基于行车动力学仿真的半挂车弯道超车风险分析

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201804028

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 1439-1447.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201804028

基于行车动力学仿真的半挂车弯道超车风险分析

张驰^1,2, 齐晨¹, 闫晓敏¹, 邵东建¹, 张敏¹

1. 长安大学教育部特殊地区公路工程重点实验室,陕西西安 710064;
2. 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西西安 710075

收稿日期:2016-02-29 修回日期:2016-04-29 发布日期:2019-01-04
作者简介:张驰(1981-),男,四川宜宾,博士,副教授,研究方向为交通安全与道路仿真。
基金资助:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2014BAG 05B01), 教育部博士点基金新教师项目(2012020512 0013), 交通运输部应用基础研究(2014319812170), 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2013G2211005& 310821151017)

Risk Analysis of Semitrailer Overtaking on Curved Sections Based on Dynamic Simulation

Zhang Chi^1,2, Qi Chen¹, Yan Xiaomin¹, Shao Dongjian¹, Zhang Min¹

1. Key Laboratory of Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China;
2. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd, Xi’an 710075, China;

Received:2016-02-29 Revised:2016-04-29 Published:2019-01-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了研究半挂车弯道超车行为的安全性,利用多体动力学仿真软件TruckSim,建立了车辆的动力学模型、道路模型以及驾驶员预瞄轨迹模型。通过改变道路超高、圆曲线半径及车辆转弯半径、速度,对大货车的不同换道工况进行了仿真试验,以横向荷载转移率为评价指标,对车辆的安全性进行了评价,运用Spss回归分析建立了六轴半挂车侧翻稳定性预测模型,对西部某高速公路中的五个弯道进行了超车风险评价。研究结果表明：车辆在弯道超车的过程中会经历一个反超高,该处的行车风险随着超高的增大表现递增的趋势;当大货车行驶速度为120 km/h、在超高不小于8%的弯道路段换道行驶时,行车风险较大。

关键词: 交通工程, 风险分析, 大货车稳定性, 平曲线路段, TruckSim仿真

Abstract: To study the safety of semitrailers corner overtaking behavior, the dynamic model of vehicle, the road model and the drivers' aiming trajectory model were developed by multi-body dynamics simulation software TruckSim. The semitrailers were simulated in separate working conditions by changing the super-elevations, circular curve radius, vehicle turning radius and speed. Lateral load transfer rate was invoked as the evaluation index for evaluating the vehicle's safety. The model of six axle semitrailer side tumbling stability prediction was established through the Spss regression; the risk of overtaking on five separate bends of a western highway was evaluated by the model. Results showed that vehicle experienced an anti super-elevation during the overtaking process in curves. The risk of driving in the anti super-elevation section is higher with super-elevation increasing. The risk is high when the semitrailers change track at the design speed of 120km/h in curves with super-elevation of no less than 8%.

Key words: traffic engineering, risk analysis, lorry stability, curve sections, TruckSim simulation

中图分类号:

TP391.9

张驰, 齐晨, 闫晓敏, 邵东建, 张敏. 基于行车动力学仿真的半挂车弯道超车风险分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(4): 1439-1447.

Zhang Chi, Qi Chen, Yan Xiaomin, Shao Dongjian, Zhang Min. Risk Analysis of Semitrailer Overtaking on Curved Sections Based on Dynamic Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(4): 1439-1447.

参考文献

[1] Mcgee H W, Hanscom F R.Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety[C]// ITE 2009 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, 2009.
[2] Takano S, Nagai M, Taniguchi T, et al.Study on a vehicle dynamics model for improving roll stability[J]. Jsae Review (S0389-4304), 2003, 24(2): 149-156.
[3] Dahlberg E, Stensson A.The dynamic rollover threshold- a heavy truck sensitivity study[J]. International Journal of Vehicle Design (S0143-3369), 2006, 40(1/2/3): 228-250.
[4] Furtado G, Easa S, Abd E H A. Vehicle stability on combined horizontal and vertical alignments[C]// Proc., Csce Transportation Conference, USA: Arlington, 2002: 1630-1635.
[5] 孙川, 吴超仲, 褚端峰, 等. 基于车辆侧向稳定性分析的弯道行驶安全评价[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2014, 32(6): 95-100.
Sun Chuan, Wu Chaozhong, Chu Duanfeng, et al.Safety Evaluation of Driving on Curves Based on Analysis of Vehicle Lateral Stability[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2014, 32(6): 95-100.
[6] 孙璐, 游克思, 王易阳, 等. 道路因素对车辆侧翻的影响分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(3): 644-648.
Sun Lu, You Kesi, Wang Yiyang, et al.Influence analysis of road conditions on vehicle rollover[J]. Journal of southeast university( Natural Science Edition) 2013, 43(3): 644-648.
[7] 时晓杰, 何杰. 基于ADAMS/Car的车辆侧翻风险因素研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2014, 31(10): 130-133.
Shi Xiaojie, He Jie, Study on Rollover Risk Factors of Vehicles Based on ADAMS/Car[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2014, 31(10): 130-133.
[8] 张驰, 邵东建, 张敏. 基于小客车侧滑微观仿真曲线路段行车风险分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(7): 1609-1627.
Zhang Chi, Shao Dongjian, Zhang Min.Risk Analysis of Passenger Car Moving on Curved Sections Based on Sideslip Microscopic Simulation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(7): 1609-1627.
[9] Kordani A A, Molan A M, Monajjem S, et al.Simulation Modeling of Dynamic Response of Vehicles to Different Types of Speed Control Humps[C]//Transportation & Development Congress, USA, E Sadeghvaziri, 2014: 533-542.
[10] Rakha H, Yu B.Truck Performance Curves Reflective of Truck and Pavement Characteristics[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering (S0733-947X), 2004, 130(6): 753-767.
[11] 交通运输部综合规划司. 2013中国高速公路运输量统计调查分析报告[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2014.
Department of comprehensive planning of the Ministry of transportation and transportation. 2013 statistics and analysis report on the traffic volume of Expressway in China [M]. BeiJing: China Communications Press, 2014.
[12] 张驰, 华贵龙, 张敏. 考虑大货车横向稳定性的平曲线设计控制指标[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 34(3): 36-41.
Zhang Chi, Hua Guilong, Zhang Min.Control Index of Horizontal Curve Design Considering Truck’s Lateral Stability[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiao tong university (Natural Science), 2015, 34(3):36-41.
[13] 李玮, 高德芝, 段建民. 智能车辆自由换道模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2010, 27(2): 119-123.
Li Wei, Gao Dezhi, Duan Jianmin.Research on Lane Change Model for Intelligent Vehicles[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27(2): 119-123.
[14] 王崇伦, 李振龙, 陈阳舟, 等. 考虑换道约束空间的车辆换道模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2012, 29(1): 121-127.
Wang Chonglun, Li Zhenlong, Chen Yangzhou, et al.Research on Lane-changing Models Considering Restricted Space[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2012, 29(1):121-127.
[15] 徐中明, 于海兴, 伍小龙, 等. 车辆侧翻指标与侧翻风险因素分析[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2013, 36(3): 25-31.
Xu Zhongming, Yu Haixing, Wu Xiaolong, et al.Analysis on Rollover Index and Rollover Risk Factors of Vehicles[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2013, 36(3): 25-31.
[16] 张驰, 孟良, 汪双杰, 等. 高速公路曲线路段小客车制动行为侧滑风险仿真分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(12): 134-142.
Zhang Chi, Meng Liang, Wang Shuangjie, et al.Sideslip Risk Simulation Analysis of Passenger Car Braking Behavior on Expressway Curved Sections[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(12): 134-142.
[17] 汪双杰, 张驰, 金龙, 等. 基于模糊综合评判的山区危险性急弯路段辅助决策方法[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(12): 120-127.
Wang Shuangjie, Zhang Chi, Jin Long, et al.Auxiliary Decision-making Method on Risky Sharp Turn Section in Mountain Area Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(12):120-127.

基于行车动力学仿真的半挂车弯道超车风险分析

Risk Analysis of Semitrailer Overtaking on Curved Sections Based on Dynamic Simulation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘展宏, 杨秀建, 吴相稷, 黄震. 基于元胞自动机的雾天车辆跟驰建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(10): 2399-2410.
[2]	戢晓峰, 戈艺澄. 基于深度学习的节假日高速公路交通流预测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(6): 1164-1171.
[3]	周晨静, 高亚聪, 荣建. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定方法改善研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(11): 2112-2120.
[4]	邵海鹏, 郑斌斌, 隆林栩. 双向双车道施工区信号控制方法及仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 448-459.
[5]	周晨静, 荣建, 郭琳科. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定结果取值方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(12): 2802-2809.
[6]	曹祎, 李彦瑾, 罗霞. 考虑网约车影响的出租车乘客出行方式仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(2): 505-512.
[7]	刘明宇, 吴建平, 王钰博, 何磊. 基于深度学习的交通流量预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(11): 4100-4106.
[8]	黄宝军, 房晓丹, 王洁宁. 基于多agent的跑道侵入风险分析建模及仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(4): 910-917.
[9]	张威威, 李瑞敏, 谢中教. 基于深度学习的城市道路旅行时间预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(10): 2309-2316.
[10]	林培群, 刘佳辉, 姚凯斌. 道路交通事故应急处置的微观在线仿真方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(5): 1158-1164.
[11]	邝先验, 曹韦华, 吴赟. 考虑混入逆行车辆的非机动车流元胞自动机模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(2): 268-274.
[12]	杨宝森, 郑柯君, 来玲. 基于设计结构矩阵的复杂研发项目过程模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(9): 2187-2193.
[13]	张驰, 邵东建, 张敏. 基于小客车侧滑微观仿真曲线路段行车风险分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(7): 1609-1616.
[14]	杨宝森, 杨楠, 崔立. 复杂产品研发项目进度费用风险的仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(11): 2811-2815.