智能网联车辆混行交通流效益研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0487

系统仿真学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 2270-2278.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0487

智能网联车辆混行交通流效益研究

胡明伟^1,2,3, 张芷铭¹, 陈湘生^1,2,3,*

1.深圳大学土木与交通工程学院,广东深圳 518060;
2.深圳大学未来地下城市研究院,广东深圳 518060;
3.深圳大学滨海城市韧性基础设施教育部重点实验室,广东深圳 518060

收稿日期:2020-07-14 修回日期:2020-07-30 出版日期:2021-09-18 发布日期:2021-09-17
通讯作者: 陈湘生(1956-),男,中国工程院院士,博士,教授,研究方向为交通运输工程。E-mail：xschen@szu.edu.cn
作者简介:胡明伟(1972-)，男，博士，教授，研究方向为交通系统建模与仿真，智能交通系统。E-mail：humw2005@126.com
基金资助:
中国工程科技发展战略广东研究院咨询研究(2018-GD-11); 中国工程科技发展战略广东研究院咨询研究(2020-GD-04-1-1)

Research on Benefits of Mixed Traffic Flow of Intelligent Connected Vehicles

Hu Mingwei^1,2,3, Zhang Zhiming¹, Chen Xiangsheng^1,2,3,*

1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;
2. Underground Polis Academy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Coastal Urban Resilient Infrastructures, Ministry of Education, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Received:2020-07-14 Revised:2020-07-30 Online:2021-09-18 Published:2021-09-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究智能网联车辆与非网联车辆的混行交通流效益,针对智能网联车辆的“智能化”与“网联化”2种特性,通过对微观交通仿真软件Vissim进行二次开发,使其具备智能网联车辆交通流建模功能,仿真了不同市场渗透率条件下智能网联车辆与非网联车辆构成的混行交通流,通过对比不同时段及不同渗透率情况下的交通效益发现,随着智能网联车辆市场渗透率的增加,道路混行交通流的平均车速有明显增加,出行时间降低。通过对高峰和平峰期的交通效益敏感性分析,发现智能网联车辆在高峰期对道路交通流产生的效益较平峰期更为显著。

关键词: 智能网联车辆, 交通仿真, 混行交通流, 交通效益

Abstract: In order to study the benefits of the mixed traffic flow Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICV) and non-connected vehicles, aiming at the intelligent and connected characteristics of ICV. Through the microscopic traffic simulation software Vissim redevelopment, ICV having the function of intelligent connected vehicles traffic flow modeling is realized. The mixed traffic flow composed of intelligent connected vehicles and non-connected vehicles under different market penetration rates is simulated. By comparing the traffic benefits at different time periods and different penetration rates, it is found that with the increase of the market penetration rate of intelligent connected vehicles, the average speed of mixed traffic flow increases obviously and the average travel time decreases. Through the sensitivity analysis of traffic benefits during peak and non-peak periods, it is found that the benefits of intelligent connected vehicles on road traffic flow during peak periods are more significant than those during non-peak hours

Key words: Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICV), traffic simulation, mixed traffic flow, traffic benefits

中图分类号:

U495
TP391

胡明伟, 张芷铭, 陈湘生. 智能网联车辆混行交通流效益研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(9): 2270-2278.

Hu Mingwei, Zhang Zhiming, Chen Xiangsheng. Research on Benefits of Mixed Traffic Flow of Intelligent Connected Vehicles[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(9): 2270-2278.

参考文献

[1] Chen D, Ahn S, Chitturi M, et al. Towards Vehicle Automation: Roadway Capacity Formulation for Traffic Mixed with Regular and Automated Vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part B (S0191-2615), 2017, 100:196-221.
[2] Talebpour A, Mahmassani H S.Influence of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Flow Stability and Throughput[J]. Transportation Research Part C (S0968-090X), 2016, 71(10): 143-163.
[3] 中国公路学报编辑部. 中国交通工程学术研究综述·2016[J]. 中国公路学报, 2016, 29(6): 1-161.
Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Highway and Transportation. Review on China's Traffic Engineering Research Progress·2016[J]. Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016, 29(6): 1-161.
[4] 中国公路学报编辑部. 中国汽车工程学术研究综述·2017[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(6): 1-197.
Editorial Department of Chinese Journal of Highways. Summary of Academic Research on Automotive Engineering in China·2017[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(6): 1-197.
[5] 道路交通集成优化与安全分析技术国家工程实验室自动驾驶测试技术研究组. 自自动驾驶技术解读: 世界各国及组织现行法规政策[J]. 汽车与安全, 2018(3): 34-39.
[6] 胡元聪, 李明康. 自动驾驶汽车对《道路交通安全法》的挑战及应对[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 27(1): 44-53, 62.
Hu Yuancong, Li Mingkang.Challenges and Responses of Self-Driving Vehicles to Road Traffic Safety Law[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019, 27(1): 44-53, 62.
[7] Ling Y X, Feng G. A Comprehensive Review of the Development of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems[J]. Vehicle System, Dynamics (S0042-3114), 2010, 48(10):1167-1192.
[8] Werf J V, Shladover S E, Miller M A, et al.Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Highway Traffic Flow Capacity[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (S0361-1981), 2002, 1800(1): 78-84.
[9] Zhao L, Sun J.Simulation Framework for Vehicle Platooning and Car-following Behaviors Under Connected-vehicle Environment[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (S1877-0428), 2013, 96(6): 914-924.
[10] Cui L, Hu J, Park B B, et al.Development of a Simulation Platform for Safety Impact Analysis Considering Vehicle Dynamics, Sensor Errors, and Communication Latencies: Assessing cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Under Cyber Attack[J]. Transportation Research Part C (S0968-090X), 2018, 97(6): 1-22.
[11] 潘福全, 亓荣杰, 张璇, 等. 无人驾驶汽车研究综述与发展展望[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2017(2): 27-28.
Pan Fuquan, Qi Rongjie, Zhang Xuan, et al.Review and Development Prospect of Self-driving Car Research[J]. Science and Technology Innovation and Application, 2017(2): 27-28.
[12] 王建萍. 面向2020年无人驾驶的发展动向[J]. 汽车与配件, 2018(12): 60-67.
Wang Jianping. Development Trend of Driverless Driving Towards2020[J]. Automobiles and Accessories, 2018(12): 60-67.
[13] 程刚, 郭达. 车联网现状与发展研究[J]. 移动通信, 2011, 35(17): 23-26.
Cheng Gang, Guo Da.Research on the Status Quo and Development of Internet of Vehicles[J]. Mobile Communications, 2011, 35(17): 23-26.
[14] 裴锦, 陈凌, 黄铮. 车联网架构与关键技术研究[J]. 科学技术创新, 2019(17): 96-97.
Pei Jin, Chen Ling, Huang Zheng.Research on Architecture and Key Technologies of Internet of Vehicles[J]. Science and Technology Innovation, 2019(17): 96-97.
[15] Michaud F, Lepage P, Frenette P, et al.Coordinated Maneuvering of Automated Vehicles in Platoons[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (S1524-9050), 2006, 7(4): 437-447.
[16] PTV AG.VISSIM 10.0 User Manual[Z]. Karlsruhe, Germany, 2018.
[17] 姚志洪, 蒋阳升. 集成Vissim和Python的车联网仿真平台研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2018, 35(12): 143-146, 405.
Yao Zhihong, Jiang Yangsheng.Research on the Internet of Vehicles Simulation Platform integrating Vissim and Python[J]. Computer Simulation, 2018, 35(12): 143-146, 405.

智能网联车辆混行交通流效益研究

Research on Benefits of Mixed Traffic Flow of Intelligent Connected Vehicles

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马庆禄, 张琳, 袁新新, 刘丰杰. 城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.
[2]	何兆成, 林炫华, 聂佩林, 张荣辉. 考虑展宽设计的中观交通仿真模型及其标定[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 781-791.
[3]	马文欣, 李瑞敏. 检测数据驱动的交通仿真参数标定方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2808-2819.
[4]	赵丹, 牛学军, 张书豪, 魏佳旭. 平面交叉口借道左转设置研究与效果评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2975-2982.
[5]	周晨静, 高亚聪, 荣建. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定方法改善研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(11): 2112-2120.
[6]	段宇洲, 柴婷婷, 简洁. 环形交叉口内部运行时间可靠度研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 438-447.
[7]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 陈宇, 刘龙飞, 吴建平. 南宁市滨湖路绿波方案仿真评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 585-591.
[8]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 吴建平, 陈宇, 黄琳, 刘龙飞. 南宁市中心区域交通动态调控技术[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 324-331.
[9]	周晨静, 荣建, 郭琳科. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定结果取值方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(12): 2802-2809.
[10]	罗龙溪, 谢丽君, 吴建平, 许明. 绿灯时车辆启动延迟及其直接和连锁反应对交通流影响的仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(11): 2422-2433.
[11]	庞明宝, 夏泽民, 栾燕海. 城市快速路多匝道协调控制信号施加策略仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(8): 3050-3057.
[12]	庞明宝, 蔡章辉. 一个山区高速公路下纵坡弯道可能事故的CAM[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(4): 1414-1422.
[13]	邢志伟, 李世皎, 唐云霄, 罗谦. 基于Agent-元胞自动机的机场场面交通仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(3): 857-865.
[14]	李扬, 焦朋朋, 刘美琪. 基于人均延误最小的干线协调实时控制研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 1938-1944.
[15]	黄敏, 钮中铭, 张小兰, 潘嘉杰, 张学强. 基于GIS-T的交通仿真路网构建研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(3): 531-536.