基于组合赋权的离散车间生产计划综合评价

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0287

系统仿真学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1856-1865.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0287

基于组合赋权的离散车间生产计划综合评价

罗樟圳, 江海凡, 付建林^*, 丁国富

西南交通大学机械工程学院,四川成都 610031

收稿日期:2020-06-01 修回日期:2020-07-14 发布日期:2021-08-19
通讯作者: 付建林(1978-),男,讲师,博士生,研究方向为生产系统建模仿真、物流优化等。E-mail: jlfuhappy@swjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:罗樟圳(1997-),男,硕士生,研究方向为智能制造。E-mail: 493169500@qq.com
基金资助:
四川省重大科技专项(2020YJ0215)

Combination Weighting-based Comprehensive Evaluation for Discrete Workshop Production Plan

Luo Zhangzhen, Jiang Haifan, Fu Jianlin^*, Ding Guofu

School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2020-06-01 Revised:2020-07-14 Published:2021-08-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对离散车间生产计划缺乏通用的评价指标体系以及定性和定量相结合的综合评价方法,从经济性、时间性和适应性三个方面构建离散车间生产计划评价指标体系,提出一种基于组合赋权的离散车间生产计划综合评价方法。该方法通过综合可拓层次分析法、熵值法和改进CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation)法得到具有主客观意义的组合权重,提高了离散车间生产计划综合评价的科学性。实例验证结果表明该方法对数据的敏感程度更高,具有更好的评价灵敏度。

关键词: 离散车间, 可拓层次分析法, 改进CRITIC法, 熵值法, 生产计划综合评价

Abstract: Aiming at the lack of a general evaluation index system and a comprehensive evaluation method combining qualitative and quantitative for discrete workshop production planning, an evaluation index system is constructed from the economy, timeliness and adaptability and a combination weighting-based comprehensive evaluation method is proposed. A combination weight of subjective and objective significance is obtained by combining the extension of analytic hierarchy process, entropy value method and improved CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method, which improves the scientific evaluation of discrete workshop production planning. The verification results of examples show that the method is more sensitive to the data and has the better evaluation sensitivity.

Key words: discrete workshop, extension AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), improved CRITIC(Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method, entropy method, comprehensive evaluation of production plan

中图分类号:

TP391.9

罗樟圳, 江海凡, 付建林, 丁国富. 基于组合赋权的离散车间生产计划综合评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(8): 1856-1865.

Luo Zhangzhen, Jiang Haifan, Fu Jianlin, Ding Guofu. Combination Weighting-based Comprehensive Evaluation for Discrete Workshop Production Plan[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(8): 1856-1865.

参考文献

[1] Afshar S, Koroorian F, Ashjaei M.Investigating Alternatives for System Architectures to Enhance Discrete Manufacturing[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (S1550-1477), 2019, 15(8).
[2] Gordic B.Flexible Optimization in the Process of Planning and Pronduction Control[J]. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette (S1848-6339), 2017, 24(4): 1087-1094.
[3] 李玉东. 全过程视角下某离散制造系统运行评价及应用[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2015.
Li Yudong.Operation Evaluation and Its Application of One Discrete Manufacturing System under a Whole Process Perspective[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2015.
[4] Li L H, Mo R.Production Task Queue Optimization Based on Multi-Attribute Evaluation for Complex Product Assembly Workshop[J]. PLoS One (S1932-6203), 2015, 10(9): e0134343.
[5] 张通. 汽车制造企业S公司生产计划模型研究与评价[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2011.
Zhang Tong.Research and Evaluation of Production Plan Optimization for S Automobile Manufacturers Enterprise[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2011.
[6] 雷崇武. 基于知识表示的钢铁生产合同计划决策支持系统研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2015.
Lei Chongwu.Decision Support System of Iron and Steel Production Order Planning based on Knowledge Representation[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2015.
[7] 郭菁菁. 基于紧急订单的生产计划制定与影响评价研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2018.
Guo Jingjing.Study of Production Planning and Impact Evaluating Based on Rush Order[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology, 2018.
[8] Tas O, Ekmekcioglu M.Mortgage Demanders Evaluation by Fuzzy AHP[J]. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing (S1542-3980), 2013, 21(5/6): 511-524.
[9] 高炜, 张庆普, 敦晓彪. 基于改进的可拓层次分析法和动态加权的航天高技术综合评价研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(1): 102-109.
Gao Wei, Zhang Qingpu, Dun Xiaobiao.Comprehensive Assessment of Advanced Military Aerospace Technologies Based on Improved EAHP and Dynamic Weighting[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(1): 102-109.
[10] Lin Z Z, Wen F S, Wang H F.CRITIC-Based Node Importance Evaluation in Skeleton-Network Reconfiguration of Power Grids[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II-Express Briefs (S1549-7747), 2018, 65(2): 206-210.
[11] 祝志川, 张国超, 张君妍. 基于改进CRITIC的修正G2赋权方法及实证[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(18): 33-38.
Zhu Zhichuan, Zhang Guochao, Zhang Junyan.Modified G2 Weighting Method and Empirical Research Based on Improved CRITIC[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018, 34(18): 33-38.
[12] Li M, Sun H, Singh V P.Agricultural Water Resources Management Using Maximum Entropy and Entropy-Weight-Based TOPSIS Methods[J]. Entropy (S1099-4300), 2019, 21(4): 364.
[13] 宋冬梅, 刘春晓, 沈晨. 基于主客观赋权法的多目标多属性决策方法[J]. 山东大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1-9.
Song Dongmei, Liu Chunxiao, Shen Chen.Multiple Objective and Attribute Decision Making Based on the Subjective and Objective Weighting[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2015, 45(4): 1-9.
[14] 曹东风, 王艳. 基于组合权重的制造系统能效贝叶斯评价方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2018, 30(11): 4313-4322.
Cao Dongfeng, Wang Yan.Bayesian Evaluation Method for Energy Efficiency of Manufacturing System Based on Combined Weights[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2018, 30(11): 4313-4322.
[15] 彭竹清, 王艳, 纪志成. 基于改进熵值法的离散制造系统能效评价方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 2121-2127.
Peng Zhuqing, Wang Yan, Ji Zhicheng.Energy Efficiency Evaluation of Discrete Manufacturing System Based on Improved Entropy Method[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2017, 29(9): 2121-2127.

基于组合赋权的离散车间生产计划综合评价

Combination Weighting-based Comprehensive Evaluation for Discrete Workshop Production Plan

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	冯开团, 袁杰. 基于改进注水算法的离散车间任务分配问题研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2022, 34(4): 768-776.
[2]	彭竹清, 王艳, 纪志成. 基于改进熵值法的离散制造系统能效评价方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(9): 2121-2127.