entity, web ontology language(OWL)

中图分类号:

TP391

周葱,周思航,黄健等 . 基于上下结合法的战场态势信息本体构建[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(10): 2469-2487.

Zhou Cong,Zhou Sihang,Huang Jian,et al . A Method for Battlefield Situation Information Ontology Construction Based on Top-down and Bottom-up Integration[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(10): 2469-2487.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 32

1	Li Xiaoli, Li Weihua, Qu Youmiao. Towards Ontology-based Battlefield Information Fusion Framework for Decision Support[C]//Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronic Technology. Dordrecht: Atlantis Press, 2016: 45-48.
2	赵宗贵, 李君灵, 王珂. 战场态势估计概念、结构与效能[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2010, 5(3): 226-230.
	Zhao Zonggui, Li Junling, Wang Ke. The Concept, Structure and Efficiency of Battlefield Situation Assessment[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2010, 5(3): 226-230.
3	朱丰, 胡晓峰, 吴琳, 等. 从态势认知走向态势智能认知[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(3): 761-771.
	Zhu Feng, Hu Xiaofeng, Wu Lin, et al. From Situation Cognition Stepped into Situation Intelligent Cognition[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(3): 761-771.
4	彭亚飞, 杨凡德. 战场态势认知综述[J]. 兵工自动化, 2021, 40(7): 24-27, 66.
	Peng Yafei, Yang Fande. Battlefield Situation Cognition Overview[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2021, 40(7): 24-27, 66.
5	顾丹阳, 李明倩, 权冀川, 等. 基于本体的主战武器装备知识图谱构建[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2021, 43(6): 14-20.
	Gu Danyang, Li Mingqian, Quan Jichuan, et al. Ontology Based Knowledge Graph Construction for Combat Weapon Equipment[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2021, 43(6): 14-20.
6	Li Liming, Gu Ping, Wang Wei. Ontology Modeling of Army Equipment Maintenance Support Business Process Under the New System Base on IDEF5/Owl[C]//2021 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Computer Applications (ICPECA). Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 331-335.
7	李昌玺, 朱刚, 黄申, 等. 联合作战条件下陆战场态势感知体系构建问题研究[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2020, 15(4): 350-355.
	Li Changxi, Zhu Gang, Huang Shen, et al. Construction Problem Study on Land Battlefield Situation Awareness System Under Joint Operation[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2020, 15(4): 350-355.
8	卜令娟. 基于本体的战场态势一致性关键技术研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2015.
	Bu Lingjuan. Research on Key Technologies in Ontology-based Battlefield Situation Consistency[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2015.
9	王琦文. 战场态势推理关键技术研究及应用[D]. 西安: 西安电子科技大学, 2018.
	Wang Qiwen. Research and Application of Key Techniques of Battlefield Situational Reasoning[D]. Xi'an: Xidian University, 2018.
10	周葱, 黄健. 战场态势知识图谱构建技术[C]//复杂系统体系工程论文集一. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2019: 123-130.
11	Tudorache T. Ontology Engineering: Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions[J]. Semantic Web, 2020, 11(1): 125-138.
12	Chantrapornchai Chantana, Choksuchat Chidchanok. Ontology Construction and Application in Practice Case Study of Health Tourism in Thailand[J]. SpringerPlus, 2016, 5(1): 2106.
13	田董炜, 仇阿根, 张志然. 多层次地质灾害领域本体构建与应用[J]. 测绘科学, 2019, 44(6): 330-336.
	Tian Dongwei, Qiu Agen, Zhang Zhiran. Domain Ontology Construction and Application of Multi-level Geological Disasters[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2019, 44(6): 330-336.
14	臧根林, 王亚强, 吴庆蓉, 等. 智慧城市知识图谱模型与本体构建方法[J]. 大数据, 2020, 6(2): 96-106.
	Zang Genlin, Wang Yaqiang, Wu Qingrong, et al. Model and Construction Method of the Ontology of Knowledge Graph of Smart City[J]. Big Data Research, 2020, 6(2): 96-106.
15	谢忠局, 陈思安, 张文迪, 等. 金融科技业务风险本体构建与推理仿真[J]. 计算机仿真, 2022, 39(4): 1-4, 36.
	Xie Zhongju, Chen Sian, Zhang Wendi, et al. Construction and Reasoning Simulation for Financial Technology Business Risk Ontology[J]. Computer Simulation, 2022, 39(4): 1-4, 36.
16	Keltoum Benlaharche, Nabila Nouaouria, Djamel Meslati. Towards a Reference Ontology in Islamic Finance and Banking[C]//2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M). Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 74-79.
17	赵颜利, 李连军, 余红梅, 等. 面向战例知识图谱的本体构建[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2020, 35(5): 407-413.
	Zhao Yanli, Li Lianjun, Yu Hongmei, et al. Ontology Construction Oriented Knowledge Graph of Battle Case[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2020, 35(5): 407-413.
18	Lei Zhen, Cui Peizhi, Huang Yanyan. Research on Tactical Intention Recognition Method Based on Probabilistic Network Ontology Language[C]//2020 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications(AEECA). Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 957-960.
19	邹烨翰, 冯旸赫, 程光权, 等. 面向军事条令条例的本体构建技术[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2019, 5(1): 47-54.
	Zou Yehan, Feng Yanghe, Cheng Guangquan, et al. Ontology Developing Technology for Military Regulations[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2019, 5(1): 47-54.
20	朱杰, 张宏军. 基于本体的仿真想定空间知识表达模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(5): 1051-1061.
	Zhu Jie, Zhang Hongjun. Spatial Knowledge Representation Model of Simulation Scenario Based on Ontology[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(5): 1051-1061.
21	彭超, 董献洲, 徐浩, 等. 作战仿真本体构建研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2022, 44(1): 72-78.
	Peng Chao, Dong Xianzhou, Xu Hao, et al. Research on Combat Simulation Ontology Construction[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2022, 44(1): 72-78.
22	Ji Jinyu, Zhou Wen, Yu Miao, et al. Ontology Construction and Reasoning of Air Defense and Anti-missile Assistant Decision Based on Distributed Operation[C]//2021 7th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA). Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 157-165.
23	夏旭东, 于荣欢. 面向空间态势的知识图谱构建[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(增1): 293-298.
	Xia Xudong, Yu Ronghuan. Construction of Knowledge Graph for Space Situation[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(S1): 293-298.
24	刘斌, 蚁佳才, 姚莉, 等. 面向太空网络战威胁的态势感知本体建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
	Liu Bin, Yi Jiacai, Yao Li, et al. Situational Awareness Ontology Modeling for Threat from Space Cyber Operations[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(3): 745-754.
25	李宝森, 王浩军, 穆仕博. 基于本体建模的态势推理[J]. 航空科学技术, 2021, 32(2): 80-90.
	Li Baosen, Wang Haojun, Mu Shibo. Situation Reasoning Based on Ontology Modeling[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2021, 32(2): 80-90.
26	Gregor D, Toral S, Ariza T, et al. A Methodology for Structured Ontology Construction Applied to Intelligent Transportation Systems[J]. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 2016, 47: 108-119.
27	陈禄明. 基于真实世界医疗大数据的中文医学本体重构的研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2021.
28	俞海亮. 面向军事领域的武器本体构建研究[D]. 杭州: 杭州电子科技大学, 2022.
	Yu Hailiang. Research on the Construction of Weapon Ontology for Military Field[D]. Hangzhou: Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2022.
29	U. S Army Regulations and Pamphlets[EB/OL]. (2019-02-28) [2021-06-30]. .
30	Bouguettaya A, Yu Qi, Liu Xumin, et al. Efficient Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(5): 2785-2797.
31	Zhou Hai. Research of Text Classification Based on TF-IDF and CNN-LSTM[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2022, 2171(1): 012021.
32	Ahmed M, Seraj R, Islam S M S. The k-means Algorithm: A Comprehensive Survey and Performance Evaluation[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(8): 1295.

关系名称	关系描述	关系示例
包含Kind_of	父类与子类的关系	K(环境因素，气候)
执行Excute_of	对象与行动空间二级本体之间的关系	E(部队，作战任务)
驻扎Stationed_in	部队与物理地形之间的关系	S(部队，地点)
具备Ability_of	主战武器与装备能力之间的关系	A(导弹，装备能力)
提供Supply_to	后勤与对象之间的关系	S(生活物资，平民)
关联Related_to	行动空间与案例之间的关系	R(作战任务，案例)

[1]	葛程鹏, 赵东, 王蕊, 马庆华. 基于改进DBSCAN和距离共识评估的分段点云去噪方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(8): 1800-1809.
[2]	黄林, 刘善君, 王伟, 龚立. 基于随机邻域嵌入的无监督复杂工况识别[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(6): 1334-1343.
[3]	卫升, 王艳, 纪志成. 多工况生产过程下的即时学习能耗预测建模方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(6): 1378-1391.
[4]	肖鹏, 谢锋, 倪海鸿, 张敏, 汤志荔, 李霓. 多机任务分配与路径规划协同优化法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(5): 1141-1151.
[5]	罗宇航, 吴润秀, 崔志华, 张翼英, 何业慎, 赵嘉. 基于密度峰值聚类的Tri-training算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(5): 1189-1198.
[6]	赵彦霖, 田云娜. 基于K-means聚类的超启发式跨单元调度方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(4): 941-956.
[7]	邵绪强, 程雅, 金佚钟. 基于聚类融合的三维流线可视化方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(3): 625-635.
[8]	陈静, 张昭冲, 王琳凯, 安脉, 王伟. 基于卷积长短时记忆网络的短时公交客流量预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(2): 476-486.
[9]	关景文, 宋晓, 李晓庆, 杨彤, 周军华. 导弹领域文本嵌套命名实体识别方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(8): 1757-1767.
[10]	丁飞, 张美楠, 庄衡衡, 马海蓉, 张登银. 极地灾害区域监测的目标搜索规划与算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(7): 1526-1538.
[11]	赵拓, 邓汉强, 高佳隆, 黄健. 基于网络节点聚类的多无人机动态目标分配[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(4): 695-708.
[12]	何一帆, 何玉林, 蔡湧达, 黄哲学. 基于夹角几何的I-niceMO增强算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(4): 797-808.
[13]	王旭, 季伟东, 周国辉, 杨佳慧. 基于多指标精英个体博弈机制的多目标优化算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(3): 494-514.
[14]	范厚明, 咸富山, 王怀奇. 动态需求下考虑订单聚类的外卖配送路径优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(2): 396-407.
[15]	陈雪, 胡蓉, 王辉, 李作成, 钱斌, 李熠胥. 学习型蚁群算法求解一类复杂两级车辆路径问题[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(11): 2476-2495.