基于非均衡理论的出行者路径选择行为建模与仿真

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201811004

系统仿真学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 4067-4078.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201811004

基于非均衡理论的出行者路径选择行为建模与仿真

黄中祥¹, 伍建辉^1,2,*, 况爱武¹, 张生¹, 许艳²

1. 长沙理工大学交通运输工程学院,湖南长沙 410114;
2. 湖南理工学院信息科学与工程学院,湖南岳阳 414006

收稿日期:2018-05-11 修回日期:2018-06-19 发布日期:2019-01-04

Modeling and Simulation of Travelers’ Route Choice Behavior Based on Disequilibrium Theory

Huang Zhongxiang¹, Wu Jianhui^1,2,*, Kuang Aiwu¹, Zhang Sheng¹, Xu Yan²

1. School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410114, China;
2. School of Information Science and Technology, Hunan Institute of Science and Technology, Yueyang 414006, China

Received:2018-05-11 Revised:2018-06-19 Published:2019-01-04
About author:Huang Zhongxiang (1965-), Male, Miluo Hunan, Doctor, Professor, His main research interest is transportation planning and management.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51338002, 51408058), Science and Technology Program of Hunan Province (2016TP1021)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑出行异质性对交通流分布的影响,基于非均衡理论将出行者路径选择行为分为价格调节、数量调节和价格—数量调节三类,建立三种逐日动态随机分配模型,证明了逐日动态随机分配模型解的存在性、唯一性和稳定性。通过模型仿真,验证了三种逐日动态随机分配模型经有限次出行调整后,各路径流量均能收敛到稳定状态,价格—数量调节逐日动态随机分配模型能够模拟出行异质性对交通流分布形态与动态演化的影响。

关键词: 路径选择行为, 随机交通分配, 非均衡理论, 价格调节, 数量调节

Abstract: Considering the influence of heterogeneous travel on traffic flow distribution, the travelers’ route choice behaviors are classified into three types: price regulation, quantity regulation and price-quantity regulation. Three day-to-day dynamical stochastic assignment models based on the disequilibrium theory are established, and the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the solutions to these models are proved. Through model simulation, it proved that each path flow in these three models can converge to a steady state after a finite travel adjustment, and the day-to-day dynamical stochastic assignment model under price-quantity regulation can simulate the influence of heterogeneous travel behaviors on the distribution characteristic and dynamic evolution of traffic flow.

Key words: route choice behavior, stochastic traffic assignment, disequilibrium theory, price regulation, quantity regulation

中图分类号:

U491.2

黄中祥, 伍建辉, 况爱武, 张生, 许艳. 基于非均衡理论的出行者路径选择行为建模与仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(11): 4067-4078.

Huang Zhongxiang, Wu Jianhui, Kuang Aiwu, Zhang Sheng, Xu Yan. Modeling and Simulation of Travelers’ Route Choice Behavior Based on Disequilibrium Theory[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(11): 4067-4078.

参考文献

[1] Wardrop J G.Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society (S0160-5682), 1953, 4: 72-73.
[2] Watling D, Hazelton M L.The Dynamics and Equilibria of Day-to-Day Assignment Models[J]. Networks & Spatial Economics (S1566-113X), 2003, 3(3): 349-370.
[3] Li X F, Lang M X.Multi-Class and Multi-Criteria Stochastic User Equilibrium Model Based on Generalized Nested Logit Model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology (S1570-6672), 2014, 14(4): 139-145.
[4] Smith M J, Watling D P.A Route-Swapping Dynamical System and Lyapunov Function for Stochastic User Equilibrium[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological (S0191-2615), 2016, 85: 132-141.
[5] Yang J, Jiang G.Development of an Enhanced Route Choice Model Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2014, 47: 168-178.
[6] Li Q, Liao F X, Timmermans H J P, et al. A User Equilibrium Model for Combined Activity-Travel Choice under Prospect Theoretical Mechanisms of Decision- Making under Uncertainty[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science (S2324-9935), 2016, 12(7): 629-649.
[7] Zhang C, Liu T L, Huang H J, et al.A Cumulative Prospect Theory Approach to Commuters’ Day-to-Day Route-Choice Modeling with Friends’ Travel Information[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2018, 86: 527-548.
[8] Loomes G, Sugden R.Regret theory: an Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty[J]. The Economic Journal (S1468-0297), 1982, 92(368): 805-824.
[9] Chorus C G.A Generalized Random Regret Minimization Model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological (S0191-2615), 2014, 68: 224-238.
[10] Li M, Huang H J.A Regret Theory-Based Route Choice Model[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science (S2324-9935), 2017, 13(3): 250-272.
[11] Peeta S, Mahmassani H S.Multiple User Classes Real-Time Traffic Assignment for Online Operations: a Rolling Horizon Solution Framework[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 1995, 3(2): 83-98.
[12] Florian M, Wu J H, He S.A Multi-Class Multi-Mode Variable Demand Network Equilibrium Model with Hierarchical Logit Structures[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai Forence & Technology (S1007-6735), 1999, 63: 119-133.
[13] Brown D B, Giorgi E D, Sim M.Aspirational Preferences and Their Representation by Risk Measures[J]. Management Science (S0025-1909), 2012, 58(11): 2095-2113.
[14] Ramos G M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S.Modelling Travellers’ Heterogeneous Route Choice Behaviour as Prospect Maximizers[J]. Journal of Choice Modelling (S1755-5345), 2013, 6: 17-33.
[15] Zockaie A, Saberi M, Mahmassani H S, et al.Activity-Based Model with Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Consideration of Heterogeneous User Preferences and Reliability Valuation[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (S0361-1981), 2016, 2493: 78-87.
[16] Huang Z X, He G G.Disequilibrium Transportation Planning View[C]//Traffic and Transportation Studies. Reston: ASCE, 2015: 305-310.
[17] Link H.Is Car Drivers’ Response to Congestion Charging Schemes Based on the Correct Perception of Price Signals[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (S0965-8564), 2015, 71: 96-109.
[18] Chiou Y C, Fu C.Responses of Drivers and Motorcyclists to Congestion Charge[J]. Transportation Research Procedia (S2352-1465), 2017, 25: 2961-2973.
[19] Huang W J, Zhang W H, Shen J Y, et al.Road Congestion Pricing Model Considering Energy Consumption Measurement[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology (S1570-6672), 2018, 18(1): 166-172.
[20] Habib K, Mahmoud M, Coleman J.Effect of Parking Charges at Transit Stations on Park-and-Ride Mode Choice: Lessons Learned From Stated Preference Survey in Greater Vancouver, Canada[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board (S0361-1981), 2013, 2351: 163-170.
[21] Wang J J, Jin S X, Li W J, et al.Parking Pricing Method of Public Parking Lots Based on Multi-Aspect Comprehensive Benefit Maximization[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (S2095-7564), 2017, 17(2): 126-135.
[22] Lin X X, Yuan P C.A Dynamic Parking Charge Optimal Control Model under Perspective of Commuters’ Evolutionary Game Behavior[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (S0378-4371), 2018, 490: 1096-1110.
[23] Hasan M, Jha M, Ben A M.Evaluation of Ramp Control Algorithms Using Microscopic Traffic Simulation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2002, 10(3): 229-256.
[24] Frejo J R D, Camacho E F. Global Versus Local MPC Algorithms in Freeway Traffic Control with Ramp Metering and Variable Speed Limits[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (S1524-9050), 2012, 13(4): 1556-1565.
[25] Yang X F, Cheng Y, Chang G L.Integration of Adaptive Signal Control and Freeway Off-Ramp Priority Control for Commuting Corridors[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies (S0968-090X), 2018, 86: 328-345.
[26] Yao J, Hou C F, Yang Z X, et al.Optimization Study on Road Pricing with Variable Bus Frequency[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology (S1570-6672), 2010, 10(2): 93-99.
[27] Wang J, Hu L G, He X.Bi-Level Programming Model and the Solution Algorithm for Urban Bus Departure Frequency[J]. Optimization. Systems Engineering (S1001- 4098), 2013, 31(12): 69-73.
[28] Berrebi S J, Watkins K E, Laval J A.A Real-Time Bus Dispatching Policy to Minimize Passenger Wait on a High Frequency Route[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological (S0191-2615), 2015, 81: 377-389.
[29] Ruiz M, Segui-Pons J M, Mateu-Lladó J. Improving Bus Service Levels and Social Equity Through Bus Frequency Modelling[J]. Journal of Transport Geography (S0966- 6923), 2017, 58: 220-233.
[30] Nash J.Non-Cooperative Games[J]. Annals of Mathematics (S0003-486X), 1951, 54(2): 286-295.
[31] Liu S X, Guan H Z, Yan H.Chaotic Behavior in the Dynamical Evolution of Network Traffic Flow and Its Control[J]. Acta Physica Sinica (S1000-3290), 2012, 61(9): 090506.

基于非均衡理论的出行者路径选择行为建模与仿真

Modeling and Simulation of Travelers’ Route Choice Behavior Based on Disequilibrium Theory

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵丹, 牛学军, 张书豪, 魏佳旭. 平面交叉口借道左转设置研究与效果评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(12): 2975-2982.
[2]	张立帆, 焦朋朋, 司铭锴. 城市道路落客区车辆延误模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(9): 1839-1846.
[3]	翟志强, 许进亮, 袁皓, 周永明, 赵龙飞, 王世谦. 自适应巡航系统车辆跟驰控制策略仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(5): 885-891.
[4]	孙剑, 黄润涵, 李霖, 刘启远, 李宇迪. 智能汽车环境感知与规划决策一体化仿真测试平台[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(2): 236-246.
[5]	贾宇涵, 吴建平, 杜怡曼, 刘明宇. 快速路车辆跟驰建模与仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(2): 248-256.
[6]	贾宇涵, 吴建平, 杜怡曼, 奇格奇. FLOWSIM在深圳交通管理与评价中的应用研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1881-1887.
[7]	段宇洲, 柴婷婷, 简洁. 环形交叉口内部运行时间可靠度研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(3): 438-447.
[8]	柴琳果, 蔡伯根, 上官伟, 王剑, 陈俊杰. 基于间隙理论的智能车交叉口运行控制方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2019, 31(9): 1875-1882.
[9]	邵海鹏, 王宇轩, 陈兴影, 郑斌斌. 信号交叉口进口道掉头设置条件研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(11): 4429-4436.
[10]	左康, 刘启远, 孙剑. 城市快速路匝道汇入行为建模及仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 1895-1906.
[11]	贾宇涵, 吴建平, 许明, 刘明宇, 何磊. 基于FlowSIM的动态交通分配系统离线参数标定研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 2198-2205.
[12]	安玉, 焦朋朋, 白紫秀. 考虑多因素的驾驶行为安全评价与风险等级预测[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(1): 118-126.