面向计算机生成兵力的认知行为模型架构研究综述

doi:10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0937

系统仿真学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 239-248.doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.20-0937

• 专栏：智能认知行为建模与仿真 • 下一篇

面向计算机生成兵力的认知行为模型架构研究综述

许凯¹, 曾俊杰¹, 杨伟龙^2,*, 秦龙¹, 尹全军¹

1.国防科技大学系统工程学院,湖南长沙 410073;
2.军事科学院,北京 100089

收稿日期:2020-11-28 修回日期:2020-12-03 出版日期:2021-02-18 发布日期:2021-02-20
通讯作者: 杨伟龙(1991-),男,博士,讲师,研究方向为作战仿真。E-mail: yangweilong09@nudt.edu.cn
作者简介:许凯(1990-),男,博士,讲师,研究方向为人类行为建模与意图识别。E-mail: xukai09@nudt.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61473300)

Overview of CGF-oriented Cognitive Architecture

Xu Kai¹, Zeng Junjie¹, Yang Weilong^2,*, Qin Long¹, Yin Quanjun¹

1. College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China;
2. The Academy of Military Science, Beijing 100089, China

Received:2020-11-28 Revised:2020-12-03 Online:2021-02-18 Published:2021-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为规范和促进计算机生成兵力各类认知行为模型的标准化开发,对面向计算机生成兵力的认知行为模型架构进行综述研究,以计算机生成兵力的意图识别行为为例,探讨了一般认知行为在标准认知架构基础上的功能实现方式。论证结果表明,良设计的认知行为模型架构对于复杂认知行为建模具有很强的指导意义。还提出了需求分析、设计实现、理论基础、协作机制四个方面具体的研究建议。

关键词: 计算机生成兵力, 认知行为建模, 认知行为模型架构, 意图识别行为建模

Abstract: In order to further formalize and boost standardized behavioral model development of Computer Generated Forces (CGF), the CGF-oriented cognitive architecture is reviewed and the implementation details of one of the CGF cognitive behaviors, i.e. plan recognition, upon standard cognitive architecture are designed. The results show that the well-designed architecture has a strong support for complex behavior modeling. Four specific suggestions, including requirement analysis, design implementation, theoretical principle and cooperation mechanism, for architecture design and complex behavior modeling are provided.

Key words: computer generated forces, cognitive behavioral modeling, cognitive architecture, plan recognition behavior modeling

中图分类号:

TP391.9

许凯, 曾俊杰, 杨伟龙, 秦龙, 尹全军. 面向计算机生成兵力的认知行为模型架构研究综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 239-248.

Xu Kai, Zeng Junjie, Yang Weilong, Qin Long, Yin Quanjun. Overview of CGF-oriented Cognitive Architecture[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(2): 239-248.

参考文献

[1] Council N R.Behavioral Modeling and Simulation: From Individuals to Societies[M]. USA: National Academies Press, 2008.
[2] Ernst G W, Newell A.GPS: A Case Study in Generality and Problem Solving[M]. USA: Academic Pr, 1969.
[3] Kotseruba I, Tsotsos J K.40 Years of Cognitive Architectures: Core Cognitive Abilities and Practical Applications[J]. Artificial Intelligence Review (S0269-2821), 2018, 53: 17-94.
[4] Ferrucci D, Brown E, Chu-Carroll J, et al.Building Watson: An Overview of the DeepQA project[J]. AI Magazine (S0738-4602), 2010, 31(3): 59-79.
[5] Lenat D B.CYC: A Large-scale Investment in Knowledge Infrastructure[J]. Communications of the ACM (S0001-0782), 1995, 38(11): 33-38.
[6] Brownston L, Farrell R, Kant E, et al.Programming Expert Systems in OPS5[M]. USA: Addison-Wesley, 1985.
[7] Hill E F.Jess in Action: Java Rule-based Systems[M]. USA: Manning Publications, 2003.
[8] Corkill D D.GBB: A generic blackboard development system[C]. AAAI. Vancouver, CAN: AAAI Press, 1986: 1008-1014.
[9] Pollock J L.Rational Cognition in OSCAR[C]. International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. Orlando, Florida, USA: Springer, 1999: 71-90.
[10] Brooks R A.Cambrian intelligence: The Early History of the New AI[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT press, 1999.
[11] Bratman M. Intention, Plans,Practical Reason[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA, 1987.
[12] Card S K, Moran T P, Newell A.The Psychology of Human-computer Interaction[J]. American Journal of Psychology (S0002-9556), 1983, 25(4).
[13] Newell A.Unified Theories of Cognition[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
[14] Laird J E.The Soar Cognitive Architecture[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2012.
[15] Kelley T D.Symbolic and Sub-symbolic Representations in Computational Models of Human Cognition: What Can Be Learned from Biology[J]. Theory & Psychology (S0959-3543), 2003, 13(6): 847-860.
[16] Sun R, Bookman L A.Computational Architectures Integrating Neural and Symbolic Processes: A Perspective on the State of the Art[M]. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media, 1994.
[17] Anderson J R.How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe[M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[18] Fikes R E, Nilsson N J.STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving[J]. Artificial Intelligence (S0004-3702), 1971, 2(3/4): 189-208.
[19] Marsella S, Adibi J, Al-Onaizan Y, et al.On Being a Teammate: Experiences Acquired in the Design of RoboCup Teams[C]. Third Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents. USA: ACM Press, 1999: 221-227.
[20] Tanner B, White A.RL-Glue: Language-independent software for reinforcement-learning experiments[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research (S1532-4435), 2009, 10(9): 2133-2136.
[21] Genesereth M, Love N, Pell B.General Game Playing: Overview of the AAAI Competition[J]. AI Magazine (S0738-4602), 2005, 26(2): 62.
[22] Laird J E, Lebiere C, Rosenbloom P S.A Standard Model of The Mind: Toward a Common Computational Framework Across Artificial Intelligence, cognitive Science, Neuroscience, and Robotics[J]. AI Magazine (S0738-4602), 2017, 38(4): 13-26.
[23] Laird J E.The Soar Cognitive Architecture[M]. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2012.

面向计算机生成兵力的认知行为模型架构研究综述

Overview of CGF-oriented Cognitive Architecture

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	高昂, 董志明, 张国辉, 梁涛, 郭齐胜. LVC训练系统中计算机生成兵力生成技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(3): 745-752.
[2]	胡越, 许凯, 秦龙, 尹全军, 查亚兵. 时空记忆模型在空间认知行为建模中的应用分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 249-261.
[3]	杨伟龙, 许凯, 谢旭, 孙林. 面向计算机生成兵力的虚拟人感知注意力模型研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 262-270.
[4]	张琪, 曾俊杰, 许凯, 秦龙, 尹全军. 基于机器学习的计算机生成兵力行为建模研究综述[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 280-287.
[5]	唐见兵, 张琪, 焦鹏, 查亚兵. CGF行为建模校核与验证初探[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(2): 288-294.
[6]	许凯, 曾云秀, 武万森, 尹全军, 查亚兵. 面向计算机生成兵力的意图识别行为建模框架[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(10): 2344-2355.
[7]	雷永林, 姚剑, 朱宁, 朱一凡, 王维平. 武器装备作战效能仿真系统WESS[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2017, 29(6): 1244-1252.
[8]	李昕龙, 向毛. 基于DEVS理论的指控系统建模与分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2015, 27(8): 1708-1714.