Study on Invulnerability of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Traffic Network Considering Time Characteristics

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0298

Abstract

Abstract:

The cascading failure invulnerability study of comprehensive passenger transport network in urban agglomeration is helpful to improve the safety and transportation efficiency of intercity travel. In order to be consistent with the actual situation, a comprehensive passenger transport network model for urban agglomerations is constructed based on multi-layer complex network theory and actual passenger flow. The passenger transport network cascading failure invulnerability model considering time characteristics is established with unit time step. The spatial and temporal evaluation indexes are put forward to analyze the network situation in each period. Taking Hu-Bao-E-Yu urban agglomeration as an example, the results show that the network invulnerability is stronger when the overload capacity adjustment parameter value is 1.2, and the improvement of the network invulnerability is not obvious with the increase of the overload capacity adjustment parameter. The network invulnerability becomes significantly worse when the load adjustment parameter value is greater than 1.2.

Key words: integrated transportation, time characteristics, cascading failure, comprehensive passenger traffic network, invulnerability, urban agglomeration

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Chengbing Li, Yunfei Li, Peng Wu. Study on Invulnerability of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Traffic Network Considering Time Characteristics[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(09): 2037-2045.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig. 4

Table 2

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 11

[1]	Candelieri A, Galuzzi B G, Giogdani I, et al. Vulnerability of Public Transportation Networks Against Directed Attacks and Cascading Failures[J]. Public Transport (S1077-291X), 2019, 11(1): 27-49.
[2]	Zhang H, Yao Y G. An Integrative Vulnerability Evaluation Model to Urban Road Complex Network[J].Wireless Personal Communications (S0929-6212), 2019, 107(1): 193-204.
[3]	Yang H H, An S. Robustness Evaluation for Multi-subnet Composited Complex Network of Urban Public Transport[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal (S1110-0168), 2021, 60(2): 2065-2074.
[4]	李成兵, 郝羽成, 高巍, 等. 城市群交通网络级联失效建模与可靠性仿真[J]. 公路交通科技, 2018, 35(5): 135-141.
	Li Chengbing, Hao Yucheng, Gao Wei, et al. Modelling of Cascading Failure and Reliability Simulation of Urban Agglomeration Traffic Network[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35(5): 135-141.
[5]	李成兵, 魏磊, 卢天伟, 等. 城市群交通网络抗毁性仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(2): 489-496.
	Li Chengbing, Wei Lie, Lu Tianwei, et al. Invulnerability Simulation Analysis of Compound Traffic Network in Urban Agglomeration[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(2): 489-496.
[6]	王哲, 李建华, 康东. 基于极大连通子图边界的复杂网络恢复研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2306-2316.
	Wang Zhe, Li Jianhua, Kang Dong. Research on Recovering of Complex Networks Based on Boundary Nodes of Giant Connected Component[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(12): 2306-2316.
[7]	种鹏云, 帅斌. 危险品运输关联网络级联失效建模及耦合特性[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15(5): 150-156.
	Zhong Pengyun, Shuai Bin. Cascading Failure Model and Coupling Properties for Interdependent Networks of Hazardous Materials Transportation[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(5): 150-156.
[8]	种鹏云. 基于复杂网络的危险品运输网络拓扑特性、级联失效机制及抗毁性研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015.
	Zhong Pengyun. Topology Properties, Mechanism of Cascading Failure and Invulnerability for Hazardous Materials Transportation Network Based on Complex Network[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015.
[9]	Ren H P, Song J, Yang R, et al. Cascade Failure Analysis of Power Grid Using New Load Distribution Law and Node Removal Rule[J]. Physica A Statistical Mechanics& Its Applications (S0378-4371), 2016, 442(1): 239-251.
[10]	李思佶, 帅斌, 刘奕杉. 城市轨道交通网络级联失效机理研究[J]. 综合运输, 2020, 42(7): 69-74.
	Li Siji, Shuai Bin, Liu Yishan. Cascading Failure Mechanism of Urban Rail Transit Network[J]. China Transportation Review, 2020, 42(7): 69-74.
[11]	李成兵, 张帅, 杨志成, 等. 蓄意攻击下城市群客运交通网络级联抗毁性仿真[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2019, 19(2): 14-21.
	Li Chengbing, Zhang Shuai, Yang Zhicheng, et al. Invulnerability Simulation in Urban Agglomeration Passenger Traffic Network under Targeted Attacks[J].Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2019, 19(2): 14-21.

轨道网站点	道路网站点	换乘时间/min
呼和浩特火车西站	呼和浩特长途汽车站	5
呼和浩特火车西站	客运西站	5
榆林火车站	客运南站	10
榆林火车站	榆林汽车客运总站	10
鄂尔多斯火车站	鄂尔多斯汽车站	8
达拉特旗火车站	达拉特旗汽车站	6
察素齐火车站	察素齐汽车站	3
包头火车东站	包头长途客运总站	8
清涧火车站	清涧汽车站	3
锦界火车站	锦界汽车站	10
米脂火车站	米脂汽车站	5
府谷火车站	府谷汽车站	8

站点编号	暂停比	站点名称
2	0.126 245 847	呼和浩特火车西站
6	0.083 056 478	鄂尔多斯火车站
42	0.063 122 924	察素齐火车站
116	0.139 534 884	包头火车东站
166	0.166 112 957	呼和浩特火车东站
171	0.139 534 884	包头火车站
186	0.139 534 884	榆林火车站
188	0.116 279 071	绥德火车站
192	0.102 990 033	东胜火车站