Research and Design of ETC Simulation Platform for Expressway

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.22-0814

Abstract

Abstract:

It is difficult to quantitatively calculate and display the real-time traffic situation of expressway ETC system, and there is no simulation system for ETC to optimize the operating situation. A simulation system based on ETC data in proposed, in witch there are three key algorithms. ETC data feature extraction algorithm provides the feature of generating simulation data for the simulation platform. The improved multitask scheduling algorithm has the computing ability of multitasks in simulation environment. The algorithm of expressway traffic flow control strategy provides the decision index for traffic flow control on the way. The experimental results show that the proposed system can effectively extract the features of ETC data, and is better than other algorithms, which can realize the overall traffic flow control and optimization of simulation road network.

Key words: simulation technology, feature recognition, multi task scheduling, traffic flow control, expressway

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Zou Fumin, Guo Feng, Luo Sijie, Liao Lüchao, Li Nan, Xing Yue. Research and Design of ETC Simulation Platform for Expressway[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(12): 2624-2640.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

Fig. 6

Table 2

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Table 3

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Table 4

References 24

1	Zou Fumin, Guo Feng, Tian Junshan, et al. The Method of Dynamic Identification of the Maximum Speed Limit of Expressway Based on Electronic Toll Collection Data[J]. Scientific Programming, 2021, 2021: 4702669.
2	Burger M, van den Berg M, Hegyi A, et al. Considerations for Model-based Traffic Control[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 35: 1-19.
3	Ciuffo B, Lima Azevedo C. A Sensitivity-analysis-based Approach for the Calibration of Traffic Simulation Models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(3): 1298-1309.
4	Ilgin Guler S, Menendez M, Meier L. Using Connected Vehicle Technology to Improve the Efficiency of Intersections[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 46: 121-131.
5	黄流川. 基于车路协同的典型应用场景构建与仿真研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021.
	Huang Liuchuan. Research on Construction and Simulation of Typical Application Scenarios Based on Vehicle-road Collaboration[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2021.
6	王贺. 基于正交试验法的城市道路交通VISSIM仿真参数标定系统设计与实现[D]. 石家庄: 石家庄铁道大学, 2020.
	Wang He. Design and Implementation of VISSIM Simulation Parameter Calibration System for Urban Road Traffic Based on the Orthogonal Experiment[D]. Shijiazhuang: Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, 2020.
7	程晓鹏. 基于VISSIM交通仿真的城市高架拥堵分析及控制改善[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2015.
	Cheng Xiaopeng. Urban Elevated Expressway Traffic Congestion Analysis and Control Based on VISSIM Traffic Simulation[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2015.
8	Bujanovic P, Lochrane T. Capacity Predictions and Capacity Passenger Car Equivalents of Platooning Vehicles on Basic Segments[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 2018, 144(10): 04018063.
9	李美影. 基于改进遗传算法的微观交通仿真模型参数标定方法研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
	Li Meiying. Research on Parameters Calibration of Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model Based on Improved Genetic Algorithm[D]. Jiʹnan: Shandong University, 2019.
10	张婧. 城市道路交通拥堵判别、疏导与仿真[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2016.
	Zhang Jing. The Study on Identification, Dispersion and Simulation of Urban Traffic Congestion[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2016.
11	曾华倩. V2 V条件下的车辆队列跟驰行为建模与仿真实现[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2018.
	Zeng Huaqian. Modeling and Simulation of Vehicle Platoon Following Behavior Under the Condition of V2V[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2018.
12	Zhang Yuming, Zhang Guohui, Fierro R, et al. Force-driven Traffic Simulation for a Future Connected Autonomous Vehicle-enabled Smart Transportation System[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19(7): 2221-2233.
13	Márton Tamás Horváth, Lu Qiong, Tettamanti Tamás, et al. Vehicle-in-the-loop (VIL) and Scenario-in-the-loop (SCIL) Automotive Simulation Concepts from the Perspectives of Traffic Simulation and Traffic Control[J]. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 2019, 20(2): 153-161.
14	Zlatkovic M, Zlatkovic S, Sullivan T, et al. Assessment of Effects of Street Connectivity on Traffic Performance and Sustainability Within Communities and Neighborhoods Through Traffic Simulation[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2019, 46: 101409.
15	Lu Qiong, Tettamanti Tamás, Hörcher Dániel, et al. The Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Traffic Network Capacity: An Experimental Analysis by Microscopic Traffic Simulation[J]. Transportation Letters, 2020, 12(8): 540-549.
16	Janczykowski M, Turek W, Malawski M, et al. Large-scale Urban Traffic Simulation with Scala and High-performance Computing System[J]. Journal of Computational Science, 2019, 35: 91-101.
17	庞明宝, 刘震. 基于Petri网立交桥智能网联车协作控制仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(3): 484-493.
	Pang Mingbao, Liu Zhen. Simulation on Cooperative Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles at Interchange Based on Petri Net[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(3): 484-493.
18	宗芳, 王猛, 曾梦, 等. 考虑多前车作用势的混行交通流车辆跟驰模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2022, 22(1): 250-262.
	Zong Fang, Wang Meng, Zeng Meng, et al. Vehicle-following Model in Mixed Traffic Flow Considering Interaction Potential of Multiple Front Vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(1): 250-262.
19	马庆禄, 张琳, 袁新新, 等. 城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.
	Ma Qinglu, Zhang Lin, Yuan Xinxin, et al. Continuous Simulation Technology for Multi-state Evolution of Urban Road Traffic[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.
20	吉柯, 唐进君, 曾捷, 等. 基于递阶优化的城市区域路网交通控制[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023, 20(1): 63-73.
	Ji Ke, Tang Jinjun, Zeng Jie, et al. Urban Road Network Traffic Control Based on Hierarchical Optimization[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 63-73.
21	Bansal N, Maurya A, Kumar T, et al. Cost Performance of QoS Driven Task Scheduling in Cloud Computing[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 57: 126-130.
22	Mondal R K, Nandi E, Sarddar D. Load Balancing Scheduling with Shortest Load First[J]. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 2015, 8(4): 171-178.
23	Pradhan P, Behera P K, Ray B N B. Modified Round Robin Algorithm for Resource Allocation in Cloud Computing[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 85: 878-890.
24	Ghanbari S, Othman M. A Priority Based Job Scheduling Algorithm in Cloud Computing[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 50: 778-785.

字段表示	字段名称	例子
TRADEID	交易标识	S0***1(位)
TRADETIME	交易时间	2020/9/3 20:00:01
FLAGID	门架编号	3502**
OBUID	设备MAC	66AD40**
OBUPLATE	OBU车牌	蓝闽AP****
ENTIME	入口时间	2020/9/3 07:48:39
ENSTATION	入口收费站	46**
LNG	经度	118.56**
LAT	纬度	24.85***
VEHCLASS	车辆类型	1

车型	车类	数量	占比/%
客车	I类	8 985 755	73.34
	II类	36 368	0.30
	III类	71 171	0.58
	IV类	85 236	0.70
货车	I类	904 328	7.38
	II类	336 131	2.74
	III类	135 834	1.11
	IV类	243 303	1.99
	V类	109 592	0.89
	VI类	1 326 630	10.83
作业车	I类专项	8 677	0.000 7
作业车	II类专项	8 609	0.000 7

数量(组)	MTS	Priority	RR	FCFS	SJF	数量(组)	MTS	Priority	RR	FCFS	SJF
10	1	1.38	2.01	1.49	1.19	1 000	1	1.43	1.82	1.41	1.31
100	1	1.42	1.80	1.34	1.23	1 500	1	1.42	1.83	1.40	1.29
500	1	1.41	1.86	1.46	1.30	2 000	1	1.42	1.82	1.42	1.33

路段车流统计总数	行程全路径的车流量
7 168	大田广平入口→大田广平―大田奇韬(696)→大田奇韬―尤溪新阳(1 044)→尤溪新阳―尤溪闽湖(2 610)→尤溪闽湖―华口枢纽(3 306)→华口枢纽―德化上涌(4 872)→德化上涌―德化九仙山(4 480)→德化九仙山―德化(4 992)→德化―汤城枢纽(5 248)→汤城枢纽―下洋(5 504)→下洋―吴山(6 656)→吴山―大田(6 784)→大田出口(7 168)
7 004	白水洋入口→白水洋―大溪枢纽(378)→大溪枢纽―周宁(1 008)→周宁―白云山(1 134)→白云山―康厝枢纽(2 016)→康厝枢纽―坂中枢纽(2 596)→坂中枢纽―福安北(3 074)→福安北―柘荣(3 502)→柘荣―福鼎管阳(3 811)→福鼎管阳―邦福枢纽(4 635)→邦福枢纽―福鼎(5 459)→福鼎―八尺门(6 386)→八尺门出口(7 004)
9 180	白云山入口→白云山―康厝枢纽(360)→康厝枢纽―福安枢纽(540)→福安枢纽―赛岐(540)→赛岐―湾坞枢纽(1 980)→湾坞枢纽―下白石(3 600)→下白石―宁德汽车城(5 220)→宁德汽车城―宁德北(5 400)→宁德北―增坂枢纽(6 840)→增坂枢纽―宁德东(8 280)→宁德东―飞鸾(8 820)→飞鸾出口(9 180)
9 234	福安北入口→福安北―柘荣(1 408)→柘荣―福鼎管阳(2 121)→福鼎管阳―邦福枢纽(4 545)→邦福枢纽―福鼎(5 773)→福鼎―八尺门(7 776)→八尺门出口(9 234)
9 750	福州北入口→洋门枢纽―福州北(3 375)→洋门枢纽―连江(6 375)→连江出口(9 750)
……

[1]	Jianguo Cao. Development Opportunities and Application Prospects of Aero-Engine Simulation Technology under Digital Transformation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(1): 1-10.
[2]	Geqi Qi, Sijin Liu, Yikang He, Meng Wang, Ailing Huang. Simulation-driven Based Utility Evaluation and Recommendation of Expressway Proactive Speed Limit [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(12): 2522-2534.
[3]	Ji Xiaofeng, Ge Yicheng. Holiday Highway Traffic Flow Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(6): 1164-1171.
[4]	Pang Mingbao, Xia Zemin, Luan Yanhai. Inputting Strategy Simulation of Multi-ramp Coordinated Control Signal for Urban Expressway [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(8): 3050-3057.
[5]	Liu Lifang, Zhao Lisha, Qi Xiaogang, Xiong Wei. Security Evaluation Techniques and Network Performance Simulation Based on Queue Model [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(1): 191-196.
[6]	Zuo Kang, Liu Qiyuan, Sun Jian. Modeling and Simulation of Merging Behavior at Urban Expressway On-ramp [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(9): 1895-1906.
[7]	Yang Senyan, Wu Jianping, Liu Mingyu, He Lei. Simulation Study for Truck Restriction Strategies on Jingzang Expressway in Beijing [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(10): 2432-2440.
[8]	Hu Xiaofei, Zhou Yang, Li Pengfei, Xu Jiwei, Xue Xianguang. Research on Space Environment Simulation Technology Based on Mobile Platform [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28(9): 2017-2022.