城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0896

系统仿真学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 847-855.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0896

• 仿真支撑平台/系统技术 • 上一篇下一篇

城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究

马庆禄(), 张琳(), 袁新新, 刘丰杰

重庆交通大学交通运输学院，重庆 400074

收稿日期:2020-11-13 修回日期:2021-03-12 出版日期:2022-04-30 发布日期:2022-04-19
通讯作者: 张琳 E-mail:mql360@qq.com;1023496958@qq.com
作者简介:马庆禄（1980-），男，博士，教授，研究方向为智能交通系统与安全。E-mail：mql360@qq.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金国家应急管理体系建设研究专项(20VYJ023);重庆市教育委员会教委科学技术研究计划重点项目(KJZD-K202000704);重庆市科技局技术预见与制度创新专项(cstc2019jsyj-yzysbA0058)

Continuous Simulation Technology for Multi-State Evolution of Urban Road Traffic

Qinglu Ma(), Lin Zhang(), Xinxin Yuan, Fengjie Liu

School of Traffic and Transportation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China

Received:2020-11-13 Revised:2021-03-12 Online:2022-04-30 Published:2022-04-19
Contact: Lin Zhang E-mail:mql360@qq.com;1023496958@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为实现交通多状态演化下的仿真连续性，解决多状态交通只能利用单状态交通进行多次仿真实现的问题，利用VISSIM仿真软件的二次开发接口，构建连续交通事件仿真中间件模型，将原本两个相关联的交通仿真事件进行联合驱动。利用C#与数据库进行VISSIM-COM二次开发，选用重庆市渝中区钢花路与柏华街交叉口的调查数据，对其“平时-拥堵-消散”的交通运行状态进行连续仿真验证。实验结果表明：连续仿真中会分别产生波速为-16.3 km/h和-7.47 km/h的交通波，且连续仿真与实际调查的平均延误、总延误、停车次数和平均速度在数据上更为接近，其差值分别为1.318 s、0.748 h、308次和0.647 km/h，相较于单次仿真，连续仿真与实际调查数据更为接近。

关键词: 交通仿真, 二次开发, 连续仿真, 交叉口

Abstract:

In order to realize the simulation continuity of the multi-state evolution of traffic and to solve the problem that multi-state traffic can only be simulated by single state traffic through multiple times, the middleware model of continuous traffic event simulation is built by the secondary development interface of VISSIM simulation software, and the original two related traffic simulation events are jointly driven. The secondary development of VISSIM-com is carried out by C# and database. The survey data of the intersection of Ganghua Road and Baihua Road in the Yuzhong District of Chongqing is selected as the example, and the continuous simulation verification for the traffic operation state of "Peacetime-Congestion-Dissipation" is carried out. The experimental results show that the traffic waves with speeds of -16.3 km/h and -7.47 km/h will be generated in the continuous simulation, and the average delay, total delay, parking times and average speed of the continuous simulation are more accurate, while the differences are 1.318 s, 0.748 h, 308 times and 0.647 km/h, respectively. Compared with the single simulation, the continuous simulation and the actual survey data are more consistent.

Key words: traffic simulation, secondary development, continuous simulation, intersection

中图分类号:

TP396

马庆禄, 张琳, 袁新新, 刘丰杰. 城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.

Qinglu Ma, Lin Zhang, Xinxin Yuan, Fengjie Liu. Continuous Simulation Technology for Multi-State Evolution of Urban Road Traffic[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

钢花路与柏华街交叉口道路基本状况

道路名称	道路类别	$N L$	$F A$ /(pcu/h)	$F B$ /(pcu/h)	$v / C$
$N k$	主干路	3	3 744	4 880	0.77
$S k$	主干路	3	3 809	4 880	0.78
$W k$	次干路	2	895	2 689	0.33
$E k$	次干路	2	964	2 796	0.35

表1

表2

三种仿真交通流量 (pcu/h)

进口道车辆转向	平时仿真	拥堵仿真	消散仿真
$N 3 → E 3'$	143	546	235
$N 2 → S 2'$	730	2 076	1 016
$N 1 → W 1'$	175	654	307
$S 3 → W 3'$	308	600	325
$S 2 → N 2'$	919	2 386	140
$S 1 → E 1'$	19	101	52
$W 3 → N 3'$	78	206	152
$W 1 → E 1'$	53	321	93
$W 1 → S 1'$	258	914	389
$E 3 → S 3'$	78	244	173
$E 1 → W 1'$	33	125	91
$E 1 → N 1'$	81	281	135

表2

图6

图7

图8

表3

参考文献 17

1	Guo Yanyong, Tarek Sayed, Zheng Lai, et al. An Extreme Value Theory Based Approach for Calibration of Microsimulation Models for Safety Analysis[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory(S1569-190X), 2021, 106(1): 102172.
2	Manish Dutta, Ahmed Mokaddes Ali. Calibration of VISSIM Models at Three-Legged Unsignalized Intersections under Mixed Traffic Conditions[J]. Advances in Transportation Studies(S1824-5463), 2019, 7(48): 31-46.
3	方丽琴, 段满珍, 李铮, 等. 城市交叉口交通信号控制仿真模块设计[J]. 华北理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 70-76.
	Fang Liqin, Duan Manzhen, Li Zheng, et al. Design of Simulation Module for Traffic Signal Control at Urban Intersections [J]. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2018,40(4): 70-76.
4	林培群, 刘佳辉, 姚凯斌. 道路交通事故应急处置的微观在线仿真方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(5): 1158-1164.
	Lin Peiqun, Liu Jiahui, Yao Kaibin. Microscopic Online Simulation Method of Road Traffic Accident Emergency Disposal[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28(5): 1158-1164.
5	尹俊淞. 基于道路速度-排队长度的VISSIM参数标定建模与算法[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2019, 17(3):144-151.
	Yin Junsong. VISSIM Parameter Calibration Modeling and Algorithm Based on Road Speed-Queue Length[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2019, 17(3): 144-151.
6	Wang Yu, Zhang Qi, Huang Xiao. Research on Traffic Signal Self-Organizing Control Based on VANET Acquisition Information[J]. Materials Science and Engineering(S0921-5093), 2018, 392(6): 62159.
7	Ji Yanjie, Hu Bo, Han Jing. An Improved Algebraic Method for Transit Signal Priority Scheme and Its Impact on Traffic Emission[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering (S1024-123X), 2014(5): 1-11.
8	李洁玮, 武珂缦, 周荣贵, 等. 港珠澳大桥三维动态交通仿真平台设计与实现[J]. 公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2016, 12(7): 201-204.
	Li Jiewei, Wu Keman, Zhou Ronggui, et al. Design and Implementation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Traffic Simulation Platform of HongKong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. Highway Traffic Technology (Applied Technology Version), 2016, 12(7): 201-204.
9	章瑀. VISSIM-COM技术在有轨电车优先控制中的应用[J]. 铁道运营技术, 2019, 25(2): 49-52.
	Zhang Yu. Application of VISSIM-COM Technology in Priority Control of Tram[J]. Railway Operation Technology, 2019, 25(2): 49-52.
10	刘权, 宋万忠. 连续交通流可视化仿真[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(3): 42-45.
	Liu Quan, Song Wanzhong. Visualization Simulation of Continuous Traffic Flow[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 50(3): 42-45.
11	Markou Ioulia, Papathanasopoulou Vasileia, Antoniou Constantinos. Dynamic Car-Following Model Calibration Using SPSA and ISRES Algorithms[J]. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering(S0303-7800), 2019, 47(2): 146-156.
12	张东明, 成卫, 潘云伟, 等. 基于PARAMICS的信号交叉口可变进口道诱导方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2011, 11(8): 1868-1871.
	Zhang Dongming, Cheng Wei, Pan Yunwei, et al. Research on Induction Method of Variable Inlet Road at Signalized Intersections Based on Paramics[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2011, 11(8): 1868-1871.
13	Ma Changxi, Hao Wei, Wang Aobo, et al. Developing a Coordinated Signal Control System for Urban Ring Road Under the Vehicle-Infrastructure Connected Environment[J]. IEEE Access(S2169-3536), 2018, 6: 52471-52478.
14	Pau Giovanni, Campisi Tiziana, Canale Antonino, et al. Smart Pedestrian Crossing Management at Traffic Light Junctions Through a Fuzzy-Based Approach[J]. Future Internet(S1999-5903), 2018, 10(2): 15-34.
15	邵江, 胡晓晓, 白宝钢, 等. 波阵面视角下的车辆拥堵分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2016, 43(4): 481-491.
	Shao Jiang, Hu Xiaoxiao, Bai Baogang, et al. Analysis of Vehicle Congestion from the Perspective of Wavefront[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition), 2016, 43(4): 481-491.
16	Qu Dayi, Wan Mengfei, Wang Zilin, et al. Green Wave Coordinate Control Method for Arterial Traffic Based on Traffic Wave Theory[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development(S1002-0268), 2017, 11(4): 65-73.
17	Omar Syed, Mallikarjuna Ch. Analysis of the Macroscopic Relations for No-Lane Based Heterogeneous Traffic Stream[J]. Procedia Engineering (S1877-7058), 2016, 142: 244-251.

评价指标	平均延误/s	总延误/h	停车次数(次)	平均速度/(km/h)
单次仿真	6.187	10.068	929	43.263
连续仿真	14.438	15.825	1 619	29.931
实际调查	13.120	16.573	1 927	30.578

[1]	朱依婷, 闫云, 何兆成. 公交与社会车辆混合的中观交通建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(9): 2019-2027.
[2]	张建旭, 胡帅, 金宏意. 信号交叉口人机混驾交通流速度控制策略建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(8): 1697-1709.
[3]	胡明伟, 张芷铭, 陈湘生. 智能网联车辆混行交通流效益研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(9): 2270-2278.
[4]	何兆成, 林炫华, 聂佩林, 张荣辉. 考虑展宽设计的中观交通仿真模型及其标定[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 781-791.
[5]	马文欣, 李瑞敏. 检测数据驱动的交通仿真参数标定方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2808-2819.
[6]	赵丹, 牛学军, 张书豪, 魏佳旭. 平面交叉口借道左转设置研究与效果评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2975-2982.
[7]	张小雨, 邵春福. 城乡结合部道路交叉口多目标信号配时优化模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(4): 709-717.
[8]	周晨静, 高亚聪, 荣建. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定方法改善研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(11): 2112-2120.
[9]	柴琳果, 蔡伯根, 上官伟, 王剑, 陈俊杰. 基于间隙理论的智能车交叉口运行控制方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(9): 1875-1882.
[10]	段宇洲, 柴婷婷, 简洁. 环形交叉口内部运行时间可靠度研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 438-447.
[11]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 陈宇, 刘龙飞, 吴建平. 南宁市滨湖路绿波方案仿真评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 585-591.
[12]	王健, 冯琦, 胡晓伟. 自动驾驶车辆在交叉口的通行模式研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 199-211.
[13]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 吴建平, 陈宇, 黄琳, 刘龙飞. 南宁市中心区域交通动态调控技术[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 324-331.
[14]	周晨静, 荣建, 郭琳科. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定结果取值方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(12): 2802-2809.
[15]	罗龙溪, 谢丽君, 吴建平, 许明. 绿灯时车辆启动延迟及其直接和连锁反应对交通流影响的仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(11): 2422-2433.

城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究

Continuous Simulation Technology for Multi-State Evolution of Urban Road Traffic

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 17

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价