Research on Complex Combat Network Dynamic Evolution Based on Information Entropy

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-FZ0908

Abstract

Abstract:

Network-centric warfare, distributed and decentralized command and control gradually replace separately the traditional platform-centric warfare and centralized command and control, and information has become a combat capability. Based on the new information weapon equipment system operation loop, a complex combat network model based on information entropy is constructed, and the combat capability measurement method is proposed. On the basis of the combat capability upgrade being the network driving force, the dynamic evolution rule of the complex combat network is designed and the preferential evolution and stochastic evolution models are constructed. According to a typical system combat example, the influence of the weapon equipment combat units on the overall combat capability is analyzed, and a theoretical basis for designing and optimizing the combat effectiveness of the equipment system is proposed.

Key words: weapon equipment system, combat effectiveness, cooperative gain, self-information, dynamic evolution of the network

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Lianyi Zhang, Xisheng Shen, Duzheng Qing, Han Zhang, Min Zhou, Xifu Wang. Research on Complex Combat Network Dynamic Evolution Based on Information Entropy[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(12): 2605-2618.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

References 13

1	胡晓峰, 杨镜宇, 司光亚, 等. 战争复杂系统仿真分析与实验[M]. 北京: 国防大学出版社, 2008.
	Hu Xiaofeng, Yang Jingyu, Si Guangya, et al. Simulation Analysis and Experiment of Complex War System[M]. Beijing: National Defense University Press, 2008.
2	Lee Y, Lee T. Network-Based Metric for Measuring Combat Effectiveness[J]. Defence Science Journal(S0011-748X), 2014, 64(2): 115-122.
3	Dagdeviren M, Yavuz S, Kilinc N. Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods under Fuzzy Environment[J]. Expert Systems with Application(S0957-4174), 2009, 36(4): 8143-8151.
4	陈国社, 马亚平. 武器装备作战能力量化体系[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36(4): 46-49.
	Chen Guoshe, Ma Yaping. Research on Combat Capability of Combat Weapons and Equipments[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2011, 36(4): 46-49.
5	张强, 雷虎民. 复杂网络理论的防空某系统网络特征[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2011, 36(10): 41-44.
	Zhang Qiang, Lei Humin. Research on Network Properties of Air Defense and Antimissile System Based on Complex Network Theory[J]. Fire Control and Command Control, 2011, 36(10): 41-44.
6	朱刚, 谭贤四, 王红, 等. 武器装备体系复杂网络模型构建算法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2015, 40(4): 115-119.
	Zhu Gang, Tan Xiansi, Wang Hong, et al. Armament System of System Complex Network Model Construction Algorithm[J]. Firepower and Command and Control, 2015, 40(4): 115-119.
7	鲁统亮, 陈文豪, 葛冰峰, 等. 信息支援下的作战体系多层网络建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 520-528.
	Lu Tongliang, Chen Wenhao, Ge Bingfeng, et al. Multi-Layer Network Modeling of Combat System of System under Information Support[J]. System Engineering and Electronic, 2022, 44(2): 520-528.
8	王飞, 司光亚, 荣明, 等. 武器装备体系的异质超网络模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(9): 2052-2060.
	Wang Fei, Si Guangya, Rong Ming, et al. Research on Network-of-Networks Model of Armament System-of-System[J]. System Engineering and Electronic, 2015, 37(9): 2052-2060.
9	张强, 李建华, 沈迪, 等. 复杂网络理论的作战网络动态演化模型[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2015, 47(10): 106-112.
	Zhang Qiang, Li Jianhua, Shen Di, et al. Dynamic Evolution Model of Operational Network Based on Complex Network Theory[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47(10): 106-112.
10	杨圩生, 王钰, 杨洋, 等. 基于作战环的不同节点攻击策略下的作战网络效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
	Yang Weisheng, Wang Yu, Yang Yang, et al. Combat Network Effectiveness Evaluation under Different Node Attack Strategies Based on Operation Loop[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronic, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
11	Jeffrey R C. An Information Age Combat Model[M]. Newport: Alidade Incorporated, 2004.
12	卜先锦. 军事组织协同的建模与分析[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2009.
	Bu Xianjin. Modeling and Analysis of Military Organization Cooperation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2009.
13	Atkinson S R, Moffat J. The Agile Organization: From Informal Networks to Complex Effects and Agility[M]. Washington: CCRP Publications, 2005.

边	权重	作战能力值
(S1, P2)	0.218 5	0.803 7
(S2, P2)	0.203 1	0.816 2
(S3, P3)	0.196 9	0.821 3
(P1, D1)	0.082 3	0.921 0
(P1, D2)	0.076 8	0.926 1
(P1, P4)	0.255 6	0.774 4
(P1, P5)	0.225 0	0.798 6
(P2, P1)	0.245 3	0.782 5

作战环	边数	作战能力
T1-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F2-T1	8	0.179 6
T1-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F3-T1	8	0.161 3
T1-S1-P2-P1-D2-P1-P5-F2-T1	8	0.181 6
T1-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F2-T1	8	0.179 5
T1-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F3-T1	8	0.161 3

作战环	边数	作战能力
T2-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P4-F1-T2	8	0.144 5
T2-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F2-T2	8	0.182 7
T2-S1-P2-P1-D2-P1-P4-F1-T2	8	0.146 2
T2-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P4-F1-T2	8	0.144 5
T2-S1-P2-P1-D1-P1-P5-F2-T2	8	0.182 7
T2-S1-P2-P1-D2-P1-P4-F1-T2	8	0.146 2

打击对象	作战能力
对敌方导弹T1	0.383 8
对敌方导弹T2	0.363 2
对敌方导弹T1和T2	0.377 6

项目	数值
节点冗余成本	0.424 5
连接冗余成本	0.176 0
网络冗余成本	0.300 3
网络收益	0.377 6
网络协同增益	0.264 2