Operational Effectiveness Analysis Method Based on Spherical Fibonacci Lattice

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-0753

Abstract

Abstract:

An operational effectiveness modeling and computing method based on spherical Fibonacci lattice is proposed to address the low simulation accuracy and computational efficiency of large-scale sampling for traditional latitude and longitude grids. The formal description of operational effectiveness in command information systems and the generation method of spherical Fibonacci grid points are provided.A command information systems capability analysis framework is constructed, which focuses on ensuring the continuous mission support and uses the responsibility area of combat tasks as a reference. Through a top-down system design approach, a layered and decoupled combat effectiveness computing framework is proposed which studies the task assurance satisfaction based on the status data of various weapon resources within the system and the target task requirements. With the radar network's detection and perception capability as an example, through visual analysis by using heat maps,the method is validated to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Key words: command information systems, operational effectiveness calculation, Fibonacci lattice, evaluation method

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Guo Weiran, Zhou Jiahao, Huang Xiang, Zhao Xin. Operational Effectiveness Analysis Method Based on Spherical Fibonacci Lattice[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(10): 2435-2443.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References 22

1	臧垒, 蒋晓原, 王钰, 等. C⁴ISR系统作战效能评估指标体系研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(3): 574-577, 611.
	Zang Lei, Jiang Xiaoyuan, Wang Yu, et al. Research on Metrics of Measure of Force Effectiveness for C⁴ISR System[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(3): 574-577, 611.
2	张兆晨, 毛少杰, 闫晶晶, 等. 面向软件定义的C⁴ISR系统资源建模方法研究[J]. 现代防御技术, 2024, 52(1): 65-73.
	Zhang Zhaochen, Mao Shaojie, Yan Jingjing, et al. Research on Resource Modeling Method of C⁴ISR System for Software Definition[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2024, 52(1): 65-73.
3	张国春, 胡晓峰. 体系对抗仿真中体系效能分析初探[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2003, 15(12): 1698-1701.
	Zhang Guochun, Hu Xiaofeng. The Initial Study of SoS Effectiveness Analysis in SoS Combat Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2003, 15(12): 1698-1701.
4	姜伟杰, 刘勇, 权冀川, 等. 指挥信息系统效能评估研究进展[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(12): 1-5, 13.
	Jiang Weijie, Liu Yong, Quan Jichuan, et al. Research Progress for the Effectiveness Evaluation of Command Information System[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(12): 1-5, 13.
5	Stanton N A, Walker G, Jenkins D, et al. Models of Command and Control[C]//Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007: 600-608.
6	施云聪, 程建, 钟慧. 基于ANP和群决策的指挥信息系统作战效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2022, 47(9): 112-119.
	Shi Yuncong, Cheng Jian, Zhong Hui. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Command Information System Based on ANP and Group Decision Making[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2022, 47(9): 112-119.
7	陆梦驰. 基于SD的指挥信息系统作战效能评估模型[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(1): 128-131.
	Lu Mengchi. Model of Operational Effectiveness Evaluation for Command Information System Based on System Dynamics[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43(1): 128-131.
8	Ceranowicz A. Modular Semi-automated Forces[C]//Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway: IEEE, 1994: 755-761.
9	Campbell and G C. E.. McCulley, Terrain reasoning challenges in the CCTT dynamic environment[C]//Fifth Annual Conference on AI, and Planning in High Autonomy Systems, Gainesville, FL, USA, 1994, pp. 55-61
10	Tang Tang, Wang Yue, Jia Lijuan, et al. Close-in Weapon System Planning Based on Multi-living Agent Theory[J]. Defence Technology, 2022, 18(7): 1219-1231.
11	王轩. 基于赋色Petri网的反辐射导弹对雷达毁伤效率评估建模[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2023, 48(1): 176-180, 186.
	Wang Xuan. Radar Damage Efficiency Evaluation Modelling Based on Anti-radiation Missiles of the Colored Petri Network-based[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2023, 48(1): 176-180, 186.
12	Sun Qin, Li Hongxu, Wang Yuzhi, et al. Multi-swarm-based Cooperative Reconfiguration Model for Resilient Unmanned Weapon System-of-systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 222: 108426.
13	Bi Wenhao, Gao Fei, Zhang An. A Novel Weapon System Effectiveness Assessment Method Based on the Interval-valued Evidential Reasoning Algorithm and the Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 53480-53490.
14	李小娟, 马兴民. 基于混沌遗传-支持向量机的空地攻击型无人机作战效能评估[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2023, 53(2): 152-158.
	Li Xiaojuan, Ma Xingmin. Operational Effectiveness Evaluation of Electronic Warfare UAV Based on Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2023, 53(2): 152-158.
15	Snyder J P, Voxland P M. An Album of Map Projections[M]. Denver: U.S. Geological Survey, 1989.
16	Williams R T. Lambert and Mercator Map Projections in Geology and Geophysics[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 1995, 21(3): 353-364.
17	闫瑾, 杨绚, 李妮, 等. 地图投影变形球面大圆弧的度量指标[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(6): 711-723.
	Yan Jin, Yang Xuan, Li Ni, et al. Spherical Great Circle Arcs Based Indicators for Evaluating Distortions of Map Projections[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2020, 49(6): 711-723.
18	Saff E B, Kuijlaars A B J. Distributing Many Points on a Sphere[J]. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 1997, 19(1): 5-11.
19	Swinbank R, James Purser R. Fibonacci Grids: A Novel Approach to Global Modelling[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2006, 132(619): 1769-1793.
20	L Van Trees Harry, Bell Kristine L, Tian Zhi. Detection Estimation and Modulation Theory, Part I: Detection, Estimation, and Filtering Theory[M]. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2013.
21	Richards M A, Scheer J A, Holm W A. Principles of Modern Radar: Basic Principles[M]. London: IET, 2010.
22	Melvin W L, Scheer J A. Principles of Modern Radar: Volume 3: Radar Applications[M]. London: IET, 2013.

[1]	Haoxiang Li, Chunyi Chen, Xiaojuan Hu, Yunbiao Liu, Qiwei Xing. Virtual Scene Stereoscopic Panorama Generation and Viewport Rendering Algorithm [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(4): 777-787.
[2]	Cai Shuyu, Shi Lizhong. Airframe Damage Region Division Evaluation Method Based on Boundary Grid Gradient [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(7): 2729-2735.
[3]	Zeng Yanyang, Feng Zhenjing. 3D Visual Effects Assessment Based on Comprehensive Weight [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(6): 2258-2262.
[4]	Sun Xiangyu, Chao Tao, Wang Songyan, Ma Ping. Synthetic EvaluationMethod Based on Grey Evaluation Method and Analytic Hierarchy Model Theory [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(2): 699-706.
[5]	Xue Xiao, Gui Bin, Wang Yongmao. Evaluation Method Research for Coal Mine Services Policy [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(4): 798-807.
[6]	Cui Jianling, Tian Wen, Dai Huanyao, Zhou Bo, Qiao Huidong. Research on New Evaluation Method Based on Extreme Learning Machine [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28(1): 44-50.
[7]	Zeng Yanyang, Jia Panpan. Evaluation Method of Dimensional Visual Effects Based on Improved Grey Clustering [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(10): 2497-2501.