基于综合赋权的三维视景效果评估方法

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201806032

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 2258-2262.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201806032

基于综合赋权的三维视景效果评估方法

曾艳阳¹, 冯振敬²

1. 河南理工大学计算机科学与技术学院,焦作 454000;
2. 河南理工大学医学院,焦作 454000

收稿日期:2016-05-10 修回日期:2016-08-10 出版日期:2018-06-08 发布日期:2018-06-14
作者简介:曾艳阳(1987-),男,河南固始,博士,讲师,研究方向为仿真方法及应用。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61503124),高等学校重点科研项目(15A520018)

3D Visual Effects Assessment Based on Comprehensive Weight

Zeng Yanyang¹, Feng Zhenjing²

1. College of Computer Science and Technology of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China;
2. Medicine College of Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China

Received:2016-05-10 Revised:2016-08-10 Online:2018-06-08 Published:2018-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在三维视景效果评估中有多个指标的评估,一般各指标的权重系数需事先确定,单独运用专家知识或理论模型这两种赋权方法各有利弊,提出了基于专家知识和理论模型的综合赋权方法,通过建立优化模型,直接求解出具有主客观信息的指标权重向量。实验结果表明,确定权向量的方法不同,评估的排序结果也略有差别。采用综合赋权法来确定各指标权重,相应的评估结果即满足视景观察者的需求,又符合严谨的客观评价原则。

关键词: 专家知识, 理论模型, 综合赋权, 三维视景效果, 评估方法

Abstract: There are various indicators for assessing the 3D visual effects, while the general weight of each index needs pre-determined coefficients individually, for which either the expert knowledge model or theoretical model used has advantages and disadvantages empowerment. Based on expert knowledge and theoretical models, the comprehensive weight method, optimization model, and direct solution of the index weight vectors have subjective and objective information. Experimental results show that the method of determining the weight vector different sort results of the assessment is also slightly different. Integrated weighting method to determine the weight of each index and the corresponding results of the assessment meet the needs of users, and are consistent with the principles of rigorous and objective evaluation.

Key words: expert knowledge, theoretical model, comprehensive weight, three-dimensional visual effect, evaluation method

中图分类号:

TP391.9

曾艳阳, 冯振敬. 基于综合赋权的三维视景效果评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(6): 2258-2262.

Zeng Yanyang, Feng Zhenjing. 3D Visual Effects Assessment Based on Comprehensive Weight[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(6): 2258-2262.

参考文献

[1] Timson Emma, Perfect Philip, White Mark.Subjective fidelity assessment of rotorcraft training simulators[C]// Proc. of 68th American Helicopter Society International Annual Forum, 2012, 3: 2118-2133.
[2] Zeyada Y.Modeling human pilot cue utilization with applications to simulator fidelity assessment[J]. Journal of Aircraft (S0957-4174), 2000, 37(4): 588-597.
[3] 曾艳阳, 贾盼盼. 基于改进灰色聚类的三维视景效果评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(10): 2497-2501. Zeng Yanyang, Jia Panpan. Evaluation method of dimensional visual effects based on improved Grey Clustering[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(10): 2497-2501.
[4] Zhang W, Wang X.Study on credibility of physical effects of man-in-the-loop simulation system[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2002, 14(6): 815-820.
[5] Hess Ronald A, Marchesi Federico.Analytical assessment of flight simulator fidelity using pilot models[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics (S0731-5090), 2009, 32(3): 760-770.
[6] 尤天惠, 张尧, 樊治平. 信息不完全确定的多指标决策理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 28-35. You Tianhui, Zhang Yao, Fan Zhiping. The theory and method of multiple index decision-making with incomplete information[M]. Beijing: Science Publishing, 2010: 28-35.
[7] 汪文革, 王珍惜. 一种主客观综合的训练评估指标权重的确定方法[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2013, 33(8): 123-125.
Wang Wenge, Wang Zhenxi.A subjective and objective method for determining index weights of training evaluation, Ship Electronic Engineering, 2013, 33(8): 123-125.
[8] Pendharkar P C.Characterization of aggregate fuzzy membership functions using Saaty's eigenvalue approach[J]. Computers and Operations Research (S0305-0548), 2003, 30(2): 199-212.
[9] Chu A T W, Kalaba R E, Springarn K. A Comparision of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Application (S0022-3239), 1979, 27(4): 531-538.
[10] 宜家骥. 多目标决策[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1989: 20-29.
Yi Jiaji.Multi-objective decision[M]. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 1989: 20-29.
[11] 樊治平. 多属性决策的一种新方法[J]. 系统工程, 1994, 12(1): 15-17.
Fan Zhiping.A New Method of Multiple Attribute Decision[J]. Systems Engineering, 1994, 12(1): 15-17.

基于综合赋权的三维视景效果评估方法

3D Visual Effects Assessment Based on Comprehensive Weight

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李述清, 张志利, 魏玉淼, 王海涛. 导弹精度评估方法仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(8): 1825-1831.
[2]	曹慧敏, 黄安祥, 雷祥. 空战临战态势评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 257-263.
[3]	薛霄, 桂彬, 王永茂. 煤矿服务策略的评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(4): 798-807.
[4]	王洋, 杨宏, 陈晓光, 丁凯. 深空通信LTP传递时延的理论建模及试验验证[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(3): 479-486.
[5]	崔建岭, 田雯, 戴幻尧, 周波, 乔会东. 基于超限学习机的评估新方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(1): 44-50.
[6]	曾艳阳, 贾盼盼. 基于改进灰色聚类的三维视景效果评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(10): 2497-2501.