基于VSP与基于LN(TAD)的道路油耗微观模型比较

系统仿真学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 2662-2669.

• 仿真建模与仿真算法及数值仿真 • 上一篇下一篇

基于VSP与基于LN(TAD)的道路油耗微观模型比较

赵琦¹, 于雷², 宋国华¹

1.北京交通大学城市交通复杂系统理论与技术教育部重点实验室,北京 100044;
2.德克萨斯南方大学,休斯敦 77004

收稿日期:2015-01-23 修回日期:2015-04-15 出版日期:2015-11-08 发布日期:2020-08-05
作者简介:赵琦(1985-),男,山西阳城,博士生,研究方向为道路交通排放建模;于雷(1963-),男,黑龙江黑河,博导,研究方向为城市交通规划与管理、汽车尾气排放控制以及智能交通系统技术开发与应用等。
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2014AA110301)

Comparison of Microscopic On-road Fuel Consumption Model Based on VSP and Ln (TAD)

Zhao Qi¹, Yu Lei², Song Guohua¹

1. MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex System Theory and Technology, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Department of Transportation Studies, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX 77004, USA

Received:2015-01-23 Revised:2015-04-15 Online:2015-11-08 Published:2020-08-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在道路微观油耗模型中,基于功率需求类的参数因其与油耗之间的高度相关性,常被用来描述车辆运行特征。VSP(Vehicle Specific Power)和Ln(TAD)(Natural Logarithm of the Total Absolute Difference of Vehicle Instantaneous Speed)都是常用的基于功率需求类的参数,有必要对基于VSP和Ln(TAD)的微观油耗模型的准确性和特征进行对比。利用收集到的实际逐秒速度数据和油耗数据,分别建立基于VSP和Ln(TAD)的轻型车微观油耗模型,以及平均行程速度与VSP和Ln(TAD)的分布模型,,并将利用模型得到的油耗量和油耗因子测算值与实际值进行比较,归纳出这2种微观油耗模型的特征和规律。

关键词: 油耗模型, 机动车比功率, Ln(TAD), 预测精度

Abstract: In microscopic on-road fuel consumption models, the power demand-based parameter was commonly used to characterize the vehicle activities because of its strong correlation with fuel consumption. Both VSP and the natural logarithm of Ln(TAD) were commonly used power demand-based parameters. It is necessary to compare the accuracy and characteristic of two fuel consumption models that are developed based on the VSP with Ln(TAD). By collecting and processing field vehicle activities and fuel consumption data, two fuel consumption models for LDVs, one based on the VSP and another one based on Ln(TAD) were developed. Then, the distribution model between the VSP distribution and Ln(TAD) and the average travel speed was constructed. Subsequently, prediction accuracies based on the developed models were compared. The characteristics and regularities of microscopic fuel consumption models based on the VSP and Ln(TAD) for LDVs on urban roads were summarized for the measurements of vehicle fuel consumption.

Key words: fuel consumption model, VSP, Ln(TAD), prediction accuracy

中图分类号:

U491

赵琦, 于雷, 宋国华. 基于VSP与基于LN(TAD)的道路油耗微观模型比较[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(11): 2662-2669.

Zhao Qi, Yu Lei, Song Guohua. Comparison of Microscopic On-road Fuel Consumption Model Based on VSP and Ln (TAD)[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(11): 2662-2669.

参考文献

[1] 汪成亮, 陈俊宏, 张晨. 基于车联网的油耗检测及其时空分布研究[J]. 计算机工程, 2013, 39(9): 34-38.
[2] 高艺, 于雷, 宋国华, 等. 交通排放量化模型的建立与仿真实现[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2012, 24(4): 887-891.
(Gao Yi, Yu Lei, Song Guohua, et al. Quantitative Modeling and Simulation of Traffic Emissions[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2012, 24(4): 887-891.)
[3] Zhao Q, L Yu, G Song. Characteristics of VSP Distributions of Light-duty and Heavy-duty Vehicles on Freeway: A Case Study[M]. Washington, DC, USA: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2012.
[4] Cappiello A, I Chabini, E Nam, et al. A Statistical Model of Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Consumption[C]// Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2002. USA: IEEE, 2002: 801-809.
[5] Jiménez-Palacios J.Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDAS Remote Sensing [D]. Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
[6] Ligterink N, J van Baalen, A Eijk, et al. Predicting Local Vehicle Emissions Using VERSIT+ and VISSIM[C]// 7th European Congress and Exhibition on the Intelligent Transport Systems and Services, Geneva, Switzerland, ARRB Group Limited, 2008: 151-167.
[7] U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) 2010 User Guide[M]// EPA-420-B-09-041. Washington, DC, USA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009: 1-41.
[8] Davis N, J Lents M Osses, N Nikkila, et al. Development and Application of an International Vehicle Emissions Model [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC, USA: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2005.
[9] Smit R, Smokers R, Schoen E.VERSIT+ LD: Development of A New Emission Factor Model for Passenger Cars Linking Real-world Emissions to Driving Cycle Characteristics[C]// 14th International Conference Transport and Air Pollution. Graz, Austria, Graz University Of Technology, 2005: 177-186.
[10] Smit R, Smokers R, Rabe E.A New Modelling Approach for Road Traffic Emissions: VERSIT+[J]. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment (S1361-9209), 2007, 12(6): 414-422.
[11] Jie L, Van Zuylen H, Chen Y, et al. Calibration of a microscopic simulation model for emission calculation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2013, 31: 172-184.
[12] Song G, L Yu, Z T Distributions Characteristics of Vehicle Specific Power on Urban Restricted Access Roadway[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering (S0733-947X), 2011, 138(2): 202-209.
[13] Bar-Gera H.Evaluation of a Cellular Phone-based System for Measurements of Traffic Speeds and Travel Times: A Case study From Israel[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2007, 15(6): 380-391.
[14] 费文鹏, 宋国华, 于雷. 车辆跟驰模型的VSP和加速度分布对比分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2014, 26(11): 2757-2764.
(Fei Wenpeng, Song Guohua, Yu Lei.Comparative Analysis of VSP and Acceleration Distribution of Car-following Models[J]. Journal of System Simulation (S1004-731X), 2014, 26(11): 2757-2764.)
[15] Frey H C, N M Rouphail, H Zhai. Speed- and Facility-Specific Emission Estimates for On-Road Light-Duty Vehicles on the Basis of Real-World Speed Profiles[J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board (S0361-1981), 2006, 1987: 128-137.

基于VSP与基于LN(TAD)的道路油耗微观模型比较

Comparison of Microscopic On-road Fuel Consumption Model Based on VSP and Ln (TAD)

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵丹, 牛学军, 张书豪, 魏佳旭. 平面交叉口借道左转设置研究与效果评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2975-2982.
[2]	何兆成, 林炫华, 聂佩林, 张荣辉. 考虑展宽设计的中观交通仿真模型及其标定[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 781-791.
[3]	周晨静, 高亚聪, 荣建. 微观交通仿真模型参数标定方法改善研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(11): 2112-2120.
[4]	费蓉, 刘方, 谢国, 黑新宏, 李莎莎, 胡博. 基于门控循环单元的车辆跟驰行为仿真模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(10): 1862-1873.
[5]	张立帆, 焦朋朋, 司铭锴. 城市道路落客区车辆延误模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(9): 1839-1846.
[6]	张文会, 苏永民, 孙舒蕊. 偏置追尾事故车辆运动学参数仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(5): 848-855.
[7]	翟志强, 许进亮, 袁皓, 周永明, 赵龙飞, 王世谦. 自适应巡航系统车辆跟驰控制策略仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(5): 885-891.
[8]	张小雨, 邵春福. 城乡结合部道路交叉口多目标信号配时优化模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(4): 709-717.
[9]	唐少虎, 周进, 尚春琳, 郑国荣. 降雨情景下城市道路交通信号控制优化模型与方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(2): 149-156.
[10]	孙剑, 黄润涵, 李霖, 刘启远, 李宇迪. 智能汽车环境感知与规划决策一体化仿真测试平台[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(2): 236-246.
[11]	李之红, 文琰杰, 许旺土, 齐悦. 差异化设施布局下的建筑物人流疏散效率研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(10): 2146-2154.
[12]	贾宇涵, 吴建平, 杜怡曼, 刘明宇. 快速路车辆跟驰建模与仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 248-256.
[13]	李双琳, 郑斌. 动态交通流下震后路网抢修排程仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(9): 3386-3398.
[14]	庞明宝, 夏泽民, 栾燕海. 城市快速路多匝道协调控制信号施加策略仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(8): 3050-3057.
[15]	唐克双, 张桁嘉, 衣谢博闻. 基于多智能体仿真的交通诱导系统效率评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(7): 2630-2639.