Lidar SLAM Mapping Method Adapted to Environmental Spatial Changes

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0489

Abstract

Songming Jiao, Xin Yao, Hui Ding, Yufei Zhong. Lidar SLAM Mapping Method Adapted to Environmental Spatial Changes[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(8): 1788-1798.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 1

Table 2

References 19

1	王金科, 左星星, 赵祥瑞, 等. 多源融合SLAM的现状与挑战[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2022, 27(2): 368-389.
	Wang Jinke, Zuo Xingxing, Zhao Xiangrui, et al. Review of Multi-source Fusion SLAM: Current Status and Challenges[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2022, 27(2): 368-389.
2	周治国, 曹江微, 邸顺帆. 3D激光雷达SLAM算法综述[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2021, 42(9): 13-27.
	Zhou Zhiguo, Cao Jiangwei, Di Shunfan. Overview of 3D Lidar SLAM Algorithms[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2021, 42(9): 13-27.
3	危双丰, 庞帆, 刘振彬, 等. 基于激光雷达的同时定位与地图构建方法综述[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(2): 327-332.
	Wei Shuangfeng, Pang Fan, Liu Zhenbin, et al. Survey of LiDAR-based SLAM Algorithm[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2020, 37(2): 327-332.
4	杜航原, 郝燕玲, 赵玉新. 基于模糊逻辑的SLAM数据关联方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2011, 33(11): 2468-2473.
	Du Hangyuan, Hao Yanling, Zhao Yuxin. Data Association Approach for SLAM Based on Fuzzy Logic[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(11): 2468-2473.
5	Zhang Ji, Singh S. LOAM: Lidar Odometry and Mapping in Real-time[C]//RSS 2014-Robotics: Science and Systems Conference. Berkeley USA: IJRR, 2014: 109-111.
6	Shan Tixiao, Englot B. LeGO-LOAM: Lightweight and Ground-optimized Lidar Odometry and Mapping on Variable Terrain[C]//2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2018: 4758-4765.
7	Ye Haoyang, Chen Yuying, Liu Ming. Tightly Coupled 3D Lidar Inertial Odometry and Mapping[C]//2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 3144-3150.
8	林晨浩, 彭育辉. 一种融合视觉与IMU的车载激光雷达建图与定位方法[J]. 福州大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(1): 82-88.
	Lin Chenhao, Peng Yuhui. A Method of Map Construction and Location Using Lidar and Combining Vision and IMU Information[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University(Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(1): 82-88.
9	Wisth D, Camurri M, Das S, et al. Unified Multi-modal Landmark Tracking for Tightly Coupled Lidar-visual-inertial Odometry[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, 6(2): 1004-1011.
10	Wang Han, Wang Chen, Chen Chunlin, et al. F-LOAM: Fast LiDAR Odometry and Mapping[C]//2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2021: 4390-4396.
11	Shan Tixiao, Englot B, Meyers D, et al. LIO-SAM: Tightly-coupled Lidar Inertial Odometry via Smoothing and Mapping[C]//2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2020: 5135-5142.
12	Chen Xieyuani, Milioto A, Palazzolo E, et al. SuMa++: Efficient LiDAR-based Semantic SLAM[C]//2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 4530-4537.
13	李振拯, 丁恩杰, 王戈琛. 基于LiDAR-IMU松耦合的同时定位与建图方法[J]. 传感器与微系统, 2022, 41(4): 36-39, 43.
	Li Zhenzheng, Ding Enjie, Wang Gechen. SLAM Method Based on LiDAR-IMU Loose Coupling[J]. Transducer and Microsystem Technologies, 2022, 41(4): 36-39, 43.
14	李国竣, 徐延海, 段杰文, 等. 利用局部自适应阈值方法提取ORB-SLAM特征点[J]. 测绘通报, 2021(9): 32-36, 48.
	Li Guojun, Xu Yanhai, Duan Jiewen, et al. ORB-SLAM Method Based on Local Adaptive Threshold Extraction Feature Points[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2021(9): 32-36, 48.
15	于雅楠, 史敦煌, 华春杰. 特征点法SLAM视觉里程计自适应优化算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(1): 104-112.
	Yu Yanan, Shi Dunhuang, Hua Chunjie. Adaptive Optimization in Feature-based SLAM Visual Odometry[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(1): 104-112.
16	Forster C, Carlone L, Dellaert F, et al. On-manifold Preintegration for Real-time Visual-inertial Odometry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2017, 33(1): 1-21.
17	Guo Jiadong, Borges P V K, Park C, et al. Local Descriptor for Robust Place Recognition Using LiDAR Intensity[J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2019, 4(2): 1470-1477.
18	Hsiao M, Kaess M. MH-iSAM2: Multi-hypothesis iSAM Using Bayes Tree and Hypo-tree[C]//2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1274-1280.
19	Hsiao M, Kaess M. MH-iSAM2: Multi-hypothesis iSAM Using Bayes Tree and Hypo-tree[C]//2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1274-1280.

实验	算法	起点坐标	终点坐标	回环误差/m	路程/m	回环误差/%
1	lio-sam	(-3.93×10^-5, -2.22×10⁵, 5.29×10^-6)	(-0.063 2, 0.176 0, 0.413 0)	0.454 0	213.2	0.20
	Adp-lio-sam	(3.98×10^-5, 4.93×10^-5, 5.06×10^-6)	(-0.022 1, -0.034 6, 0.008 5)	0.041 9	213.5	0.02
	aloam	(0, 0, 0)	(37.910, 5.181, 40.979)	fail	208.3	fail
	lego_loam	(-0.014, -0.003, -0.015)	(2.693, 10.369, 6.659)	fail	203.3	fail
2	lio-sam	(0, 0, 0)	(0.259, -0.030, 1.526)	fail	194.7	fail
	Adp-lio-sam	(0, 0, 0)	(-0.067 6, -0.028 7, 1.147 0)	1.149 0	207.5	0.6
	aloam	(0, 0, 0)	(-6.630, 28.938, 15.593)	fail	196.9	fail
	lego_loam	(0.022 2, -0.008 2, 0.001 8)	(0.530 0, 0.025 5, 0.964 0)	1.202 0	192.8	0.60
3	lio-sam	(0, 0, 0)	(-0.350, 0.376, 0.111)	fail	158.8	fail
	Adp-lio-sam	(0, 0, 0)	(-0.390, 0.366, 0.135)	0.552 0	166.6	0.30
	aloam	(0, 0, 0)	(-9.324, 7.135, 1.075)	fail	165.4	fail
	lego_loam	(-0.029, -0.001, -0.005)	(35.901, 29.295, -17.330)	fail	155.7	fail

实验	算法	实际误差	平均误差
1	lio-sam	0.250	0.250
	Adp-lio-sam	0.130	0.130
	aloam	fail	fail
	lego_loam	fail	fail
2	lio-sam	fail	fail
	Adp-lio-sam	2.350	2.350
	aloam	fail	fail
	lego_loam	3.125	3.128
3	lio-sam	fail	fail
	Adp-lio-sam	1.271	1.271
	aloam	fail	fail
	lego_loam	fail	fail

[1]	Liu Wanjun, Cheng Yuqian, Qu Haicheng. Image Self-enhancement De-hazing Algorithm Combined with Generative Adversarial Network [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(5): 1093-1106.
[2]	Bingan Yuan, Mingen Zhong, Jingxin Ni. Research on Visual Inspection Algorithm of Crimping Appearance Defects for Wiring Harness Terminals [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(5): 1152-1159.
[3]	Wei Zhou, Yuxiang Liu, Guangping Liao, Xin Ma. Siamese Object Tracking Algorithm Combined with the Intersection over Union Loss [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(09): 1956-1967.
[4]	Feng Xiao, Zhang Hui, Zhou Rui, Qiao Lu, Wei Dong, Li Dandan, Zhang Yuyao, Zheng Guoqing. Variety Recognition Based on Deep Learning and Double-Sided Characteristics of Maize Kernel [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(12): 2983-2991.
[5]	Zhang Qing, Zou Xiangjun, Lin Guichao, Sun Yanhui. Image Feature Extraction and Online Grading Method for Weight and Shape of Strawberry [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(1): 7-9.
[6]	Yan Dahu, Xu Yangjie. Indoor Positioning Algorithm Based on ZigBee and Improved Radio Frequency Identification [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(11): 4484-4491.

Lidar SLAM Mapping Method Adapted to Environmental Spatial Changes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 19

Related Articles 6

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments