Journal of System Simulation ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 470-481.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0802
• Modeling Theory and Methodology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Guangqiu Huang(), Tiantian Wu()
Received:
2020-10-20
Revised:
2021-01-31
Online:
2022-03-18
Published:
2022-03-22
Contact:
Tiantian Wu
E-mail:huangnan93@163.com;2515811107@qq.com
CLC Number:
Guangqiu Huang, Tiantian Wu. Cause Analysis of VOCs Hazards in Related Areas Based on Object Function Petri Net[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(3): 470-481.
Table 1
Detailed information of each object place in Petri net for VOCs hazard cause analysis
潜在污染源 | 路径编号 | 路径贡献率% | 路径上的对象库所 | 位置 | 库所编号 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A食品工业园 | 0 | A食品工业园 | 34.64N,108.93E | p1 | |
1 | 36 | 西焦村 | 34.63N,108.94E | p6 | |
白象方便面厂 | 34.63N,108.96E | p7 | |||
渠岸镇 | 34.62N,108.99E | p8 | |||
安乐镇 | 34.60N,109.03E | p9 | |||
滩李村 | 34.58N,109.10E | p10 | |||
B肥料厂 | 0 | B肥料厂 | 34.47N,108.74E | p2 | |
1 | 18 | 空港新城临空产业园 | 34.48N,108.76E | p11 | |
高庄镇 | 34.48N,108.81E | p12 | |||
泾电铜业 | 34.48N,108.85E | p13 | |||
崇文镇 | 34.51N,108.94E | p14 | |||
4 | 18 | 岳家村 | 34.45N,108.76E | p15 | |
新兴工业园 | 34.42N,108.81E | p16 | |||
烟王村 | 34.40N,108.82E | p17 | |||
C制药厂 | 0 | C制药厂 | 32.59N,107.98E | p3 | |
4 | 36 | 西乡县 | 32.97N,107.90E | p18 | |
牧马河 | 33.07N,107.87E | p19 | |||
黄金峡镇 | 33.18N,107.85E | p20 | |||
西河 | 33.48N,107.80E | p21 | |||
岳坝镇 | 33.56N,107.79E | p22 | |||
D化工公司 | 0 | D化工公司 | 33.08N,108.22E | p4 | |
1 | 50 | 宁陕县 | 33.31N,108.30E | p23 | |
五金厂 | 33.36N,108.30E | p24 | |||
新场镇 | 33.65N,108.28E | p25 | |||
2 | 14 | 梅子镇 | 33.35N,108.10E | p26 | |
陈家坝镇 | 33.47N,108.07E | p27 | |||
4 | 18 | 饶峰镇 | 33.17N,108.15E | p28 | |
两河镇 | 33.28N,108.10E | p29 | |||
长角坝镇 | 33.55N,108.02E | p30 | |||
龙草坪乡 | 33.64N,108.00E | p31 | |||
E电子公司 | 0 | E电子公司 | 33.63N,108.65E | p5 | |
1 | 50 | 安沟村 | 33.67N,108.64E | p32 | |
小四方沟村 | 33.70N,108.63E | p33 | |||
神仙岩 | 33.76N,108.61E | p34 | |||
2 | 36 | 西沟村 | 33.73N,108.64E | p35 | |
旬河 | 33.81N,108.64E | p36 | |||
3 | 9 | 苦竹沟村 | 33.71N,108.67E | p37 | |
广货街镇 | 33.76N,108.72E | p38 | |||
秦岭山脉 | 33.78N,108.75E | p39 | |||
4 | 5 | 杨柳村 | 33.65N,108.76E | p40 | |
苦竹沟村(交点) | 33.71N,108.67E | p37 | |||
西沟村(交点) | 33.71N,108.68E | p35 | |||
神仙岩(交点) | 33.76N,108.61E | p34 | |||
西安市 | 西安市 | 34.23N,108.93E | p41 |
Table 2
Model geographic information data (November 8, 2018) and initial hazard degree of object repository
对象 库所 | 海拔/m | 天气 | 到达 时间/h | 浓度/ (mg·m-3)_30 m | 初始危害程度 | 对象 库所 | 海拔/m | 天气 | 到达 时间/h | 浓度/ (mg·m-3)_30 m | 初始危害程度 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p1 | 425 | 晴 | 0.0 | 3.477 2 | 0.043 5 | p4 | 410 | 多云 | 0.0 | 5.819 4 | 0.072 7 |
p6 | 420 | 晴 | 1.2 | 1.607 2 | 0.020 1 | p23 | 930 | 晴 | 5.4 | 2.856 3 | 0.035 7 |
p7 | 422 | 晴 | 2.1 | 1.391 2 | 0.017 4 | p24 | 123 1 | 晴 | 6.9 | 2.216 2 | 0.027 7 |
p8 | 413 | 晴 | 3.7 | 0.956 9 | 0.012 0 | p25 | 159 3 | 晴 | 12.7 | 0.420 8 | 0.005 3 |
p9 | 402 | 晴 | 5.4 | 0.410 7 | 0.005 1 | p26 | 749 | 晴 | 7.3 | 0.980 5 | 0.012 3 |
p10 | 379 | 晴 | 7.3 | 0.015 7 | 0.000 2 | p27 | 938 | 晴 | 9.8 | 0.103 7 | 0.001 3 |
p2 | 497 | 晴 | 0.0 | 3.723 2 | 0.046 5 | p28 | 633 | 多云 | 3.1 | 1.147 8 | 0.014 3 |
p11 | 492 | 晴 | 1.4 | 1.483 5 | 0.018 5 | p29 | 576 | 多云 | 5.5 | 0.257 9 | 0.003 2 |
p12 | 466 | 晴 | 3.6 | 1.013 6 | 0.012 7 | p30 | 148 8 | 晴 | 11.3 | 0.057 3 | 0.000 7 |
p13 | 450 | 晴 | 4.8 | 0.793 5 | 0.009 9 | p31 | 145 2 | 晴 | 13.5 | 0.041 8 | 0.000 5 |
p14 | 388 | 晴 | 7.7 | 0.191 6 | 0.002 4 | p5 | 751 | 晴 | 0.0 | 3.066 3 | 0.038 3 |
p15 | 477 | 晴 | 1.8 | 1.257 3 | 0.015 7 | p32 | 117 0 | 晴 | 2.3 | 1.485 8 | 0.018 6 |
p16 | 464 | 晴 | 3.1 | 0.907 4 | 0.011 3 | p33 | 160 1 | 晴 | 3.1 | 1.155 3 | 0.014 4 |
p17 | 415 | 晴 | 4.5 | 0.437 6 | 0.005 5 | p34 | 137 0 | 晴 | 4.7 | 0.605 2 | 0.007 6 |
p3 | 139 1 | 多云 | 0.0 | 5.025 9 | 0.062 8 | p35 | 136 9 | 晴 | 4.0 | 1.145 5 | 0.014 3 |
p18 | 107 6 | 晴 | 9.1 | 1.901 7 | 0.023 8 | p36 | 167 1 | 晴 | 5.7 | 0.514 9 | 0.006 4 |
p19 | 455 | 晴 | 10.7 | 1.381 6 | 0.017 3 | p37 | 123 4 | 晴 | 3.4 | 0.340 7 | 0.004 3 |
p20 | 599 | 晴 | 12.5 | 0.731 5 | 0.009 1 | p38 | 119 5 | 晴 | 5.1 | 0.178 9 | 0.002 2 |
p21 | 849 | 晴 | 17.2 | 0.053 4 | 0.000 7 | p39 | 155 9 | 晴 | 6.0 | 0.038 6 | 0.000 5 |
p22 | 176 9 | 晴 | 18.4 | 0.045 9 | 0.000 6 | p40 | 128 7 | 晴 | 3.2 | 0.133 8 | 0.001 7 |
Table 3
Transition rate
变迁 | 速率λ | 变迁 | 速率λ | 变迁 | 速率λ | 变迁 | 速率λ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t1 | 0.833 | t14 | 0.222 | t27 | 0.102 | t40 | 0.159 |
t2 | 0.476 | t15 | 0.175 | t28 | 0.069 | t41 | 0.294 |
t3 | 0.270 | t16 | 0.110 | t29 | 0.323 | t42 | 0.196 |
t4 | 0.185 | t17 | 0.093 | t30 | 0.182 | t43 | 0.167 |
t5 | 0.137 | t18 | 0.080 | t31 | 0.088 | t44 | 0.149 |
t6 | 0.128 | t19 | 0.058 | t32 | 0.074 | t45 | 0.313 |
t7 | 0.714 | t20 | 0.054 | t33 | 0.067 | t46 | 0.154 |
t8 | 0.278 | t21 | 0.049 | t34 | 0.435 | t47 | 0.130 |
t9 | 0.208 | t22 | 0.185 | t35 | 0.323 | t48 | 0.111 |
t10 | 0.128 | t23 | 0.145 | t36 | 0.213 | t49 | 0.102 |
t11 | 0.112 | t24 | 0.079 | t37 | 0.169 | ||
t12 | 0.556 | t25 | 0.066 | t38 | 0.250 | ||
t13 | 0.323 | t26 | 0.137 | t39 | 0.175 |
Table 4
Coefficient of mean variation
平均变化系数μ | 值 | 平均变化系数μ | 值 | 平均变化系数μ | 值 | 平均变化系数μ | 值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
μ1 | 1 | μ14 | 2.93 | μ27 | 1.45 | μ40 | 0.38 |
μ2 | 2.32 | μ15 | 1.3 | μ28 | 1.75 | μ41 | 1 |
μ3 | 1.48 | μ16 | 1 | μ29 | 1 | μ42 | 1.73 |
μ4 | 1.78 | μ17 | 0.53 | μ30 | 1.99 | μ43 | 1.41 |
μ5 | 1.73 | μ18 | 0.47 | μ31 | 1.63 | μ44 | 0.35 |
μ6 | 1.43 | μ19 | 1.92 | μ32 | 1.41 | μ45 | 1 |
μ7 | 1 | μ20 | 0.55 | μ33 | 1.55 | μ46 | 1.92 |
μ8 | 2.93 | μ21 | 2.03 | μ34 | 1 | μ47 | 1.73 |
μ9 | 1.72 | μ22 | 1 | μ35 | 1.61 | μ48 | 1.83 |
μ10 | 2.58 | μ23 | 0.72 | μ36 | 1.81 | μ49 | 0.44 |
μ11 | 1.63 | μ24 | 2.15 | μ37 | 0.44 | ||
μ12 | 1 | μ25 | 1.32 | μ38 | 1 | ||
μ13 | 1.38 | μ26 | 1 | μ39 | 1.83 |
1 | 竹涛, 朱晓晶, 牛文凤, 等. 国内外挥发性有机物排放标准对比研究[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2020, 5(2): 209-218. |
Zhu Tao, Zhu Xiaojing, Niu Wenfeng, et al. Comparative Study on Emission Standards of Volatile Organic Compounds at Home and Abroad[J]. Journal of Mining Science, 2020, 5(2): 209-218. | |
2 | 胡桐搏, 张长平, 刘浩, 等. VOCs废气危害及处理技术进展[J].化工管理, 2018(10): 125-127. |
Hu Tongbo, Zhang Changping, Liu Hao, et al. Hazards of VOCs and Progress of Treatment Technology[J]. Chemical Industry Management, 2018(10): 125-127. | |
3 | Zhang Xinmin, Xue Zhigang, Hong Li, et al. Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds Pollution in China[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences (S1001-0742), 2017, 55(5): 69-75. |
4 | 蒋美青, 陆克定, 苏榕, 等. 我国典型城市群O3污染成因和关键VOCs活性解析[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(12): 1130-1141. |
Jiang Meiqing, Lu Keding, Su Rong, et al. Causes of Ozone Pollution and Analysis of Key VOCs Activity in Typical Urban Agglomerations in China [J]. Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(12): 1130-1141. | |
5 | 毕如意. 辽东湾新区环境空气VOCs污染监测与成因分析[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018. |
Bi Ruyi. Monitoring and Cause Analysis of VOCs Pollution in Liaodong Bay New Area[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018. | |
6 | 古颖纲, 虞小芳, 杨闻达, 等. 广州市天河区2016年雨季挥发性有机物污染特征及来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6): 2528-2537. |
Gu Yinggang, Yu Xiaofang, Yang Wenda, et al. Pollution Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Volatile Organic Compounds in Rainy Season of 2016 in Tianhe District, Guangzhou[J]. Environmental Science, 2018, 39(6): 2528-2537. | |
7 | Zhang Xufeng, Yin Yuanyuan, Wen Jianhui, et al. Characteristics, Reactivity and Source Apportionment of Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in a Typical Tourist City[J]. Atmospheric Environment (S1352-2310), 2019, 215:116898.1-116898.13. |
8 | 窦筱艳, 赵雪艳, 徐珣, 等. 应用化学质量平衡模型解析西宁大气PM2.5的来源[J]. 中国环境监测, 2016, 32(4): 7-14. |
Dou Xiaoyan, Zhao Xueyan, Xu Xun, et al. Application of Chemical Mass Balance Model to the Source Analysis of PM2.5 in Xining[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2016, 32(4): 7-14. | |
9 | Guo H, So K L, Simpson I J, et al. C1-C8 Volatile Organic Compounds in the Atmosphere of Hong Kong: Overview of Atmospheric Processing and Source Apportionment[J]. Atmospheric Environment (S1352-2310), 2007, 41(7): 1456-1472. |
10 | 龙启超, 陈军辉, 廖婷婷, 等. 乐山市2016年冬季颗粒物重污染过程与输送路径及潜在源区[J].环境科学研究, 2019, 32(2): 263-272. |
Long Qichao, Chen Junhui, Liao Tingting, et al. Heavy Pollution Process, Transport Path and Potential Source Area of Particulate Matter in Winter of 2016 in Leshan City[J]. Environmental Science Research, 2019, 32(2): 263-272. | |
11 | 王郭臣, 王东启, 陈振楼. 北京冬季严重污染过程的PM2.5污染特征和输送路径及潜在源区[J].中国环境科学, 2016, 36(7): 1931-1937. |
Wang Guochen, Wang Dongqi, Chen Zhenlou.Pollution Characteristics, Transport Pathways and Potential Source Areas of PM2.5 during Severe Pollution Process in Winter in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2016, 36 (7): 1931-1937. | |
12 | 袁崇义. Petri网原理与应用[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2005. |
Yuan Chongyi. Principle and Application of Petri Nets[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2005. | |
13 | 何宁, 吴宗之, 郑伟. 一种改进的有毒气体扩散高斯模型算法及仿真[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2010, 18(4): 571-580. |
He Ning, Wu Zongzhi, Zheng Wei. An Improved Gaussian Model Algorithm for Toxic Gas Diffusion and its Simulation[J]. Journal of Applied Foundation and Engineering Science, 2010, 18(4): 571-580. |
[1] | Yanqiang Di, Ting Li, Shaochong Feng, Qiongyao Liu, Jianhong Lü, Zhijia Chen, Yang Zhang, Pengfei Cao. Parallel Simulation System of Equipment Precision Maintenance Based on Cloud-Edge-End Architecture [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(09): 1909-1919. |
[2] | Minghao Li, Wenhao Bi, An Zhang, Wenxuan Sun. Unmanned Air Vehicles Launching Aircraft Combat System and Key Technologies for Penetrating Counterair [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 1920-1932. |
[3] | Yanfang Fu, Nan Zhang, Jianing Wei, Shaochun Qu, Ying Lu, Chang Liu. OPNET Based Simulation of Hybrid TDMA Protocol for Helicopters Datalink [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 1933-1940. |
[4] | Junren Luo, Wanpeng Zhang, Weilin Yuan, Zhenzhen Hu, Shaofei Chen, Jing Chen. Research on Opponent Modeling Framework for Multi-agent Game Confrontation [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 1941-1955. |
[5] | Li Zhang, Huizhen Zhang, Dong Liu, Yuxin Lu. Particle Swarm Algorithm for Solving Emergency Material Dispatch Considering Urgency [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 1988-1998. |
[6] | Qiming Qi, Ruigang Fu, Ping Wang, Min Wang, Hongqi Fan. Design of Optical Compound Eye Simulation Software for Small Aircraft Applications [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 1999-2008. |
[7] | Yiting Zhu, Yun Yan, Zhaocheng He. Mesoscopic Modeling and Simulation of Mixed Traffic Flow of Buses and Vehicles [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 2019-2027. |
[8] | Chengbing Li, Yunfei Li, Peng Wu. Study on Invulnerability of Urban Agglomeration Passenger Traffic Network Considering Time Characteristics [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 2037-2045. |
[9] | Junjie Sheng, Zhao Tang, Shaodi Dong, Shuyang Wu, Hao Liang. Architecture Design and Prototype Verification of Railway Vehicle Dynamics Cloud Platform [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 2056-2064. |
[10] | Lifeng Zhang, Yu Miao. A High Resolution Reconstruction Method of Temperature Distribution in Acoustic Tomography [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 2065-2073. |
[11] | Wen Zheng, Zhe Zhang, Jingyi Zhu. Simulation of the Market Exclusive Competition between Platforms [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(9): 2098-2106. |
[12] | Weidong Jin, Shuli Zhang, Peng Tang, Man Zhang. Image Dehazing Network Based on Densely Connected Residual Block and Channel Pixel Attention [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(8): 1663-1673. |
[13] | Huilin Zhang, Yujie Jin, Haima Yang. Sensorless Control of PMSM Based on an ANFIS Optimized Flux Sliding Mode Observer [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(8): 1682-1690. |
[14] | Qimiao Xie, Shuaishuai Guo. Research on Passenger Ship Evacuation Simulation Based on Social Force Model [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(8): 1710-1724. |
[15] | Wanjie Hu, Jianjun Dong, Rui Ren, Zhilong Chen. Layout Planning of Metro-based Underground Logistics System Network Considering Fuzzy Uncertainties [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(8): 1725-1740. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||