基于模糊逻辑的高逼真度运动体感算法研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201703011

系统仿真学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 546-551.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201703011

基于模糊逻辑的高逼真度运动体感算法研究

王辉¹, 朱道扬¹, 平凡²

1.中国民航大学航空工程学院,天津 300300;
2.深圳航空维修工程部,广东深圳 518128

收稿日期:2016-04-20 修回日期:2016-06-24 出版日期:2017-03-08 发布日期:2020-06-02
作者简介:王辉(1966-),男,辽宁本溪,博士,教授,研究方向为飞行仿真技术和流体传动及控制;朱道扬(1990-),男,湖北孝感,硕士,研究方向为飞行仿真技术和智能控制。
基金资助:
中国民航局科技创新项目(MHRD20140210)

Study on Motion Cueing Algorithm of High-Fidelity Based on Fuzzy Logic

Wang Hui¹, Zhu Daoyang¹, Ping Fan²

1. College of Aeronautical Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. Shenzhen Airlines Maintenance & Engineering Department, Guangdong, Shenzhen 518128, China

Received:2016-04-20 Revised:2016-06-24 Online:2017-03-08 Published:2020-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对经典洗出算法存在虚假暗示和相位延迟导致飞行模拟器运动体感逼真度不够的问题,结合人体前庭感官系统和模糊逻辑控制理论对经典洗出算法的体感误差进行反馈控制,分别对洗出算法的高通加速度通道、倾斜协调通道以及角速度通道进行补偿。对模糊逻辑洗出算法进行仿真建模,通过一组飞行数据对模糊逻辑洗出算法进行仿真实验。仿真结果表明:模糊逻辑控制理论在一定程度上克服了经典洗出算法的虚假暗示和相位延迟误差的缺陷,具有高度的稳定性和可靠性,且能够有效的提升飞行模拟器的动感逼真度。

关键词: 模糊控制, 洗出算法, 飞行模拟器, 动感逼真度

Abstract: Because classical washout algorithm exists false cues and phase retardation, these problems cause the lack of motion proprioceptive fidelity in flight simulators. By combining human vestibular perception system and the theory of fuzzy logic control to regulate the feedback of its sensory error, the translational acceleration channel, the Tilt coordination channel and the angular velocity channel of classical wash out algorithm were compensated, respectively. Simulation and modeling was carried out by fuzzy logic washout algorithm, and simulation verification was conducted on a set of flight data within fuzzy logic washout algorithm. The simulation results show that the theory of fuzzy logic control, to a certain extent, overcomes the defect of false cues and phase retardation error. The proposed method not only has a high stability and reliability, but can effectively improve the dynamic fidelity of flight simulators.

Key words: fuzzy control, washout algorithm, flight simulator, dynamic fidelity

中图分类号:

TP391

王辉, 朱道扬, 平凡. 基于模糊逻辑的高逼真度运动体感算法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(3): 546-551.

Wang Hui, Zhu Daoyang, Ping Fan. Study on Motion Cueing Algorithm of High-Fidelity Based on Fuzzy Logic[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(3): 546-551.

参考文献

[1] Schmidt S F.Motion Drive Signals for Piloted Flight Simulators[M]. USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970.
[2] Grant P R, Reid L D.Motion Washout Filter Tuning: Rules and Requirements[J]. Journal of Aircraft (S0021-8669), 1997, 34(2): 145-151.
[3] Parrish R V, Dieudonne J E, Martin Jr D J. Coordinated Adaptive Washout for Motion Simulators[J]. Journal of Aircraft (S0021-8669), 1975, 12(1): 44-50.
[4] Sivan R, Ish-Shalom J, Huang J K.An Optimal Control Approach to the Design of Moving Flight Simulators[J]. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on (S2168-2216), 1982, 12(6): 818-827.
[5] Telban Robert J, Cardullo F M.Motion cueing algorithm development: human-centered linear and nonlinear approaches [R]// Tech. rep., NASA/CR- 2005-213747, 2005. New York. USA: CASI, 2005, 5: 97-107.
[6] Song J B, Jung U J, Ko H D.Washout Algorithm with Fuzzy-based Tuning for A Motion Simulator[J]. KSME International Journal (S1226-4865), 2003, 17(2): 221-229.
[7] Asadi H, Mohamed S, Nahavandi S.Incorporating Human Perception with the Motion Washout Filter Using Fuzzy Logic Control[J]. Mechatronics, IEEE/ ASME Transactions on (S1083-4435), 2015, 20(6): 3276-3284.
[8] Hosman R, Van Der Vaart J C. Vestibular Models and Thresholds of Motion Perception. Results of Tests in a Flight Simulator [R]. Holland: Delft University of Technology, 1978.
[9] Young L R, Oman C M.Model for Vestibular Adaptation to Horizontal Rotation[J]. Aerospace Medicine (S0001-9402), 1969, 40(10): 1076-1080.
[10] 李士勇. 模糊控制·神经控制和智能控制理论 [M]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学出版社, 1998: 269-270.
(Li Shiyong.Fuzzy Control • Neural Control and Intelligent Control Theory [M]. Harbin, China: Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 1998: 269-270.)
[11] 孙增圻, 邓志东, 张再兴. 智能控制理论与技术 [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011: 33-34.
(Sun Zengqi, Deng Zhidong, Zhang Zaixing, Intelligent Control Theory and Technology [M]. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press, 2011: 33-34.)

[1]	孟建军, 王终军, 胥如迅, 李德仓. 基于模糊复合策略的高速列车主动悬挂控制研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(7): 1554-1564.
[2]	韩金刚, 李旭. 基于模糊控制的海流发电系统能量管理[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(6): 1406-1414.
[3]	王辉, 吕兴顺. 一种改进的萤火虫算法及在洗出优化中的应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 306-314.
[4]	甘浪雄, 吴昌胜, 邓巍, 郑元洲, 周春辉. 内河弯曲河道船舶过弯自适应航迹控制仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 461-471.
[5]	李亦豪, 张志利, 李向阳, 龙勇. 特种车辆模拟驾驶训练中六自由度平台控制研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(11): 2681-2690.
[6]	王辉, 柳颖涛. 基于逻辑控制的双输入运动体感算法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(1): 91-98.
[7]	李孝禄, 闫剑锋, 许沧粟, 吴宗明, 张远辉, 朱俊江. 基于VR运动模拟器的体感模拟算法的研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(2): 255-261.
[8]	刘佳佳, 左兴权. 交叉口交通信号灯的模糊控制及优化研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2401-2408.
[9]	张宪霞, 章进强, 李致远, 马世伟, 杨帮华. 基于支持向量回归机学习的机械臂视觉反馈模糊控制[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(10): 1997-2009.
[10]	周晓光, 方逸洪, 田怀英, 姚明智. 持续载荷飞行模拟器控制算法设计研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(9): 1835-1841.
[11]	白海亮, 姜南, 张辽, 付跃文. 飞行模拟器反射镜球壳的设计及有限元分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(11): 2388-2392.
[12]	陈珍, 杨海宽, 姜南, 王元诚, 江天娇. 直升机飞行模拟器通用型操纵负荷系统设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(11): 2408-2412.
[13]	王辉, 张保峰. 基于模糊自适应飞行模拟器体感算法的研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(10): 2052-2057.
[14]	沈艳霞, 靳保龙. 永磁同步电机模糊遗忘因子最小二乘法参数辨识[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(9): 3404-3410.
[15]	武小兰, 白志峰, 史小辉, 曹秉刚. PHEV模糊能量管理策略优化设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(1): 242-248.

基于模糊逻辑的高逼真度运动体感算法研究

Study on Motion Cueing Algorithm of High-Fidelity Based on Fuzzy Logic

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价