体系贡献率能效综合评估方法

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812004

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 4520-4529.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812004

体系贡献率能效综合评估方法

李小波¹, 林木¹, 束哲¹, 刘贵柏², 王涛¹, 王维平¹

1.国防科技大学系统工程学院,湖南长沙 410073;
2.中国人民解放军75600部队53分队,广东深圳 518048

收稿日期:2018-05-10 修回日期:2018-07-19 出版日期:2018-12-10 发布日期:2019-01-03
作者简介:李小波(1983-),男,湖南衡南,博士,讲师,研究方向为体系工程与体系仿真;林木(1983-),男,辽宁鞍山,硕士生,研究方向为军事建模与仿真。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71673292)

Synthesized Capability-Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Contribution Ratio to System-of-Systems

Li Xiaobo¹, Lin Mu¹, Shu Zhe¹, Liu Guibai², Wang Tao¹, Wang Weiping¹

1.College of Information System and Management, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China;
2. Troops 75600 of PLA, Shenzhen 518048, China

Received:2018-05-10 Revised:2018-07-19 Online:2018-12-10 Published:2019-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现代战争呈现出体系化网络化的发展趋势,成体系建设和成体系运用武器装备是体系对抗的必然要求。体系贡献率评估是推进武器装备体系化发展的重要抓手,亟需开展从理论概念到方法手段各方面的深入研究。从体系贡献的分类和武器装备全寿命周期管理两个维度建立了体系贡献率的研究框架,从现阶段的问题特点和研究基础出发给出了能力-效能角度的体系贡献率定义,提出了基于能效综合的体系贡献率评估方法和实施步骤,用一个实验案例验证了方法的可行性和有效性。

关键词: 体系贡献率, 体系工程, 体系能力评估, 体系效能仿真, 能力效能综合

Abstract: Since modern combats represent the development trend of systematization and network, it has become an essential requirement to build and use the equipment through a system-of-systems approach. The evaluation of contribution ratio to system-of-systems (CRSOS) is an important means to advance the development of weapon equipment systematization, and it is also urgently needed to carry out in-depth research on the theoretical concepts and methods. This paper establishes the research framework of CRSOS from the classification of contribution type and the equipment management life cycle. It proposes a CRSOS definition from the perspective of capability-efficiency dimension based on current problem characteristics and research progress. Tproposes a synthesized capability-effectiveness CRSOS evaluation method and implementation steps. Acase study is presented to validate the proposed method.

Key words: contribution ratio to system-of-systems (CRSOS), system-of-systems engineering, system-of-systems capability evaluation, system-of-systems effectiveness simulation, synthesized capability-effectiveness

中图分类号:

李小波, 林木, 束哲, 刘贵柏, 王涛, 王维平. 体系贡献率能效综合评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4520-4529.

Li Xiaobo, Lin Mu, Shu Zhe, Liu Guibai, Wang Tao, Wang Weiping. Synthesized Capability-Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Contribution Ratio to System-of-Systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(12): 4520-4529.

参考文献

[1] 张军扩. “七五”期间经济效益的综合分析—各要素对经济增长贡献率测算[J]. 经济研究, 1991, 4(4): 8-17.
ZHANG Junkuo.Comprehensive Analysis of Economic Benefits during the Seventh Five-Year Plan Period - Measurement of the Contribution Rate of Various Elements to Economic Growth[J]. Economic Research, 1991, 4(4): 8-17.
[2] 卜广志, 张宇. 系统在体系中的贡献率评估建模方法[C]. 北京: 中国系统工程学会第19届学术会议, 2016.
BU Guangzhi, ZHANG Yu.Modeling method for system contribution rate evaluation[C]. Beijing: 19th Academic Conference of Chinese Society of Systems Engineering, 2016.
[3] 罗鹏程, 周经伦, 金光. 武器装备体系作战效能与作战能力评估分析方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.
LUO Pengcheng, ZHOU Jinglun, JIN guang. Assessment and Analysis Methods for Combat Effectiveness and Combat Capability of Weapon Equipment System[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014.
[4] 郭齐胜. 装备作战仿真[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013.
GUO Qisheng.Equipment operational simulation[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013.
[5] 吕惠文, 张炜, 吕耀平, 等. 基于多视角的武器装备体系贡献率评估指标体系构建[J]. 装备学院学报, 2017, 28(3): 62-66.
LV Huiwen, ZHANG Wei, LV Yaoping, et al.Establishment of an index system for evaluating the contribution rate of weapon and equipment systems from multiple perspectives[J]. Journal of the Institute of Equipment, 2017, 28(3): 62-66.
[6] 金丛镇. 基于MMF--OODA的海军装备体系贡献度评估方法研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2017.
JIN Congzhen.Study on the evaluation method of contribution degree of naval equipment SoS based on MMF-OODA[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Technology, 2017.
[7] 罗小明, 朱延雷, 何榕. 基于SEM的武器装备作战体系贡献度评估方法[J]. 装备学院学报, 2015(5): 1-6.
LUO Xiaoming, ZHU Yanlei, HE Rong.Evaluation method of contribution degree of Weapon Equipment Combat System Based on SEM[J]. Journal of Institute of Equipment, 2015(5): 1-6.
[8] 陈小卫, 谢茂林, 张军奇. 新型装备对作战体系的贡献机理[J]. 装备学院学报, 2016, 27(6): 26-30.
CHEN Xiaowei, XIE Maolin, ZHANG Junqi.The contribution mechanism of new equipment to combat system[J]. Journal of Equipment College, 2016, 27(6): 26-30.
[9] Beach T D, Bock T.DoDAF limitations and enhancements for the Capability Test Methodology[C]. Spring Simulation Multiconference, 2007: 170-176.
[10] 张明智, 马力. 体系对抗OODA循环鲁棒性建模及仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 1968-1975.
ZHANG Mingzhi, MA Li.Modeling and Simulation of Cyclic Robustness of Systems against OODA[J]. Journal of Systems Simulation, 2017, 29(9): 1968-1975.
[11] 许永平, 石福丽, 杨峰, 等. 基于QFD与作战仿真的舰艇装备需求分析方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(1): 167-172.
XU Yongping, SHI Fuli, YANG Feng, et al.Requirement analysis method for warship equipment based on QFD and combat simulation[J]. Theory and practice of system engineering, 2010, 30(1): 167-172.
[12] 黄建新, 李群, 贾全, 等. 基于ABMS的体系效能评估框架研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2011, 33(8): 1794-1798.
HUANG Jianxin, LI Qun, JIA Quan, et al.Research on ABMS-based SoS effectiveness evaluation framework[J]. System Engineering and Electronic Technology, 2011, 33(8): 1794-1798.

体系贡献率能效综合评估方法

Synthesized Capability-Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Contribution Ratio to System-of-Systems

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张霖, 王昆玉, 赖李媛君, 任磊. 基于建模仿真的体系工程[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(2): 179-190.
[2]	荣明, 胡晓峰, 杨镜宇. 基于动态超网的作战体系结构弹性分析评估研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(6): 1055-1061.
[3]	荣明, 胡晓峰, 杨镜宇. 基于试验床的作战体系弹性评估研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4711-4717.
[4]	钱晓超, 唐伟, 陈伟, 陆营波, 陆志沣. 面向关键能力的陆军全域作战体系贡献率评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4786-4793.
[5]	张明智, 马力. 体系对抗OODA循环鲁棒性建模及仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 1968-1975.