多跑道机场机动区滑行道运行方案设计及仿真评估

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0789

系统仿真学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2448-2457.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.21-0789

• 仿真模型/系统置信度评估技术 • 上一篇下一篇

多跑道机场机动区滑行道运行方案设计及仿真评估

朱新平(), 徐川, 瞿菁菁, 苏庭文

中国民用航空飞行学院，四川　广汉　618300

收稿日期:2021-08-02 修回日期:2021-11-26 出版日期:2022-11-18 发布日期:2022-11-25
作者简介:朱新平(1983-)，男，博士，教授，研究方向为新一代空中交通管理，民航应急管理。E-mail：zhu408@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2018YFC0809500);四川省中央引导地方科技发展专项(2020ZYD094)

Design and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Taxiway Operation Scheme for Multi-runway Airport Maneuvering Area

Xinping Zhu(), Chuan Xu, Jingjing Qu, Tingwen Su

Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618300, China

Received:2021-08-02 Revised:2021-11-26 Online:2022-11-18 Published:2022-11-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

机动区滑行道系统运行方案对于促进多跑道机场场面资源的高效利用十分重要。研究多跑道机场机动区滑行道运行方案设计及仿真评估方法，给出了滑行道运行方案“固定、单向、顺向、循环”设计原则以及运行方案设计范式，提出了机动区滑行道空间占用指数和进离港滑行潜在冲突指数的概念。以海口美兰国际机场为应用场景，基于设计原则和范式给出了对应的机动区滑行道系统优化方案。对原方案和优化方案开展AirTOp仿真分析。结果表明：优化方案与原方案相比：在机动区冲突次数和航班在机动区的平均延误时间上，4种场景对应的优化方案分别有大幅度降低，降幅平均值分别为30.53%和37.75%。

关键词: 滑行道, 运行方案, 仿真评估, AirTOp

Abstract:

The operational scheme of the taxiway system is very important to promote the efficient utilization of airfield resources in multi-runway airports. The design and simulation evaluation methods of the taxiway operation scheme for multi-runway airports are studied. The design principles of "fixed, unidirectional, compliant and circular" taxiway operation scheme and the design paradigm of the operation scheme are presented, and the concepts of taxiway space occupancy index and potential conflict index are proposed. Using Haikou Meilan International Airport as the application scenario, the corresponding optimization scheme of the taxiway system in the maneuvering area is given based on the design principles and paradigms. AirTOp simulation analysis is carried out for the original and optimized schemes. The results show that the optimized scenario has a significant reduction in the number of conflicts in the maneuvering area and the average delay time of flights in the maneuvering area compared with the original scenario, with an average reduction of 30.53% and 37.75%, respectively, for the four scenarios.

Key words: taxiway, operation scheme, simulation-based evaluation, AirTOp

中图分类号:

TP391.9

朱新平, 徐川, 瞿菁菁, 苏庭文. 多跑道机场机动区滑行道运行方案设计及仿真评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(11): 2448-2457.

Xinping Zhu, Chuan Xu, Jingjing Qu, Tingwen Su. Design and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Taxiway Operation Scheme for Multi-runway Airport Maneuvering Area[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2022, 34(11): 2448-2457.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

参考文献 13

[1]	廖勇. 大型机场滑行方案安全评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(2): 483-489.
	Liao Yong. Safety Assessment of Taxiing Schemes at Large Airports[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(2): 483-489.
[2]	Atkin J, Burke E, Ravizza S. The Airport Ground Movement Problem: Past and Current Research and Future Directions[C]//4^th International Conference on Research in Air Transportation. Budapest, Hungary: IATA, 2010: 131-138.
[3]	朱新平, 汤新民, 韩松臣. 基于Petri网与遗传算法的航空器滑行初始路径规划[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2013, 48(3): 565-571.
	Zhu Xinping, Tang Xinmin, Han Songchen. Initial Path Planning of Aircraft Taxiing Based on Petri Net and Genetic Algorithm[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2013, 48(3): 565-571.
[4]	尤杰, 韩松臣. 基于多Agent的机场场面最优滑行路径算法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2009, 9(1): 109-112.
	You Jie, Han Songchen. Multi-Agent-Based Optimal Taxiing Path Algorithm for Airport Surfaces[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9(1): 109-112.
[5]	邢志伟, 李世皎, 唐云霄, 等. 基于Agent-元胞自动机的机场场面交通仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(3): 857-865.
	Xing Zhiwei, Li Shijiao, Tang Yunxiao, et al. Airport Surface Traffic Simulation Based on Agent-Cellular Automaton[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(3): 857-865.
[6]	姜雨, 王欢, 樊卫国, 等. 场面航空器滑行时空协同优化模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(1): 127-134.
	Jiang Yu, Wang Huan, Fan Weiguo, et al. Spatio-Temporal Cooperative Optimization Model for Field Aircraft Taxiing[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(1): 127-134.
[7]	Balakrishnan H, Jung Y. A Framework for Coordinated Surface Operations Planning at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport[C]//AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Hilton Head, USA: AIAA, 2007: 1-19.
[8]	汤新民, 王玉婷, 韩松臣. 基于DEDS的A-SMGCS航空器动态滑行路径规划研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(12): 2669-2675.
	Tang Xinmin, Wang Yuting, Han Songchen. Research on Dynamic Glide Path Planning of A-SMGCS Aircraft Based on DEDS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics Technology, 2010, 32(12): 2669-2675.
[9]	王玄. 基于场面冲突热点的航空器滑行路径优化研究[D]. 广汉: 中国民用航空飞行学院, 2015.
	Wang Xuan. Study on Aircraft Taxiing Path Optimization Based on Field Conflict Hotspots[D]. Guanghan: Civil Aviation Flight Academy of China, 2015.
[10]	李杰. 平行滑行道、垂直联络滑行道运行模式研究[J]. 民航学报, 2018, 2(6): 26-29.
	Li Jie. Study on the Operation Mode of Parallel Taxiway and Vertical Contact Taxiway[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2018, 2(6): 26-29.
[11]	李斌, 谢春生. 基于AirTOp的龙嘉机场地面滑行路径优化研究[J]. 科技风, 2019, 4(28): 29-32.
	Li Bin, Xie Chunsheng. Optimization Study of Ground Taxiing Path Based on AirTOp at Longjia Airport[J]. Science and Technology Wind, 2019, 4(28): 29-32.
[12]	张红颖, 杨旭伟, 罗谦. 基于元胞自动机的机场航班流建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(8): 2864-2874.
	Zhang Hongying, Yang Xuwei, Luo qian. Modeling and Simulation of Airport Flight Flow Based on Cellular Automaton[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(8): 2864-2874.
[13]	张立帆, 焦朋朋, 司铭锴. 城市道路落客区车辆延误模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(9): 1839-1846.
	Zhang Lifan, Jiao Pengpeng, Si Mingkai. Delay Model of Vehicles at Urban Road Drop-off Area[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32(9): 1839-1846.

多跑道机场机动区滑行道运行方案设计及仿真评估

Design and Simulation-Based Evaluation of Taxiway Operation Scheme for Multi-runway Airport Maneuvering Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 13

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴枫, 刘秀罗, 王佳, 刘阳, 李苏疆, 仲妍. 航天发射可视化仿真分析技术与应用研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 856-869.
[2]	张子伟, 李亮, 董志明, 王艺霏, 段莉. 作战概念牵引的作战效能仿真评估指标构建方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(3): 603-613.
[3]	马宁, 林圣琳. 面向多装备协同的体系效能仿真评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(6): 1155-1163.
[4]	江波, 周云帆, 李诚龙, 张昊. 控制污染物排放的支线机场跑滑结构优化仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(3): 501-508.
[5]	李羚玮, 王兵, 曹军海, 张磊, 沈洪. 基于仿真的装备动用与保障效能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(9): 1747-1754.
[6]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 陈宇, 刘龙飞, 吴建平. 南宁市滨湖路绿波方案仿真评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 585-591.
[7]	杜怡曼, 苏红帆, 吴建平, 陈宇, 黄琳, 刘龙飞. 南宁市中心区域交通动态调控技术[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 324-331.
[8]	艾小锋, 曾勇虎, 汪连栋, 郑光勇, 王肖洋, 王满喜. 基于实测信号的无源雷达仿真评估系统[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(8): 1833-1840.
[9]	焦松, 楚威, 毛少杰. 基于聚类和相关性分析的作战效能仿真评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(9): 2083-2088.