航天侦察装备体系指标关联信息挖掘研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0553

系统仿真学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 2372-2380.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0553

航天侦察装备体系指标关联信息挖掘研究

韩驰, 熊伟

航天工程大学,北京 101416

收稿日期:2020-08-01 修回日期:2020-10-13 出版日期:2021-10-18 发布日期:2021-10-18
作者简介:韩驰(1997-),男,硕士生,研究方向为体系效能评估。E-mail：15850466132@163.com
基金资助:
国防科技重点实验室基金(XM2020XT 1023)

Research on Assocoation Information Mining of Space Reconnaissance Equipment System Index

Han Chi, Xiong Wei

Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China

Received:2020-08-01 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-10-18 Published:2021-10-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 航天侦察装备体系的体系效能和体系贡献率影响因素指标数量多,指标间关系复杂。如何识别关联,优选关键性能指标并明确性能指标与体系贡献率之间的关系是体系效能及贡献率评估问题的关键。通过MATLAB与STK联合仿真获取航天侦察装备底层指标数据,基于FP-Tree (Frequent Pattern-Tree)算法发现指标间关联信息,去除冗余,确定指标关联类型,并结合Marichal熵建立优化模型确定关键性能指标的贡献度。仿真实验结果表明,通过FP-Tree算法可挖掘航天侦察装备初始评价指标体系间的关联性及关联类型,确定指标贡献度并实现指标体系的精简。

关键词: 航天侦察, 关联规则, 指标关联, 数据挖掘, FP-Tree (Frequent Pattern-Tree)算法

Abstract: The system effectiveness and system contribution rate of the Space Reconnaissance Equipment System (SRES) has a large number of mutally associated indicators. How to identify relationships the association, select the key indicators and clarify the assocition between core indicators and system contribution rate are the key of the evaluation of system effectiveness and contribution rate. Through the joint simulation of MATLAB and STK, the underlying index data of SRES is obtained. Based on the Frequent Pattern-Tree (FP-Tree) algorithm, the assocition information is discovered, the redundancy is removed and the type of indicator assocition is determined, and an optimization model is established to determine the contribution of the key indicators by combining Marichal entropy. Simulation experiment results show that the FP-Tree algorithm can be used to mine the assocition and its types between the initial evaluation index system, determine the index contribution and realize the streamlining of the index system.

Key words: space reconnaissance, association rules, index linkage, data mining, FP-Tree (Frequent Pattern-Tree) algorithm

中图分类号:

韩驰, 熊伟. 航天侦察装备体系指标关联信息挖掘研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(10): 2372-2380.

Han Chi, Xiong Wei. Research on Assocoation Information Mining of Space Reconnaissance Equipment System Index[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(10): 2372-2380.

参考文献

[1] 杨永利, 胡晓峰, 荣明, 等. 基于机器学习的作战体系能力特征指标挖掘[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(6): 1048-1054.
Yang Yongli, Hu Xiaofeng, Rong Ming, et al.Characteristic Index Digging of Combat SoS Capacity Based on Machine Learning[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(6): 1048-1054.
[2] 陈萌. 基于FCM混合模型指标关联下的航班风险评估研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018.
Chen Meng.Research on Flight Risk Assessment Based on FCM Hybrid Model Index Association[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018.
[3] Agrawal R, Srikant R.Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules[C]// 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. Santiago: IEEE, 1994.
[4] Lee H B.An Efficient Hashing Mechanism of the DHP Algorithm for Mining Association Rules[J]. The KIPS Transactions: PartD (S1598-2866), 2006, 13D(5): 651-660.
[5] Nidhi Makarand Kawale, Dr. Snehil Dahima.Market Basket Analysis using Apriori Algorithm in R Language[J]. Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (S2456-6470), 2018, 2(4): 2628-2633.
[6] Han J, Pei J, Yin Y, et al.Mining Frequent Patterns without Candidate Generation[J]. ACM SIGMOD Record (S0163-5808), 2000, 29(2): 1-12.
[7] 许德心. 关联规则挖掘算法的并行化及应用研究[D]. 南京: 南京邮电大学, 2019.
Xu Dexin.Research on Parallelization and Application of Association Rules Mining Algorithm[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2019.
[8] 王枭, 刘雅奇, 齐锋. 基于Apriori算法的作战仿真探索实验控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(4): 917-923.
Wang Xiao, Liu Yaqi, Qi Feng.Combat Simulation Exploration Experiment Control based on Apriori Algorithm[J]. System Engineering and Electronic Technology, 2017, 39(4): 917-923.
[9] 贺艳蓉. 基于FP-tree最小无冗余关联规则挖掘[D].武汉: 华中科技大学, 2008.
He Yanrong.Mining of Minimum Non-redundant Association Rules Based on FP-tree[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2008.
[10] 罗滇生, 别少勇, 庞振国, 等. 考虑指标关联的配电网设备利用率综合评价[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2017, 29(10): 73-78, 150.
Luo Diansheng, Bie Shaoyong, Pang Zhenguo, et al.Comprehensive Evaluation of Equipment Utilization Rate of Distribution Network Considering Index Correlation[J]. Journal of Electric Power System and Automation, 2017, 29(10): 73-78, 150.
[11] Arenas-Díaz G, Ramírez-Lamus E R. Fuzzy Measures and Fuzzy Integrals[J]. Readings in Fuzzy Sets for Intelligent Systems (S4832-1450), 1993, 6(1): 251-257.
[12] 杨海霞, 李晨宇, 章玲, 等. 基于FP-tree算法的评价指标关联信息挖掘和指标重要程度确定[J]. 系统工程, 2019, 37(3): 141-150.
Yang Haixia, Li Chenyu, Zhang Ling, et al.Related Information Mining of Evaluation Indicators and Determination of Indicator Importance Based on FP-tree Algorithm[J]. System Engineering, 2019, 37(3): 141-150.
[13] Khodadadi E, Aghabeigi M.A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, ANP, and Fuzzy VIKOR for Selecting the Best Project Managers[J]. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (S0263-7863), 2018, 9(2): 38-64.
[14] 章玲, 周德群. 基于关联的层次评价方法及其在网站评价中的应用研究[J]. 情报学报, 2007, 26(5): 699-703.
Zhang Ling, Zhou Dequn.Relevance-based Hierarchical Evaluation Method and its Application in Website Evaluation[J]. Journal of Information, 2007, 26(5): 699-703.
[15] 刘锋. 遥感卫星系统任务效能评估方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学(中国科学院国家空间科学中心), 2017.
Liu Feng.Research on Mission Effectiveness Evaluation Method of Remote Sensing Satellite System[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (National Center for Space Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences), 2017.
[16] 杨克巍, 杨志伟, 谭跃进, 等. 面向体系贡献率的装备体系评估方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(2): 311-321.
Yang Kewei, Yang Zhiwei, Tan Yuejin, et al.Review of the Evaluation Methods of Equipment System of Systems Facing the Contribution Rate[J]. System Engineering and Electronic Technology, 2019, 41(2): 311-321.
[17] 刘旭光, 孔德强, 胡璟璟. 军用卫星通信系统通信能力指标体系研究[J]. 舰船电子对抗, 2013, 36(1): 73-75.
Liu Xuguang, Kong Deqiang, Hu Jingjing.Research on the Communication Capability Index System of Military Satellite Communication System[J]. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasure, 2013, 36(1): 73-75.
[18] 曹建军, 马海洲, 蒋德珑. 武器装备体系评估建模研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(1): 37-42.
Cao Jianjun, Ma Haizhou, Jiang Delong.Research on Modeling of Weapons System of Systems Evaluation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(1): 37-42.
[19] 杨越文, 侯慧娟, 杨祎, 等. 基于贝叶斯模型的输电线路运行参量关联规则挖掘及预测方法[J]. 电网技术, 2017, 41(11): 3648-3654.
Yang Yuewen, Hou Huijuan, Yang Yi, et al.Association Rule Mining and Prediction Method for Transmission Line Operating Parameters Based on Bayesian Model[J]. Power System Technology, 2017, 41(11): 3648-3654.

航天侦察装备体系指标关联信息挖掘研究

Research on Assocoation Information Mining of Space Reconnaissance Equipment System Index

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马宁, 林圣琳. 面向多装备协同的体系效能仿真评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(6): 1155-1163.
[2]	吴敬兵, 唐汉卿, 胥军. 水泥窑协同处置生活垃圾的燃烧特性分析优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(1): 35-43.
[3]	林雨谷, 王艳. 离散车间能效数据挖掘及调度优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(12): 2702-2711.
[4]	肖长亮, 杨镜宇, 吴曦, 马骏, 殷小静. 基于组合模式的航天侦察行动模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(12): 2781-2789.
[5]	吕盛坪, 乐强生, 刘涛. 基于数据挖掘的印制电路样板投料优化[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(7): 2656-2665.
[6]	程艳云, 边荟凇, 边长生. 基于图数据模型的聚类方法及可信度检测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(6): 2102-2109.
[7]	张明智, 李义. Map Reduce框架下空间大数据的关联规则分析方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(3): 840-845.
[8]	陆营波, 钱晓超, 陈伟, 何舒, 陆志沣. 数据驱动的装备效能评估模型构建方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4587-4595.
[9]	陈冰, 张亨, 程泽凯, 董鹏, 林超. Robocup2D仿真对抗中进攻行为的挖掘与验证[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(12): 4718-4726.
[10]	黄文成, 贾立, 彭道刚, 李望. 基于Apriori的关联规则算法及其在电厂中的应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(1): 266-271.