考虑目标定位误差的毁伤比求解

系统仿真学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 3082-3086.

考虑目标定位误差的毁伤比求解

宋谢恩¹, 宋卫东¹, 马茜²

1.军械工程学院火炮工程系,石家庄 050003;
2.中国农业大学食品科学与营养工程学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2014-08-26 修回日期:2014-11-24 出版日期:2015-12-08 发布日期:2020-07-30
作者简介:宋谢恩(1988-),男,河北定州,硕士,研究方向为弹道学理论与应用;宋卫东(1964-),男,河北大名,博士,教授,研究方向为弹道学理论与应用;马茜(1989-),女,河北定州,硕士,研究方向为计算机仿真。

Research on Damage Ratio Considering Target-location Error

Song Xieen¹, Song Weidong¹, Ma Qian²

1. The Artillery Engineering Department, Ordnance Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China;
2. The Food Science and Nutritional Engineering College, China Agriculture University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2014-08-26 Revised:2014-11-24 Online:2015-12-08 Published:2020-07-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在集群目标毁伤比的求解过程中,不同的目标定位误差处理方法对计算结果影响较大。基于现有的毁伤比求解方法,提出了误差合成法、随机目标法等几种设想。通过具体算例分析,对比各种方法的求解结果,得出了各自的计算精度和应用条件。最终确定,一般条件下随机目标法为最优;满足解析法条件和诸元误差合成条件时,诸元误差合成法为最优;K<K_f时定位误差可忽略。结论对于研究存在目标定位误差时的毁伤效能和弹药消耗量有重要意义。

关键词: 目标定位误差, 毁伤比, 解析法, 仿真法, 误差合成

Abstract: Different computing methods for target-location error have much influence on the result of cluster target damage ratio. In order to find a suitable method, based on existing damage ratio analytical method and error combination method, several new ideas, such as error synthesis method, random target method, were proposed. By analyzing specific examples and comparing the results, the accuracy and application conditions for each method were reached. Random target method was proved to be the best on the whole; error combination method was optimal when it could meet the conditions of analytical method and data error combination; target-location error could be ignored when K<K_f. It is a good reference in the research of damage efficiency of target-location error and ammunition consumption.

Key words: target-location error, damage ratio, analytical method, simulation method, error combination

中图分类号:

TJ015

宋谢恩, 宋卫东, 马茜. 考虑目标定位误差的毁伤比求解[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(12): 3082-3086.

Song Xieen, Song Weidong, Ma Qian. Research on Damage Ratio Considering Target-location Error[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27(12): 3082-3086.