基于改进拉丁超立方的制导控制系统性能评估

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201710016

系统仿真学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 2345-2352.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.201710016

基于改进拉丁超立方的制导控制系统性能评估

张登辉, 晁涛, 王松艳, 马萍

哈尔滨工业大学控制与仿真中心,黑龙江哈尔滨 150080

收稿日期:2017-05-04 发布日期:2020-06-04

Performance Evaluation of Guidance and Control System Based on Improved Latin Hypercube

Zhang Denghui, Chao Tao, Wang Songyan, Ma Ping

Control and Simulation Center, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China

Received:2017-05-04 Published:2020-06-04
About author:Zhang Denghui1 (1992-), male, Changzhi City, Shanxi Province, China, Ph.D candiadate,guidance and control.
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation (61403096).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对结合仿真试验的性能评估存在运算效率低、充满空间特性差问题,提出了一种改进拉丁超立方试验设计的飞行器性能评估方法。建立了飞行器刚体六自由度模型;结合BTT飞行器俯冲段制导控制系统特点,构建了其性能评估指标体系;将改进拉丁超立方试验设计方法运用到飞行器制导控制系统性能评估中。该算法能够在资源受限的情况下,快速构造出“充满空间”特性较好的试验设计方案。性能评估实例验证了该方法在飞行器制导控制系统性能评估中的可行性。

关键词: 试验设计, 制导控制系统, 性能评估, 改进拉丁超立方

Abstract: Aiming at the low efficiency and the poor space-filling property in the aircraft performance evaluation combined with simulation experiment, a novel aircraft performance evaluation method based on the improved LHD (Latin hypercube designs) was investigated. The six-DOF (Degree of Freedom) rigid aircraft model was built. Considering the characteristic of BTT (bank-to-turn) vehicle in dive phase, the performance evaluation index system of its guidance and control system was set up. The optimal LHD was applied to the performance evaluation of the aircraft guidance and control system. The improved algorithm can quickly construct a good design of experiments given a limited computational resource. The instance of performance evaluation verifies that the proposed approach is effective and feasible.

Key words: experimental design, guidance and control system, performance evaluation, improved Latin hypercube design

中图分类号:

TJ765

张登辉, 晁涛, 王松艳, 马萍. 基于改进拉丁超立方的制导控制系统性能评估[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(10): 2345-2352.

Zhang Denghui, Chao Tao, Wang Songyan, Ma Ping. Performance Evaluation of Guidance and Control System Based on Improved Latin Hypercube[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(10): 2345-2352.

参考文献

[1] Sun S, Zhang H M, Zhou D.A Survey of Terminal Guidance Law[J]. Aerospace Control(S1006-3242), 2012, 30(1): 86-96.
[2] Morris M D, Mitchell T J.Exploratory designs for computational experiments[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (S0378-3758), 1995, 43(4): 381-402.
[3] Park J S.Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (S0378-3758), 1994, 39(1): 95-111.
[4] Ye K Q, Li W, Sudjianto A.Algorithmic construction of optimal symmetric Latin hypercube designs[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (S0378-3758), 2000, 90(1): 145-159.
[5] Fanf K T, Ma C X, Winker P.Centered L2- discrepancy of random sampling and La tin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (S0378-3758), 2002, 71(237): 275-296.
[6] Bates S J, Sienz J, Toropov V V.Formulation of the optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments using a permutation genetic algorithm [C]// Proc. of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference. Palm Springs, California, USA: AIAA Press 2004: 2004-2011.
[7] Husslage B G M, Rennen G, Hertog D, et al. Space-filling Latin hypercube designs for computer experiments[J]. Optimization and Engineering(S1389-4420), 2011, 12(4): 611-630.
[8] Schubert J, H Rling P. A comparative study between using A*-search, Latin Hypercube and geneticalgorithm in design of experiment for simulation of military operational plans [C]// Proc. of 2014 IEEE International Conference on System, Man, and Cybernetics. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE Press 2014: 372-379.
[9] Chen R B, Hsieh D N, Hung Y.Optimizing Latin hypercube designs by particle swarm[J]. Statistics and Computing(S0960-3174), 2013, 23(5): 663-676.
[10] Leatherman E, Dean A, Santner T.Computer Experiment Designs via Particle Swarm Optimization[J]. Topic in Statistical Simulation(S2194-1009), 2014, 114(10): 309-317.
[11] Phoa F K H. A Swarm Intelligence Based (SIB) method for optimization in designs of experiments[J]. Natural Computing (S1567-7818), 2016: 1-9.
[12] Sun X Y, Chao T, Wang S Y, et al.Integrated Guidance and Control Design Method Considering Channel Coupling[J]. Journal of Astronautics (S1000-1328), 2016, 37(8): 936-945.
[13] Jin R C, Chen W, Sudjianto A.An Efficient Algorithm for Construction Optimal Design of Computer Experiments[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (S0378-3758), 2005, 134(1): 268-287.

基于改进拉丁超立方的制导控制系统性能评估

Performance Evaluation of Guidance and Control System Based on Improved Latin Hypercube

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘灏哲, 李伟, 马萍, 杨明. 基于多源先验数据的系统性能评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(11): 2673-2680.
[2]	张甜甜, 李妮, 龚光红, 卢元杰. 一种基于数独分组的拉丁超立方试验设计方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32(11): 2185-2191.
[3]	黄天羽, 郭芸莹. 面向动作捕捉的非线性时间序列预测方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(7): 2808-2815.
[4]	王雨潇, 王松艳, 晁涛, 杨明. 制导控制系统的多准则变权综合评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(2): 435-442.
[5]	祖象欢, 王银燕, 杨传雷, 杜剑维, 王佳伦. 增压柴油机EGR性能评估研究与实现[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(12): 3075-3081.
[6]	于雅楠. 改善旋翼飞行体气动力参数的正交试验优化设计[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(3): 668-675.
[7]	戚宗锋, 韩山, 李建勋. 基于粗糙集的雷达抗干扰性能评估指标体系研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(2): 335-342.
[8]	李凡, 耿旭, 董效杰, 洪泽华. 多层次模糊算法在光电抗干扰性能综合评估中的应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(9): 2176-2180.
[9]	叶雪荣, 陈岑, 王一行, 翟国富. 基于EDA的开关电源健康状态评估方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(1): 185-191.