煤矿服务策略的评估方法研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201704013

系统仿真学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 798-807.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201704013

煤矿服务策略的评估方法研究

薛霄, 桂彬, 王永茂

河南理工大学计算机科学与技术学院,河南焦作 454000

收稿日期:2015-06-30 修回日期:2015-08-25 出版日期:2017-04-08 发布日期:2020-06-03
作者简介:薛霄(1979-),男,河南焦作,博士,教授,研究方向为服务计算与计算实验等。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61175066,61100008,61379126),河南省科技创新杰出青年支持计划,河南省高校科技创新人才资助项目(2012HASTIT013),河南省自然科学基金面上项目(162300410121),河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(12A630072)

Evaluation Method Research for Coal Mine Services Policy

Xue Xiao, Gui Bin, Wang Yongmao

School of Computer Sciences and Technology, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China

Received:2015-06-30 Revised:2015-08-25 Online:2017-04-08 Published:2020-06-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 煤矿服务系统是通过对多个现有信息系统的封装和集成来实现,其中服务策略的运行效果直接决定了服务系统的整体性能。但是,由于煤矿事故的复杂性和煤矿环境的特殊性,难以在实际环境中对服务策略进行测试评估。针对该问题,提出基于计算实验的煤矿服务策略评估方法。该方法分为三个步骤：给出了煤矿服务系统的自适应服务策略;构建出与真实环境相符的实验系统模型;根据模型分析,构建出三维虚拟矿井实验平台,能够对服务策略的正确性进行定量评估。实验结果证明该方法是可行的,能够对服务策略的运行效果提供决策支持。

关键词: 煤矿服务策略, 信息集成, 计算实验, 评估方法

Abstract: Mine service is the integration of the package which is based on a number of existing information system, the operation effect of service strategy directly determines the overall performance of the service system. However, due to the complexity of coal mine accidents and the special of mine environment, testing and evaluation of service strategy is very difficult in the actual environment. In order to solve this problem, an integrated evaluation method of coal mine service policy was proposed based on computational experiment. This method could be divided into three steps: the adaptive service strategy of service system in the coal mine was given; the experimental system model was constructed which was similar to the actual environment. According to the analysis of the models, a 3D virtual mine experimental platform was constructed to quantitatively evaluate the correctness of the service strategy. The experimental results show that the method is feasible, and can provide decision-making support for the effect of service strategy.

Key words: coal services policy, information integration, computational experiments, evaluation method

中图分类号:

TP391

薛霄, 桂彬, 王永茂. 煤矿服务策略的评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(4): 798-807.

Xue Xiao, Gui Bin, Wang Yongmao. Evaluation Method Research for Coal Mine Services Policy[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(4): 798-807.

参考文献

[1] 薛霄, 常静坤, 安吉宇. 智慧矿山服务系统的情境感知实现技术研究[J]. 计算机研究与发展. 2014, 51(12): 2746-2758.
(Xue Xiao, Chang Jingkun, An Jiyu.Intelligent Service System with Context-Awareness Capability for Coal Mine Industry: Design and Implementation[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2014, 51(12): 2746-2758)
[2] 陈松航, 汤淑明, 朱凤华, 等. 人工交通系统计算实验的分布式框架研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2013, 25(4): 605-611.
(Chen Songhang, Tang Shuming, Zhu Fenghua, et al.Research on Distributed Framework for Computational Experiments Based on Artificial Transportation Systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2013, 25(4): 605-611.)
[3] 杨镜宇, 司光亚, 胡晓峰. 战争分析仿真实验:战争工程方法学的一类实践[J]. 系统仿真学报. 2005, 17(11): 2775-2779.
(Yang Jingyu, Si Guangya, Hu Xiaofeng.Simulation- based Warfare Analysis Experiment: a Practice of War Engineering Methodology[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2005, 17(11): 2775-2779.)
[4] 王国成. 基于Agent真实行为揭示社会经济复杂之谜——集成建模与计算实验的实现途径[J]. 中国社会科学院研究生院学报, 2012(5): 35-41.
(Wang Guocheng.On the Complexity in Society and Economy based on the Agent-Real-Behavior---Realizing Path to Integrated Modeling and Computational Experiment[J]. Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 2012 (5): 35-41.)
[5] 李光辉, 夏其表, 李洪. 基于渗透理论的林火蔓延模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(24): 6595-6598.
(Li Guang-hui, Xia Qi-biao, Li Hong.Forest Fire Spread Model Based on Percolation Theory[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2008, 20(24): 6595-6598. )
[6] 王庆慧, 刘鹏, 王丹枫. 安全检查表对作业条件危险性分析方法修正的研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(8): 125-129.
(Wang Qing-hui, Liu Peng, Wang Dan-feng.Research on amendment of LEC by safety checklist analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(8): 125-129.)
[7] 王涛, 邵云飞. 技术创新的动态时变专家评价方法研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010, 30(10): 8-10.
(Wang Tao, Shao Yunfei.A study on the dynamic time-varying expert evaluation method on the aspect of technological innovation[J]. Science and technology management research, 2010, 30(10): 8-10.)
[8] Nakajo T, Kume H.A case history analysis of software error cause-effect relationships[J]. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (S0098-5589), 1991, 17(8): 830-838.
[9] 安景文, 刘颖. 对中国质量培训现状的思考[J]. 中国质量, 2014(9) : 28-31.
(An Jingwen, Liu Ying.Thinking about the Present Situation of Chinese Quality Training[J]. China Quality, 2014 (9): 28-31.)
[10] Wang Y, Luo Y, Hua Z.On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications[J]. European Journal of Operational Research (S0377-2217), 2008, 186(2): 735-747.
[11] Ding S, Jia W, Su C, et al.An Improved BP Neural Network Algorithm Based on Factor Analysis[J]. Journal of Convergence Information Technology (S1975-9320), 2010, 5(4): 103-108.
[12] Xue X, Chang J, Liu Z.Context-aware intelligent service system for coal mine industry[J]. Computers in Industry (S0166-3615), 2014, 65(2): 291-305.

煤矿服务策略的评估方法研究

Evaluation Method Research for Coal Mine Services Policy

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李述清, 张志利, 魏玉淼, 王海涛. 导弹精度评估方法仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(8): 1825-1831.
[2]	张寿明, 王志萍, 毕贵红, 曾振华. 双语和谐微观仿真模型与计算实验[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(5): 1133-1147.
[3]	陈彬, 杨妹, 艾川, 马亮, 朱正秋, 陈海亮, 朱蒙娜, 许伟. 基于人工社会的疫情传播风险预测和防控措施评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2507-2514.
[4]	汪云峰. 基于空间认知智能体的医院流线结构评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 181-188.
[5]	曹慧敏, 黄安祥, 雷祥. 空战临战态势评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 257-263.
[6]	曾艳阳, 冯振敬. 基于综合赋权的三维视景效果评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(6): 2258-2262.
[7]	崔建岭, 田雯, 戴幻尧, 周波, 乔会东. 基于超限学习机的评估新方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(1): 44-50.
[8]	邱思航, 邱晓刚, 陈彬. 生化仿真与人工社会计算实验集成的途径探讨[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(9): 2194-2202.
[9]	曾艳阳, 贾盼盼. 基于改进灰色聚类的三维视景效果评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(10): 2497-2501.