基于改进鸽群层级的无人机集群视觉巡检模型

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-1121

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决无人机在执行输电线路巡检工作过程中易受环境干扰，以及传统单人单机工作模式巡检效率低下等问题，提出基于改进鸽群层级算法的无人机集群视觉巡检模型。根据载机车辆与待检塔位的GPS坐标计算出启航无人机的初始地标点，并规划运动轨迹；根据当前在巡无人机结束巡检点的位置更新待起飞无人机初始地标，实现启航与在巡无人机巡检地标的动态衔接，完成对地图指南针算子的改进；利用改进的自适应模板匹配算法优化在巡无人机的Adaboost视觉识别系统，通过自适应比对线路间距实现无人机与输电线路间相对位置的自主调整，在动态调节姿态的基础上提高检测质量。实验结果表明：相比于传统鸽群方法，该模型在巡检效率方面的在空巡检时间提高了12%、巡检距离提高了27.5%，风吹、地形变化的情况下巡线质量相比于常规识别模型分别提高了21%和15%。

关键词: 无人机输电线路巡检, 改进鸽群层级算法, 改进Adaboost, 视觉识别

Abstract:

Aim at UAV being vulnerable to the environmental interference and the low efficiency of the traditional single-person-UAV model in the transmission line inspection, a visual inspection model for the power line by UAV is proposed based on the improved pigeon flock hierarchy. The initial landmark point of the UAV is generated based on GPS coordinates of the aircraft-carrying vehicle and the tower to be inspected, and the movement trajectory is planned. The return point of the UAV is used to update the initial landmark of onward UAV, which realizes the dynamic handover between the work-exchanging UAV, and the landmark point is optimized. An advanced adaptive template matching algorithm is adopted to improve the adaboost visual recognition of the patrol UAV, which can autonomously adjust the relative position between UAV and the line by adaptively comparing the line spacing. Experimental results show that the proposed model improves the inspection time in the air by 12% and the distance by 27.5% in terms of inspection efficiency, and the quality of the inspection under the conditions of wind blows and terrain changes increase by 21% and 15% respectively.

Key words: UAV transmission line inspection, improved pigeon hierarchy algorithm, improved Adaboost, visual recognition

中图分类号:

TP391.9

陈麒,崔昊杨 . 基于改进鸽群层级的无人机集群视觉巡检模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(6): 1275-1285.

Qi Chen,Haoyang Cui . Visual inspection model of UAV cluster based on improved pigeon flock hierarchy[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(6): 1275-1285.

图/表 15

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

表1

参考文献 20

1	顾超越, 李喆, 史晋涛, 等. 基于改进Faster-RCNN的无人机巡检架空线路销钉缺陷检测[J]. 高电压技术, 2020, 46(9): 3089-3096.
	Gu Chaoyue, Li Zhe, Shi Jintao, et al. Detection for Pin Defects of Overhead Lines by UAV Patrol Image Based on Improved Faster-RCNN[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2020, 46(9): 3089-3096.
2	梁文勇, 吴大伟, 谷山强, 等. 输电线路多旋翼无人机精细化自主巡检航迹优化方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2020, 46(9): 3054-3061.
	Liang Wenyong, Wu Dawei, Gu Shanqiang, et al. Optimization Method for Fine Autonomous Inspection Route of Transmission Lines by Multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2020, 46(9): 3054-3061.
3	Duan H B, Qiao P X. Pigeon-Inspired Optimization: A New Swarm Intelligence Optimizer for Air Robot Path Planning[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics(S1756-378X), 2014, 7(1): 24-37.
4	Zhang B, Duan H B. Three-Dimensional Path Planning for Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicle Based on Predator-Prey Pigeon-Inspired Optimization in Dynamic Environment[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics(S1545-5963), 2017, 14(1): 97-107.
5	戴佳佳, 范丽鹏, 庞明勇. 特征驱动的三维网格模型自适应重采样算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(5): 853-860.
	Dai Jiajia, Fan Lipeng, Pang Mingyong. Adaptively Resampling 3D Mesh Models Based on Editable Features[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(5): 853-860.
6	张衡, 程浩忠, 柳璐, 等. 基于点估计法随机潮流的输电网多阶段规划研究[J]. 电网技术, 2018, 42(10): 3204-3211.
	Zhang Heng, Cheng Haozhong, Liu Lu, et al. Research on Multistage Transmission Network Expansion Planning Using Point Estimation Method Based on Stochastic Power Flow[J]. Power System Technology, 2018, 42(10): 3204-3211.
7	Qi S, Qing L Z, Shu X W, et al. Dynamic Path Planning for Unmanned Vehicles Based on Fuzzy Logic and Improved Ant Colony Optimization[J]. IEEE Access(S2169-3536), 2020, 8: 62107-62115.
8	Dash Meera, Panigrahi Trilochan, Sharma Renu. Distributed Parameter Estimation of IIR System Using Diffusion Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm[J]. Journal of King Saud University Engineering Sciences(S1018-3639), 2019, 31(4): 345-354.
9	杨虹, 张雅声, 徐灿. 基于trace特征的ISAR像空间目标识别[J]. 电子学报, 2020, 48(3): 431-441.
	Yang Hong, Zhang Yasheng, Xu Can. Space Target Recognition Based on Trace Feature of ISAR Image[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2020, 48(3): 431-441.
10	Lan R S, Yong J, Ding L G, et al. Automated Flare Prediction Using the AdaBoost Algorithm[J]. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics(S1674-4527), 2012, 12(9): 1191-1196.
11	Dinh V Q, Pham C C, Jeon J W. Robust Adaptive Normalized Cross-Correlation for Stereo Matching Cost Computation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology(S1051-8215), 2017, 27(7): 1421-1434.
12	Feng Y. Mobile Terminal Video Image Fuzzy Feature Extraction Simulation Based on SURF Virtual Reality Technology[J]. IEEE Access(S2169-3536), 2020, 8:156740-156751.
13	毛远宏, 贺占庄, 马钟. 重构迁移学习的红外目标分类[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2020, 49(4): 609-614.
	Mao Yuanhong, He Zhanzhuang, Ma Zhong. Infrared Target Classification with Reconstruction Transfer Learning[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020, 49(4): 609-614.
14	Chen Z, Bai Z J. Classification of Color Images Based on Vgg16 Network Model and Lib-SVM[J]. International Journal of Compu-tational and Engineering(S2414-1895), 2019, 4(2): 32-34.
15	Xing H H, Zi L W, Qiang F, Mobile Robot ADRC With an Automatic Parameter Tuning Mechanism Via Modified Pigeon-Inspired Optimization [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics(S1083-4435), 2019, 24(6): 2616-2626.
16	Zhang F, Wang Y, Ni J, et al. SAR Target Small Sample Recognition Based on CNN Cascaded Features and AdaBoost Rotation Forest[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letter(S1545-598X), 2020, 17(6): 1008-1012.
17	吴鹏, 徐洪玲, 宋文龙. 结合小波金字塔的快速NCC图像匹配算法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2017, 38(5): 791-796.
	Wu Peng, Xu Hongling, Song Wenlong. A Fast NCC Image Matching Algorithm Based on Wavelet Pyramid Search Strategy[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2017, 38(5): 791-796.
18	宿德志, 王玉良, 吴世永, 等. 基于相似三角形的星图识别[J]. 光学精密工程, 2019, 27(11): 2467-2473.
	Su Dezhi, Wang Yuliang, Wu Shiyong, et al. Star Identification Algorithm Based on Similar Triangle Principle[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2019, 27(11): 2467-2473.
19	潘志庚, 刘荣飞, 张明敏. 基于模糊综合评价的疲劳驾驶检测算法研究[J]. 软件学报, 2019, 30(10): 2954-2963.
	Pan Zhigeng, Liu Rongfei, Zhang Mingmin. Research on Fatigue Driving Detection Algorithm Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Journal of Software, 2019, 30(10): 2954-2963.
20	Shahzad M, Maurer M, Fraundorfer F, et al. Buildings Detection in VHR SAR Images Using Fully Convolution Neural Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing(S0196-2892), 2019, 57(2): 1100-1116.

算法	无风/有风
算法	线路巡检距离/km	线路识别率/%
本文	5.6/4.7	100/96
A	5.9/4.8	85/72.4
SURF	6.6/5.4	79/55
SVM	6.2/5.1	96/80
V	4.9/3.9	100/97

[1]	董志明, 胡忠奇, 戴浩然, 高建成. 基于大语言模型的作战仿真想定自动化生成方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1129-1145.
[2]	李校男, 晁涛, 马萍, 杨明, 王玉轩. 基于期望最大化方法的非线性SSM黑箱鲁棒辨识[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1146-1158.
[3]	刘银钢, 马明, 张荣华. 基于大语言模型的兵棋推演动态任务规划[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1187-1204.
[4]	苏泓嘉, 张成, 刘飞. 基于模糊功能依赖网分析的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1224-1238.
[5]	梅华威, 杨鹏慧, 余洋. 计及数据漂移改进PatchTST的超短期光伏功率预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1239-1254.
[6]	李权, 苏鹏, 万海英, 张承玺, 何志坚, 倪艺洋, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于多阶段LHS-EPRCC方法的青霉素发酵过程建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1255-1276.
[7]	周子聪, 曾俊杰, 胡越, 朱正秋, 尹全军. 基于次优示例引导的兵棋推演多智能体强化学习方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1277-1289.
[8]	石敏, 郭诗盛, 王素琴, 李兆歆, 朱登明. 融合物理与几何先验的无抓取标注6-DoF抓取检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1290-1302.
[9]	姜彦吉, 肖星佚, 董浩, 于淼, 黄金山, 刘大千, 费博雯. 融合点线特征的图关系优化3D车道线检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1303-1319.
[10]	张鑫, 张平, 张琛, 刘威, 韩博阳. 非均质土壤条件下挖掘阻力计算模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1320-1332.
[11]	王伟, 刘东, 崔新豪, 李博, 肖依永, 任羿. 复杂项目多级动态挣值管理数字化模型及应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1350-1364.
[12]	彭莉峻, 苏庭琪, 刘沛津, 何林, 周协武, 张闽心. 融合人体关键点的实验室PPE规范穿戴检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1365-1382.
[13]	滕靖, 童文聪, 张中杰, 姚幸, 李君羡. 有轨电车交叉口速度自动引导方法及仿真评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1426-1439.
[14]	蒋圣超, 裴云庆, 翟宏营, 吴国键, 高放. 基于块编码绝热量子牛顿‒拉夫逊法的潮流计算[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1453-1465.
[15]	秦浪, 谢嘉成, 乔晓军, 王学文, 肖智杰. 执行器位姿异常的机器人轨迹规划调整方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1466-1483.