基于改进LDA和自编码器的调制识别算法

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0326

系统仿真学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 494-500.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0326

基于改进LDA和自编码器的调制识别算法

郭业才^1,2, 张浩然¹

1.南京信息工程大学电子与信息工程学院,江苏南京 210044;
2.南京信息工程大学江苏省大气环境与装备技术协同创新中心,江苏南京 210044

收稿日期:2019-07-15 修回日期:2019-09-11 出版日期:2021-02-18 发布日期:2021-02-20
第一作者简介:郭业才(1962-),男,博士,教授,博导,研究方向为通信信号处理、自适应盲均衡技术。E-mail：guo-yecai@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61673222,61371131),江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(13KJA510001),江苏高校品牌专业建设项目(PPZY2015B134)

Modulation Recognition Algorithm Based on Improved LDA and Autoencoders

Guo Yecai^1,2, Zhang Haoran¹

1. School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
2. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center on Atmospheric Environment and Equipment, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2019-07-15 Revised:2019-09-11 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 传统调制识别算法是基于高斯白噪声信道的,在复杂信道条件下识别性能明显下降。针对此问题,提出基于抗混淆线性判别分析A-ALDA (Anti-alias Linear Discriminant Analysis)和堆叠稀疏降噪自编码器SSDAE (Stacked Sparse Denoising Autoencoders)的调制识别算法。该算法中,A-ALDA算法将信号累积量特征重构为新的特征,这些特征具有更优的分离性能;将原始特征与新特征输入SSDAE进行分类,SSDAE具有提取关键信息和抗噪声的能力。结果表明,本文算法的识别准确率高于已有的算法;并且在有限信号长度条件下和相位、频率误差干扰情况下,识别准确率均有提高。

关键词: 复杂信道, 抗混淆线形判别分析, 稀疏降噪自动编码器, 高阶累积量

Abstract: The traditional modulation recognition algorithms are based on the Gaussian white noise channel, which significantly degrade recognition performance in complex channel conditions. Aiming at this problem, a modulation recognition algorithm based on A-ALDA (Anti-alias Linear Discriminant Analysis) and SSDAE (Stacked Sparse Denoising Autoencoders) is proposed. In this algorithm, A-ALDA algorithm reconstructs signal cumulants feature into new features, which has better separability. The combination of original features and new features is input into SSDAE for classification, and SSADE has the ability to extract key information and resist noise. Simulation results show that recognition accuracy of the proposed algorithm is higher than that of the existing algorithms, and recognition accuracy is improved under the condition of limited signal length and phase and frequency offset interference.

Key words: complex channels, anti-alias linear discriminant analysis, sparse denoising autoencoders, high order cumulants

中图分类号:

TP391

郭业才,张浩然 . 基于改进LDA和自编码器的调制识别算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 494-500.

Guo Yecai,Zhang Haoran . Modulation Recognition Algorithm Based on Improved LDA and Autoencoders[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(2): 494-500.

参考文献

[1] Zhu Z, Nandi A K.Automatic Modulation Classification: Principles, Algorithms and Applications[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
[2] Abdelmutalab A, Assaleh K, El-Tarhuni M.Automatic Modulation Classification based on High Order Cumulants and Hierarchical Polynomial Classifiers[J]. Physical Communication (S1874-4907), 2016, 21(12): 10-18.
[3] Zhu X, Lin Y, Dou Z.Automatic Recognition of Communication Signal Modulation based on Neural Network[C]// 2016 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT). Harbin: IEEE, 2016: 223-226.
[4] Lü J, Zhang L, Teng X.A Modulation Classification based on SVM[C]// 2016 15^th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks(ICOCN), Hangzhou: IEEE, 2016: 1-3.
[5] Zhu Z, Aslam M W, Nandi A K.Genetic Algorithm Optimized Distribution Sampling Test for M-QAM Modulation Classification[J]. Signal Processing (S1687-4811), 2014, 94: 264-277.
[6] Mughal M O, Kim S.Signal Classification and Jamming Detection in Wide-band Radios Using Naïve Bayes Classifier[J]. IEEE Communications Letters (S1089-7798), 2018, 22(7): 1398-1401.
[7] Kim B, Kim J, Chae H, et al.Deep Neural Network-based Automatic Modulation Classification Technique[C]// Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2016 International Conference. Jeju: IEEE, 2016: 579-582.
[8] Li J, Qi L, Lin Y.Research on Modulation Identification of Digital Signals based on Deep Learning[C]// Electronic Information and Communication Technology (ICEICT), IEEE International Conference. Harbin: IEEE, 2016: 402-405.
[9] Ali A, Yangyu F.Automatic Modulation Classification Using Deep Learning based on Sparse Autoencoders with Nonnegativity Constraints[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters (S1070-9908), 2017, 24(11): 1626-1630.
[10] Hussain A, Sohail M F, Alam S, et al.Classification of M-QAM and M-PSK Signals Using Genetic Programming (GP)[J]. Neural Computing and Applications (S0941-0643), 2018, 3433(1): 1-9.
[11] Ali A, Yangyu F.Automatic Modulation Classification Using Principle Composition Analysis based Features Selection[C]. Computing Conference. London: IEEE, 2017: 294-296.
[12] Wen J, Fang X, Cui J, et al.Robust Sparse Linear Discriminant Analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (S1051-8215), 2018, 29(2): 390-403.
[13] Aranganayagi S, Thangavel K.Clustering Categorical Data Using Silhouette Coefficient as a Relocating Measure[C]// Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications, 2007. International Conference. Sivakasi: IEEE, 2007, 2: 13-17.
[14] Atlas R S, Overall J E.Comparative Evaluation of Two Superior Stopping Rules for Hierarchical Cluster Analysis[J]. Psychometrika (S0033-3123), 1994, 59(4): 581-591.

[1]	董志明, 胡忠奇, 戴浩然, 高建成. 基于大语言模型的作战仿真想定自动化生成方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1129-1145.
[2]	李校男, 晁涛, 马萍, 杨明, 王玉轩. 基于期望最大化方法的非线性SSM黑箱鲁棒辨识[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1146-1158.
[3]	刘银钢, 马明, 张荣华. 基于大语言模型的兵棋推演动态任务规划[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1187-1204.
[4]	苏泓嘉, 张成, 刘飞. 基于模糊功能依赖网分析的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1224-1238.
[5]	梅华威, 杨鹏慧, 余洋. 计及数据漂移改进PatchTST的超短期光伏功率预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1239-1254.
[6]	李权, 苏鹏, 万海英, 张承玺, 何志坚, 倪艺洋, 赵忠盖, 刘飞. 基于多阶段LHS-EPRCC方法的青霉素发酵过程建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1255-1276.
[7]	周子聪, 曾俊杰, 胡越, 朱正秋, 尹全军. 基于次优示例引导的兵棋推演多智能体强化学习方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1277-1289.
[8]	石敏, 郭诗盛, 王素琴, 李兆歆, 朱登明. 融合物理与几何先验的无抓取标注6-DoF抓取检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1290-1302.
[9]	姜彦吉, 肖星佚, 董浩, 于淼, 黄金山, 刘大千, 费博雯. 融合点线特征的图关系优化3D车道线检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1303-1319.
[10]	张鑫, 张平, 张琛, 刘威, 韩博阳. 非均质土壤条件下挖掘阻力计算模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1320-1332.
[11]	陶冶, 汤锦辉, 周臣, 王冲. 基于图像表征与特征协同感知的航迹补全方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1333-1349.
[12]	王伟, 刘东, 崔新豪, 李博, 肖依永, 任羿. 复杂项目多级动态挣值管理数字化模型及应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1350-1364.
[13]	彭莉峻, 苏庭琪, 刘沛津, 何林, 周协武, 张闽心. 融合人体关键点的实验室PPE规范穿戴检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1365-1382.
[14]	滕靖, 童文聪, 张中杰, 姚幸, 李君羡. 有轨电车交叉口速度自动引导方法及仿真评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1426-1439.
[15]	范双豪, 何芳, 赵建伟, 胡豪杰, 朱丰超, 李向阳. 基于窗口重构协同表示的高光谱异常检测算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(5): 1440-1452.

基于改进LDA和自编码器的调制识别算法

Modulation Recognition Algorithm Based on Improved LDA and Autoencoders

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价