系统仿真学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (7): 2020-2036.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.25-0745
于俊杰1, 吉卫喜1,2, 陈琛3, 卢璟钰1, 张朝阳1,2
收稿日期:2025-08-04
修回日期:2025-09-30
出版日期:2026-07-28
发布日期:2026-07-31
通讯作者:
吉卫喜
第一作者简介:于俊杰(1995-),男,博士生,研究方向为智能制造、高级计划排程等。
基金资助:Yu Junjie1, Ji Weixi1,2, Chen Chen3, Lu Jingyu1, Zhang Chaoyang1,2
Received:2025-08-04
Revised:2025-09-30
Online:2026-07-28
Published:2026-07-31
Contact:
Ji Weixi
摘要:
针对订单可拆分的多目标混合流水车间调度问题(order splitting multi-objective hybrid flow-shop scheduling problem, OSMOHFSP),构建了以最小化最大完工时间和订单总延迟为双目标的优化模型。引入固定子批规格约束以反映实际生产中常见的拆分限制。设计了一种基于子批规格候选集合的子批生成策略,用于高效筛选可行拆分组合,有效压缩搜索空间维度与计算复杂度。提出融合NSGA-II与SA的混合多目标元启发式算法,通过构造2种交叉与4种变异算子增强全局搜索能力,嵌入多种邻域策略、Pareto自适应接受准则与Pareto归档机制的改进SA,用于挖掘拆分方案与调度序列协同优化的潜能,引入改进的拥挤距离计算与精英保留策略以保障解集多样性与优质个体传承。仿真实验结果显示所提算法在求解OSMOHFSP时相较对比算法表现出更好的收敛性、多样性和支配优势。
中图分类号:
于俊杰,吉卫喜,陈琛等 . 订单可拆分的多目标混合流水车间调度研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(7): 2020-2036.
Yu Junjie,Ji Weixi,Chen Chen,et al . Research on Multi-objective Hybrid Flow-shop Scheduling with Order Splitting[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2026, 38(7): 2020-2036.
表1
模型符号定义
| 符号 | 定义 |
|---|---|
| i, a | 订单索引 |
| j, b | 子批索引 |
| k | 阶段、工序索引 |
| l | 机器索引 |
| h, c | 速度索引 |
| n | 订单总数 |
| pi | 订单i的子批总数 |
| Qi | 订单i的总需求量 |
| s | 阶段总数 |
| mk | 阶段k的机器数量 |
| vl | 机器l的速度总数 |
| qij | 订单i的子批j的批量 |
| Oijk | 订单i的子批j的第k道工序 |
| 订单i的完工时间 | |
| Oijk 的加工开始时间 | |
| Oijk 的加工结束时间 | |
| Di | 订单i的截止日期 |
| tijklh | 工序Oijk 在机器l上以h速度的加工时间 |
| wijkl | 0-1变量,若工序Oijk 能在机器l上加工,其值为1,否则为0 |
| uijkl | 0-1变量,若工序Oijk 在机器l上加工,其值为1,否则为0 |
| xijklh | 0-1变量,若工序Oijk 在机器l上以h的速度加工,其值为1,否则为0 |
| yijkabkl | 0-1变量,若工序Oijk 先于工序Oabk 在机器l上加工,其值为1,否则为0 |
| zij | 0-1变量,若订单i的子批j的批量非0(qij ≥1),其值为1,否则为0 |
| E | 一个很大的正数 |
表3
变体算法在随机算例上的RDI结果
| 算例 | 算法① | 算法② | 算法③ | 算法④ | 算法⑤ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 121.09 | 39.18 | 44.04 | 36.98 | 30.64 |
| 9 | 143.16 | 48.03 | 37.44 | 33.30 | 28.78 |
| 10 | 155.04 | 38.02 | 41.02 | 35.48 | 26.80 |
| 11 | 126.84 | 76.51 | 74.04 | 63.71 | 61.89 |
| 12 | 174.41 | 92.15 | 63.72 | 67.16 | 59.15 |
| 18 | 139.52 | 76.99 | 73.71 | 73.23 | 37.16 |
| 22 | 131.65 | 49.70 | 57.95 | 27.50 | 24.77 |
| 23 | 141.94 | 79.49 | 59.69 | 63.90 | 29.85 |
| 26 | 95.11 | 49.84 | 48.97 | 29.62 | 9.38 |
| 29 | 143.49 | 42.13 | 60.83 | 41.52 | 18.16 |
表4
各算法在测试集上的RDI和HV结果
| 组号 | 算例规模 | NSGA-II | NSTLBO | MOPSO | NSLSO | NSGA-II-SA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDI/% | HV | RDI/% | HV | RDI/% | HV | RDI/% | HV | RDI/% | HV | ||
| 平均 | 26.30 | 4.56×108 | 163.21 | 1.07×107 | 150.97 | 2.03×107 | 110.75 | 8.41×107 | 8.40 | 5.64×108 | |
| 1 | 10×2×3×3 | 23.67 | 4.75×106 | 137.95 | 4.55×105 | 113.36 | 8.72×105 | 91.03 | 1.69×106 | 5.97 | 5.76×106 |
| 2 | 10×2×3×5 | 20.63 | 2.01×106 | 135.33 | 1.79×105 | 121.57 | 3.16×105 | 81.49 | 8.35×105 | 7.05 | 2.38×106 |
| 3 | 10×2×5×3 | 23.32 | 6.24×106 | 142.44 | 3.65×105 | 126.23 | 8.90×105 | 89.40 | 2.19×106 | 8.87 | 7.28×106 |
| 4 | 10×2×5×5 | 21.52 | 4.49×106 | 148.21 | 3.27×105 | 131.33 | 6.67×105 | 87.06 | 1.82×106 | 8.89 | 5.05×106 |
| 5 | 10×4×3×3 | 32.07 | 9.22×106 | 150.99 | 6.35×105 | 138.49 | 1.06×106 | 104.60 | 2.96×106 | 8.81 | 1.19×107 |
| 6 | 10×4×3×5 | 27.26 | 5.42×106 | 147.50 | 4.68×105 | 139.64 | 5.99×105 | 101.13 | 1.78×106 | 6.56 | 6.82×106 |
| 7 | 10×4×5×3 | 22.77 | 2.71×107 | 162.79 | 1.37×106 | 148.92 | 2.45×106 | 97.02 | 9.55×106 | 9.69 | 3.11×107 |
| 8 | 10×4×5×5 | 24.43 | 1.12×107 | 158.69 | 5.86×105 | 146.10 | 1.04×106 | 95.39 | 4.16×106 | 9.49 | 1.33×107 |
| 9 | 10×8×3×3 | 33.57 | 2.27×107 | 166.20 | 9.95×105 | 151.71 | 1.97×106 | 111.76 | 6.96×106 | 8.02 | 3.08×107 |
| 10 | 10×8×3×5 | 24.52 | 9.95×106 | 151.65 | 7.83×105 | 136.72 | 1.26×106 | 94.84 | 3.49×106 | 5.84 | 1.22×107 |
| 11 | 10×8×5×3 | 24.62 | 2.97×107 | 168.31 | 1.08×106 | 155.46 | 2.06×106 | 110.48 | 7.67×106 | 9.15 | 3.53×107 |
| 12 | 10×8×5×5 | 23.99 | 2.28×107 | 163.66 | 1.21×106 | 148.57 | 1.99×106 | 99.60 | 7.55×106 | 9.24 | 2.70×107 |
| 13 | 20×2×3×3 | 24.21 | 3.27×107 | 148.38 | 2.51×106 | 139.71 | 3.02×106 | 99.93 | 1.08×107 | 6.97 | 3.90×107 |
| 14 | 20×2×3×5 | 19.53 | 2.04×107 | 151.68 | 1.22×106 | 130.96 | 2.92×106 | 91.54 | 7.29×106 | 5.39 | 2.35×107 |
| 15 | 20×2×5×3 | 21.14 | 6.70×107 | 159.77 | 3.13×106 | 151.21 | 5.30×106 | 109.27 | 1.73×107 | 7.49 | 7.73×107 |
| 16 | 20×2×5×5 | 21.07 | 2.82×107 | 158.81 | 1.56×106 | 143.09 | 3.01×106 | 105.18 | 8.13×106 | 8.91 | 3.17×107 |
| 17 | 20×4×3×3 | 30.15 | 6.65×107 | 156.04 | 4.33×106 | 153.18 | 4.65×106 | 106.05 | 2.02×107 | 8.50 | 8.55×107 |
| 18 | 20×4×3×5 | 26.59 | 4.00×107 | 160.47 | 2.73×106 | 149.58 | 3.48×106 | 106.75 | 1.18×107 | 7.96 | 5.00×107 |
| 19 | 20×4×5×3 | 26.25 | 1.78×108 | 168.90 | 6.03×106 | 154.70 | 1.32×107 | 115.24 | 4.38×107 | 10.93 | 2.11×108 |
| 20 | 20×4×5×5 | 22.19 | 8.10×107 | 170.07 | 2.66×106 | 155.96 | 5.58×106 | 107.86 | 2.22×107 | 9.77 | 9.29×107 |
| 21 | 20×8×3×3 | 33.70 | 1.92×108 | 173.62 | 5.68×106 | 154.37 | 1.70×107 | 122.69 | 4.44×107 | 10.76 | 2.45×108 |
| 22 | 20×8×3×5 | 31.95 | 8.27×107 | 172.72 | 3.35×106 | 157.93 | 6.34×106 | 115.22 | 2.24×107 | 8.44 | 1.06×108 |
| 23 | 20×8×5×3 | 31.89 | 2.79×108 | 179.46 | 4.85×106 | 169.86 | 9.55×106 | 120.30 | 6.39×107 | 10.23 | 3.53×108 |
| 24 | 20×8×5×5 | 26.22 | 1.67×108 | 172.16 | 5.25×106 | 162.64 | 8.64×106 | 119.69 | 3.79×107 | 8.98 | 2.01×108 |
| 25 | 50×2×3×3 | 27.11 | 3.31×108 | 157.69 | 1.77×107 | 147.00 | 2.93×107 | 111.81 | 8.61×107 | 6.55 | 4.09×108 |
| 26 | 50×2×3×5 | 29.03 | 1.57×108 | 162.92 | 7.86×106 | 152.31 | 1.21×107 | 112.58 | 4.30×107 | 8.47 | 1.97×108 |
| 27 | 50×2×5×3 | 21.74 | 8.28×108 | 171.63 | 2.08×107 | 159.28 | 4.67×107 | 124.17 | 1.56×108 | 9.04 | 9.46×108 |
| 28 | 50×2×5×5 | 16.94 | 3.32×108 | 168.76 | 1.06×107 | 160.00 | 1.72×107 | 122.46 | 6.20×107 | 7.46 | 3.69×108 |
| 29 | 50×4×3×3 | 31.78 | 1.22×109 | 175.26 | 2.69×107 | 163.66 | 6.09×107 | 125.10 | 2.56×108 | 6.99 | 1.59×109 |
| 30 | 50×4×3×5 | 28.90 | 4.18×108 | 169.56 | 1.48×107 | 162.55 | 2.01×107 | 127.17 | 7.95×107 | 8.14 | 5.21×108 |
| 31 | 50×4×5×3 | 28.84 | 1.76×109 | 174.21 | 3.82×107 | 169.18 | 5.87×107 | 128.43 | 3.07×108 | 10.61 | 2.12×109 |
| 32 | 50×4×5×5 | 27.06 | 9.26×108 | 176.02 | 2.18×107 | 164.65 | 4.03×107 | 124.32 | 1.86×108 | 9.25 | 1.12×109 |
| 33 | 50×8×3×3 | 34.51 | 1.95×109 | 178.12 | 3.92×107 | 169.20 | 6.98×107 | 133.34 | 3.29×108 | 7.70 | 2.61×109 |
| 34 | 50×8×3×5 | 32.93 | 9.67×108 | 176.38 | 2.39×107 | 169.37 | 3.79×107 | 130.96 | 1.72×108 | 10.47 | 1.23×109 |
| 35 | 50×8×5×3 | 28.19 | 4.11×109 | 180.90 | 7.00×107 | 171.39 | 1.46×108 | 132.39 | 6.67×108 | 8.78 | 5.06×109 |
| 36 | 50×8×5×5 | 22.43 | 2.05×109 | 178.43 | 4.12×107 | 164.96 | 9.52×107 | 130.91 | 3.24×108 | 7.04 | 2.42×109 |
表5
各算法在测试集上的Cov和运行时间结果
| 组号 | 算例规模 | Cov1 | Cov1' | Cov2 | Cov2' | Cov3 | Cov3' | Cov4 | Cov4' | T1/s | T2/s | T3/s | T4/s | T5/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 平均 | 0.04 | 0.91 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 456 | 1 025 | 303 | 683 | 533 | |
| 1 | 10×2×3×3 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 76 | 168 | 45 | 106 | 92 |
| 2 | 10×2×3×5 | 0.07 | 0.87 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 65 | 145 | 39 | 91 | 79 |
| 3 | 10×2×5×3 | 0.09 | 0.83 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 106 | 245 | 66 | 154 | 127 |
| 4 | 10×2×5×5 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 134 | 306 | 83 | 193 | 166 |
| 5 | 10×4×3×3 | 0 | 0.97 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 99 | 224 | 61 | 143 | 120 |
| 6 | 10×4×3×5 | 0.02 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 215 | 59 | 136 | 113 |
| 7 | 10×4×5×3 | 0.09 | 0.82 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 189 | 431 | 118 | 274 | 228 |
| 8 | 10×4×5×5 | 0.07 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 169 | 380 | 104 | 252 | 204 |
| 9 | 10×8×3×3 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 178 | 397 | 110 | 259 | 213 |
| 10 | 10×8×3×5 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 172 | 395 | 110 | 253 | 205 |
| 11 | 10×8×5×3 | 0.08 | 0.86 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 282 | 639 | 177 | 407 | 340 |
| 12 | 10×8×5×5 | 0.08 | 0.80 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 329 | 744 | 210 | 479 | 398 |
| 13 | 20×2×3×3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 94 | 207 | 56 | 131 | 114 |
| 14 | 20×2×3×5 | 0 | 0.93 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 68 | 152 | 42 | 96 | 81 |
| 15 | 20×2×5×3 | 0.05 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 213 | 59 | 135 | 114 |
| 16 | 20×2×5×5 | 0.09 | 0.81 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 81 | 180 | 50 | 115 | 98 |
| 17 | 20×4×3×3 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 214 | 60 | 137 | 114 |
| 18 | 20×4×3×5 | 0.01 | 0.95 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 91 | 206 | 58 | 130 | 109 |
| 19 | 20×4×5×3 | 0.10 | 0.85 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 177 | 397 | 111 | 254 | 212 |
| 20 | 20×4×5×5 | 0.09 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 159 | 361 | 102 | 232 | 190 |
| 21 | 20×8×3×3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 388 | 864 | 246 | 559 | 463 |
| 22 | 20×8×3×5 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 383 | 860 | 247 | 560 | 446 |
| 23 | 20×8×5×3 | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 633 | 1 421 | 408 | 926 | 747 |
| 24 | 20×8×5×5 | 0.10 | 0.88 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 727 | 1 643 | 482 | 1 088 | 864 |
| 25 | 50×2×3×3 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 207 | 464 | 129 | 295 | 248 |
| 26 | 50×2×3×5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 224 | 499 | 144 | 320 | 267 |
| 27 | 50×2×5×3 | 0.11 | 0.85 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 484 | 1 063 | 296 | 680 | 581 |
| 28 | 50×2×5×5 | 0.13 | 0.71 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 575 | 1 294 | 364 | 829 | 685 |
| 29 | 50×4×3×3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 746 | 1 664 | 479 | 1 092 | 887 |
| 30 | 50×4×3×5 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 744 | 1 648 | 478 | 1 085 | 876 |
| 31 | 50×4×5×3 | 0 | 0.96 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 163 | 2 586 | 755 | 1 701 | 1 379 |
| 32 | 50×4×5×5 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 641 | 1 436 | 423 | 950 | 755 |
| 33 | 50×8×3×3 | 0 | 0.94 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 102 | 2 467 | 746 | 1 677 | 1 290 |
| 34 | 50×8×3×5 | 0.03 | 0.95 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 897 | 2 043 | 628 | 1 399 | 1 045 |
| 35 | 50×8×5×3 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 227 | 5 012 | 1 560 | 3 472 | 2 611 |
| 36 | 50×8×5×5 | 0.01 | 0.96 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 509 | 5 704 | 1 797 | 3 981 | 2 745 |
| [1] | Mendoza-Mendoza Adel, Ospino-Castro Wilfrido, Romero-Martínez Daniela. Production Scheduling in a Flexible Hybrid Flow Shop in the Food Industry Based on the Theory of Constraints[J]. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 2021, 52: 124-136. |
| [2] | Mariappan Kadarkarainadar Marichelvam, Prabaharan Thirumoorthy, Yang Xinshe. A Discrete Firefly Algorithm for the Multi-objective Hybrid Flowshop Scheduling Problems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(2): 301-305. |
| [3] | Cao Jianhua, Pan Ruilin, Xia Xue, et al. An Efficient Scheduling Approach for an Iron-steel Plant Equipped with Self-generation Equipment Under Time-of-use Electricity Tariffs[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 60: 100764. |
| [4] | Tliba Khalil, M L Diallo Thierno, Penas Olivia, et al. Digital Twin-driven Dynamic Scheduling of a Hybrid Flow Shop[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2023, 34(5): 2281-2306. |
| [5] | Wang Shijin, Wang Xiaodong, Chu Feng, et al. An Energy-efficient Two-stage Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem in a Glass Production[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(8): 2283-2314. |
| [6] | Liu Ming, Yang Xuenan, Chu Feng, et al. Energy-oriented Bi-objective Optimization for the Tempered Glass Scheduling[J]. Omega, 2020, 90: 101995. |
| [7] | Li Ronghao, Li Junqing, Li Jiake, et al. A Dimension-aware Gaining-sharing Knowledge Algorithm for Distributed Hybrid Flowshop Scheduling with Resource-dependent Processing Time[J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2024, 10(5): 6051-6080. |
| [8] | 李颖俐, 李新宇, 高亮. 混合流水车间调度问题研究综述[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(23): 2798-2813, 2828. |
| Li Yingli, Li Xinyu, Gao Liang. Review on Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problems[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 31(23): 2798-2813, 2828. | |
| [9] | Luo Lin, Yan Xuesong. Selection Hyperheuristic with Knowledge-based Q-learning for Dynamic Distributed Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem Considering Operation Inspection[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2025, 95: 101936. |
| [10] | Feng Yingjie, Kong Jili. Multi-objective Hybrid Flow-shop Scheduling in Parallel Sequential Mode While Considering Handling Time and Setup Time[J]. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(6): 3563. |
| [11] | Huang Hui, Luo Bin, Wang Zhongning, et al. Improved MOMVO Algorithm to Solve the Multi-objective HFSP Considering Machine Shutdown[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1873(1): 012049. |
| [12] | Kurt A. Integrating Sequence-dependent Setup Times and Blocking in Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling to Minimize Total Tardiness[J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2025, 16(1): 147-158. |
| [13] | Wang Yijian, Wang Gaige, Wang Ling. A Tree-based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for Energy-efficient Hybrid Flow-shop Scheduling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2025, 29(6): 2313-2327. |
| [14] | 轩华, 吕琳, 李冰. 考虑组合缓冲的分布式异构混合流水车间调度[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(10): 2672-2686. |
| Xuan Hua, Lin Lü, Li Bing. Distributed Heterogeneous Hybrid Flow-shop Scheduling Considering Combined Buffer[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(10): 2672-2686. | |
| [15] | Öztop Hande, Fatih Tasgetiren M, Kandiller Levent, et al. Ensemble of Metaheuristics for Energy-efficient Hybrid Flowshops: Makespan Versus Total Energy Consumption[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2020, 54: 100660. |
| [16] | Bozorgirad M A, Logendran R. A Comparison of Local Search Algorithms with Population-based Algorithms in Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problems with Realistic Characteristics[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 83(5): 1135-1151. |
| [17] | Chen T L, Cheng Chenyang, Yihan Chou. Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm for Energy-efficient Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling with Lot Streaming[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 290(1): 813-836. |
| [18] | Fan Jiaxin, Li Yingli, Xie Jin, et al. A Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithm Using Two Solution Representations for Hybrid Flow-shop Scheduling Problem[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2023, 53(3): 1752-1764. |
| [19] | Fattahi Parviz, Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini, Jolai Fariborz, et al. A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Setup Time and Assembly Operations[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(1): 119-134. |
| [20] | Dabiri Mohamadreza, Yazdani Mehdi, Naderi Bahman, et al. Modeling and Solution Methods for Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Job Rejection[J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22(3): 2721-2765. |
| [21] | Tang L, Xuan H. Lagrangian Relaxation Algorithms for Real-time Hybrid Flowshop Scheduling with Finite Intermediate Buffers[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2006, 57(3): 316-324. |
| [22] | Guinet A G P, Solomon M M. Scheduling Hybrid Flowshops to Minimize Maximum Tardiness or Maximum Completion Time[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1996, 34(6): 1643-1654. |
| [23] | Dios Manuel, Fernandez-Viagas Victor, Framinan Jose M. Efficient Heuristics for the Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Missing Operations[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 115: 88-99. |
| [24] | Gupta J N D, Tunc E A. Minimizing Tardy Jobs in a Two-stage Hybrid Flowshop[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 1998, 36(9): 2397-2417. |
| [25] | Yan Jihong, Li Lin, Zhao Fu, et al. A Multi-level Optimization Approach for Energy-efficient Flexible Flow Shop Scheduling[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137: 1543-1552. |
| [26] | Liao Ching-Jong, Tjandradjaja Evi, Chung Tsui-Ping. An Approach Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Bottleneck Heuristic to Solve Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12(6): 1755-1764. |
| [27] | 秦红斌, 李晨晓, 唐红涛, 等. 基于MOMA的可重入混合流水车间调度问题研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(1): 131-148. |
| Qin Hongbin, Li Chenxiao, Tang Hongtao, et al. Reentrant Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Problem Based on MOMA[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(1): 131-148. | |
| [28] | 温廷新, 关婷誉. 考虑能耗和运输的有限缓冲区混合流水车间调度[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(6): 1344-1358. |
| Wen Tingxin, Guan Tingyu. Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling with Limited Buffers Considering Energy Consumption and Transportation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(6): 1344-1358. | |
| [29] | 马训德, 毕利, 王俊杰. 基于群体免疫算法的绿色车间调度研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(11): 2578-2591. |
| Ma Xunde, Bi Li, Wang Junjie. Research on Green Job Shop Scheduling Based on Herd Immunity Optimizer[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(11): 2578-2591. | |
| [30] | Zhou Binghai, Liu Wenlong. Energy-efficient Multi-objective Scheduling Algorithm for Hybrid Flow Shop with Fuzzy Processing Time[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2019, 233(10): 1282-1297. |
| [31] | Zhang Wenqiang, Geng Huili, Li Chen, et al. Q-learning-based Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Local Search Within Factories for Energy-efficient Distributed Flow-shop Scheduling Problem[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2025, 36(1): 185-208. |
| [32] | Neufeld Janis S, Schulz Sven, Buscher Udo. A Systematic Review of Multi-objective Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 309(1): 1-23. |
| [33] | Zhu Huangqiu, Shi Yijian. Displacement Self-sensing Control of Permanent Magnet Assisted Bearingless Synchronous Reluctance Motor Based on Least Square Support Vector Machine Optimized by Improved NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2024, 71(2): 1201-1211. |
| [34] | Verma Shanu, Pant Millie, Snasel Vaclav. A Comprehensive Review on NSGA-II for Multi-objective Combinatorial Optimization Problems[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 57757-57791. |
| [35] | Li Xinyu, Gao Liang. An Effective Hybrid Genetic Algorithm and Tabu Search for Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 174: 93-110. |
| [36] | Yu Junjie, Chen Chen, Zhang Jian, et al. Quantitative Study of Solid-state Mechanical Mixing by High-pressure Torsion Based on Image Processing[J]. Materials Today Communications, 2024, 39: 109126. |
| [37] | Yue Caitong, Suganthan P N, Liang Jing, et al. Differential Evolution Using Improved Crowding Distance for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2021, 62: 100849. |
| [38] | Hu Xiaomin, Zhang Shourong, Li Min, et al. Multimodal Particle Swarm Optimization for Feature Selection[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 113, Part A: 113107887. |
| [39] | Yang Xunian, Hao Xiaochen, Yang Tianqi, et al. Elite-guided Multi-objective Cuckoo Search Algorithm Based on Crossover Operation and Information Enhancement[J]. Soft Computing, 2023, 27(8): 4761-4778. |
| [40] | Ma Haiping, Zhang Yajing, Sun Shengyi, et al. A Comprehensive Survey on NSGA-II for Multi-objective Optimization and Applications[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56(12): 15217-15270. |
| [41] | Venkata Rao Ravipudi. Jaya: An Advanced Optimization Algorithm and Its Engineering Applications[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 13-16. |
| [42] | Coello Coello C A, Lechuga M S. MOPSO: A Proposal for Multiple Objective Particle Swarm Optimization[C]//Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC' 02. Piscataway: IEEE, 2002: 1051-1056. |
| [43] | Karimi N, Davoudpour H. Multi-objective Colonial Competitive Algorithm for Hybrid Flowshop Problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 49: 725-733. |
| [44] | Lei Deming, Zheng Youlian. Hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling with Assembly Operations and Key Objectives: A Novel Neighborhood Search[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 61: 122-128. |
| [45] | Liu Chenfei, Qiang Cheng, Cheng Chenyang, et al. Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Distributed Hybrid Forging Flow-shops: A Novel Scheduling Approach to Capitalise on Residual Forging Heat[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2025, 63(6): 2170-2189. |
| [46] | Potts C N, Van Wassenhove L N. A Decomposition Algorithm for the Single Machine Total Tardiness Problem[J]. Operations Research Letters, 1982, 1(5): 177-181. |
| [47] | Taillard E. Benchmarks for Basic Scheduling Problems[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1993, 64(2): 278-285. |
| [48] | Pan Quanke, Ruiz Rubén, Alfaro-Fernández Pedro. Iterated Search Methods for Earliness and Tardiness Minimization in Hybrid Flowshops with Due Windows[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2017, 80: 50-60. |
| [49] | Yu Fei, Gao Liang, Lu Chao, et al. A Learning-based Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Energy-efficient Distributed Heterogeneous Type-2 Fuzzy Welding Shop Scheduling Problem with Factory Eligibility[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2025, 22: 9934-9947. |
| [50] | Vallada Eva, Ruiz Rubén, Minella Gerardo. Minimising Total Tardiness in the M-machine Flowshop Problem: A Review and Evaluation of Heuristics and Metaheuristics[J]. Computers and Operations Research, 2008, 35(4): 1350-1373. |
| [1] | 韩义勇, 王诗雨, 叶杨, 张震, 裴凤雀, 苑明海. 基于实时占用感知的电梯群控调度仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(7): 1993-2006. |
| [2] | 唐进君, 张帅杰. 考虑车载质量变化的混合动力公交车能量管理策略[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(6): 1583-1597. |
| [3] | 刘满强, 尚自强. 改进多目标差分算法应用于机械臂多目标轨迹规划研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(6): 1647-1668. |
| [4] | 梁斌豪, 魏静萱, 梁沨琴. 基于多区域动态分组的大规模多目标进化算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(4): 974-987. |
| [5] | 李德权, 熊婉. 基于SAC3Q-HDM的强化学习机器人路径规划[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(3): 714-724. |
| [6] | 邹静, 谭谞, 毛俊佶, 高海东, 谭建荣. 基于层次化显微特征建模与仿真的缺陷检测方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2026, 38(1): 1-13. |
| [7] | 陈娟, 郑旺, 刘倩倩, 鲁斌. 基于动态储位分配策略的自动化立库多目标优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(6): 1435-1448. |
| [8] | 顾文斌, 卿洁瑕, 方杰, 刘斯麒. 改进混合优化算法求解多目标IPPS问题[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(5): 1197-1209. |
| [9] | 吴自松, 苌道方, 盖宇春. 基于两阶段混合算法的四向穿梭式密集仓储系统货位分配优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(5): 1234-1245. |
| [10] | 古齐鸣, 陈嘉智, 曹国彦, 周晨初, 于登秀, 胡海峰. 一种仿真建模的置信度信息管理方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(5): 1314-1328. |
| [11] | 江雨燕, 马宁, 李艳, 甘如美江, 王付宇. 考虑动态预维护与绿色调度的协同优化问题[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(2): 362-378. |
| [12] | 刘翔, 金乾坤. 基于PAC-Bayes的多目标强化学习A2C算法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(12): 3212-3223. |
| [13] | 梁秀满, 刘子良, 刘振东. 基于深度强化学习的改进RRT算法路径规划[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(10): 2578-2593. |
| [14] | 丁新桓, 王华庆, 党旭. 考虑尾气排放的交叉口信号配时多目标优化研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(10): 2687-2700. |
| [15] | 王科, 官思佳, 殷希彦, 李西兴, 唐红涛. 基于混合遗传禁忌搜索算法的混流装配线平衡优化研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(1): 167-182. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||