Research on the Conceptual Modeling of COA for Analysis of Wargaming

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812009

Abstract

Abstract: On the background of the Campaign COA analysis with simulation system wargaming, aiming at the information sharing problem in the course of wargaming, the composition and difference of the domestic and foreign COA are deeply analyzed, and the development trend of the COA modeling methods are also analyzed. The COA models are divided into the conceptual models and the solution models for the first time, and the limitation of the current COA conceptual models is analyzed with this viewpoint. For the characteristics of across the campaign level and tactical level during the process of the COA wargaming, utilizing the entity-property-relationship method, the conceptual model with the task-instruction core is designed for the COA, and the description ability of the conceptual model in different levels is verified by the action of mastering the air domination.

Key words: COA, conceptual model, solution model, JC3IEDM

CLC Number:

E919

Liu Zhaopeng, Liu Shaojun, Si Guangya, Zhou Wen. Research on the Conceptual Modeling of COA for Analysis of Wargaming[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(12): 4563-4573.

References

[1] Joint Publication5-0 Joint Planning[EB/OL] [2017- 6-16]. http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/ jp5_0. pdf.
[2] 宋有法, 洪耀斌. 一体化联合作战司令部工作[M]. 北京: 军事科学出版社. 2005: 165.
Song Youfa, Hong Yaobin.Integrated Joint Operation Command Work[M]. Beijing: Military Science Academy Press. 2005: 165.
[3] Multilateral Interoperability Programme.Overview of the Jonit C3 intormation exchange data model [EB/OL].[2015-05-03].https://mipsite.lsec.dnd.ca/Public%20Document%20Libr-ary/04-baseline_3.1/Interface-Specification/JC3IEDM/JC3IEDM-Overview-3.1.4.pdf.
[4] RTO T G.Coalition battle management language(C-BML) study final report[R]. Technical Report SISO-REF-016-2006-V1.0, SISO, 2006.
[5] Gil Y, Blythe J.PLANET: A shareable and reusable ontology for representing plan[C]// Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Representational Issues for Realworld Planning Systems, 2000: 1-6.
[6] J R Surdu, K Kittka.The Deep Green Concept[C]// Spring Simulation Multiconference, Military Modeling and Simulation Symposium (MMS), 2008: 14-18 Ottawa, Canada, MSIAC Journal November, 2008: 4-12.
[7] 樊青云, 刘东波, 阮启明, 等. 基于XML的作战计划形式化描述[J].计算机技术与发展, 2009, 19(10): 204-210.
Fan Qingyun, Liu Dongbo, Ruan Qiming, et al.The Operation Plan Formal Description based on XML[J]. Computer Technology and Development, 2009, 19(10): 204-210.
[8] 戈义君, 刘忠, 张维明. 作战计划的可视化建模方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2006, 32(4):46-49.
Ge Yijun, Liu Zhong, Zhang Weiming.The Visual Modelling approach of Operation Plan[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2006, 32(4):46-49.
[9] Fowler I II N, Cross S E, Owens C. The ARPA-Rome Knowledge-based planning and scheduling initiative[C]// IEEEExpert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 1995: 4-9.
[10] 钱猛, 刘忠, 姚莉, 等. 作战计划的本体建模研究[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(5): 994-1000.
Qian Meng, Liu Zhong, Zhang Li, et al.Research on the Ontology Modelling of Operation Plan[J]. System Engineering and Electronic Technology, 2010, 32(5): 994-1000.
[11] Core plan representation (CPR)[EB/OL]. [2008-12-23]. http://reliant.teknowledge.com/CPR2/.
[12] Polyak S, Tate A. Planning intiative: Shared planning and activity representation-SPAR version 0.2: Request for comments[EB/OL]. [2008-12-23]. http:// www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/~arpi/spar/spar-doc02.html
[13] 钱猛, 胡升泽, 刘忠, 等. 基于SysML的作战行动序列建模方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2008, 33(8): 15-19.
Qian Meng, Hu Shengze, Liu Zhong, et al.The Modelling Approach of COA based on SysML[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2008, 33(8): 15-19.
[14] SISO-STD-011-2014. Standard for coalition battle management language(C-BML)phase 1, Version1. 0[S]. 2014.
[15] K Heffner, F Hassaine.Towards intelligent operator interfaces in support of autonomous uvs operations[C]// in 16^th ICCRTS-Collective C2 in Multinational Civil-Military Operations, 2011.
[16] T Remmersmann, U Schade, C Schlick.Interactive Multi-Robot Command and Control with Quasi-Natural Command Language IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cypbernetics, San Diego, CA, October, 2014.
[17] 钱猛, 刘忠, 姚莉等. 本体技术在作战计划中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45(16):18-23.
Qian Meng, Liu Zhong, Yao Li, et al.Survey for COA ontological technologies in military planning[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2009, 45(16):18-23.
[18] 罗旭辉, 刘忠, 张维明, 等. 层次任务网络的作战计划建模及生成技术[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2009, 34(12): 22-26.
Luo Xuhui, Liu Zhong, Zhang Weiming, et al.The Modelling Approach and Technology of Operation Plan based on Hierarchical Task Network[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2009, 34(12): 22-26.
[19] 吴林锋, 陈行军, 齐欢, 等. 含时间窗联合作战计划问题的建模与求解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(9): 1979-1985.
Wu Linfeng, Cheng Xingjun, Qi Huang, et al.Modelling and Solving of Joint Operation Plan Problem with Time Window[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32(9): 1979-1985.
[20] 彭小宏, 杨东升, 武云鹏, 等. 基于EAP-GA的联合作战行动计划[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2009, 34(2): 1-4. Peng Xiaohong, Yang Dongsheng, Wu Yunpeng, et al. Joint Operation Plan based on EAP-GA[J]. Fire and Command Control, 2009, 34(2):1-4.
[21] 武云鹏, 黄金才, 张维明, 等. 对抗条件下的计划生成过程建模及状态推理[J].计算机工程与应用, 2011, 47(26): 1-3.
Wu Yunpeng, Huang Jincai, Zhang Weiming, et al.Planning Generation Process Modelling and State Reasoning under Counter Conditions[J]. Computer Engineering and Application, 2011, 47(26): 1-3.
[22] 杜正军, 陈超, 姜鑫. 基于影响网络与序贯博弈的作战行动序列模型与求解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(1): 215-222.
Du Zhengjun, Chen Chao, Jiang Xin.COA Model and Solution based on the Influence Network and Sequential Game[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2013, 33(1): 215-222.
[23] 周忠旺, 柳少军. 战争模拟多分辨率联合仿真关键技术研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2014, 28(2): 70-76.
Zhou Zhongwang, Liu Shaojun.Research on the Key Technology of Multi-resolution Joint Simulation of War Simulation[J]. Operation Research and System Engineering, 2014, 28(2): 70-76.
[24] 阳东升, 张维明, 刘忠, 等. 战役任务计划的数学描述与求解算法研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2006, 26(1): 26-35.
Yang Dongsheng, Zhang Weiming, Liu Zhong, et al.Research on Mathematical Description and Solving Algorithms of Tasks Scheduling for Campaign[J]. System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2006, 26(1): 26-35.