美军作战仿真与指控系统互操作发展历程及案例研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812024

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 4686-4692.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201812024

美军作战仿真与指控系统互操作发展历程及案例研究

徐享忠, 汤再江, 谭亚新

装甲兵工程学院装备指挥与管理系, 北京 100072

收稿日期:2016-05-13 修回日期:2016-08-26 出版日期:2018-12-10 发布日期:2019-01-03
作者简介:徐享忠(1974-),男,江西玉山,博士,副教授,硕导,研究方向为作战仿真; 汤再江(1976-),男,云南昆明,博士生,讲师,研究方向为作战仿真; 谭亚新(1979-),男,湖南湘潭,博士,副教授,研究方向为作战仿真。

Development History and Case Study of Interoperability between US Combat Simulation and C2 Systems

Xu Xiangzhong, Tang Zaijiang, Tan Yaxin

Department of Equipment Command and Administration, Academy of Armored Force Engineering, Beijing 100072, China

Received:2016-05-13 Revised:2016-08-26 Online:2018-12-10 Published:2019-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 深入分析了美军作战仿真系统与指控系统的异构性,梳理了美军作战仿真系统与指控系统互操作的发展路线图、主要发展阶段及发展趋势,分别剖析了双向接口及嵌入式互操作的典型案例,即NSS/GCCS-M联邦和C4I人员训练系统(CTTS)。从强化指控与仿真领域的合作、制定长远规划以及注重协调管理等方面得出对于促进我军相关领域发展的启示。

关键词: 作战仿真系统, 指控系统, 互操作, 启示

Abstract: The analysis of heterogeneity between U.S. combat simulation and command & control (C2) systems is carried out. The roadmap, its main development stage and main tendency of interoperability between US combat simulation and C2 systems are also analyzed. Two case studies, Viz., the Naval Simulation System/the Global Command and Control - Maritime (NSS/GCCS-M) Federation and C4I Team Training System (CTTS) are conducted, which are representatives of bidirectional interfaces and embedded interoperability respectively. The main measures such as ensuring interoperability which is a shared responsibility between the M&S and C2 communities, long-term plan and coordination are beneficial to the promotion of similar domains for PLA.

Key words: combat simulation system, C2 system, interoperability, hint

中图分类号:

TP391.9

徐享忠, 汤再江, 谭亚新. 美军作战仿真与指控系统互操作发展历程及案例研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4686-4692.

Xu Xiangzhong, Tang Zaijiang, Tan Yaxin. Development History and Case Study of Interoperability between US Combat Simulation and C2 Systems[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(12): 4686-4692.

参考文献

[1] 徐享忠, 郭齐胜, 张伟, 等. 先进分布仿真[M]. 2版. 北京: 国防工业出版社,2013: 178-180.
Xu X Z, Guo Q S, Zhang W, et al.Advanced distributed simulation[M]. Beijing: Defence Industrial Press, 2013: 178-180.
[2] 李辉光. 美军信息作战与信息化建设 [M]. 北京:军事科学出版社, 2004: 315-318.
Li H G.US Army information operation and information-based construction[M]. Beijing: Military Science Press, 2004: 315-318.
[3] Timian D H, Hieb M R, Lacetera J, et al.Report Out of the C4I Study Group[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (00F-SIW-005), San Diego, CA, 2000.
[4] Allen G, Smith R D.TACSIM: Intelligence Training for Tomorrow's Battlefield[R]. Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin. Fort Huachuca, Arizona, 1994.
[5] Smith R D.The Conflict between Heterogeneous Simulations and Interoperability[C]. Proceedings of the 1995 Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference. Albuquerque, NM, 1995.
[6] Robert L, Marnie S, Garrett B.A Demonstration of C2I System-to-Simulation Interoperability: The NSS/GCCS- M Federation[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (99F-SIW-065), San Diego, CA, 1999.
[7] John D, Daniel R, Jim W.Integrating Simulations into DII COE Compliant C4I Systems[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop(02F-SIW-048), Newport, RI, 2002.
[8] Mark J P, Douglas C, Thomas R, et al.Linked Heterogeneous BML Servers in NATO MSG-085[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (13F-SIW-024), Orlando, FL, 2013.
[9] Gustavsson M, Wemmergrd J, Jonsson F.Object- Orientated implementation of Grammar Based Battle Management Languages[C]. Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop (12S-SIW-001), Orlando, FL, 2012.
[10] Samuel S.Semantic C2SIM: Scope and Challenges[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (14F-SIW-037), Alexandia, VA, 2014.
[11] Mark J, Magnus G.Publish/Subscribe and Translation Performance in the WISE-SBML Server for MSDL and C-BML[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (14F-SIW-036), San Diego, CA, 2014.
[12] Brennan J M, Smith E B.M&S-C4ISR Interoperability/ Synchronization Issues and Potential Solutions[C]. 2001 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, 2001.
[13] Remmersmann T, Schade U, Khimeche L, et al.Lessons Recognized: How to Combine BML and MSDL[C]. 2012 Spring Simulation Interoperability Workshop (12S-SIW-012), Orlando, FL, 2012.
[14] The Office of the Defense Information Systems Agency. Defense Information Infrastructure (DII COE) Technical Working Groups and Advisory Group Page [EB/OL]. (2000-08-12) [2015-03-09]. http://diicoe.disa.mil/coe/ aog_twg/twg/twg_page.html.
[15] Thomas R, Dr Ulrich S, Kellyn R, et al.BML for Communicating with Multi-Robot Systems[C]. Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop (15F-SIW-001). Orlando, FL, 2015.

美军作战仿真与指控系统互操作发展历程及案例研究

Development History and Case Study of Interoperability between US Combat Simulation and C2 Systems

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	施国强, 刘泽伟, 林廷宇, 徐钊, 杨星熠, 郭丽琴, 贾政轩. 面向复杂产品建模与仿真系统的开放式云架构设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(3): 442-451.
[2]	邓巧雨, 何明, 王智学, 王中伟. 作战进程的上下文感知模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(8): 1626-1635.
[3]	汤再江, 徐享忠, 薛青. 可扩展作战管理本体语言研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(11): 4220-4226.
[4]	谭亚新, 夏永春, 范锐, 智海涛. 陆军指控系统功能验证的可信性研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(3): 696-704.
[5]	汤再江, 徐享忠, 薛青, 徐豪华. 指挥信息系统与作战仿真系统互操作研究综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1659-1664.
[6]	徐享忠, 汤再江, 谭亚新. 作战仿真与指控系统语义互操作技术参考框架研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1735-1739.
[7]	彭春光, 邓建辉, 张博. 基于多视图的武器装备仿真模型体系研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1861-1867.
[8]	董志华, 朱元昌, 邸彦强, 孟宪国. TENA与某C2系统互操作研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(2): 226-233.
[9]	蔡继红, 卿杜政, 谢宝娣. 支持LVC互操作的分布式联合仿真技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(1): 93-97.