一种不确定性动态环境下的威胁评估方法

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.24-FZ0735

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对战争复杂系统存在动态不确定性，提出一种基于先验信息和动态观测结果的威胁评估方法。对先验信息进行数据挖掘获得战场态势先验知识并构建装备关联置信矩阵；构建传感器模型，综合考虑先验知识和观测结果的情况下使用贝叶斯方法动态更新当前态势情况下蓝方实体的数量；确定威胁评价指标和指标权重，使用TOPSIS法完成威胁评估。该方法能较好地描述复杂多变的动态战场环境，并充分利用先验信息和动态观测结果对探测区域或探测位置附近探测盲区进行威胁评估。通过案例仿真分析验证了该方法的可行性。

关键词: 威胁评估, 数据挖掘, 贝叶斯, TOPSIS法, 不确定性

Abstract:

A threat assessment method based on priori information and dynamic observation results is studied for the existence of dynamic uncertainty in complex war systems. The data mining is applied to obtain prior knowledge on the battlefield situation and construct an equipment-related confidence matrix. The sensor model is constructed to dynamically update the number of blue-side entities under the current situation by using the Bayesian method and considering both intelligence and observation results. The threat evaluation indicators and their weights are determined, and the TOPSIS method is used to finish the threat assessment. This method can well describe the complex and changing dynamic battlefield environment and make full use of priori information and dynamic observation results for threat assessment of the detection area or the undetectable location nearby. The feasibility of this method is verified through case simulation analysis.

Key words: threat assessment, data mining, Bayesian, TOPSIS, uncertainty

中图分类号:

TP391.9

杨妹,王秉坤,张中杰等 . 一种不确定性动态环境下的威胁评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(12): 2741-2754.

Yang Mei,Wang Bingkun,Zhang Zhongjie,et al . A Threat Assessment Method in Uncertain Dynamic Environments[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2024, 36(12): 2741-2754.

图/表 14

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 23

1	曲长文, 何友, 马强. 应用多属性决策的威胁评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2000, 22(5): 26-29.
	Qu Changwen, He You, Ma Qiang. Threat Assessment Using Multiple Attribute Decision Making[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2000, 22(5): 26-29.
2	董彦非, 郭基联, 张恒喜. 多机空战目标威胁评估算法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2002, 27(4): 73-76.
	Dong Yanfei, Guo Jilian, Zhang Hengxi. Threat Assessment for Multi-aircraft-air Combat[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2002, 27(4): 73-76.
3	杨妹. 面向高层辅助决策支持的军事分析仿真系统关键技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014.
	Yang Mei. Research on Key Technologies of Military Analytic Simulation for High Level Decision-making[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014.
4	黄炎焱, 雷震, 薄煜明. 基于概率本体和多实体贝叶斯网络的目标威胁评估[C]//第八届中国指挥控制大会论文集. 北京: 中国指挥与控制学会, 2020: 656-661.
5	陆遥, 李东生. 基于威胁概率图的无人机作战场景模型设计[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2018, 33(5): 60-66, 79.
	Lu Yao, Li Dongsheng. Design of UAV Combat Scenario Model Based on Threat Probability Graph[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2018, 33(5): 60-66, 79.
6	Wen Jiaxing, Zhang Qijia, Li Yunchen. UUV Mission Re-planning Based on Threat Assessment of Uncertain Events[C]//2023 38th Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC). Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 341-346.
7	Li Danyi, Liu Meiqin, Zhang Senlin. Underwater Target Threat Assessment Method Based on Bayesian Network[C]//2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). Piscataway: IEEE, 2021: 3363-3367.
8	Cao Xiang, Sun Changyin, Wang Xuerao. Threat Assessment Strategy of Human-in-the-loop Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Under Uncertain Events[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024, 54(1): 520-532.
9	Shi Guoqing, Pu Junwei, Zhang Lin, et al. Situation Assessment Based on Multi-entity Bayesian Network[C]//2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA). Piscataway: IEEE, 2020: 702-707.
10	Gao Yang, Li Dongsheng, Zhong Hua. A Novel Target Threat Assessment Method Based on Three-way Decisions Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making Environment[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, 87: 103276.
11	Zhang Jinhuan, Shan Yujie, Dong Jian. A Threat Assessment Method Based on Correlation-similarity Information and Three-way Decisions in Interval Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 135: 108793.
12	Lu Yanli, Lei Xiaoli, Zhou Zhiping, et al. Approximate Reasoning Based on IFRS and DS Theory with Its Application in Threat Assessment[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 160558-160568.
13	Zhang Kun, Kong Weiren, Liu Peipei, et al. Assessment and Sequencing of Air Target Threat Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy and Dynamic VIKOR[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29(2): 305-310.
14	Li Yiyuan, Chen Weiyi, Liu Shukan, et al. Multi-UAV Cooperative Air Combat Target Assignment Method Based on VNS-IBPSO in Complex Dynamic Environment[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2024, 2024(1): 9980746.
15	王毅, 刘三阳, 张文, 等. 属性权重不确定的直觉模糊多属性决策的威胁评估方法[J]. 电子学报, 2014, 42(12): 2509-2514.
	Wang Yi, Liu Sanyang, Zhang Wen, et al. Threat Assessment Method with Uncertain Attribute Weight Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2014, 42(12): 2509-2514.
16	Zhou Lin, Zhang Meng, Weiwei Shuai, et al. Air Target Threat Assessment and Prediction Based on Improved GM(1,1) Model[C]//2023 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC). Piscataway: IEEE, 2023: 1-6.
17	Wang Yu, Fan Zilin, Ren Tianjun, et al. Target Threat Assessment in Air Combat with Incomplete Information[C]//2022 34th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). Piscataway: IEEE, 2022: 5326-5330.
18	Ristic Branko, Benavoli Alessio, Skvortsov Alex. Robust Target Area Search Using Sets of Probabilities[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2023, 142: 104195.
19	Yu Liang, Lin Da. Bayesian-based Search Decision Framework and Search Strategy Analysis in Probabilistic Search[J]. Scientific Programming, 2020, 2020(1): 8865381.
20	Ganter B, Rudolf W. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations[M]. Switzerland: Springer, 1999.
21	Agrawal R, Srikant R. Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases[C]//Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1994: 487-499.
22	贺毅辉. 作战模拟基础[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012.
	He Yihui. Fundamentals of Operational Simulation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012.
23	张堃, 周德云. 熵权与群组AHP相结合的TOPSIS法多目标威胁评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2008, 20(7): 1661-1664.
	Zhang Kun, Zhou Deyun. Application of TOPSIS Based on Entropy and GD-AHP in Evaluating Sequence of Air Target Threat[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2008, 20(7): 1661-1664.

类型	概率
人员	0.45
装备1	0.35
装备2	0.45
装备3	0.35
装备4	0.45
装备5	0.30

[1]	包哲, 李薇, 张潇方, 安宗元, 许野. 基于风、光联合出力仿真的多能联供系统鲁棒机会约束优化研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(8): 1895-1913.
[2]	解鑫, 胡小兵, 周航. 动态路网环境下的路径优化算法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(8): 1969-1981.
[3]	张坤鹏, 王艳, 纪志成. 基于不完全信息博弈的云制造群智能优化方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(4): 915-928.
[4]	税纪钧, 彭道刚, 宋炎侃, 周强. 计及风光不确定性含碳排放和碳惩罚的虚拟电厂优化调度策略[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(2): 305-319.
[5]	牟建鹏, 熊伟丽. 基于滑动窗和多块卷积自编码器的故障检测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(2): 423-435.
[6]	张鹏, 冯柯. 基于组合赋权-TOPSIS模型的防空重点保卫目标优选[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(11): 2644-2653.
[7]	周启帆, 刘海旭, 董志鹏, 徐银. 基于轨迹数据的大规模路网交通拥挤时空关联规则挖掘[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2024, 36(1): 260-271.
[8]	张立, 贺明玲, 尹秋霜, 李宁, 余乐安. 不确定条件下多周期应急物资配送优化研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(8): 1669-1680.
[9]	闫哲, 刘伟, 杜玉越. 基于逻辑博弈概率Petri网的地铁应急决策建模与分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(7): 1602-1618.
[10]	刘书元. 一种威胁指数加权的截击引导航线解算算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(5): 971-978.
[11]	刘君阳, 朱世松. 基于DBN的飞行保障力量配置辅助决策方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(5): 1008-1019.
[12]	范雅倩, 于松源, 房方. 热电联产虚拟电厂两阶段分布鲁棒优化调度[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(5): 1046-1058.
[13]	刘兆鹏, 徐新海, 袁博文, 张金璐. 一种多分辨率仿真模型构建方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(1): 202-211.
[14]	柴慧敏, 张勇, 李欣粤, 宋雅楠. 基于深度学习的空中目标威胁评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(7): 1459-1467.
[15]	聂凯, 曾科军, 孟庆海. 基于深度贝叶斯网络学习的不确定性建模方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(1): 79-85.