仿真可信性评估中的若干问题及对策研究

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0244

系统仿真学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 1257-1262.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0244

仿真可信性评估中的若干问题及对策研究

焦鹏, 张琪, 魏翔宇, 查亚兵

国防科技大学系统工程学院,湖南长沙 410073

收稿日期:2019-05-10 修回日期:2019-06-24 发布日期:2019-12-12
作者简介:焦鹏(1981-),男,河北藁城,博士,副研究员,研究方向为复杂系统建模与仿真,仿真可信性评估;张琪(1988-),男,陕西渭南,博士,讲师,研究方向为复杂系统建模与仿真、智能行为建模;魏翔宇(1989-),男,山东日照,博士生,研究方向为仿真建模与实验分析。

Some Problems and Countermeasures in Simulation Credibility Evaluation

Jiao Peng, Zhang Qi, Wei Xiangyu, Zha Yabing

College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received:2019-05-10 Revised:2019-06-24 Published:2019-12-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着仿真技术在各个领域的愈发广泛应用,用户对仿真系统的可信性也提出了更高的要求。针对在以往仿真系统可信性评估工作中遇到的预期应用不明确、评估工作不全面、评估标准不清晰、评估结论不闭环等若干问题,分析了仿真系统可信性评估的特点,从全面开展可信性评估、加强可接受性标准设计、注重评估闭环实施3个方面,对如何解决现实问题进行了研究和论述。研究成果具有通用性,能够有效指导各类仿真系统可信性评估工作的计划、组织和实施,对提升仿真可信性评估工作的可操作性和实际评估效果有重要意义。

关键词: 仿真, 可信性, 校核、验证与确认, 校核与验证, 可接受性标准

Abstract: With the increasing application of simulation technology in various fields, users have put forward higher requirements for the credibility of the simulation system. This paper focuses on some key issues of the credibility evaluation of the simulation system, such as the unclear expected application, the incomplete evaluation, the unclear evaluation criteria, and the open loop of evaluation conclusions. From the perspectives of comprehensive implementation of credibility assessment, strengthening the design of acceptability standards, and focusing on the evaluation of closed-loop implementation, how to solve the real problem has been studied and discussed. The research results of this paper are universal. It can effectively guide the planning, organization and implementation of the credibility evaluation work for various simulation systems, which have important significance for improving the operability and actual effect of the evaluation of simulation credibility.

Key words: simulation, credibility, VV&A (Verification,Validation and Accreditation), V & V (Verification and Validation), acceptability criteria

中图分类号:

TP391.9

焦鹏, 张琪, 魏翔宇, 查亚兵. 仿真可信性评估中的若干问题及对策研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(7): 1257-1262.

Jiao Peng, Zhang Qi, Wei Xiangyu, Zha Yabing. Some Problems and Countermeasures in Simulation Credibility Evaluation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2019, 31(7): 1257-1262.

参考文献

[1] DoD M&SCO. VV&A Recommended Practice Guide [EB/OL]. [2019-05-05]. http://www.msco.mil.
[2] NASA-STD-7009. Standard for models and simulations[S].
[3] DoD M&SCO. M&S VV&A RPG Special Topic: Acceptability Criteria [EB/OL]. [2019-05-05]. http://www.msco.mil.
[4] 王子才. 关于仿真理论的探讨[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2000, 12(6): 604-608.
Wang Zicai.Research on Simulation Theory[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2000, 12(6): 604-608.
[5] 邢继娟,汤礼建. 体系级仿真系统VV&A关键问题研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2012, 26(3): 61-64.
Xing Jijuan, Tang Lijian.Research on Key Problems of VV&A in System-of System Level Simulation[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2012, 26(3): 61-64.
[6] NASA-STD-7009A W/CHANGE 1. Standard for models and simulations[S].
[7] DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.61. DoD Modeling and Simulation (M&S) Verification, Validation, Accreditation (VV&A)[S].
[8] SISO-GUIDE-001.1-2012. Guide for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations, and Data, GM-VV Volume 1: Introduction and Overview[S].
[9] SISO-GUIDE-001.2-2013. Guide for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations, and Data, GM-VV Volume 2: Implementation Guide[S].
[10] SISO-REF-039-2013. Guide for Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation (GM-VV) to Support Acceptance of Models, Simulations, and Data, GM-VV Vol. 3: Reference Manual[S].
[11] Jonsson F, Giannoulis C, Roza M.GM-VV - An International Recommended Practice for Verification and Validation of Models, Simulations, and Data[J]. M&S JOURNAL, 2014: 42-54.
[12] Roza M, Voogd J, van Emmerik M, et al. Generic Methodology for Verification and Validation for Training Simulations[C]. The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC). FL: Orlando, USA. 2010.
[13] Voogd J, Roza M.The Generic Methodology for Verification and validation Applied to Medium Range Anti-tank Simulation Training Devices[C]. 2015 Fall SISO Simulation Interoperability Workshop (SIW), 31 August-4 September 2015, FL: Orlando, USA. 2015.

[1]	陆淼嘉, 黄承媛, 滕靖. 基于多智能体的网购生鲜无人车配送调度仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(6): 1185-1195.
[2]	陆承, 靳学胜. 基于Steam VR的交互仿真水枪灭火训练系统设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(6): 1312-1319.
[3]	倪凌佳, 黄晓霞, 李红旮, 张子博. 基于协作式深度强化学习的火灾应急疏散仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(6): 1353-1366.
[4]	胡冰山, 程科, 陆盛, 喻洪流. 变刚度储能助力髋外骨骼设计及助力效果仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(5): 1090-1100.
[5]	古鹏飞, 张霖, 陈真, 叶俊杰. 基于X语言的起飞场景民机协同设计与仿真一体化方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(5): 929-943.
[6]	刘文正, 张和明. 面向复杂系统运动仿真的信息物理融合建模[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(5): 954-963.
[7]	于帆, 罗东琦, 司宾强, 朱纪洪. 可交互式相控阵雷达DOA估计仿真系统设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(5): 964-977.
[8]	付建林, 丁国富, 张剑, 江海凡, 郭沛佩. 基于响应面和NSGA-II的AGV系统多目标优化配置[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(5): 994-1002.
[9]	李伟, 张欢, 马萍, 杨明. 云仿真系统可信度评估问题探讨[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 679-687.
[10]	刘永奎, 曾鸣, 张霖, 郭金维, 原思阳, 平垚垚. 基于微服务架构的云制造调度仿真系统设计与开发[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 700-711.
[11]	张立峰, 王会忍. 基于卷积神经网络及有限元仿真的电容层析成像图像重建[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 712-718.
[12]	马庆禄, 张琳, 袁新新, 刘丰杰. 城市道路交通多状态演化下的连续仿真技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 847-855.
[13]	吴枫, 刘秀罗, 王佳, 刘阳, 李苏疆, 仲妍. 航天发射可视化仿真分析技术与应用研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 856-869.
[14]	姚红光, 肖恢翚, 张航. 无标度物流网络中延误扩散临界条件的仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 901-909.
[15]	叶飞, 李梓晴, 赖李媛君. 分布式车间生产维修联合调度仿真优化方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 688-699.

仿真可信性评估中的若干问题及对策研究

Some Problems and Countermeasures in Simulation Credibility Evaluation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价