Journal of System Simulation ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (10): 3015-3027.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.25-1122
• Complex System Scheduling and Resource Allocation • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Hualan, Wang Li, Fu Zhongning
Received:2025-11-14
Revised:2026-01-23
Online:2026-10-31
Published:2026-10-20
Contact:
Wang Li
CLC Number:
Wang Hualan, Wang Li, Fu Zhongning. Simulation Study on Circular-track RGV Scheduling Based on Railway Operating Rules[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(10): 3015-3027.
Table 2
Relevant indicators and cost function values for different c values
| RGV数量 | 系统服务强度 | 系统空闲概率 | 平均排队货物数 | 系统平均货物数 | 边际平均货物数减少量区间 | 系统总费用/(元/天) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0.83 | 0.004 5 | 2.77 | 3.6 | 624.00 | |
| 7 | 0.71 | 0.003 3 | 0.42 | 1.13 | 0.442~2.470 | 605.20 |
| 8 | 0.625 | 0.001 5 | 0.063 | 0.688 | 0.119~0.442 | 667.52 |
| 9 | 0.56 | 0.000 56 | 0.009 | 0.569 | 0.068~0.119 | 742.76 |
| 10 | 0.5 | 0.000 21 | 0.001 | 0.501 | 820.04 |
Table 4
Simulation statistics without track-switching devices
| 车数 | 总体任务并行完成时长/s | 单个任务平均完成时长/s | 所有车辆累计空驶时长/s | RGV占用率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 39 593.840 (39 593.838, 39 593.841) | 18 007.711 (18 007.709, 18 007.715) | 32 704.071 (32 704.069, 32 704.072) | 73.800 (73.223, 74.377) |
| 4 | 29 712.340 (29 712.339, 29 712.342) | 13 002.370 (13 002.367, 13 002.374) | 33 046.904 (33 046.903, 33 046.906) | 74.600 (74.115, 75.085) |
| 5 | 23 828.240 (23 828.239, 23 828.242) | 10 040.650 (10 040.648, 10 040.651) | 33 050.740 (33 050.738, 33 050.742) | 75.500 (74.933, 76.067) |
| 6 | 19 917.650 (19 917.646, 19 917.652) | 8 158.550 (8 158.546, 8 158.553) | 33 611.866 (33 611.866, 33 611.867) | 75.800 (75.427, 76.173) |
| 7 | 17 297.280 (17 297.277, 17 297.282) | 6 833.220 (6 833.220, 6 833.221) | 34 103.210 (34 103.207, 34 103.212) | 75.600 (75.143, 76.057) |
| 8 | 15 207.340 (15 207.337, 15 207.342) | 5 758.271 (5 758.268, 5 758.274) | 34 029.149 (34 029.147, 34 029.150) | 75.900 (75.668, 76.132) |
| 9 | 13 718.859 (13 718.857, 13 718.861) | 5 023.590 (5 023.588, 5 023.592) | 34 408.749 (34 408.747, 34 408.751) | 74.800 (74.492, 75.108) |
| 10 | 12 478.340 (12 478.339, 12 478.341) | 4 353.742 (4 353.739, 4 353.745) | 34 672.190 (34 671.868, 34 672.512) | 74.700 (74.354, 75.046) |
Table 5
Simulation statistics with one track-switching device
| 车数 | 总体任务并行完成时长/s | 单个任务平均完成时长/s | 所有车辆累计空驶时长/s | RGV占用率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 36 409.339 (36 409.333, 36 409.344) | 16 350.141 (16 350.136, 16 350.147) | 32 234.449 (32 234.448, 32 234.452) | 72.800 (72.308, 73.292) |
| 4 | 27 382.339 (27 382.331, 27 382.342) | 11 821.141 (11 821.140, 11 821.145) | 32 919.624 (32 919.621, 32 919.625) | 73.600 (73.000, 74.200) |
| 5 | 22 156.340 (22 156.339, 22 156.341) | 9 213.603 (9 212.880, 9 214.326) | 33 200.902 (33 200.901, 33 200.904) | 73.700 (73.231, 74.169) |
| 6 | 18 599.840 (18 599.838, 18 599.841) | 7 450.152 (7 450.150, 7 450.157) | 33 483.749 (33 483.747, 33 483.750) | 73.800 (73.308, 74.292) |
| 7 | 16 104.329 (16 104.325, 16 104.333) | 6 189.496 (6 189.440, 6 189.530) | 33 771.319 (33 771.318, 33 771.320) | 73.900 (73.500, 74.300) |
| 8 | 14 349.859 (14 349.855, 14 349.863) | 5 242.740 (5 242.738, 5 242.742) | 34 623.545 (34 623.544, 34 623.546) | 73.500 (72.885, 74.115) |
| 9 | 12 955.340 (12 955.339, 12 955.342) | 4 557.292 (4 557.290, 4 557.296) | 34 950.766 (34 950.766, 34 950.767) | 73.800 (73.308, 74.292) |
| 10 | 11 756.840 (11 756.837, 11 756.841) | 3 999.849 (3 999.846, 3 999.851) | 35 409.825 (35 409.824, 35 409.827) | 73.600 (73.000, 74.200) |
Table 6
Simulation statistics with two track-switching devices
| 车数 | 总体任务并行完成时长/s | 单个任务平均完成时长/s | 所有车辆累计空驶时长/s | RGV占用率/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 34 502.860 (34 502.850, 34 502.870) | 15 479.740 (15 479.738, 15 479.745) | 28 330.529 (28 330.528, 28 330.530) | 71.200 (70.831, 71.569) |
| 4 | 26 072.849 (26 072.844, 26 072.852) | 11 190.759 (11 190.750, 11 190.761) | 28 891.693 (28 891.692, 28 891.694) | 72.100 (71.808, 72.392) |
| 5 | 20 964.379 (20 964.376, 20 964.382) | 8 636.451 (8 636.446, 8 636.470) | 28 893.657 (28 893.653, 28 893.659) | 72.200 (71.831, 72.569) |
| 6 | 17 671.370 (17 671.368, 17 671.372) | 6 994.910 (6 994.900, 6 994.912) | 29 397.317 (29 397.317, 29 397.318) | 72.200 (71.831, 72.569) |
| 7 | 15 258.340 (15 258.330, 15 258.350) | 5 747.209 (5 747.200, 5 747.220) | 29 756.611 (29 756.611, 29 756.613) | 73.200 (72.831, 73.569) |
| 8 | 13 614.380 (13 614.370, 13 614.390) | 4 935.620 (4 935.610, 4 935.630) | 30 529.718 (30 529.717, 30 529.719) | 73.200 (72.831, 73.569) |
| 9 | 12 182.839 (12 182.820, 12 182.850) | 4 225.584 (4 225.180, 4 227.190) | 30 634.236 (30 634.235, 30 634.236) | 73.200 (72.831, 73.569) |
| 10 | 11 147.344 (11 147.330, 11 147.350) | 3 702.650 (3 701.450, 3 703.160) | 31 235.339 (31 234.456, 31 235.923) | 73.200 (72.831, 73.569) |
| [1] | 丁飞阳, 张逸博, 邱洪斌, 等. 结合贪心策略的RGV动态规划调度模型[J]. 电子技术与软件工程, 2021(21): 121-124. |
| [2] | 李涛, 汪翼, 丁祥海. 自动化立体仓库中RGV货物出仓调度策略仿真[J]. 信息与管理研究, 2022, 7(2): 48-55. |
| Li Tao, Wang Yi, Ding Xianghai. Simulation on RGV Scheduling Policies in Automatic Storage Warehouse[J]. Journal of Information and Management, 2022, 7(2): 48-55. | |
| [3] | 丁扬. 面向密集仓储的多AGV与RGV协同调度研究[D]. 上海: 东华大学, 2018. |
| Ding Yang. Research on Multi AGV and RGV Cooperative Scheduling for Dense Storage[D]. Shanghai: Donghua University, 2018. | |
| [4] | 张同锋. 基于自动化立体货架系统的多穿梭车调度及应用研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江科技学院, 2021. |
| Zhang Tongfeng. Research on Multi-shuttle Vehicle Scheduling and Application Based on Automatic Stereoscopic Shelving System[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 2021. | |
| [5] | Li Xinlin, Wu Xuzhen, Wang Peipei, et al. Bi-objective Circular Multi-rail-guided Vehicle Scheduling Optimization Considering Multi-type Entry and Delivery Tasks: A Combined Genetic Algorithm and Symmetry Algorithm[J]. Symmetry, 2024, 16(9): 1205. |
| [6] | 陈颖, 葛显龙. 智能RGV的动态调度策略研究[J]. 物流技术, 2019, 38(4): 35-43. |
| Chen Ying, Ge Xianlong. Research on Dynamic Scheduling Strategy of Intelligent RGV[J]. Logistics Technology, 2019, 38(4): 35-43. | |
| [7] | 马昌谱, 周炳海. 自动存取系统多载量轨道小车避碰调度方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2020, 54(2): 126-134. |
| Ma Changpu, Zhou Binghai. Scheduling of Multi-load Rail Guided Vehicles in AS/RS with Collision Avoidance Constrains[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020, 54(2): 126-134. | |
| [8] | 陈元. 基于FlexSim仿真的自动化物流系统立体仓库调度优化研究[J]. 自动化与仪器仪表, 2025(4): 132-135, 140. |
| Chen Yuan. Research on Optimization of Automated Logistics System Stereoscopic Warehouse Scheduling Based on FlexSim Simulation[J]. Automation & Instrumentation, 2025(4): 132-135, 140. | |
| [9] | 赵启胜. 基于AnyLogic的自动化立体仓库调度系统仿真优化研究[D]. 天津: 天津工业大学, 2020. |
| [10] | 姚星宇. A医药企业物流中心自动化立体仓库仿真优化研究[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2024. |
| Yao Xingyu. Research on Simulation and Optimization of Automated Stereoscopic Warehouse in Logistics Center of Pharmaceutical Enterprise A[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Technology, 2024. | |
| [11] | Brailsford S C, Eldabi T, Kunc M, et al. Hybrid Simulation Modelling in Operational Research: A State-of-the-art Review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 278(3): 721-737. |
| [12] | Ghasemi Amir, Farajzadeh F, Heavey Cathal, et al. Simulation Optimization Applied to Production Scheduling in the Era of Industry 4.0: A Review and Future Roadmap[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2024, 39: 100599. |
| [13] | 何瑞春, 赵敏, 向万里. 基于AnyLogic的系统建模与仿真[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2020. |
| [14] | René de Koster, Le-Duc Tho, Kees Jan Roodbergen. Design and Control of Warehouse Order Picking: A Literature Review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 182(2): 481-501. |
| [15] | Gong, Yeming, B M de Koster René. A Review on Stochastic Models and Analysis of Warehouse Operations[J]. Logistics Research, 2011, 3(4): 191-205. |
| [16] | 林兵, 冯毅. 随机情景下MTS/MTO串联生产系统库存控制策略[J]. 工业工程, 2024, 27(3): 98-105. |
| Lin Bing, Feng Yi. An Inventory Control Strategy for MTS/MTO Tandem Production Systems in Stochastic Scenarios[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2024, 27(3): 98-105. | |
| [17] | 杨林辉, 杨中华. 电子商务仓储环境下基于改进A*算法的AGV路径规划研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2025, 14(11): 3025-3037. |
| Yang Linhui, Yang Zhonghua. Research on AGV Path Planning Based on Improved A* Algorithm in E-commerce Warehousing Environment[J]. E-Commerce Letters, 2025, 14(11): 3025-3037. | |
| [18] | 黎永壹, 韩开旭. 基于排队论智能RGV的动态调度策略的研究[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2019, 14(6): 660-666, 670. |
| Li Yongyi, Han Kaixu. On Dynamic Scheduling Strategy of Intelligent RGV Based on Queuing Theory[J]. Journal of China Academy of Electronics and Information Technology, 2019, 14(6): 660-666, 670. | |
| [19] | 盖宇仙, 陈宜吉. 铁路货运组织[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2011. |
| Ge Yuxian, Chen Yiji. Railway Freight Transportation Organization[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2011. | |
| [20] | 何华武. 铁路行车组织[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2015: 488. |
| He Huawu. Railway Traffic Organization[M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 2015: 488. | |
| [21] | 陈雷雷. 基于列车运行图阶段调整的机车运用优化研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2017. |
| Chen Leilei. Research on Optimization of the Locomotive Scheduling Based on Phase Adjustment of Working Diagram[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2017. | |
| [22] | 董晋廷. 高铁快运列车"装配-时刻表-停站"方案优化研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2024. |
| Dong Jinting. Optimization of "Allocation-timetable-stopping" Scheme for High-speed Railway Express Trains[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2024. |
| [1] | Gong Feng, Jiang Tao, Zhang Qin, Liu Yu. Simulation and Optimization of Support Processes for Aircraft Fleet Launch Under Limited Resources [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(8): 1965-1977. |
| [2] | Chen Juan, Zheng Wang, Liu Qianqian, Lu Bin. Automatic Multi-objective Optimization Based on Dynamic Storage Location Allocation Strategy [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(6): 1435-1448. |
| [3] | Zhou Kai, Wang Yan, Ji Zhicheng. Hybrid Quantum-behaved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Solving Mould Job Shop Scheduling Problem [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28(6): 1247-1255. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||