某型涡扇发动机燃调故障联合仿真

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201810039

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 3923-3932.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201810039

某型涡扇发动机燃调故障联合仿真

韦祥¹, 李本威¹, 杨欣毅¹, 王星博²

1. 海军航空工程学院飞行器工程系,山东烟台 264001;
2. 96235部队,山东青岛 266000

收稿日期:2016-09-08 修回日期:2016-12-19 出版日期:2018-10-10 发布日期:2019-01-04
作者简介:韦祥(1990-),男,山西原平,博士生,研究方向为航空发动机状态监控与故障诊断;李本威(1962-),男,山东威海,博士,教授,研究方向为航空发动机状态监控与健康管理;杨欣毅(1978-),男,辽宁葫芦岛,博士,讲师,研究方向为航空发动机状态监控。

Fault Co-simulation of Fuel Regulator in a Certain Type of Turbofan Engine

Wei Xiang¹, Li Benwei¹, Yang Xinyi¹, Wang Xingbo²

1. Aircraft Engineering, Naval Aeronautics and Astronautics University, Yantai 264001, China;
2. 96235th Unit of PLA, Qingdao 266000, China

Received:2016-09-08 Revised:2016-12-19 Online:2018-10-10 Published:2019-01-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对某型航空发动机燃油调节器系统故障诊断的问题,提出一种主燃油控制系统AMEsim模型和发动机动态Simulink模型联合仿真的方法。建立了主燃油系统AMEsim模型和发动机动态Simulink模型,并通过试验和发动机实测参数验证了模型的有效性;通过AMEsim软件和Simulink平台的接口,建立了联合仿真模型;通过联合仿真模型对燃油调节器典型故障和排故措施进行了仿真。研究结果表明,联合仿真的方法可以将燃油调节器故障诊断转化为发动机监控参数模式识别的问题,该方法不仅为燃油调节器的故障诊断提供了途径,为故障排除提供了定量的解决方案,也为发动机视情维修提供依据。

关键词: 航空发动机, 燃油调节器, 故障诊断, 联合仿真

Abstract: A co-simulation method for fuel regulator fault diagnosis in a certain type of turbofan engine is performed, which consists of AMEsim Model of main fuel control system and Simulink Model of aero-engine. The AMEsim Model of main fuel system and Simulink Model of aero-engine are built and their accuracy is validated by experiments and the engine’s operating data, respectively. The co-simulation model based on the main fuel control system and the aero-engine is proposed through the interface of AMEsim and Simulink software. The typical faults and obviation methods are simulated by the co-simulation model. The research shows that the problem of fuel regulator fault diagnosis can turn into pattern recognition of feature parameters in aero-engine field. The method provides not only troubleshooting solutions and fault diagnosis for fuel regulator system, but also supports theory and sample for establishing standards of engine’s condition based maintenance.

Key words: aero-engine, fuel regulator, fault diagnosis, co-simulation

中图分类号:

V235

韦祥, 李本威, 杨欣毅, 王星博. 某型涡扇发动机燃调故障联合仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(10): 3923-3932.

Wei Xiang, Li Benwei, Yang Xinyi, Wang Xingbo. Fault Co-simulation of Fuel Regulator in a Certain Type of Turbofan Engine[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(10): 3923-3932.

参考文献

[1] 冯海峰, 樊丁. 某型航空涡轴发动机燃油调节器建模与仿真[J]. 计算机仿真, 2014, 12(24): 45-48.
Feng Haifeng,Fan Ding.Modeling and simulation of x turboshaft aeroengine controller[J]. Computer Simulation, 2014, 12(24): 45-48
[2] 苏三买. 某型涡扇发动机燃油调节器改进及高空适应性分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 10(22): 1760-1764.
SU San-mai.Analysis of modification and high-altitude adaptability for fuel flow regulator of a turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 10(22): 1760-1764.
[3] 蔡开龙, 谢寿生, 胡金海, 等. 涡扇发动机燃油综合控制半实物仿真试验系统[J]. 推进技术, 2007, 4(28): 422-427.
Cai Kailong, Xie Shousheng, Hu Jinhai, et al.Semi-physical simulation experiment system of fuel integration control system for turbofan engine[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2007, 4(28): 422-427.
[4] 丁琳, 王道波, 李猛, 等. 直升机涡轴发动机燃油调节系统建模与仿真[J]. 航空兵器, 2011, 8(4): 30-34.
Ding Lin, Wang Dao bo, Li Meng, et al. Modeling and simulation of fuel conditioning system for turbo-shaft engine of helicopter[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2011, 8(4): 30-34.
[5] 李吉. X6发动机燃油调节器建模与仿真研究 [D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2006.
Li ji. Modeling and simulation of x6 engine fuel regulator [D]. Xi'an, China: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2006.
[6] 任新宇, 郭迎清, 姚华廷. 基于AMESim的航空发动机防喘调节器性能仿真研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2004, 4(19): 572-576.
Ren Xinyu, Guo Yingqing, Yao Huating.Simulation of aeroengine anti-surge regulator performance based on AMESim[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Power, 2004, 4(19): 572-576.
[7] 尤裕荣, 赵双龙, 吴宝元. 基于AMESIM的冲压发动机燃油调节器动态特性仿真[J]. 火箭推进, 2010, 4(36): 12-15.
You Yurong, Zhao Shuanglong, Wu baoyuan. A simulation on dynamic characteristics of ramjet fuel regulator based on AMESIM[J]. Journal of rocket propulsion, 2010, 4(36): 12-15
[8] 傅强. 基于AMESim的某型涡轴发动机燃油调节器建模仿真[J]. 机械设计与制造, 2013, 4(4): 252-255.
Fu qiang. A turboshaft engine adjuster modeling simulation based on the AMESim[J]. Machinary design and manufacture, 2013, 4(4): 252-255.
[9] 任新宇, 王建礼, 赵小龙. 基于AMESim的涡扇发动机控制系统综合仿真[J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 12(25): 2816-2820.
Ren Xinyu,Wang Jianli,Zhao Xiaolong.Simulation of turbofan engine main fuel control system based on AMESim[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 12(25): 2816-2820.
[10] 刘占生, 曹智选, 沈勇, 等. 某型涡轴发动机气路故障数值仿真[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2014, 34(5): 844-850.
Liu Zhansheng,Cao Zhixuan, Shen yong,etal. Numeric simulation of gas-path fault for a turboshaft[J]. Journal of vibration, measurement and diagnosis, 2014, 34(5): 844-850.
[11] 朱行健, 王雪瑜. 燃气轮机工作原理及性能 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.
Zhu Xingjian, Wang Xueyu.Gas turbine working principle and performance [M]. Beijing, China: Science Press, 1992.
[12] 童万军, 唐世建. 基于流量法的齿轮传动涡扇发动机动态建模[J]. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(2): 1377-1383.
Tong Wanjun, Tang Shijian.Geared turbofan engine transient modeling research based on CMF method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(2): 1377-1383.
[13] 田超. 航空涡桨发动机建模与控制的仿真研究 [D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2010.
Tian Chao.Simulation study on modeling and control of aviation turbopropellers [D]. Nanjing, China: Nanjing university of aeronautics and astronautics.
[14] 杨欣毅, 沈伟, 王永华, 等. 涡扇发动机气路部件衰退对转速差影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 5(35): 610-617.
Yang Xinyi, ShenWei, Wang Yonghua, et al. Study on negative effects on rotational speeds difference caused by turbine fan engine gas path components performance deteriorations[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 5(35): 610-617.
[15] Guang Binhuang, Qin Yuzhu, Chee-Kheong Siew.Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications[J]. Science Direct, Neurocomputing, 2006, 70(1): 489-501.
[16] Nash J E, Sutciliffe J V.River flow forecasting through conceptual model[J]. J. Hydrol, 1970, 10(3): 282-290.

某型涡扇发动机燃调故障联合仿真

Fault Co-simulation of Fuel Regulator in a Certain Type of Turbofan Engine

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祝志超, 吴定会, 岳远昌. 基于监督核熵成分分析的发动机磨损故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(1): 45-52.
[2]	李元, 耿泽伟. 基于LLE与K均值聚类算法的工业过程故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(9): 2066-2073.
[3]	高胜东, 于鑫. 盘坯温度分布参数系统冷速控制并行联合仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(8): 1839-1845.
[4]	王印松, 孙天舒. 基于二分类NMF网络的执行器故障状态评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(8): 1882-1891.
[5]	位晶晶, 刘勤明, 叶春明, 李冠林. 基于GA-SVR的小样本数据缺失下的设备故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(6): 1342-1349.
[6]	吴定会, 祝志超, 韩欣宏. 基于BO-SDAE多源信号的风电机组轴承故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(5): 1148-1156.
[7]	沈景凤, 李初蕾, 武殿梁, 张佳欣. 航空发动机半物理仿真试车系统的设计研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(5): 808-816.
[8]	吴伟, 李博, 刘娜娜, 马广志. 轮式牵引机器人优化设计及运动特性分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(5): 918-926.
[9]	李炜, 周丙相, 蒋栋年. 基于深度学习序贯检验的电源车故障诊断方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(4): 638-648.
[10]	皮骏, 常佳泽, 刘光才. 航空发动机振动信号分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(3): 525-532.
[11]	樊名鲁, 王艳, 纪志成. 基于特征生成的轴承不均衡数据故障诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2438-2448.
[12]	梁彩云, 李宏新, 隋岩峰, 栾旭, 石峰. 航空发动机虚拟采办的构建和发展设想[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2485-2493.
[13]	李炜, 葛振福, 申富媛, 龚建兴. 基于FDRE的3D威亚编码器故障检测与容错控制[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(4): 740-749.
[14]	蒋清扬, 宋华. 航空发动机换热器控制技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(11): 2442-2451.
[15]	贾立山, 刘喆, 孙毅. 基于RMBP神经网络的飞机电气故障智能诊断[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(9): 3493-3501.