Review on Interoperability of Command Information System and Combat Simulation System

Abstract

Abstract: The interoperability of command information system and combat simulation system is an important and difficult problem of building practical training environment. The four aspects of interoperability connotation were summarized. The demands of interoperability were analyzed. The status and development of interoperability, especially for C⁴ISR/Sim Technical Reference Model (TRM), Battle Management Language (MBL), Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model (LCIM) were studied. The existing problems were summarized, and four kinds of solutions were proposed. The general technical framework of interoperability based on service oriented architecture was designed, and the interoperability solving method based on Ontology was given.

Key words: interoperability, command information system, warfare simulation system, general technical framework, base ontology

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Tang Zaijiang, Xu Xiangzhong, Xue Qing, Xu Haohua. Review on Interoperability of Command Information System and Combat Simulation System[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(8): 1659-1664.

References

[1] IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology[S]. IEEE Std 610. 12-1990.
[2] Joint Chiefs of Staff. Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. As amended through June 9, 2004 (Joint Pub 1-02). [K]. U.S. Joint Staff,2004, 9-10.
[3] Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5000. 59[Z], DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Management. Enclosure 2, U.S. DoD ,1994.
[4] 中国人民解放军总装备部.军用仿真术语[S]. GJB 6935-2009, 2009, 12, 22
[5] Allison Griffin, Joe Lacetera, Andreas Tolk.C4ISR/Sim Technical Reference Model Study Group [R]// Final Report, Simulation Interoperability Workshop,2002, 02F-SIW-022. http://www.sisostd.org
[6] Scott A Carey, Martin S Kleiner, Michael R Hieb, et al.Standardizing Battle Management Language - A Vital Move Towards the Army Transformation [C]// Proceedings of the 2001 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2001,01F-SIW-067. http://www.sisostd.org
[7] Tolk Andreas.The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model [C]// 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop. Simulation Interoperability Workshop, 2003, http://www.sisostd.org
[8] Tolk Andreas.Interoperability and composability.[M]// Modeling and Simulation Fundamentals: Theoretical Underpinnings and Practical Domains, edited by JA Sokolowski and CM Banks. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley, 2010: 403-433.
[9] 陈博, 刘新盛, 高阜乡. 军事信息系统互操作性等级模型研究[J]. 军事通信, 2008(3): 24-26.
[10] 周玉芳, 余云智, 翟永翠. 仿真技术综述[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2010, 32(4): 1-7.
[11] 李进, 吉宁, 刘小荷, 等. 美军新一代支持联合训练的框架研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2015, 32(1): 463-467.
[12] 黎昌政,余玲娟. 我国首家互操作性测评中心成立 [N]. 陕西日报, 2002-11-24 (06)
[13] 江汉, 尹浩, 李学军. 半实物仿真系统互联设计及其互操作[J]. 计算机仿真, 2006, 23(5): 21-24.
[14] 英超, 肖田元, 范文慧等. 对基于多视图–嵌套本体映射的HLA语义互操作[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2012, 18(5): 365-369.
[15] 英超, 肖田元, 范文慧, 等. 基于语义互操作的动态协同仿真平台[J]. 清华大学学报自然科学版, 2012, 52(5): 655-662.
[16] 李伟, 王子才, 杨明. 分布交互仿真中互操作性研究[C]// 2004年仿真计算机与软件、仿真方法与建模学术交流会论文集. 北京: 中国系统仿真学会, 2004: 215-222.
[17] 郑赟. 基于WEB的仿真互操作性测试工具研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2008.
[18] 郭锐, 张国, 王超. 海军联合仿真实验系统互操作问题研究[J]. System Simulation Technology & Application, 2011, 13(1): 441-445.
[19] 马卫兵, 朱一凡. 指控与仿真系统互操作性语言的形式化语法[J]. 计算机工程, 2011, 37(增刊): 19-23.
[20] 曹星平, 李志平, 卿杜政. 仿真系统与指控系统互操作方法研究[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2011, 28(9): 3402-3406.
[21] 宋莉莉. 基于SOA的建模与仿真框架及仿真服务发现技术研究 [D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2008.