情绪博弈的行为计算原理

系统仿真学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 29-36.

• 建模与仿真理论及方法 • 上一篇下一篇

情绪博弈的行为计算原理

张国锋¹, 王牛², 熊虎³

1.西安工业大学行为计算研究所,西安 710032;
2.重庆大学自动化学院,重庆 400044;
3.贵州财经大学金融学院,贵阳 550025

收稿日期:2014-01-05 修回日期:2014-06-19 出版日期:2015-01-08 发布日期:2020-09-02
作者简介:张国锋(1970-),男,山西人,博士,讲师,研究方向为行为选择,仿生智能控制;王牛(1974-),男,重庆人,博士,副教授,研究方向为智能机器人、仿人智能控制;熊虎(1972-),贵州人,博士,副教授,研究方向为金融博弈,战略管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(61174104); 西安工业大学博士启动基金(204-000120)

Principe of Behavior Computing on Emotional Game

Zhang Guofeng¹, Wang Niu², Xiong Hu³

1. Institute of Behavior Computing of Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710032, China;
2. Automation College of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
3. College of Finance, Guizhou University of Finance & Economics, Guiyang 550025, China

Received:2014-01-05 Revised:2014-06-19 Online:2015-01-08 Published:2020-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前行为博弈的研究,只把情绪作为行为影响因素,借助数理统计分析工具来获取情绪影响行为互动的规律。针对这种状况,以情绪理性替代结果理性为前提,设计情绪行为图式函数,建立情绪博弈计算原理。将该原理应用于改进型最后通牒博弈计算,获得情绪均衡结局,并揭示勇敢行为的心理机制。同时,建立行为选择模式辨识的基本原理。根据原理所要求的约束为条件,运用Matlab进行仿真计算。所获结果与俗语“事不过三”、“先下手为强”、“留有余地”所揭示的行为规律相吻合,验证了所建立的情绪博弈计算机制的合理性和有效性。从而,为通过非数理统计方法进行情绪博弈行为研究提供一条可行途径。

关键词: 行为计算, 博弈论, 情绪, 最后通牒

Abstract: Emotions is analyzed by mathematical statistics as an influence factor on behavior interaction in the current behavioral game researches. On the face of the status quo, premising emotion rationality that is the alternative to results rationality, a fresh emotional game computing principle was proposed by building emotion behavior schemata function. The suggested thought was applied to a modified ultimatum game computing, an emotional equilibrium outcome was obtained, and the psychological mechanism of the brave behavior was revealed. Meanwhile, the basic principle of pattern recognition to behavior selection mode was established. According to the constraint conditions of the proposed principle, its Matlab simulation calculation was accomplished. The obtained results are consistent with the behavior laws revealed by the sayings “Not to do anything more than three times”, “He who strikes first gains the advantage” and “Leave adequate leeway”. The rationality and validity of the established emotional game computing system was confirmed. Therefore, it provides a feasible way for emotional game behavior research by the method of non-mathematical statistics.

Key words: behavior computing, game theory, emotion, ultimatum

中图分类号:

张国锋, 王牛, 熊虎. 情绪博弈的行为计算原理[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(1): 29-36.

Zhang Guofeng, Wang Niu, Xiong Hu. Principe of Behavior Computing on Emotional Game[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(1): 29-36.

参考文献

[1] Longbing Cao, Philip S Yu. Behavior Computing: Modeling, Analysis, Mining and Decision [M]. London, UK: Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2012: v-vii.
[2] Rodríguez L F, Ramos F.Computational Models of Emotions for Autonomous Agents: Major Challenges[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review (S0269-2821), 2012, 39(12): 1-29.
[3] 科林·凯莫勒. 行为博弈—对策略互动的实验研究[M]. 北京: 人民大学出版社, 2009.
[4] 张国锋, 李祖枢. 基于情绪的人工生命行为选择机制研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(6): 1701-1705, 1709.
[5] Giorgio Coricelli, Elena Rusconi, Marie Claire Villeval.Tax Evasion and Emotions in repeated interactions: An Empirical Test of Re-integrative Shaming Theory[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology (S0167-4870), 2014, 40(1): 49-61.
[6] Fiori M, Lintas A, Mesrobian S, et al. Effect of Personality and Emotion on Deviation from Purely Rational Decision-making[J]. Decision Making and Imperfection Studies in Computational Intelligence (S1860-949X), 2013, 474(1): 129-161.
[7] Joseph P Forgas, Hui Bing Tan.To Give or to Keep? Affective Influences on Selfishness and Fairness in Computer-mediated Interactions in the Dictator Game and the Ultimatum Game[J]. Computers in Human Behavior (S0747-5632), 2013, 29(1): 64-74.
[8] Dunn B D, Evans D, Makarova D, White J, Clark L.Gut Feelings and the Reaction to Perceived Inequity: The Interplay between Bodily Responses, Regulation, and Perception Shapes the Rejection of Unfair Offers on the Ultimatum Game[J]. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (S1530-7026), 2012, 12(3): 419-429.
[9] Tzieropoulos H, De Peralta R G., Bossaerts P, et al. The Impact of Disappointment in Decision Making: Inter-individual Differences and Electrical Neuroimaging[J]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (S1662-5161), 2011, 4(235): 1-19.
[10] Eduardo B., Andrade, Teck-hua Ho. Gaming Emotions in Social Interactions[J]. Journal of Consumer Research (S0093-5301), 2009, 36(4): 539-552.
[11] María Ruz, Pío Tudela.Emotional Conflict in Interpersonal Interactions[J]. NeuroImage (S1053-8119), 2011, 54(2): 1685-1691.
[12] Franzen N, Hagenhoff M, Baer N, et al. Superior 'theory of mind' in Borderline Personality Disorder: An Analysis of Interaction Behavior in a Virtual Trust Game[J]. Psychiatry Research (S0165-1781), 2011, 187(1-2): 224-233.
[13] Lis S, Schonwetter T, Mier D, et al. Impaired Integration of Socio-emotional Information in Schizophrenia-a Study with a Modified Trust Game[J]. Nervenheilkunde (S0722-1541), 2011, 30(6): 385-393.
[14] Lawrence Ian Reed, Katharine N, Zeglen, Karen L Schmidt. Facial Expressions as Honest Signals of Cooperative Intent in a One-shot Anonymous Prisoner's Dilemma game[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior (S1090-5138), 2012, 33(3): 200-209.
[15] Celso M De Melo, Peter Carnevale, et al. The Influence of Emotions in Embodied Agents on Human Decision-Making[C]// Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 357-370.
[16] Fetchenhauer D, Groothuis T, Pradel J.Not only States but Traits - Humans can Identify Permanent Altruistic Dispositions in 20s[J]. Evolution and Human Behavior (S1090-5138), 2010, 31(2): 80-86.
[17] Arthur Lupia, Jesse Menning.Politics and the Equilibrium of Fear: Can Strategies and Emotions Interact? [C]// The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2007: 1-23.
[18] Butler Christopher K.Prospect Theory and Coercive Bargaining[J]. Journal of Conflict Resolution (S0022-0027), 2007, 51(2): 227-250.
[19] Casper J, Albers. Barteld P. Kooi. Willem Schaafsma.Trying to resolve the two-envelope problem[J]. Synthese (S0039-7857), 2005, 145(1): 89-109.

情绪博弈的行为计算原理

Principe of Behavior Computing on Emotional Game

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐颖, 刘勤明, 周林森. 基于博弈论的闭环双渠道回收供应链决策研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(2): 396-408.
[2]	李昌华, 杨晶, 李智杰. 一种应用于人群仿真的改进社会力模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(3): 521-528.
[3]	王素琴, 张峰, 高宇豆, 石敏. 基于图像序列的学习表情识别[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(7): 1322-1330.
[4]	王静, 刘洪岩, 刘芳芳, 王青青. 基于随机森林和卷积特征学习的人机交互语音情感识别[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(12): 2388-2400.
[5]	陈斐然, 陈彬, 朱正秋, 邱晓刚, 王一多, 赵勇. 基于博弈论的化工园区合作巡逻策略研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(10): 1903-1909.
[6]	吴佳佳, 刘箴, 许辉煌, 刘婷婷, 王瑾, 柴艳杰. 面向康复训练的严肃游戏人机交互设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(5): 909-918.
[7]	张烙兵, 阮启明, 邱晓刚. 研究社会复杂系统的两种互补方法：仿真与博弈论[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(10): 1960-1969.
[8]	向南, 张明敏, 朱凌云. 动态人群情绪感染并行仿真算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(9): 1964-1969.
[9]	陈浩, 刘箴, 陈田, 刘婷婷, 刘翠娟, 朱宪莹. 一个面向老年人娱乐健身的体感严肃游戏研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(10): 2586-2592.
[10]	马忠贵, 班莎, 陈桂梅, 陈林旗. 认知无线网络自适应功率控制博弈算法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(3): 584-590.
[11]	刘翠娟, 刘箴, 刘婷婷, 陆涛, 方昊, 刘良平. 虚拟现实在焦虑症和自闭症治疗中的应用研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(10): 2233-2238.