中断航迹关联仿真环境构建及算法性能评估

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-1500

系统仿真学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 982-992.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.23-1500

中断航迹关联仿真环境构建及算法性能评估

丁典¹, 魏广芬¹, 曹政², 温韶晖¹

^1.山东工商学院信息与电子工程学院，山东烟台 264005
^2.海军航空大学信息融合研究所，山东烟台 264001

收稿日期:2023-12-08 修回日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2025-04-17 发布日期:2025-04-16
通讯作者: 魏广芬
第一作者简介:丁典(1998-)，男，硕士生，研究方向为目标跟踪。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(62388102);泰山学者工程(tsqn202211246)

Simulation Environment Construction of Track Segment Association and Algorithm Performance Evaluation

Ding Dian¹, Wei Guangfen¹, Cao Zheng², Wen Shaohui¹

^1.School of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China
^2.Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China

Received:2023-12-08 Revised:2024-02-02 Online:2025-04-17 Published:2025-04-16
Contact: Wei Guangfen

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究各类中断航迹关联(track segment association，TSA)算法在实际雷达工作环境中的适用性，构建了一个能较好模拟真实运动目标的TSA仿真环境。通过构建丰富的目标运动集集合，基于马尔可夫状态转移矩阵描述了目标运动状态切换过程，并通过航迹的平移来实现密集程度的灵活控制。仿真结果表明：该环境能够较好地评估各类经典的TSA算法的性能，评估结果为中断航迹关联的实际工程应用提供了参考。

关键词: 中断航迹关联, 密集程度, 性能评估, 马尔可夫状态转移矩阵, 仿真环境构建

Abstract:

In order to study the applicability of Track Segment Association (TSA) algorithms in actual radar working environment, a TSA simulation environment which can simulate the real movement of the target is constructed. By constructing a rich set of target motion sets, the state switching process of target motion is described based on Markov state transition matrix, and the density is flexibly controlled through track translation. The simulation results show that this environment can evaluate the performance of the current classical TSA algorithms. The evaluation results provide a good reference for the practical engineering application of interrupted track association.

Key words: track segment association(TSA), intensity, performance evaluation, Markov state transition matrix, simulation environment construction

中图分类号:

TP391.9

丁典,魏广芬,曹政等 . 中断航迹关联仿真环境构建及算法性能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2025, 37(4): 982-992.

Ding Dian,Wei Guangfen,Cao Zheng,et al . Simulation Environment Construction of Track Segment Association and Algorithm Performance Evaluation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2025, 37(4): 982-992.

图/表 17

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

图9

图10

图11

图12

表2

表3

不同密集程度调控半径对应的算法平均关联正确率 (%)

$r / m$	IMM-TSA	IMMSDP-TSA	SBT-TSA	FTSM-TSA	MHMPI-TSA
5 000	39.9	28.5	42.7	5.4	22.7
10 000	42.1	42.0	51.9	4.7	36.8
20 000	49.5	63.7	63.3	5.6	54.5
30 000	55.9	70.9	70.3	6.7	65.6
40 000	58.9	75.7	74.1	9.3	70.1
50 000	64.5	77.1	77.5	13.1	70.5

表3

表4

不同固定状态转移次数对应的算法平均关联正确率 (%)

$C n$	IMM-TSA	IMMSDP-TSA	SBT-TSA	FTSM-TSA	MHMPI-TSA
1	49.1	55.2	55.5	6.0	49.2
5	42.7	45.1	49.3	5.1	38.3
7	38.4	40.4	48.4	4.8	34.1
9	40.1	39.5	48.5	4.2	32.9
11	34.6	36.7	47.9	3.5	28.9
13	37.0	36.4	46.6	3.9	28.7
15	33.2	33.5	46.7	3.3	26.7

表4

表5

不同中断时长对应的算法平均关联正确率 (%)

$S T / s$	IMM-TSA	IMMSDP-TSA	SBT-TSA	FTSM-TSA	MHMPI-TSA
10	99.8	99.6	99.9	89.9	99.7
50	63.0	87.8	80.3	8.7	86.7
100	39.9	44.9	50.4	5.2	37.9
150	29.8	24.1	35.1	5.5	16.2
200	22.7	13.1	24.1	4.5	8.7
250	18.0	9.3	17.7	4.3	5.1
300	13.1	5.7	11.7	3.4	3.8

表5

参考文献 17

1	Yeom S W, Kirubarajan T, Bar-Shalom Y. Track Segment Association, Fine-step IMM and Initialization with Doppler for Improved Track Performance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2004, 40(1): 293-309.
2	Zhang Shuo, Bar-Shalom Y. Track Segment Association for GMTI Tracks of Evasive Move-stop-move Maneuvering Targets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2011, 47(3): 1899-1914.
3	齐林, 王海鹏, 刘瑜. 基于统计双门限的中断航迹配对关联算法[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(3): 301-308.
	Qi Lin, Wang Haipeng, Liu Yu. Track Segment Association Algorithm Based on Statistical Binary Thresholds[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(3): 301-308.
4	Sun Jinping, Wang Naiyu, Zhang Zhiguo. Track Segment Association of Maneuvering Target Based on Expectation Maximization[C]//2018 11th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI). Piscataway: IEEE, 2018: 1-5.
5	王朝辉, 韩贺勤. 机载雷达中断航迹关联算法[J]. 现代雷达, 2019, 41(7): 61-64.
	Wang Zhaohui, Han Heqin. Tracking Segment Association Algorithm for Airborne Radar[J]. Modern Radar, 2019, 41(7): 61-64.
6	修建娟, 张敬艳, 董凯. 空间目标航迹片段关联算法研究[J]. 弹道学报, 2020, 32(3): 85-90.
	Xiu Jianjuan, Zhang Jingyan, Dong Kai. Research on Space-target Track Segments Association Algorithm[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2020, 32(3): 85-90.
7	陈兆彤, 陈江平, 潘励. 基于模糊隶属度的船舶中断航迹关联识别方法[J]. 应用科学学报, 2023, 41(2): 296-310.
	Chen Zhaotong, Chen Jiangping, Pan Li. Identification Method for Vessel Interrupt Track Correlating Based on Fuzzy Membership Degree[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2023, 41(2): 296-310.
8	齐林, 王海鹏, 熊伟, 等. 基于先验信息的多假设模型中断航迹关联算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(4): 732-739.
	Qi Lin, Wang Haipeng, Xiong Wei, et al. Track Segment Association Algorithm Based on Multiple-hypothesis Models with Priori Information[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(4): 732-739.
9	Pan Shengsen, Bao Qinglong, Hou Weibing, et al. An Improved Track Segment Association Algorithm Using MM-GNN Method[C]//2017 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium-Spring (PIERS). Piscataway: IEEE, 2017: 675-681.
10	毛艺帆, 张多林, 王路. 基于模糊理论和证据组合的被动段弹道导弹中断航迹关联方法[J]. 电光与控制, 2017, 24(2): 47-50, 59.
	Mao Yifan, Zhang Duolin, Wang Lu. Fuzzy Theory and Evidence Combination Based Track Segment Association for Ballistic Missile in Unpowered Phase[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2017, 24(2): 47-50, 59.
11	杜渐, 夏学知. 面向航迹中断的模糊航迹关联算法[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2013, 38(6): 68-71, 76.
	Du Jian, Xia Xuezhi. A Fuzzy Track Association Algorithm in Track Interrupt-oriented[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2013, 38(6): 68-71, 76.
12	Cao Yupeng, Cao Jiangwei, Zhou Zhiguo. Track Segment Association Method Based on Bidirectional Track Prediction and Fuzzy Analysis[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(5): 274.
13	Xiong Wei, Xu Pingliang, Cui Yaqi, et al. Track Segment Association via Track Graph Representation Learning[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2021, 15(11): 1458-1471.
14	Xiong Wei, Xu Pingliang, Cui Yaqi, et al. Track Segment Association with Dual Contrast Neural Network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2022, 58(1): 247-261.
15	徐平亮, 崔亚奇, 熊伟, 等. 生成式中断航迹接续关联方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(5): 1543-1552.
	Xu Pingliang, Cui Yaqi, Xiong Wei, et al. Generative Track Segment Consecutive Association Method[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(5): 1543-1552.
16	何友, 修建娟, 刘瑜, 等. 雷达数据处理及应用[M]. 4版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2022.
	He You, Xiu Jianjuan, Liu Yu, et al. Radar Data Processing with Applications[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2022.
17	李盈萱, 王中训, 董云龙. 两种新的机动目标仿真模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35(7): 1581-1589.
	Li Yingxuan, Wang Zhongxun, Dong Yunlong. Two New Maneuvering Target Simulation Methods[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35(7): 1581-1589.

运动状态	运动状态对应发生时间/s	转弯率/((˚)/s)
CAT	0	-0.504 5
CT	2	0.245 7
CAT	38	0.216 6
CA	49	0
CA	64	0
CA	131	0
CT	207	0.556 7
CA	262	0
CA	355	0
CAT	419	0.464 3
CAT	516	0.936 9

n	IMM-TSA	IMMSDP-TSA	SBT-TSA	FTSM-TSA	MHMPI-TSA
5	71.6	72.0	74.0	24.4	64.4
10	60.2	63.2	68.2	16.4	56.6
20	43.9	49.5	50.9	7.8	43.9
30	44.1	47.7	52.5	5.8	41.4
40	39.2	39.7	47.8	3.1	33.1
50	34.7	34.6	43.6	2.4	29.4

[1]	刘灏哲, 李伟, 马萍, 杨明. 基于多源先验数据的系统性能评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(11): 2673-2680.
[2]	黄天羽, 郭芸莹. 面向动作捕捉的非线性时间序列预测方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(7): 2808-2815.
[3]	王雨潇, 王松艳, 晁涛, 杨明. 制导控制系统的多准则变权综合评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(2): 435-442.
[4]	祖象欢, 王银燕, 杨传雷, 杜剑维, 王佳伦. 增压柴油机EGR性能评估研究与实现[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(12): 3075-3081.
[5]	张登辉, 晁涛, 王松艳, 马萍. 基于改进拉丁超立方的制导控制系统性能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(10): 2345-2352.
[6]	戚宗锋, 韩山, 李建勋. 基于粗糙集的雷达抗干扰性能评估指标体系研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(2): 335-342.
[7]	李凡, 耿旭, 董效杰, 洪泽华. 多层次模糊算法在光电抗干扰性能综合评估中的应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(9): 2176-2180.

中断航迹关联仿真环境构建及算法性能评估

Simulation Environment Construction of Track Segment Association and Algorithm Performance Evaluation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 17

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价