工业软件平台多模式运营利益分配优化模型与仿真

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.25-0499

系统仿真学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2242-2257.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.25-0499

• 论文 • 上一篇

工业软件平台多模式运营利益分配优化模型与仿真

郭荣玉¹, 李孝斌¹, 江沛¹, 李传江², 刘善慧³, 马军⁴

^1.重庆大学机械传动国家重点实验室，重庆 400030
^2.贵州大学公共大数据国家重点实验室，贵州贵阳 550025
^3.西安理工大学印刷包装与数字媒体学院，陕西西安 710048
^4.重庆铁马工业集团有限公司，重庆 400050

收稿日期:2025-05-31 修回日期:2025-08-19 出版日期:2025-09-18 发布日期:2025-09-22
通讯作者: 江沛
第一作者简介:郭荣玉(2000-)，女，硕士生，研究方向为网络化协同制造、绿色制造。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFB3308800);国家自然科学基金(52475511);国家自然科学基金(52075060);重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1283);重庆市技术创新与应用发展专项项目(CSTB2024TIAD-STX0029)

Benefit Distribution Optimization Model and Simulation for Multi-mode Operation of Industrial Software Platforms

Guo Rongyu¹, Li Xiaobin¹, Jiang Pei¹, Li Chuanjiang², Liu Shanhui³, Ma Jun⁴

^1.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
^2.State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
^3.Faculty of Printing, Packaging Engineering and Digital Media Technology, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
^4.Chongqing Tiema Industries Group Co. Ltd. , Chongqing 400050, China

Received:2025-05-31 Revised:2025-08-19 Online:2025-09-18 Published:2025-09-22
Contact: Jiang Pei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

工业软件服务平台凭借低成本投入、定制化服务、快速部署应用等特点在中小产业集群中取得了广泛应用，其多模式运营下的利益分配机制对平台的可持续发展至关重要。针对当前工业软件服务平台运营模式单一、难以适配多样化服务场景的问题，从用户与开发商两个核心主体出发，分析工业软件服务平台在多模式运营环境下的核心服务内容与合作机制；结合功能点分析法，建立多模式的用户需求量化模型；构建基于Stackelberg博弈多合作模式下的利益分配优化模型。仿真分析表明，该模型能够有效提升各方整体收益，为工业软件服务平台在实际运营中的策略调整提供依据。

关键词: 工业软件服务平台, 多模式运营, Stackelberg博弈, 利益分配

Abstract:

Industrial software service platforms, characterized by low-cost investment, customized services, and rapid application deployment, have been widely adopted in small and medium-sized industrial clusters. The benefit distribution mechanism under multi-mode operation is crucial to the sustainable development of such platforms. To address the current challenges of single-operation models and the difficulty in adapting to diverse service scenarios, this study focuses on two core stakeholders thatusers and software developers to analyze the core service components and cooperation mechanisms of industrial software service platforms in a multi-mode operational environment.By integrating the function point method, a multi-mode user demand quantification model is developed. An optimized benefit distribution model under multiple cooperation modes is constructed based on Stackelberg game theory. Simulation analysis demonstrates that the proposed model can effectively enhance the overall benefits of all parties and support the establishment of a benefit distribution mechanism adaptable to multiple operational modes for industrial software service platforms.

Key words: industrial software service platform, multi-mode operation, Stackelberg game, profit allocation

中图分类号:

TP311.5

郭荣玉,李孝斌,江沛等 . 工业软件平台多模式运营利益分配优化模型与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(9): 2242-2257.

Guo Rongyu,Li Xiaobin,Jiang Pei,et al . Benefit Distribution Optimization Model and Simulation for Multi-mode Operation of Industrial Software Platforms[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(9): 2242-2257.

图/表 10

图1

表1

图2

表2

表3

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 28

[1]	Borangiu Theodor, Trentesaux Damien, Thomas André, et al. Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Through Cloud Services and Resource Virtualization[J]. Computers in Industry, 2019, 108: 150-162.
[2]	Liu Yi, Zhang Yi, Xie Xiaoqing, et al. Affording Digital Transformation: The Role of Industrial Internet Platform in Traditional Manufacturing Enterprises Digital Transformation[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(7): e28772.
[3]	Wang Junliang, Xu Chuqiao, Zhang Jie, et al. A Collaborative Architecture of the Industrial Internet Platform for Manufacturing Systems[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2020, 61: 101854.
[4]	Yi Xuantong, Lu Shichang, Li Dan, et al. Manufacturing Enterprises Digital Collaboration Empowered by Industrial Internet Platform: A Multi-agent Stochastic Evolutionary Game[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 194: 110415.
[5]	Wang Bing, Ma Ming, Zhang Zongyi, et al. How Do the Key Capabilities of the Industrial Internet Platform Support Its Growth? A Longitudinal Case Study Based on the Resource Orchestration Perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 200: 123186.
[6]	Li Dongdong, Li Chunfa, Gu Runde. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Promoting Industrial Internet Platforms to Empower Manufacturing SMEs Through Value Cocreation Cooperation[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(1): 4706719.
[7]	Flores-García Erik, Jeong Yongkuk, Liu Sichao, et al. Enabling Industrial Internet of Things-based Digital Servitization in Smart Production Logistics[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2023, 61(12): 3884-3909.
[8]	Wu Dazhong, Ren Anqi, Zhang Wenhui, et al. Cybersecurity for Digital Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2018, 48, Part C: 3-12.
[9]	Karnik Niharika, Bora Urvi, Bhadri Karan, et al. A Comprehensive Study on Current and Future Trends Towards the Characteristics and Enablers of Industry 4.0[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2022, 27: 100294.
[10]	Xu Chi, Yu Haibin, Jin Xi, et al. Industrial Internet for Intelligent Manufacturing: Past, Present, and Future[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2024, 25(9): 1173-1192.
[11]	Zhang Yongping, Cheng Ying, Wang Haoyu, et al. Variable-utility-aware Manufacturing Service Collaboration Optimization Toward Industrial Internet Platforms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2023, 53(10): 6007-6017.
[12]	Vieri Del Bianco, Lavazza Luigi. An Empirical Assessment of Function Point-like Object-oriented Metrics[C]//11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05). Piscataway: IEEE, 2005: 40.
[13]	Abran Alain, Robillard Pierre N. Function Points: A Study of Their Measurement Processes and Scale Transformations[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 1994, 25(2): 171-184.
[14]	罗光春, 聂坤苗, 温川彪, 等. 功能点分析法的研究和改进[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2009, 38(6): 983-986.
	Luo Guangchun, Nie Kunmiao, Wen Chuanbiao, et al. Improved Function Point Analysis[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2009, 38(6): 983-986.
[15]	Nylund P A, Ferras-Hernandez X, Brem A. Automating Profitably Together: Is There an Impact of Open Innovation and Automation on Firm Turnover?[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2020, 14(1): 269-285.
[16]	Lee I. Pricing and Profit Management Models for SaaS Providers and IaaS Providers[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2021, 16(4): 859-873.
[17]	Zhu Zhengfa, Peng Jun, Liu Kaiyang, et al. A Game-based Resource Pricing and Allocation Mechanism for Profit Maximization in Cloud Computing[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(6): 4191-4203.
[18]	Huang Wei, Chen Wei, Poor H V. Request Delay-based Pricing for Proactive Caching: A Stackelberg Game Approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2019, 18(6): 2903-2918.
[19]	Mashayekhy L, Nejad M M, Grosu D. Cloud Federations in the Sky: Formation Game and Mechanism[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2015, 3(1): 14-27.
[20]	Prasad Abhinandan S, Rao Shrisha. A Mechanism Design Approach to Resource Procurement in Cloud Computing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2014, 63(1): 17-30.
[21]	Garmus D, Herron D P. Function Point Analysis: Measurement Practices for Successful Software Projects[M]. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2001.
[22]	刘迪. 基于改进的功能点分析法在软件项目规模估计中的应用研究[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2007.
	Liu Di. Apply Research on the Scale of Software Evaluation Based on Improved Function Point Analysis[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2007.
[23]	况彬. 软件项目管理的计划和控制方法研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2006.
[24]	Truong-Huu Tram, Tham Chen-Khong. A Novel Model for Competition and Cooperation Among Cloud Providers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2014, 2(3): 251-265.
[25]	IFPUG(International Function Point Users Group). Function Point Counting Practices Manual-release 4.2[R]. Westerville, 2004.
[26]	Zaman S, Grosu D. Combinatorial Auction-based Allocation of Virtual Machine Instances in Clouds[C]//2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science. Piscataway: IEEE, 2010: 127-134.
[27]	Zaman S, Grosu D. A Combinatorial Auction-based Mechanism for Dynamic VM Provisioning and Allocation in Clouds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2013, 1(2): 129-141.
[28]	Wee S. Debunking Real-time Pricing in Cloud Computing[C]//2011 11th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. Piscataway: IEEE, 2011: 585-590.

功能点类别	低	中	高
EI	3	4	6
EO	4	5	7
EQ	3	4	6
ILF	7	10	15
EIF	5	7	10

功能模块	功能说明	功能点类型	复杂度
入库管理	扫码录入、货位自动推荐、物料检验记录	EI、EO、ILF	中
出库管理	订单出库匹配、发货扫码校验、异常记录推送	EI、EO、EQ	高
库存查询	支持多条件快速检索、库存预警、批次追踪	EQ、EO	中
库内操作日志	员工操作记录、修改留痕、异常审计	ILF、EO	高
报表统计导出	每日报表生成、支持Excel/PDF格式导出	EO	低
系统权限控制	用户分级管理、角色权限配置、操作权限分配	EI、ILF	中
第三方系统接口	与MES系统接口对接(数据同步、调用接口日志)、ERP对接(订单信息同步)	EIF	高

功能点类型	数量	复杂度等级	单个权重	加权合计
总计 FP	111
EI	5	中	4	20
EO	4	高	7	28
EQ	2	中	4	8
ILF	3	高	15	45
EIF	1	高	10	10

工业软件平台多模式运营利益分配优化模型与仿真

Benefit Distribution Optimization Model and Simulation for Multi-mode Operation of Industrial Software Platforms

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 28

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周娴玮, 龚启旭, 余松森. 基于Stackelberg博弈与深度强化学习的计算卸载策略[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(2): 372-385.
[2]	徐颖, 刘勤明, 周林森. 基于博弈论的闭环双渠道回收供应链决策研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(2): 396-408.
[3]	郑文, 窦晨希, 张喆. 外卖平台专送式利益分配仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(3): 631-644.