Dynamic Risk Assessment of VOCs Cross Regional Flow Based on Petri Nets

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0938

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the interaction between regions due to the cross regional flow of VOCs(volatile organic compounds) under polluted weather, a dynamic risk assessment method of cross regional flow of VOCs is proposed by using Petri net modeling method. The migration paths of VOCs between multiple potential pollution sources and contaminated areas are determined by HYSPLIT model, and the relationship between each migration path is described by Petri net; the dynamic risk assessment method is defined, and the calculation of dynamic risk is integrated into the operation of functional Petri net; through case analysis, the dynamic risk assessment results of surrounding areas for Xi'an under polluted weather and the potential risk index of each pollution path are obtained. The research shows that under heavy pollution weather, the influence degree of each pollution source city on Xi'an is Baoji > Hanzhong > Xining > Lanzhou from high to low. This method provides a basis for evaluating the risk degree of potential pollution sources in the cross regional flow of VOCs.

Key words: volatile organic compounds(VOCs), risk assessment, cross regional, functional Petri net, contribution rate

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Guangqiu Huang, He Wang. Dynamic Risk Assessment of VOCs Cross Regional Flow Based on Petri Nets[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(1): 57-68.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 1

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 12

1	陆秋琴, 李玮, 黄光球. 陕西省VOCs人为源高分辨率排放清单及时空分布[J]. 福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 34(4): 32-43.
	Lu Qiuqin, Li Wei, Huang Guangqiu. High Resolution Emission Inventory and Temporal and Spatial Distribution of VOCs from Anthropogenic Sources in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 34(4): 32-43.
2	王琴, 刘保献, 张大伟, 等. 北京市大气VOCs的时空分布特征及化学反应活性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(10): 3636-3646.
	Wang Qin, Liu Baoxian, Zhang Dawei, et al. Temporal and Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Chemical Reaction Activity of Atmospheric VOCs in Beijing[J]. China Environmental Science, 2017, 37(10): 3636-3646.
3	陈雨, 万宝春, 倪爽英, 等. 京津冀VOCs排放环境政策比较分析[J]. 绿色科技, 2018(4): 130-133, 135.
	Chen Yu, Wan Baochun, Ni Shuangying, et al. Comparative Analysis of VOCs Emission Environmental Policies in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei[J]. Green Technology, 2018(4): 130-133, 135.
4	Zhang Xinmin, Xue Zhigang, Li Hong, et al. Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds Pollution in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences (S1001-0742), 2017, 55(5): 69-75.
5	程云轩, 高秋生, 李捷, 等. 淮河流域南四湖可挥发性有机物污染特征及风险评价[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(4): 1820-1829.
	Cheng Yunxuan, Gao Qiusheng, Li Jie, et al. Pollution Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds in Nansi Lake of Huaihe River Basin[J]. Environmental Science, 2021, 42 (4): 1820-1829.
6	周洁, 何雪芹, 王捷. 化学合成类制药行业工艺废气VOCs排放特征与危害评估分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(5): 166-169.
	Zhou Jie, He Xueqin, Wang Jie. VOCs Emission Characteristics and Hazard Assessment Analysis of Process Waste Gas in Chemical Synthesis Pharmaceutical Industry[J]. Comprehensive Utilization of Resources in China, 2020, 38(5): 166-169.
7	张坤锋, 赵少延, 孙兴滨, 等. 海拉尔河及傍河地下水饮用水源中挥发性有机物的污染特征与风险[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5): 74-82.
	Zhang Kunfeng, Zhao Shaoyan, Sun Xingbin, et al. Pollution Characteristics and Risks of Volatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water Sources of Groundwater in Hailar River and Adjacent Rivers[J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021,49 (5): 74-82.
8	齐一谨, 倪经纬, 赵东旭, 等. 郑州市高新区大气VOCs源解析及风险评估[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(增2): 201-208.
	Qi Yijin, Ni Jingwei, Zhao Dongxu, et al. Source Analysis and Risk Assessment of Atmospheric VOCs in Zhengzhou High Tech Zone[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2020, 43(S2): 201-208.
9	程曦, 张利慧, 李红, 等. 首届"一带一路"会议期间北京市典型城区空气中VOCs的污染特征及健康风险评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(9): 2839-2851.
	Cheng Xi, Zhang Lihui, Li Hong, et al. One Belt, One Road Conference, Pollution Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment of VOCs in Typical Urban Area of Beijing During[J]. Journal of Environmental Science, 2019, 39(9): 2839-2851.
10	黄光球, 叶文娟, 陆秋琴. 基于随机Petri网的关联区域内VOCs级联危害评价[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(7): 1882-1896.
	Huang Guangqiu, Ye Wenjuan, Lu qiuqin. Cascading Hazard Assessment of VOCs in Associated Areas Based on Stochastic Petri Nets[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2021, 41(7): 1882-1896.
11	李陵, 张丹, 胡伟, 等. 西南地区大型综合工业区和周边区域大气VOCs污染特征及健康风险评估[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(1): 102-112.
	Li Ling, Zhang Dan, Hu Wei, et al. Characteristics of Atmospheric VOCs Pollution and Health Risk Assessment in Large Comprehensive Industrial Areas and Surrounding Areas in Southwest China[J]. Environmental Science, 2022, 43(1): 102-112.
12	桑博, 魏凤霞. 济南市区大气中VOCs的浓度、来源及健康风险评价[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2019, 36(2): 169-177.
	Sang Bo, Wei Fengxia. Concentration, Source and Health Risk Assessment of VOCs in the Atmosphere of Jinan City[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2019, 36(2): 169-177.

VOCs潜在风险系数	单点源风险	潜在风险指数（RI)	总的潜在风险程度
<0.5	轻微	<0.5	轻微
0.5~0.75	中	0.5~1.5	中等
0.75~1	较强	1.5~2.5	强
1~1.5	强	>2.5	极强
>1.5	极强

潜在污染源	路径编号	路径贡献率/%	库所编号	坐标	库所位置
兰州	4	16	P₆	36.87N，103.34E	永登县
			P₈	37.69N，103.09E	景泰县
			P₉	38.08N，108.82E	古浪县黄花滩镇
	3	36	P₇	36.82N，103.58E	兰州新区上川镇
			P₁₁	37.43N，104.08E	景泰县草窝滩镇
			P₁₂	37.54N，104.19E	景泰县温都尔勒图镇
			P₁₃	38.02N，104.70E	中卫市
西宁	3	9	P₈	37.69N，103.09E	景泰县
			P₁₀	37.64N，103.67E	武威市
			P₁₂	37.54N，104.19E	景泰县温都尔勒图镇
			P₁₄	37.12N，105.64E	同心县喊叫水乡
			P₁₅	36.94N，106.09E	同心县王团镇
			P₂₄	36.49N，107.15E	环县
			P₂₅	36.67N，106.75E	小南沟乡
	4	11	P₆	36.87N，103.34E	永登县
	4	11	P₇	36.82N，103.58E	兰州新区上川镇
汉中	2	18	P₁₇	33.98N，106.63E	凤县
			P₁₈	35.48N，106.60E	平凉市
			P₂₀	36.26N，106.67E	固原市王洼镇
			P₂₁	35.87N，106.63E	彭阳县
			P₂₅	36.67N，106.75E	小南沟乡
	3	14	P₂₆	34.72N，106.98E	千阳县水沟镇
			P₂₇	34.81N，107.08E	千阳县张家塬镇
			P₂₈	35.04N，107.74E	灵台县
			P₂₉	34.94N，108.28E	旬邑县龙高镇
宝鸡	1	14	P₁₅	36.94N，106.09E	同心县王团镇
			P₁₆	36.64N，106.20E	同心县七营镇
			P₁₈	35.48N，106.60E	平凉市
			P₁₉	36.02N，106.40E	固原市
			P₂₆	34.72N，106.98E	千阳县水沟镇
	5	28	P₂₂	35.59N，107.02E	镇原县
			P₂₃	35.94N，107.04E	庙渠镇
			P₂₄	36.49N，107.15E	环县
			P₂₇	34.81N，107.08E	千阳县张家塬镇

对象库所	浓度实测值/(μg/m³）	路径贡献率/%	污染系数E	风险等级	潜在风险指数RI	综合污染指数θ
P₄	115	16	0.297	轻微	0.365	0.22
P₆	10.427		0.027
P₇	13.417		0.035
P₈	2.3		0.006
P₉	0.153	36	0.001	轻微	0.1	0.035
P₁₁	7.283		0.042
P₁₂	7.053		0.041
P₁₃	2.683		0.016
P₅	189	11	0.347	轻微	0.402	0.263
P₆	15.419		0.028
P₇	14.726		0.027
P₈	12.687	9	0.019	轻微	0.08	0.016
P₁₀	11.481		0.017
P₁₂	10.064		0.015
P₁₄	6.946		0.010
P₁₅	5.812		0.006
P₂₅	4.820		0.007
P₂₄	3.898		0.006
P₂	125	14	0.407	中等	0.52	0.294
P₁₇	10.865		0.035
P₂₆	8.24		0.027
P₂₇	7.802		0.025
P₂₈	4.885		0.016
P₂₉	3.063		0.010
P₁₈	8.343	18	0.345	轻微	0.409	0.254
P₂₀	6.938		0.029
P₂₁	5.343		0.022
P₂₅	3.094		0.013
P₃	228	28	1.030	强	1.819	0.772
P₂₇	57.456		0.259
P₂₂	44.954		0.203
P₂₃	39.9		0.180
P₂₄	32.452		0.147
P₂₆	28.728	14	0.065	轻微	0.221	0.056
P₁₈	22.078		0.050
P₁₉	18.62		0.042
P₁₆	15.162		0.034
P₁₅	13.3		0.030
P₁	331	17	1.705	极强	2.739	1.237
P₂₉	46.892		0.242
P₂₃	37.279		0.192
P₂₀	35.169		0.181
P₁₆	32.355		0.167
P₁₄	28.369		0.146
P₁₃	20.632		0.106
P₂₈	53.457	13	0.211	中等	1.285	0.198
P₂₂	51.346		0.202
P₂₁	49.471		0.195
P₁₉	49.002		0.193
P₁₁	42.203		0.166
P₁₀	41.265		0.163
P₉	39.389		0.155

[1]	Guangqiu Huang, Tiantian Wu. Cause Analysis of VOCs Hazards in Related Areas Based on Object Function Petri Net [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(3): 470-481.
[2]	Zejian Ding, Songtao Sun, Zhiwen He, Fei Liu. Contribution Rate Calculation Method to System-of-Systems Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number ANP [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(11): 2386-2395.
[3]	Tang Hanwen, Zhang Tao, Li Yumei, Li Lei, Zhang Jinghua, Hu Dongliang. Research on Stick-slip Vibration Level Estimation of Near-bit Based on Optimized XGBoost [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(11): 2704-2710.
[4]	Li haibin, Wang jialiang, Li haiyan. Uncertainty Quantitative Analysis in Risk Assessment of Returning to School in the Post-COVID-19 Era [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(1): 13-23.
[5]	Yin Xiaojing, Hu Xiaofeng, Rong Ming, Liu Haiyang, Yang Yongli. Review of Evaluation Methods of Contribution Rate to System of Systems [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(6): 1027-1038.
[6]	Liu Shuoyu, Dai Yueming. Noise Clipping Algorithm Based on Relative Contribution Rate [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(12): 2721-2730.
[7]	Guo Shengming, He Xiaoyuan, Wu Lin, Hu Xiaofeng. Situation Assessment Approach for Air Defense Operation System Based on Force-Sparsed Stacked-Auto Encoding Neural Networks [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(3): 772-785.
[8]	Xie Cui, Xun Jinjin, Zhou Xiaowei, Dong Junyu. Visual Tsunami Simulation and Disaster Risk Assessment [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28(10): 2567-2573.